• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Say hello
Rethink Real Estate. For Good.

Rethink Real Estate. For Good.

  • Podcast
  • Posts
  • In the news
  • Speaking and media
    • About Eve
    • Speaking requests
    • Speaking engagements
    • Press kit
  • Investment opportunities

Visionary

Mass timber for the masses.

April 7, 2021

Scott Ehlert is the co-founder of Fabric Workshop, a company focused on low carbon, mass timber building technologies for California’s livable future. Scott is designing a proprietary hollow core mass timber plate, column, and wall system that uses 50% less wood fiber and will cost 10-35% less overall than for a CLT (cross laminated timber) structure. The system will also provide installation benefits like integrated MEP (mechanical, electrical, plumbing), acoustic insulation and fire performance. And, as if that is not enough, Scott is also designing a robotic fabrication facility to anchor a new wood product innovation campus, in California.

Scott’s background is an unlikely one for an entrepreneur in mass timber. He spent years in the  production and logistics management of concerts, private and corporate events, and national experiential marketing campaigns before pivoting to system design strategies that leveraged research, data and design to meet high-level business objectives.

While consulting for some of the largest companies in the real estate and construction space, Scott recognized a massive need for desirable middle-income housing that wasn’t being met by the market. So, he left his agency and started on the journey of what would become Fabric Workshop.

This is a story of sheer stick-to-itness!

Insights and Inspirations

  • The mass timber industry is actually being accelerated by forest fires. The neglected undergrowth throughout 32 million square miles of forest in California, has became the perfect kindling for infernos. California (and Scott) are determined to turn that kindling into an industry.
  • Scott is focused on the “next generation” of mass timber products. This is a “cassette system” – a hollow-core system of wood housing building systems, insulation and more. These systems are already being used in Japan and Europe with great success.
  • Kick-starting an industry around this model could both reduce building costs and potentially aid in filling the huge deficit of housing in California.
  • And if this is not enough of a challenge to solve, Scott is also designing and building an automated and robotic manufacturing facility to build his cassette systems.

Information and Links

  • The Nature Conservancy: Let’s stop megafires before they start!
  • Scott also wanted to point to this New York Times article about leaps forward in construction and design using engineered wood.
  • And this piece from ProPublica, on ways to keep people and homes safer from wildfires.
Read the podcast transcript here

Eve Picker: [00:00:14] Hi there, thanks for joining me on Rethink Real Estate. I’m on a mission to make real estate work for everyone. Real estate can help to solve climate change, can house people affordably, can create beautiful streetscapes, unify neighborhoods and enliven cities. So I’m on a journey to find the most creative thinkers and doers out there. I’m not the only one who wants to rethink real estate. You can learn more about me at EvePicker.com or you can find me at SmallChange.co, a real estate crowdfunding platform with impact real estate investment opportunities open for investment right now. And if you want to support this podcast, join me at Patreon.com/rethinkrealestate, where there are special opportunities for my friends and followers.

Eve: [00:01:18] Today, I’m talking with Scott Ehlert, co-founder of Fabric Workshop, a company focused on low carbon, mass timber building technologies for California’s livable future. Scott is designing a proprietary hollow core mass timber plate column and wall system that uses 50 percent less wood fiber and will cost ten to 35 percent less overall than for a CLT structure. His system will also provide installation benefits like integrated MEP, acoustic and fire performance. And as if that is not enough, Scott is also designing a robotic fabrication facility to anchor a new wood product innovation campus in California to help in the state’s wildfire efforts. Scott’s background is an unlikely one for an entrepreneur in mass timber. He spent years in the production and logistics management of concerts, private and corporate events, and national experiential marketing campaigns before pivoting to system design strategies that leveraged research, data and design to meet high level business objectives. While consulting for some of the largest companies in the real estate and construction space, Scott recognized a massive need for desirable middle-income housing that wasn’t being met by the market. So, he left his agency and started on the journey of what would become Fabric Workshop. This is a story of sheer stick-to-it-ness.

Eve: [00:03:04] If you’d like to join me in my quest to rethink real estate, there are two simple things you can do. Share this podcast or go to Patreon.com/rethinkrealestate to learn about special opportunities for my friends and followers and subscribe if you can.

Eve: [00:03:33] Hello Scott, I’m so pleased to have you on my show.

Scott Ehlert: [00:03:37] Thank you. Yeah, good to be here.

Eve: [00:03:39] So you’ve had a fascinating and pretty astounding career, from concert and event management to design and strategic consulting, to property technology. So, I wanted to start with what you’re doing right now. What are you doing right now?

Scott: [00:03:57] Yeah, great question. Yeah. So we are, I’ve created a company called Fabric Workshop and we are pioneering a new next generation mass timber manufacturer. We manufacture in California and a fabrication, a digital and robotic fabrication facility to bring those next generation Messmer panels to life.

Eve: [00:04:20] So what does the next generation mass timber panel mean?

Scott: [00:04:26] Yeah, so, you know, we kind of started our journey looking at the cost of housing. And, you know, as you mentioned, I worked as a design strategy consultant for many years and I kind of had run my course in that in that career and was looking for something new and something for, you know, a bit more impactful. And really started looking at housing, which was the most kinda pressing thing in my life as I was starting a family and seeing how so many of my friends and peers in California were leaving the state because of the cost of housing or were in a constant state of financial and mental pressure due to housing. And I also consulted with quite a few really large companies, just by chance in my design consulting days, worked with some of the largest companies in the housing and real estate space in the United States and just saw this, you know, kind of looming existential crisis around housing affordability. And, you know, when the housing affordability comes up, we love to kind of cut out the perennial teachers and firefighters, as you know, our benchmarks for who can afford housing. But what we were seeing was that housing was really kind of impacting bankers and doctors. We were you were talking to doctors who were having to have roommates in the Bay Area because they couldn’t afford the housing.

Eve: [00:05:54] Wow.

Scott: [00:05:54] And so there was this kind of big, big question of like, how do we make housing? How do we create housing in California that’s affordable to middle income folks we traditionally call the middle-class. And so that started us down a really long journey and looking at just a year long process of just listening and asking questions and sitting in the back of rooms and talking with as many folks in the in the industry as possible. And it became really clear that how we build and the type of projects we build were really kind of fundamental to, this seems kind of obvious, the kind of fundamental to the cost of housing. And so, you know, we really started to look at how we can build things differently and what with the technologies available out there to help them offset these costs.

Eve: [00:06:53] So let’s back up a bit. Like for some people listening, they may not know what mass timber is, which is kind of all the rage in the architecture building industry, but perhaps not something that most people know about.

Scott: [00:07:06] Yes, so mass timber is kind of the catchall phrase for what is a range of engineered wood products similar to glulam beams. The most prominent is cross-laminated timber or CLT. And that’s, the that’s the type that you’ll see turning up most often. And what CLT is, is just that, it’s cross-thatched, and kind of cross-threaded dimensional lumber, 2x6s and 2x4s, laid out in a giant press with glue. And then that press puts extreme pressure on those panels and that glue and turns it into essentially a giant butcher block. It turns it into a more or less a solid piece of wood. And those panels can be 12 feet tall and 12 inches wide and 40 feet long or larger, in some cases.

Eve: [00:08:00] Smaller, non-structural pieces of wood, glued together and engineered in such a way that they become much larger structural elements.

Scott: [00:08:09] Yes. And then they take on some really incredible structural properties. So, you know, they are stronger and lighter than steel. Stronger and lighter than concrete. You know, it’s an incredible product. It has been widely adopted in Europe and into East Asia and Japan. And it’s just starting to kind of trickle up in the United States. And as you said, it’s kind of all the rage right now. Everybody’s talking about CLT and there’s a lot of hopes and prayers being put on CLT as the, you know, the silver bullet that’s going to save us from our cost of housing.

Eve: [00:08:46] So it’s cheaper than steel and other structural elements. Is that what you’re saying?

Scott: [00:08:52] Um, no, that’s kind of the problem, that’s the that’s the challenge with it, is that while it does have these incredible attributes, you know, speed of construction is one of them. You know, these are essentially printed building panels. You know, you can get an entire wall or, you know, five, half a dozen panels to make an entire floor plate of a large building. And so you’re seeing buildings, you know, eight story buildings go up in two weeks. Right. It’s all crammed in. It’s all kind of flat packed like, an IKEA footer. Pre-cut, pre-manufactured, there’s no saws on site, no hammers. You know, nobody’s doing anything manual on site. They’re just essentially cramming these giant plates into place and a small crew catching the plates and then screwing them into place with some really advanced metal connectors to hold this together.

Eve: [00:09:51] But the materials themselves are expensive…

Scott: [00:09:54] Right.

Eve: [00:09:55] But you’re saving, you’re saving time on the site. You’re saving uncertainties like weather. Because they are factory built.

Scott: [00:10:03] Yes, exactly.

Eve: [00:10:05]  Insurance you’re saving.

Scott: [00:10:09] Yeah. Insurance is still kind of a question mark. It’s still very new in the US. So, the insurance has not quite caught up yet, but it is completely a completely safe product that has to go through a very rigorous testing process called PRG 320. And that is the fire certification process. And it’s also been the new international building codes updates around mass timber and CLT. So they’re able to build much larger buildings now. So, you know, 18 plus stories, large warehouse facilities, distribution centers, you know, these very large type two, type four type structures can now be built with mass timber.

Eve: [00:10:47] So, in balance then, if you can save all of these site costs, will it provide a less expensive solution? And especially for, you know, what you’re focused on, which is what I understand, the missing middle housing, those smaller infill lots that maybe are not as efficient as a huge 800-unit building, but certainly helped to kind of just stitch cities together, right?

Scott: [00:11:17] Yeah, exactly. So, when we were looking at CLT, we want to have all of the benefits of CLT, but without the biggest drawback and the biggest drawback of CLT, or there’s a couple of other variants like DLT, which is dowel laminated timber, which is they use wooden dowels to connect the boards together, or NLT, which is nail laminated timber, which is just that the boards are stuck together with nails. The biggest drawback with them is, with those technologies, is they just use a lot of wood. There’s just no way around it. It’s a giant butcher block and so, you know, and it uses dimensional lumber, the same lumber that stick frame builders use and modular builders use. You know, when you go to Home Depot and buy, you know, Doug fir for your deck, that’s the same stuff that goes into CLT. And so, you know, it’s a commodity product and they’re using a lot of commodity product. It’s susceptible to high prices and that there’s just no way around that. And so, you know, I don’t know how anybody that started a CLT project a year ago is going to make those projects pencil today. What, the cost of dimensional lumber up to, what, two hundred percent or something like that over year over year. Right?

Eve: [00:12:34] Why is it up so high?

Scott: [00:12:36] Yeah, so…

Eve: [00:12:37] I’m sorry. I’m completely new to this so I’m learning.

Scott: [00:12:40] Absolutely. Yeah. Yeah. No, this is you know, we are we are incredibly focused on the forestry and supply side. You know, we are kind of a hybrid between a housing prefab re-manufacturer and a forestry company, in particular the wildfire side, so I can definitely share more on that. And so, yes, you know, the implications on the lumber costs are, have a big, big impact. And lumber prices were already going up, right, there was just limited supply. There’s limited companies involved in the forestry space. And everybody’s going out to the same suppliers, like, you know, in the US. Dimensional lumber on the West Coast comes primarily from British Columbia, Washington and Oregon. And Idaho and Montana to a lesser extent. But those are the three kind of major producing markets and everybody’s buying it. Right. And even if you’re on the East Coast, a lot of people want that, like the aesthetic and material qualities of West Coast feedstock. And it’s primarily Doug fir. That’s what everybody wants. And so there’s just high demand, it’s just a supply and demand, and then Covid came and just threw a giant wrench into all of that. The mills shut down, the logging shut down, and everybody thought the housing and construction industry would collapse with Covid. But just the opposite happened. There was a huge remodel boom, a huge push for new homes in the suburbs. People were trying to get more space. And so the macron effects of that are that an industry that was already under high demand pressures is now under extreme demand pressures. And then they took their capacity offline for a period of time with Covid. And now they’re just trying to play catch up. And the industry in 2019 is already at record highs. And now we are just, it’s just through the roof, you know, OSB board, plywood of all that down the stack is all impacted by this. And so, when prices are just really high so CLT or DLT, NLT that’s just going to be less price competitive now than they were before.

Eve: [00:15:00] Interesting. So let’s go back to what you’re trying to solve and what your solution looks like. And then we can talk about how the last year has impacted that.

Scott: [00:15:11] Yeah, absolutely. Yeah. So, you know, that use of material is kind of fundamental to our approach. And, you know, we were really pursuing a CLT based product initially. But when we, when that reality of the the material cost, the fiber cost, just was the 100 pound gorilla in the room, there’s no way around it. It’s going to just do more research. Kind of went back to the table and some to look at those more mature markets in Europe and Japan and started to see this kind of, as I was saying, the next generation of mass timber products coming out where they’ve already kind of gone through that and recognize that, you know, a CFT panel is not necessarily the ideal product for a lot of building types, particularly smaller and faster buildings. And so what they’re using now is what are kind of known as cassette systems. They, these are a panelized approach, just like CLT, but they’re taking the fiber out. And so, what they’re doing is, they’ll be more or less there’s like two kind of sandwich layers, a top and a bottom and then a structure on the inside of those two sandwich pieces that give it the structural integrity. So you get a box-like panel with a hollow core and that removes a substantial amount you know 50, 60 percent of the fiber, from those panels, driving the cost down while still maintaining the structural integrity of a full kind of solid wood panel.

Eve: [00:16:47] Like a hollow core door, but not as flimsy?

Scott: [00:16:53] Exactly. A hollow core door that you could build an eight-story building out of.

Eve: [00:16:58] Yeah, yeah.

Scott: [00:16:58] There’s a membrane, a structure on the inside of that hollow core that gives it its strength. Ingenuity at play here. Companies are now taking advantage of that cavity to include things that would normally be exposed in a CLT building. So, CLT with the solid wood in place, all of your MEP systems, your electrical, your plumbing, your lighting, all of that can’t run in the middle of the plate. It’s solid wood. Right. And so it has to be hung underneath or run in interior walls or both in most cases. But with these hollow core cassette systems, you can actually run those MEP systems inside the cavity of the floor plate. So, it gives it a much cleaner and tight aesthetic.

Eve: [00:17:46] Yeah, yeah.

Scott: [00:17:48] And then you can also add additional elements to those cavities. So you can add acoustic materials, you can add insulating materials to increase the R value. You can add seismic and fire safety materials in there. And so you can actually get a much thinner for floor plate overall than CLT, where you have to then just have any piece stuff hanging beneath it. With CLT, a lot of that insulating and acoustic and dampening performance has to be laid on top. And it’s generally a really thick concrete layer that’s poured on top of the wood panel. So, a lot of people with CLT they think that you get to see all the wood, but in most cases you don’t. Actually, on the floor plate it’s kind of covered in five inches of concrete and gypsum and all that stuff. So, the cassette systems are a really genius kind of approach to a lot of those challenges with CLT.

Eve: [00:18:44] And it means less time on site, by the sounds of it.

Scott: [00:18:48] It does, yes. But the flip side of all of this is that it does add complexity and you do have to be in much deeper coordination with your trades very early in the process to coordinate where all of those runs are going through those plates so that the connection points on site are all, you know, when you when you’re doing a small prefabricated, a lot of it’s going to be automated. And so, the tolerances are down to the millimeter. So things have to be tight. There’s no change orders, I guess. So there’s no saws, there’s no handsaws or circular saws on site to fix problems. Everything has to be really, really tight. So that really, kind of, front loads the design and the engineering process. And all of the trades have to be at the table very early. And so, it’s a very different process than a standard site build construction. You know, that’s the trade-off. Is that the process that has to adapt to the material.

Eve: [00:19:47] Just listening to you speak of it sounds to me like you might be enjoying that process.

Scott: [00:19:53] Yes, very much so. Yes. As somebody that that worked in design and system design and customer experience design, you know, all of that thinking is really, you know, and you can see the outcomes, right?

Eve: [00:20:07] Yes.

Scott: [00:20:08] You know, you can go and tour these sites in in Europe and parts of Australia, where they’re being, you know the sophisticated approaches, is happening in Japan and particularly Central Europe, where this market is very mature. I mean, you’re seeing build costs in major urban markets, you know, down to 140-150 dollars a square foot.

Eve: [00:20:29] Oh, that’s extraordinary.

Scott: [00:20:31] Whereas in San Francisco, you’re at, what, 750-850 a square foot for a poor-quality building.

Eve: [00:20:39] Yeah.

Scott: [00:20:39] That’s what we’re kind of chasing. Right. Like that’s the that’s the end goal is to build out the system that can drive towards those better pricing outcomes and make housing more affordable.

Eve: [00:20:50] Where are you in your process right now? You’ve been at this for how long?

Scott: [00:20:56] We’re now officially into year three, so it’s a long and winding road. As I mentioned, with our company, with Fabric Workshop, there’s this really big wildfire and forestry component to it. So, we are focused very much on the California market. We’re based in California. We by no means will turn clients away, that’s in a neighboring state. But the challenge in California is so enormous that we feel like that so many other housing starts to take on like a national approach. And we feel that we just need to be very specific to California and the codes and the and the challenges and the crisis that that’s at hand here and that it’s a big enough opportunity that it can justify that. The new housing element numbers are coming in across the state. And, you know, we’re going to need two million units of housing in the next, within the next 10 years. You know, it’s just a staggering number of housing. And so that that volume actually presents a really powerful opportunity to impact another, maybe bigger crisis at hand in the state of California. And that’s the wildfire situation here. And so, I don’t know, I’m sure you’ve seen that on the news.

Eve: [00:22:21] Oh, yeah. I mean, I’m Australian, I don’t know if you realize from my accent, so I’ve lived with it.

Scott: [00:22:27] Yes, that’s right. Right. So, yeah, in California, you know, five of California’s six largest fires in modern history were all, all happened last year. And they were all burning at the same time. Right. When four million acres of forest burned across the state last year, which was double the previous record, which was just in the previous couple of years. You know, it’s just really staggering, right? There was nearly ten thousand separate fires across California last year. And the fire season is growing, right? Climate change, drought is driving more extreme fire seasons. And so, we’re now seeing fire season in 2020 is 75 days longer than it was 20 years ago, just 20 years ago. And that’s two months longer, two and a half months longer. And so there’s this overarching kind of pressing need to fix that. And one of the best things that we can do is to get this excess unnatural growth out of our forests and turn it into wood products. So our forests in California are completely overgrown, grossly overgrown, naturally overgrown. We have, for the last hundred years, we’ve taken a policy of complete fire suppression.

Eve: [00:23:52] That’s really interesting. Yeah, because fire is an actual regeneration of forests and that’s what was brought up on me.

Scott: [00:24:02] Exactly.

Scott: [00:24:02] They happen for a reason. So, you have to just control them.

Scott: [00:24:07] Yes. Yes. And so we actually have to go back to a natural fire cycle where we’re not stopping fires. We’re actually letting fires happen. But in order for that to take place without being so destructive, like they are now, is we have to get all of that overgrowth that was the result of stopping fires in the forests.

Eve: [00:24:26] That’s really interesting, though.

Scott: [00:24:28] Yeah.

Eve: [00:24:29] But my question is, is why were they stopped? I’ve always thought that the push of, you know, the spread of cities into forests. I mean, I’ve seen it in Australia, you know, as housing popped up in amongst the forests. Of course, you want to stop fires there. And that also exacerbated the problem because, you know, you have this push and pull between people who want to live in those places and the natural the natural forest. It’s a mess.

Scott: [00:24:58] Yeah, right it is. Yeah. That’s a huge, huge driver to it that that growth is called the WUI. It’s the WUI and that’s the wilderness urban interface. And that that growth, particularly since the 90s, has just been exponential as we’ve continued to sprawl ever farther outward in California. We’ve pushed our towns and cities, the perimeter, more and more into that WUI. And so that’s been a big, big driver as well as the, you know, the agricultural, livestock and forestry industries in the 20th century. They didn’t want fires. And you combine that with just a…

Eve: [00:25:44] Yeah

Scott: [00:25:44] Very. What’s the term? I mean, what’s the word? How do you describe it?

Eve: [00:25:48] It’s a manmade problem.

Scott: [00:25:51] Yeah, yeah. And just a desire to control nature, you know, is man’s desire , the man emphasis there to control nature and dictate, basically saying fires are evil and treating them as a as an enemy that needed to be defeated.

Eve: [00:26:07] When I was young in Sydney, Australia. I mean, I remember bush fires. Like Sydney’s a huge….

Scott: [00:26:12] Bush fires. Yeah.

Eve: [00:26:12] I remember in the middle of the city, seeing just red and grey sky all around me. But there wasn’t the pain and misery of today because not, there was not nearly as much suburban housing – it pushed into the wilderness.

Scott: [00:26:31] Yeah. Yep. Yep. And that’s the same here. That’s just an overarching problem that needs to be solved. And there’s really no easy solution to it. The state now has about 33 million acres of forest, which is bigger than Oregon, and 13 million of them are considered very high risk. These are drought affected, beetle infected, because of lots of dead trees, and they have just this extreme level of overgrowth and that overgrowth are small and medium diameter trees. Those are the trees that normally would have been cleaned out by natural wildfires. And because there was no natural wildfires, they just exploded. And what they do, the small and medium diameter trees, they’re much more susceptible to fire, but they’re also tall enough to carry the fire into the canopies of the healthy, strong trees. And that’s where we get these infernos that then get the wind picks up in the canopy and carries it from tree to tree. And it just creates these, this tinder box. So, we have to get those small and medium diameter trees out of the forest. And right now, they have no value. They’re used for livestock, mulch, woodchips in your yard. And that’s not a valuable enough product to justify the cost of thinning, mechanical thinning. And mechanical thinning is a laborious, hard job. You have to, you know, carry chainsaws and particularly if we want to take a much more ecological approach to forestry thinning and not clear cut and carve up all of these fire roads that cause horrible erosion. The state’s trying to avoid the forestry problems of the past. So, it’s all done, a lot of that has to be done by hand, much more mechanical.

Eve: [00:28:20] 32 million acres, manually cleared.

Scott: [00:28:24] It’s staggering.

Eve: [00:28:25] It’s really staggering. How long does it take?

Scott: [00:28:28] Yeah, the goal of the California Forest Management Task Force, which is kind of the broad extra agency group that’s trying to address this challenge, their goal is a million acres per year by 2025. And right now – in 2019, we had 114 thousand acres – so we’re off by a factor of ten.

Eve: [00:28:47] Wow. That’s like one hundred years we’re looking at and more.

Scott: [00:28:52] That’s right. And what’s going to be left in California in 100 years of we’re burning four million acres a year. And it’s not just, this is not an abstract any more. Our water, for all of those cities comes from these forests and with these forest fires that you can grossly impact our water supply. The carbon impact of this. Right, 2020, there was 112 million metric tons of carbon were released by the 2020 wildfires. Which is 30 percent more than all the power plants that generated power that year. So, the health and that’s how you get into the asthma and respiratory issues of all that wildfire smoke. I mean, the implications of our society are bleak. And so, we have to figure out ways to get those small and medium diameter trees out of the forests. And that’s why we really kind of looked at, you know, not only these cassette systems, but getting away from dimensional lumber and really kind of focusing on veneer-based products. So, there’s another sub product of mass timber known as laminated veneer lumber or mass plywood panels, mass plywood. MPP is a brand from an Oregon company called Freres Brothers. And what they do is instead of cutting the log into 2x4s and having a bunch of scraps left over, is they put the log on a peeler and they peel the log and turn it into a big, long sheet. And then they glue those sheets together versus gluing 2x4s together. And that’s something that you can do, that’s, a that’s a vehicle for these small and medium diameter trees, whereas 2×4 dimensional lumber is not really feasible. And so they can peel logs, you know, down to six to eight inches and turn them into veneers. And so that’s what we’re really focused on, is these veneer-based structural products. Both floor plates, floor and ceiling plates and wall plates as well. That’s where we see our role in the forestry and the wildfire piece is creating market side demand for these small and medium diameter trees and putting them into really advanced, these really advanced cassette-based plate systems.

Eve: [00:31:14] Interesting. So I’m going to back up one more time. I sense a two-parter is coming on here. This is fascinating because…

Scott: [00:31:24] Yeah.

Eve: [00:31:24] I heard somewhere in amongst all the impact finance center information that there is a company out focusing on small diameter timber products. I can’t remember the name of the company, in California.

Scott: [00:31:38] So, we pitched at that event. So you might have, is that our pitch that you’re referring to?

Eve: [00:31:44] No, I think there’s another company I talked to so, we can come back to that.

Scott: [00:31:50] Yeah, yeah.

Eve: [00:31:51] But I’ve heard of people focusing on specifically that product and now it’s all falling into place for me. Personally, I didn’t know all of this. It’s really fascinating. But the importance of using that small diameter timber is becoming pretty clear.

Scott: [00:32:07] Uh huh. The great thing is that it could actually go into a very valuable product for the construction industry, the building industry. Incredibly green product, right? Very, very high embedded carbon in the veneer-based products, much lower travel times if we’re sourcing our wood from our local forest and putting it into buildings in Los Angeles and Sacramento and San Jose. Think of all the truckloads from British Columbia and northern British Columbia that we’re saving, right. And all that diesel fuel that gets burned. So, this really big upstream and downstream and benefits to sourcing this wood from California.

Eve: [00:32:51] Sounds like a whole new industry can emerge.

Scott: [00:32:54] That’s the goal, right. And that’s what the state is trying to incentivize is a re-ignition. I hate to use fire related terminology when talking about this stuff, but like, we kind of rekindling, that’s another one, restarting a forestry industry in California, which is really kind of on its last breath. Like, in the last 45 years, 70 percent of wood processing facilities in California closed. So, there’s really no eco system to actually process this. There’s no LBL manufacturers in California. There’s no plywood manufacturers in California. There’s very few mills left in California. There’s very few loggers left in California. And so we’re kind of having to start from scratch. And what the state is working on is incentivizing and creating these wood products, wood innovation campuses, across the state to bring this industry back. And to bring it back with a much greater kind of technological focus and an environmental and ecological focus. And so that things are done right. And so we’re at very early days of that. You know, we are not going to try to get into the manufacturing side of the LBL panels. It’s a very capital heavy side and there’s a reason why most of the companies that get into that, you know, they have three or four family generations that have been in the logging industry or they’ve been around for 150 years. You know, there are companies that just know how to do that and to manage those supply chains and to manage that production. And so we’re focused on it being a remanufacture of those products. And so, if we can help, you know, kind of show that there’s demand for this for this LBL and MPP type panels in California, hopefully we can then lure a manufacturer to the state, with our some of our demand, and get them active in the state and thinning our forests.

Eve: [00:34:58] So, Scott, you’ve bitten off a huge project, like where are you? You said you’re in the third year.

Scott: [00:35:04] Yes.

Eve: [00:35:06] I mean, where are you in the process of building a company?

Scott: [00:35:09] Yeah, yep. So, it is a very meaty challenge and myself and everybody that’s on our team is up for that challenge. That’s why we’re all here. We all understand the enormity of it and the, and the urgency of it. And that’s what motivates us every day. And the fact is, there’s not a lot of other companies doing this is yes, it’s an opportunity, but it’s also drives us to lead and to show that it can be done. And so, you know, we have to take advantage of the resources that we have. This is all bootstrapped at this point and self-funded, as you said, this is a big, meaty challenge. So, it’s really hard for investors to kind of wrap their head around it or see an exit to liquidity event in the near term. So fundraising has been a challenge, but that’s really not a deterrent to us in the slightest bit. And so, we have to focus on what we can sell for.

Eve: [00:36:08] Well, you have to eat. It’s going to be a little bit of a deterrent, right?

Scott: [00:36:13] Well, you know, the spouses of entrepreneurs do a lot of the heavy lifting. Right? And so, I have a really, my wife is an incredible partner and she’s also an entrepreneur, though a much more successful one. And she’s able to carry us through this kind of start-up period. But what’s great is that our story and our kind of mission is bringing a lot of really amazing people to the table. We are working with a company, for example, called Hacker Architects up in Portland, and they are an incredibly experienced, one of the most experienced architecture firms in North America working with mass timber. And they are becoming friends. Right. Like they they’ve really been a key supporter of our mission. And it really kind of backed us up and provided a lot of design assist and are really helping the design of our building system, because we have to think of this as a holistic building where we can put these different wood materials throughout the building. And so that’s just one example. We’ve got a whole network, whole ecosystem of companies that all share our same values and recognize the enormity of the problems that we’re solving. And so, we’ve built this great network of aligned allies that are helping us drive this forward. So, like I said, we’re a small kind of bootstrap team, but we’ve got some really great friends. And, you know, we are in the R&D phase and getting closer to a first prototypes. We originally had our first building construction project penciled as supposed to break ground this year, as a single-family home in the Tahoe region. Unfortunately, that project kind of fell through, just wasn’t the right application. And so, we decided to kind of shift focus. But ideally, we’d like to get a project off the ground here sometime this year with our investor pool that we do have and get a proof of concept project on paper this year and breaking ground next year. So that’s really what we’re what we’re driving for at this point.

Eve: [00:38:22] What is good proof of concept look like at this point?

Scott: [00:38:25] Yes. So, we’re looking at a small multi-family project and that’s the market that we’re going after is a unique market in the industry. Most of the construction industry and the prefab industry is really kind of set up to focus on how we build in the United States today, which is sprawl or tall. Right? Like it’s single-family homes on the peripheral cities, or it’s a big giant two hundred unit podium structures or towers in the urban core. And Fabric, we see the opportunity, especially considering the sheer scale of the housing need and how fast that housing needs to be produced and brought to market. We really see the opportunity in that missing middle upper missing middle range, small to medium lot, three to eight story buildings. So that’s really our key focus and really kind of unique, a bit more unique in the marketplace. And so we want to, we want to get a proof of concept project of at least four units. It doesn’t have to be huge. It just needs to show how the systems kind of work together and kind of bring that to life in an infill type application.

Eve: [00:39:42] I’m excited to see it.

Scott: [00:39:44] Yeah.

Eve: [00:39:44] Are you going to act as your own developer or are you looking for a developer who will use your system?

Scott: [00:39:51] Yeah, it’s kind of like yes and…

Eve: [00:39:55] Yes, I know.

Scott: [00:39:56] If we yes, either, you know, we are talking to more and more developers. We are finding that network of of young kind of independent developers, baby developers, I’ve heard that kind of term kind of thrown around, you know, the folks that are producing like the 20-unit buildings and the odd 16-plex. Right. Like those small buildings. And we’re building that network. And hopefully we can bring a developer partner to the table sooner rather than later. But we’re also kind of setting ourselves up for self-developing our first project. And that’s what we were going to do on that single family home. We were going to develop that through our, through one of our investors, but we kind of shifted and would like to ideally bring on a development partner that knows that process better than we do. You know, we’re not developers.

Eve: [00:40:47] And so you might stretch yourself very thin during trying to do both.

Scott: [00:40:52] Yes, exactly. And we have to kind of kind of focus on what our value add is. And the development side is not it today, who knows down the road where this goes. But as of now, ideally, we have a partner that can, that can really kind of drive this through that to the development process.

Eve: [00:41:11] So you’ve talked about these materials looking very sleek. What does that first project going to look like?

Scott: [00:41:18] Yeah, I wish I could show you some of the renderings, the absolutely beautiful renderings that Hacker put together for us. One of the advantages of focusing on this smaller type three, type five building typology is that the fire code and the fire ratings aren’t as strict with the CLT. So we can leave a lot more of that with the mass timber, we can leave a lot more of that exposed. So, you’ll see a lot of exposed natural wood elements. So wooden ceilings, heavy timber beams, well it will have the aesthetic about heavy timber beams, but it’s actually LDM. A lot of the columns in the beams will be exposed and even wall panels can be of exposed wood to them. So, a very natural and a minimal, what’s the term a soft minimal kind of aesthetics to them and and very high precision tolerances on that minimalism, right, like that’s kind of what separates good minimalism from bad minimalism is the execution and the precision of it. And because everything is cut in a factory, the aesthetic is just really tight and really clean. And so we’re really looking forward to bringing that to life.

Eve: [00:42:37] Do you have the renderings on the website you’d like to share?

Scott: [00:42:40] Yeah, on our website we have a few renderings on there. So you can kind of get a sense out of the real aesthetic and that that would be our proof of concept project. Each developer will have that choice that they want to drywall over those exposed wood elements they can. But our preference would be to leave them exposed. And there’s a lot of really interesting data back to that benefits of mass timber. There’s a lot of really interesting data around the biophilia benefits of mass timber, where people get that sense of serenity and calm. Like being in a forest.

Eve: [00:43:16] Yes.

Scott: [00:43:17] In a mass timber house, they are really cool buildings. I don’t know if you’ve had a chance to spend time in one. But they do have a a dampness to them, not not wet, damp, but just materially damp. And so sound travels differently. And you do get the sense that you’re in the forest. It’s really, it’s a really cool experience.

Eve: [00:43:37] So I’m going to go back.  You’re in Truckee. Right. And I’m wondering…

Scott: [00:43:41] That’s correct. Yes.

Eve: [00:43:42] Why are you in Truckee?

Scott: [00:43:44] I asked myself that question sometimes, too. I love Truckee, but I’m definitely a city kid. So, Truckee is more or less a one road town. And so, I do feel a little stir crazy here sometimes, but it is a great place. And I have two young kids, four and six years old, and just this is a big playground for them. So, we ended up in Truckee a long time, a decade and a half in San Francisco, three years down in Los Angeles, and then had to get out of L.A. and Truckee was supposed to be a one year stopover on the way back to the bay. But, shocker, the cost of housing was so high in the bay that we couldn’t afford anything there so we could afford something in Truckee, Truckee at the time. So we were able to…

Eve: [00:44:34] You’re living the Californian dream.

Scott: [00:44:36] Yeah. More or less trying to.

Eve: [00:44:40] Okay. So tell me, I’m going to move to shift gears a little bit and just ask you, are there any other current trends out there or innovations in real estate development or construction that you believe are really important for our future?

Scott: [00:44:54] Yeah, and so a couple, yeah, so one thing that we are bringing in house we have, this is a capability that we are, as we speak, kind of building out a facility is the fabrication side of construction and particularly automated and robotic fabrication. That is the piece that’s going to have prefab construction kind of realize the benefits that it kind of promised the world when it came out a few decades ago. You know, from pricing to quality control, robotic fabrication is going to be a huge piece of this. And we are actively building that capacity out in California, will be a leader in that space here in the state. And particularly as more and more construction will go towards wood-based construction to offset the carbon and environmental impacts of concrete and steel. You know, we firmly believe that wood construction is the future of construction. And so, to make that a reality, you have to have a much more advanced fabrication capabilities like you see across Switzerland and Austria and Germany and Sweden, for example.

Eve: [00:46:10] Right. Right.

Scott: [00:46:11] And so that’s going to be a big piece. Right. And then, you know, I do believe fundamentally that we are seeing the cracks in the dam when it comes to planning and zoning in particular. I think that the sea change and our laws and regulations on what gets built and where is going to happen very quickly, much faster than I think a lot of people give it credit for. You know, we are slowly starting to see the end of single family only zoning. When I first really started thinking about creating the housing company in 2014, most of them really talk about like, oh, yeah, houses are expensive in nice parts of the city. But that was kind of the attitude. And now fast forward seven years and it’s a topic in our presidential campaigns. It’s just becoming a fundamental issue in this country. And I think that the 20th century experiment of highly segregated neighborhoods, housing over here, business over there, commerce over here. Single family based, car based, an entirely car-based society, car exclusive society. I really fundamentally believe that that is coming to an end in California and that those changes are going to happen. It’s going to build and then is going to happen really rapidly.

Eve: [00:47:36] Wow. I have one final question for you, and that is, what is your big, hairy, audacious goal?

Scott: [00:47:43] Yeah, I and I would say, you know, not as ambitious to say we want to build a new city out of wood, but definitely, you know, a neighborhood out of wood. That’s kind of our big goal is to build a five 600-unit community, all sustainably sourced, locally sourced, sustainably sourced timber neighborhood. And we’re seeing those neighborhoods pop up in Europe and Japan and they are incredibly inspiring. They are walkable, human scaled, car free, no carbon passive house technology. And I would love to just get my hands on a decrepit shopping mall in central Sacramento and convert that into the neighborhood. A vibrant, diverse, mixed income neighborhood in in Sacramento, for example. And that’s our big, big goal that we’re driving towards.

Eve: [00:48:41] Oh, I’m really excited for you. It sounds amazing. And I hope sometime in the future we’ll get to host one of your projects on Small Change.

Scott: [00:48:51] Would absolutely love that. Yes.

Eve: [00:48:53] Thank you so much, Scott.

Scott: [00:48:55] Yes, thank you, Eve. Really appreciate the time. And I’m honored to be on your podcast and be part of this group. So thank you.

Eve: [00:49:11] That was Scott Ehlert of Fabric Workshop. Scott pivoted his life and career in a way that most people do not dare. He is making all bets on an industry that doesn’t quite exist yet and technology that he needs to design. While other housing developers try to crack the construction affordability code using the same old building systems, Scott has spent years planning how to become a housing developer using a brand new building system, one that he has designed and one that he will manufacture. We’ll be hearing more about Scott. I’m sure.Eve: [00:49:58] You can find out more about this episode on the show notes page at EvePicker.com, or you can find other episodes you might have missed, or you can show your support at Patreon.com/rethinkrealestate, where you can learn about special opportunities for my friends and followers. A special thanks to David Allardice for his excellent editing of this podcast and original music. And thanks to you for spending your time with me today. We’ll talk again soon. But for now, this is Eve Picker signing off to go make some change.

Image courtesy of Fabric Workshop/Scott Ehlert

The potential of unused space.

March 8, 2021

The US may be facing the most severe housing crisis in its history. Restrictive building regulations and zoning have pushed real estate prices out of reach for more and more Americans. The problem, which has been growing for the last fifty years, has been sharply accelerated by the pandemic.  

While some progress is being made, the rate of homelessness is outstripping policymaking to squash it. This problem requires more creative responses, both long-term and temporary, that recognize the unique characteristics of cities and their populations.

Vacant land 

Many cities have vacant and underutilized land. There’s a growing awareness that cities are the most sustainable places to live and this makes vacant lots in cities quite attractive. Often small in size, they can be well-suited for the building of small, affordable homes. Developers and architects are turning their attention to these lots in an effort to make an impact on housing affordability. Architects like Brian Gaudio, turned housing manufacturer, who launched his company Module to build efficient infill homes. Or Jonathan Tate, a New Orleans- based architect who focused on designing and building affordable housing on odd-shaped and forgotten lots. One of his projects, Starter Home Two, was built using crowdfunded equity raised through Small Change.

Adaptive reuse

Underutilized government offices, hotels and shuttered public schools might also help to solve the housing shortage. The pandemic has increased the inventory of buildings that now stand vacant. And some developers and investors are creatively acting upon the opportunity.

Repvblik, an LA development company, has built its practice around adaptive reuse since 2015. In Branson, Missouri, they have converted a Days Inn Hotel into affordable housing, turning 423 hotel rooms into 341 affordable multifamily units. Plato’s Cave now includes coworking spaces, meeting rooms, a gym, a communal kitchen and dining room for functions, a beach volleyball court, and free-to-use bicycles. The cost of conversion for this project was less than half of the cost of building a new property. Starcity, a San Francisco-based company, is also converting defunct and underused commercial and hospitality spaces. And ASK Studio, an architectural firm, has converted an 1888 local high school, in Clinton, Iowa, into 16 affordable multifamily units.

Empty rooms

But what about homeowners who are feeling the squeeze and have a spare room or two in their home? Or real estate owners who are just not realizing the appropriate rent for their property? Atticus LeBlanc, an affordable housing advocate for over a decade now, founded Padsplit to address affordable housing a little differently. Instead of building new, he advocates for using every empty space in every home for an abundance of affordable living options. On Padsplit, a technology platform, homeowners can list a room, or find a local contractor to reconfigure their home so that they can share it with multiple tenants. On the outside, a PadSplit looks like any other traditional home. But on the inside each house typically has five to eight furnished bedrooms, with shared bathrooms, kitchen, dining, and laundry rooms (no living rooms). Utilities, internet service and cleaning is included in weekly rent, making these “pads” extremely flexible housing options. Padsplit homes are designed to allow single person households, or individual workers in our communities, to be able to rent individual rooms rather than entire homes.

Want to learn more? Listen in to my podcast conversation with Atticus.

Image by Htm CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia

The impact accelerator.

March 3, 2021

From ecologist to impact investment guru, Dr. Stephanie Gripne has had a singular career arc. Originally trained in wildlife management and conservation, she went on to work on issues surrounding the built environment, in conservation real estate, environmental markets, and in the wonky world of financing strategies and historic tax credits. At the same time she was working as a research fellow, studying impact investing and philanthropy, and she became involved in the Colorado impact investing scene.

In 2012, it all came together when she founded the Impact Finance Center (IFC), based in Denver, as a nonprofit academic center with a mission to identify, train and activate philanthropists and investors to become impact investors. In 2019, the IFC added on an Impact Investing Institute, to provide education to organizations, family offices, foundations and other funding groups. Today, Stephanie’s big, hairy audacious goal is to move a trillion dollars into impact investing.  

Stephanie believes that impact investing is all about educating people – and the IFC is quickly becoming the go-to place for every level of investor, from the well-endowed non-profit world to individuals who have never invested before. We know you’ll be hearing more from Stephanie and the IFC, for sure.

Insights and Inspirations

  • Stephanie wants the Impact Finance Center to be the place to go for agenda-free and trustworthy investor education.
  • The Impact Finance Center is an accelerator for impact investors.
  • Stephanie believes there is a gigantic audience of potential impact investors out there we can reach.
  • The IFC provides impact education through portfolio evaluation, educational offerings (with 200 classes online), training and an ever-growing number of themed impact investor clubs.
  • And you should check out the Impact Real Estate Investing Club.
Read the podcast transcript here

Eve Picker: [00:00:14] Hi there. Thanks for joining me on Rethink Real Estate. I’m on a mission to make real estate work for everyone. Real estate can help to solve climate change, can house people affordably, can create beautiful streetscapes, unify neighborhoods and enliven cities. So, I’m on a journey to find the most creative thinkers and doers out there. I’m not the only one who wants to rethink real estate. You can learn more about me at EvePicker.com, or you can find me at SmallChange.co, a real estate crowdfunding platform with impact real estate investment opportunities open for investment right now. And if you want to support this podcast, join me at Patreon.com/RethinkRealEstate, where there are special opportunities for my friends and followers.

Eve: [00:01:09] Today, I’m talking with Dr. Stephanie Gripne. In what seems to be an improbable amount of time, Stephanie has gone from ecologist to impact investment guru. Her big, hairy, audacious goal is to move a trillion dollars into impact investing. Ten years ago, about four years after getting her doctorate, she became director of the Initiative for Sustainable Development at the University of Colorado’s Real Estate Center. There she was immersed in issues surrounding the built environment and socially responsible investing. In 2012, she took the leap and founded the Impact Finance Center as a nonprofit academic center with a mission to identify, train and activate philanthropists and investors to become impact investors. I’ve already learned a lot from Stephanie, but I’m going to learn more and so might you. So, listen in. If you’d like to join me in my quest to rethink real estate there are two simple things you can do. Share this podcast. Or go to Patreon.com/RethinkRealEstate to learn about special opportunities for my friends and followers, and subscribe if you can.

Eve: [00:02:40] Stephanie, I’m so happy to talk to you today.

Stephanie Gripne: [00:02:44] Eve, I am so happy to talk with you today.

Eve: [00:02:47] So, you have a supremely cool resume and it’s pretty clear how driven you are. There’s a lot to talk about, but I wanted to start by talking about what you’re working on today. You lead the Impact Finance Center. What is that?

Stephanie: [00:03:01] That’s a great question, Eve. For those of you in the audience who have heard of an accelerator, you might have heard of TechStars or 500 startups or Y Combinator. Those accelerators are essentially boot camps for people who want to start a startup or a small business. So, they identify, educate and invest in entrepreneurs. When I was a professor in 2010-12 at the University of Colorado at the Leeds School of Business, I was actually the director of the Initiative for Sustainable Real Estate Development. I just kept wondering why isn’t there more money flowing into good things? And I finally kept unpeeling the onion and realizing there are not entities out there providing investor education that is non-conflicted or trustworthy, in that most of the investor education is actually trying to get your business. So, it comes from Wall Street and they’re trying to become your investment adviser or raise a fund. And so, my hypothesis was that if we started providing non-conflicted investor education from the inside of a nonprofit, where we weren’t going to try to raise a fund or become your investment advisor, we could actually educate and activate these investors. So, going back to the accelerator analogy, Impact Finance Center is essentially an accelerator for impact investors. Instead of identifying, educating and investing in entrepreneurs, we identify and educate individuals and organizations who want to become impact investors. And those typically are: private foundations, community foundations, high net worth individuals, companies and family offices.

Eve: [00:04:51] So, that’s really how you and I started talking way back on the plane ramp, where we met, right?

Stephanie: [00:04:58] That is true. We did mean on a plane ramp in California. And yes, we are. I had been following the crowdfunding movement for some time and figuring out what my role in it was going to be.

Eve: [00:05:10] How do you accomplish investor education and accelerate those impact investors? What is it you actually do?

Stephanie: [00:05:17] That’s a great question. We really offer five ways for people to get education. One, and this is the the holy grail of it all, is we can evaluate your investment advisor portfolio, and that is pretty brutal. We evaluated a 100 million dollar foundation in Seattle and found out their investment advisor had charged them in excess of fees of one million dollars over five years to underperform by five million dollars.

Eve: [00:05:49] Ohhh.

Stephanie: [00:05:49] We have a 15 million dollar foundation in Denver … where we evaluated their investment advisor and found out they had been charged in excess of fees of $240,000 over seven years to underperform by 1.4 million dollars. So, we have, that is number one. We can evaluate your portfolio and investment advisor for governance and fees and evidence-based decision evaluation and impact. And then, the next phase is just education. We’re putting our 200 classes online. We have 47 recorded webinars up there. So, if you’re a do-it-yourselfer … sign on our Impact Investing Institute and train yourself. We also offer one-on-one training, small group training and large group training.

Eve: [00:06:39] Wow. That’s a lot of work, Stephanie. When did you launch the center?

Stephanie: [00:06:43] I was a professor at University of Colorado in 2010-12. And I realized then, once I had essentially collected evidence and accidentally discovered that the financial return of a grant is negative 100 percent loss. I determined that this impact investing was legal; and determined that, also, that people were interested, but there wasn’t a place for them to go learn. And then, the other piece, I realized, is asking somebody to do a first investment, cutting a 25,000 dollar check, even if you have a lot of money, is scary. And so, the key was, that’s in my, I use a baseball analogy, that’s a major league investment. And so, how do you create a T-ball opportunity for people to learn by doing. And so, that’s either using simulations like business case competitions or kind of monopoly. We do some simulation type activities, where you get to pretend you’re an investor or you actually do a small dollar amount. And we often have people take money they would have donated and pool it together in a giving circle model, and then they learn how to invest together.

Eve: [00:07:55] Interesting. Interesting. Who are you trying to reach? Like, who do you think your audience is? How big is it?

Stephanie: [00:08:04] Our audience is gigantic. If you just Google the number of millionaires in states like Colorado or Georgia or Massachusetts, and you’ll see a range from 150,000 millionaires to over a million millionaires … that’s a great question, Eve. People often ask me, oh, would you rather not work with a foundation or, versus a high net worth individual? And there’s two criteria that we look to partner with people. One, they have to be motivated and willing to take action. If you’re going to be on the slow boat will still help you, but you don’t get to be first in line. So, you have to be willing to move and take action. And the second thing is, you have to be an independent thinker. If you’re somebody who likes to have the crowd go first and you join the crowd, you’re probably not the right individual organization to come find us. And so, those are difficult to go find. But it’s great. We’re really nice about it. When people get stuck, we’re like, hey, it’s OK, go back and do this homework, and when you’re ready to get back into it, move forward. But what that means, Eve,  is that I have worked with foundations where 20 trustees, oftentimes family members, are in unison, and I’ve worked with a grumpy high-net worth individual that’s difficult to move. So, it doesn’t have to be an individual or a foundation or a family office or a corporation. It just has to be a willingness to take action.

Eve: [00:09:29] And beyond the gigantic audience of accredited investors, as you know, they are only about three percent of the population, there is now a growing audience of people who’ve never invested before and sit in the non-accredited group. So it’s huge, right?

Stephanie: [00:09:45] It’s endless. And it’s interesting, because I was trying to think the other day about how I got started. And I know my dad, when I was 12 or 13 years old, we invested in Micron Together Technology Company. I’m 47 years old. I don’t know how I found, it had to have been at the library, found a book on Motley Fool that taught direct investing. So, direct investing with public companies. And I still have some of those stocks I first invested in. But I actually did an investment in Enron, because it was a renewable energy company. So, I kind of like to think of myself as an early adopter in the modern-day crowdfunding.

Eve: [00:10:25] Since have you started seeing a shift towards impact investing?

Stephanie: [00:10:30] Oh, absolutely. In Colorado, for example, we started the Center in 2012, and I’ll go back and answer your your last question in a little bit. When we started the Center, I realized when I was at University of Colorado when I had that ‘aha’ moment that, wow, people do need education, and I thought every entrepreneurship center needs an innovative finance center. And then I took a step back, and I’m like, wait, every university that’s going to struggle financially needs innovative finance center to stay financially viable. And then I took a step back, and I thought, wait, every association of, I call them ‘clubs of money,’ a community foundation association, a YPO, family office association. They need this curriculum too. And there was, at the time, only 15 centers and really only two of us that actually do transactions. And so, that was my idea, to leave in 2012 and then start a nonprofit, multi-university academic center where we could essentially provide a curriculum in a box. And just to give you a sense of how long it takes to get going, at least in Colorado …

Eve: [00:11:46] Are you telling me how long it takes to get going?

Stephanie: [00:11:48] Well, just to just have a sense, in 2010-12, our first two transactions we supported were the Museum of Contemporary Art and the Alliance Center, and those both were real estate transactions, and one was a foundation and a couple of board members. So, they got 101 percent return. And we financed the Museum of Contemporary Art and saved them 550,000 a year. The other one was a project I led with the Alliance Center in partnership with the Denver Foundation, and we used a donor-advised fund to do a loan at zero and one percent that essentially saved that nonprofit six million dollars and gave the donor 101 percent return. I worked on those two transactions for three years and they all moved when the bills were due. They tried everything else for years and years and years. And then, when the adjustable rate mortgage was going to be due, or the building renovation COP bill was going to be due, that’s when they were finally willing to move. So, that there was a negative-like desperation as the birthplace of innovation. It took three years for two transactions. And I do believe Colorado’s probably done 100 impact investment transactions in the last three months.

Eve: [00:13:02] Wow. The story you’re telling is much like mine. I think if you build something new and I suppose on the cutting edge, it takes a really long time and you have to have stick-to-it-ness. Right. Just have to keep going.

Stephanie: [00:13:15] You do. You have to have the Stockdale paradox. You have to have this eternal knowledge you will prevail in the end. And I had great advice from a friend, Dan, whose dad said, you need to stick past three and a half years and go to five years. Most people give up at three and a half years. And there’s a great metaphor. It’s like paddling an iceberg with flippers on. It takes a long time to get that iceberg going.

Eve: [00:13:38] Yeah, it really does. It can be a little depressing but there it is.

Stephanie: [00:13:42] Um-Hmm.

Eve: [00:13:42] This is a pretty unusual place for a Ph.D. in forestry to end up. That’s what you have, right?

Stephanie: [00:13:49] Yes.

Eve: [00:13:49] So I have read about Fish and Wildlife and spotted owls on your resume. Tell me about the journey that took you from wildlife to impact investment.

Stephanie: [00:14:01] It was great. I was watching an interview this morning with Heather McGhee, and she’s approaching this conversation from a race issue. I grew up in an environmental issue, and she’s framing it using a zero sum game. And I grew up in central Idaho, in Sun Valley, Idaho. And there was a zero sum framing where it was, either we either could save the endangered species of the wolves and the salmon, or we could have jobs. And I just remember knowing deeply in my heart that there was enough resources for both of them, and my friends would literally threaten the lives of my other friends with guns. And there was a river guide I used to work for that, a bunch of the river guides, made a sticker that said ‘Happiness is the fisheries’ biologists’ face on a milk carton.’ And it was a very tumultuous, and in some ways, violent way to grow up. And I just I didn’t know. I thought it was about the wildlife at that point. And now I’m really clear it was a resource allocation issue. And I deeply believe there’s enough money for communities and the environment and jobs. And so, that just has motivated me since I was 16 and I’ll never forget. I do like woodworking. And I announced when I was 16 or 17 that I was going to become a carpenter and make furniture. And my dad, who was incredibly supportive, my late dad, of whatever I would choose, said Stephanie, what about architect? I said, I said no. I said, what about wildlife biologist? And my dad said, you have a mind for business, Stephanie. Why don’t you go make a lot of money and then you can have influence on the environment. And my dad, actually, he was a workout guy that would take companies through bankruptcy, but the last 10 years of his career, he took a company out of bankruptcy, a precast concrete company. So, for 10 years, my family made every precast concrete box in the state of Idaho, electrical box, etc., and air conditioner pad. And I said, Dad, I just don’t have the constitution to do it the way you did it. I’m not willing to go make money in whatever way I can and then do what I want to do. I’m going to do what I want to do along the way.

Eve: [00:16:22] Yeah, I think this must be part of being a parent, not really understanding what your kids are doing. Right. What would be good outcomes, do you think, if more people invest in important change making projects, what are the outcomes you hope for?

Stephanie: [00:16:41] I’ll actually, answer that question and continue my last answer a little bit. My dad would end up being quite wealthy, becoming homeless for two years, and then at 24 years of age, he would come back to live with me. And so, the roles were reversed, for those of you who cared for your parents, except my roles were reversed for me when I was 24. And I remember I was doing my Ph.D. in seven states with ranchers and, a socioeconomic analysis, a conservation project, and I got to study with my hero, the chief of the Forest Service, Dr. Jack Ward Thomas. I was also working for the Forest Service in multiple roles all around the country based out of Lander, Wyoming. And my mom came down with pancreatic cancer and my dad was living with us in a home in Lander, Wyoming. And I remember coming home one day and I said, I don’t care if you walk dogs or volunteer or you get a job, but you can’t just stay in this basement apartment. You have to do something. And he would get a real estate license and a mortgage broker license. And he didn’t cost a lot of money to support him at that time because he was living in a basement apartment of our house. And so, essentially what we did is we were used to being poor graduate students. And so, instead of taking all the excess money of having two salaries and a grad’s stipend, we would buy a house. You could buy a house in Lander, Wyoming, for six to eight thousand dollars from down payment, 120,000 dollars house from 2000-2005.

Eve: [00:18:17] Wow.

Stephanie: [00:18:18] And the reason I’m saying this is my mom passed in 2003 and I wasn’t emotionally ready to sell the house. My sister was. So, I bought the house from my sister. And I think most of us, our road to becoming an investor in a meaningful way, is that second house. The first house is, I made it. I’m an adult. I’m building wealth. But that’s a, it’s a very different experience to get your second house. And I don’t know that I would have offensively purchased my second house. It kind of came to me because my mom passed. But once that second one happened, I talked to several people who’ve had this experience, you’re like, wait a minute, I can do this. I can own an asset and make money. And so, we bought a third house and then, on the fourth or fifth house, my dad came home and he said, Stephers, he’s like, there’s these families coming into our mortgage business. A lot of them have bad credit, but there are some that have bad credit that actually used to have good credit. They just had a medical situation and they didn’t have the right medical insurance. And now they’re in this bankruptcy called a medical bankruptcy. So they’re not allowed to buy a house or car, even though they are people who paid their bills. And so we ended up doing a lease option with these families and we had a family meeting and agreed that we wanted a 10 percent return. And so we would set aside 10 percent of their rent as a partial equity. And if the house appreciated above 10 percent return during their medical bankruptcy, essentially get the upside of that. And the houses during that time period appreciated fifteen to twenty five percent. So we got the joy of philanthropy, a job for my dad, an amazing tenant, a solid 10 percent return, and they got dignity. Got to move into their home three to five years early and get partial equity upside. And so I think that all of us are on this quest of connection and meaning. And when you realize, like I did then at twenty four, twenty five years of age, that you can do well by doing good. I don’t think most of us can go back from that.

Eve: [00:20:27] I think you’re a rock star. You probably made some friends for life as well in that process, right.

Stephanie: [00:20:34] Absolutely. That was about three hundred transactions ago and I’m I have lots of friends along the way. Three to four hundred. I’ve lost count. I kind of stopped keeping count after two hundred. As as my colleague Todd James says, 60 percent of what we do has been visible and behind the scenes. So there’s a lot of lovely, incredible, awesome people out there that don’t even know that we were helping push and pull to make their dreams happen. And, you know, it’s it’s it’s an incredible role to play in people’s lives.

Eve: [00:21:03] You really did shift from fish and wildlife to real estate, and then you dragged me into it recently, which I’m really enjoying. But we’re working together on one of your many projects, which you didn’t mention before when you talked about the five ways to educate people. You’re also creating impact investing clubs, which are really fascinating, they’re themed clubs where potential impact investors gather and you’re educating them with a particular focus. And we’re on the journey of building a real estate impact investing club.

Stephanie: [00:21:38] We are, Eve. I didn’t mention this at the beginning. So Impact Finance Center does two things. We identify, educate and activate individuals and organizations to become impact investors and we also build what we call community infrastructure, which can be replicated, scaled and customized. And in that bucket of community infrastructure, you just mentioned investor clubs, which is one piece of it. We also stood up the first statewide marketplace for impact investing, which is the second time I met you when you came out to Impact Days.

Eve: [00:22:11] That’s right. Yeah.

Stephanie: [00:22:11] Our Impact Days, and that’s, you can think of it is, imagine everybody who needed money in the state, doing good, shows up and they create a farmer’s market booth and we activate new investors and organize existing investors and we bring the investors to go shopping in the farmer’s market. We call that Impactings. A Bodega is a subset of that marketplace. And that’s what we’re branding as our Investor Clubs. And then we also have two hundred classes, which we refer to as our Impact Investing Institute. And one of the most exciting pieces of infrastructure that we created was, are you familiar with The Who’s Who Under 40 that business journals do?

Eve: [00:22:49] Yes, yep.

Stephanie: [00:22:50] Yeah. We reached out to our business journal and we said we’re going to do Who’s Who in impact investing for the Rocky Mountain region. Do you want to be our media partner? And that was exciting because the first year we did it, we had 300 people apply.

Eve: [00:23:03] Oh, wow, that’s great.

Stephanie: [00:23:05] The second year that we had 1,300, and so that builds the book. And then the last piece, which is really the key, is our impact investing, giving circle or investor accelerator, and that’s in partnership with civil society organizations like Community Foundations. So, right now we have 34 women that could be middle-income or high-net worth, or connected to a company or family office or foundation, who are major league when it comes to intelligence, and major league when it comes to alignment, and major league when it comes to admission, and major league when it comes to access to money. But they’ve never actually written a check to support a sutainable real estate project, or a small business, or a startup. And so in this case, we make it low cost, easy and fun. We say, let’s participate in a giving circle, donate two thousand dollars in and we end up getting a kitty of seventy five thousand to one hundred and fifty thousand and we say, who needs money? And this year we had a 111 women apply, 112 women apply, for over 50 million dollars of need. And then we go through a selection process and they do due diligence, and they invest in a couple investments for their first investments. Because it’s a pooled donor-advised fund that the Women’s Foundation of Colorado, they don’t get the money back, it’s essentially a learned by doing fund experience where hopefully they walk in is that as a donor, they walk out as an investor and then they say, I want to join the investor club. So, yes, Eve, the investor clubs are…

Eve: [00:24:38] This is especially important, this educational piece, because because women don’t invest. And I can tell you that with certainty on Small Change, women, just a tiny minority of investors. It really kind of puzzles me.

Stephanie: [00:24:53] You know, it’s interesting because I am counting on my fingers right now and hopefully going to my toes. I have several women who will be investing in Lyneir’s project who have been spreading the good news on Lyneir and some of the other great offerings you have on Small Change right now. And I’ll be completely honest with you, we we started the Investor Club as a response to Colorado’s CDFIs, Community Financial Development Institutions and nonprofit lenders, who basically said Steph, that’s been great. The three year pilot, we had a goal to move one hundred million. We’re up to three hundred million. Success. But we need to still keep helping raise capital for the CDFI’s and non-profit lenders. And so the first Investor Club was a Main Street Lender Club. The second one was our Indigenous Investor Club. And then the third one was with the federal government’s Sustainable Forestry Mass Timber CLT Investor Club that connects with real estate. And now we’re starting clubs in California and Massachusetts and with the New York CDFIs.   But I have to say Eve Picker, the most popular one, has been the Real Estate Investor Club.

Eve: [00:26:02] This was unexpected, wasn’t it? We have to keep up.

Stephanie: [00:26:06] Yeah, I was only mildly surprised. I saw there’s a quest to need. Nobody gets paid to do the work we’re doing. I think that’s the difficult part.  If Wall Street had figured out how to get paid to educate investors we would have money flowing like hotcakes to Main Street investments.

Eve: [00:26:23] And, you know, it’s been pretty stunning because some on our club meeting announcements for mid-March, there’s something like 1,800 people signed up on LinkedIn and I have no idea where they’re coming from. It’s pretty big. It’s pretty astounding, so we better put on a really good show, right.

Stephanie: [00:26:43] Yeah, it’s well it’s easy to do. I mean, people who are either investing or working in community real estate, creating real estate, affordable housing, mass timber CLT, all of the all the good stuff. Is there some of the most inspiring people you’ve ever met.

Eve: [00:26:58] Yes, I agree.

Stephanie: [00:26:58] So so it’s pretty much you just have to set the stage and let them shine.

Eve: [00:27:04] Let me ask you, so what happens to the club meeting and how it happened? What’s your formula?

Stephanie: [00:27:10] Yeah. And and for those of you who are familiar and who’ve gone to like a pitch competition or an expo, that’s what I think about it. I think it is essentially a virtual farmer’s market. And our goal is investor education specifically and also some social venture education. But what we want to do is we do an investor panel and we want to showcase different types of investors so people can see themselves in the crowd and go, wait, they’re just like me. I could do that, too. And so really, that’s about getting diverse, interesting investors up there so we can make it seem more accessible to people sitting in the crowd that they can go from not identifying as an investor to becoming an investor. And then the same is true for the social ventures like community real estate projects. It’s a way to educate people about what’s possible. Most people I mean, Eve, you know better than anybody, but if you and I walked out of our front door right now and and just talk to the next hundred people that walked by and said, are you an investor? All of them are investors, but most of them would probably we’d probably get five to ten of them who would say that they identify as an investor?

Eve: [00:28:24] Yeah, maybe less, actually.

Stephanie: [00:28:27] Maybe less. And that is the challenge. Like I remember when Mitt Romney was running for president, the Mormon Church put up signs, they had a campaign and put up billboards and they put up everyday faces and they called I’m a Mormon campaign. And I feel like we need to put up do a similar campaign, that I’m an Investor campaign.

Eve: [00:28:46] Yeah, that’s right. I think that’s a great idea because an investor could be someone who invests ten bucks in their friend’s startup or an investor can be someone who invests a million dollars into something big.

Stephanie: [00:28:59] I would even argue a mom who goes to the grocery store and decides which milk she’s going to buy for her child as an investor. She’s invested in the supply chain of…

Eve: [00:29:08] Oh, yeah.

Stephanie: [00:29:09] Are you buying organic or not organic or how are the companies trading?

Eve: [00:29:13] Or if they decide to go purchase at a farmer’s market instead of the grocery store.

Stephanie: [00:29:18] Every time a dollar changes hands, you’re an investor.

Eve: [00:29:24] Yes. I think you have a broader description of investor than I think of. But you’re right. So the club meetings are like a mixture of panels with investors, large and small, talking about their experiences and what it means to them and social ventures. And then a little pitch round right. Of deals that are looking for money.

Stephanie: [00:29:43] Yeah. So we we essentially, because we’re in Covid, we can’t do this in person. And so I think that’s to the benefit of this, Eve.

Eve: [00:29:50] I agree.

Stephanie: [00:29:52] And because in Colorado, when you came out to Colorado, Impact Days, we physically have a farmer’s market, you know, where…

Eve: [00:29:59] I don’t want to travel that much. I kind of like this Zoom thing.

Stephanie: [00:30:02] Absolutely. So we’re essentially putting the farmer’s market online. And so we created an investor catalog. And it’s really the social venture panel is to give five to 12 minutes casually for people to learn about a couple of the investment opportunities. And then we do a speed round of two minutes. And it’s shocking to me sometimes that people actually shine better in the two minutes than they do when they’re given seven to ten minutes.

Eve: [00:30:29] Yeah, it’s pretty fun. And people get an opportunity to ask questions, too. I think it’s exciting for me. I mean, what’s your ultimate goal with these clubs? What would be a fantastic outcome in five years for you?

Stephanie: [00:30:41] I’ll put my geeky academic entrepreneur hat on for a second. We actually wrote a paper called Laying the Groundwork for the National Impact Investing Marketplace. So we published in the Foundation Review. And we’re pretty confident now that if you take our infrastructure and combine it with some other infrastructure, such as Lenny Lavis up in Seattle, he has realized impact investor flow, a Fleg regenerative accelerator. If you take some of our joint infrastructure together, we can actually completely fix the capital markets and move a trillion dollars into impact. I can do it two ways. I can go fundraise 20 million dollars and take what we did in Colorado and expand it to all 50 states. Or we can earn money from some of our social ventures, such as our Impact Investing Institute, and use it to self-fund our expansion to all 50 states. So what’s exciting about the Investor Clubs is most of our Investor Clubs are actually being purchased or supported by foundations who want to do economic development and Covid recovery. Federal government, USDA, Forest Service. And we’ve had interest in state governments, too. So I think if I was in state government or foundation interested or family office interest in Covid recovery or a corporation, I would be basically investing in as many Impact Investing Giving Circles and Investor Clubs as I could afford to support. I think that getting one percent of our wealth to invest in Main Street as an example in Colorado, that would be five billion dollars that could be leveraged through CDFI’s and banks for a 15 billion to 50 billion dollar year investment. It wouldn’t take much, just one percent of the wealth.

Eve: [00:32:27] Um-hmm. Fantastic. I’m going to change gears again. Just ask a few more questions to wrap up and they’re about you. And what do you love doing the most and why?

Stephanie: [00:32:39] I love most partner dancing. Ballroom dancing is my favorite joy in the whole world. Which I feel like it’s going to be the last activity that comes back to us after Covid. So I’m sort of isolated. I’m single in Denver, Colorado, and I Waltz and Cha-Cha and Two-step and learning the Latin dances and I Swing and I just can’t wait to get back to partner dancing.

Eve: [00:33:04] So I have to ask, have you watched my very favorite Australian movie called Strictly Ballroom?

Stephanie: [00:33:09] I have seen Strictly Ballroom. Yes.

Eve: [00:33:13] So, the Star of Strictly Ballroom used to live next to me in Sydney.

Stephanie: [00:33:17] Well, I can’t wait to be traveling with you to Sydney.

Eve: [00:33:20] I don’t think he lives there any more.

Stephanie: [00:33:24] We can go have lunch.

Eve: [00:33:24] And what are you excited about the most?

Stephanie: [00:33:27] I am excited, two things. Is, as I used to feel like that from 2012-20, I felt like I know there’s an answer and we just have to develop the answer. And now I feel like the answers there. All the puzzle pieces are on the table. Now, we just have to put the puzzle pieces together. And so I’m excited about all of the amazing impact investors and all the amazing social ventures out there. There is so much goodness and love and light and inspiring people who are showing up in the impossible ways to make the world a better place. And so I’m very fortunate in that I get to hear from people with resources and people needing resources, doing amazing things and have the the joy of being able to connect them together. And our phone has just been ringing off the hook. Especially a lot of middle aged white women, just between the combination of the global pandemic and our civil rights crisis have just called. And many of them have got a text once that says, what can I do to help my sisters of color immediately? And she made an investment quickly. I had another woman call. We do a fellowship of ten sessions. And on her first session, she’s like, I’m ready to make a first hundred thousand dollar investment today. I’m like, OK, there we go. And so, yeah. So it’s just great to see how many people are showing up and going, now’s the time. I can’t wait any longer.

Eve: [00:34:59] It’s been really wonderful talking to you and I really can’t wait to see what becomes of the Impact Finance Center and our club and what’s next for you.

Stephanie: [00:35:09] Oh, well, and likewise, Eve. I just want to give a gratitude and compliment to you, because I don’t know that we’ve discussed this, but when this movement was getting off the ground, I was very aware there’s a role to activate new investors, educate and organize existing investors and build the financial fintech solution. And I chose to be on the education of investor side, and I couldn’t be more happy to be collaborating with you. You’re just somebody who is a visionary and a joy and has incredible integrity. And I think,

Eve: [00:35:44] I’m blushing now.

Stephanie: [00:35:45] Oh, I think that what you do and what I do are two pieces…

Eve: [00:35:51] Perfect match.

Stephanie: [00:35:51] Of a puzzle that literally will democratize and provide that pathway to solve the problems that I had as a 15 year old, 16 year old watching.

Eve: [00:36:01] You know, you’re right. I mean, I think investor education is the most difficult part of what I do, and I can’t do that and investor education. So I’m extremely grateful to have you around.

Stephanie: [00:36:14] Well, let’s go find what should our goal be in the next five years.

Eve: [00:36:18] We should build humongous impact investor club and just showcase thousands of projects. And, you know, I’d have to quantify that goal clearly.

Stephanie: [00:36:30] Well, I’m going put a goal out for us. It’s February 18, 2021. How about a year from now, our goal will be able to have a list of twenty thousand investors that are actively investing in and community real estate.

Eve: [00:36:43] I think that’s a fantastic goal. I’m happy to add to it.

Stephanie: [00:36:48] Fantastic. It’s a true honor and joy to be in partnership with you.

Eve: [00:36:51] Thank you.

Stephanie: [00:36:52] Thank you.

Eve: [00:37:04] That was Dr. Stephanie Gripne. Stephanie believes that impact investing is all about educating people – trustworthy, non-conflicted investor education. The Impact Financial Center is quickly becoming the go-to place for just this type of education and for every level of investor, from foundations to individuals who have never invested before. You’ll be hearing more about the Impact Finance Center, I’m sure. Please share this podcast so that more people learn about Stephanie and the Impact Finance Center. You can find out more about this episode on the show notes page at EvePicker.com, or you can find other episodes you might have missed. Or you can show your support at Patreon.com /RethinkRealEstate, where you can learn about special opportunities for my friends and followers. A special thanks to David Allardice for his excellent editing of this podcast and original music. And thanks to you for spending your time with me today. We’ll talk again soon, but for now, this is Eve Picker, signing off to go make some change.

Image courtesy of Dr. Stephanie Gripne/IFC and CO Impact Days

Totally backwards.

February 24, 2021

Michael H. Shuman – economist, attorney, author, entrepreneur and a go-to person on local and community economics. Local, local, local. In everything he does Michael is focused on the little guy (or girl). And he firmly believes that a robust economy would not be so robust without all of those little main street businesses and startups. 

Over the past 30 years, Michael has given, on average, more than one invited talk per week in nearly every state and in more than a dozen countries. He says, “I love public speaking, because it gives me an opportunity to explain difficult, arcane topics in simple, hopefully entertaining terms to people who care about their communities.” Michael has also been credited with being one of the architects of the 2012 JOBS Act and hence is one of the fathers of investment crowdfunding. Without him we wouldn’t have our crowdfunding platform, Small Change. 

In addition to all his other outreach, Michael is the author, co-author, and editor of a number of books. His most recent is, Put Your Money Where Your Life Is: How to Invest Locally Using Solo 401ks and Self-Directed IRAs.

Insights and Inspirations

  • Locally-owned businesses comprise 60 to 80 percent of the private marketplace in the average U.S. community. But economic developers and subsidies almost always overlook them.
  • At the state and local level, it’s estimated that 100 billion dollars per year is spent on attracting big corporations. And this is a tiny fraction of what actually constitutes a community’s local economy. And that’s totally backwards.
  • Communities with a higher density of locally-owned business have higher per capita job growth rate. They have less poverty. They have more civic engagement, higher voting participation, higher rates of volunteership.
  • In four years of investment crowdfunding, 700,000 people have invested almost half a billion dollars into several thousand companies and projects – overwhelmingly, disproportionately companies led by women and people of color.

Information and Links

  • Michael’s local investment handbook.
  • A piece Michael wrote on crowdfunding for Nonprofit Quarterly.
  • And a piece he wrote on decentralization for the Next System Project.
Read the podcast transcript here

Eve Picker: [00:00:09] Hi there. Thanks so much for joining me today for the latest episode of Impact Real Estate Investing. Today, I’m talking with Michael Shuman, an economist, attorney, author, entrepreneur and a go-to person on local and community economics. Michael has been credited with being one of the architects of the 2012 Jobs Act. He’s one of the fathers of investment crowdfunding. Without him, I wouldn’t have my crowdfunding platform, Small Change. Michael’s given an average of more than one invited talk per week, mostly to local governments and universities for the past 30 years, in nearly every U.S. state and more than a dozen countries. He says, “I love public speaking because it gives me an opportunity to explain difficult, arcane topics in simple, hopefully entertaining terms to people who care about their communities.”  Not being busy enough, Michael has also authored, co-authored and edited quite a few books, most recently ‘Put Your Money Where Your Life Is: How to Invest Locally Using Solo 401ks and Self-Directed IRAs.’ I’m going to learn a lot from Michael and so might you, so listen in. Be sure to go to EvePicker.com, to find out more on the show notes page for this episode. And be sure to sign up for my newsletter so you can access information about impact real estate investing and get the latest news about the exciting projects on my crowdfunding platform, Small Change.

Eve Picker: [00:01:58] Hello, Michael, I’m really delighted to have you on my show today.

Michael Shuman: [00:02:02] Great to be here.

Eve: [00:02:04] Put your money where your life is. That’s the title of your latest book. And it seemed like a really obvious statement. Why do you need to write a book about this?

Michael: [00:02:15] Well, maybe I’m just book-o-philic, that I tend to write a lot of books and that’s the way I express myself. But I did feel like there were two bodies of knowledge I was trying to bring together. One was a whole emerging body of knowledge around why local businesses and local economies are so important. And the other is this body of knowledge about how to use these somewhat obscure tax tools, the self-directed IRA and the solo 401k, For local investing. And so, bringing these two things together in a readable form, that was really the objective and I couldn’t see a way of doing that just as a pamphlet.

Eve: [00:03:05] But I suppose more than that, like why local? Who are you trying to reach with this book and why? Why do you think it’s important?

Michael: [00:03:12] Well, I would say for about 30 years, I have been on a campaign to remake economic development, and the reason is, is that I think there is a very impressive body of evidence that locally owned businesses are the key to community prosperity. They comprise 60 to 80 percent of the private marketplace in the average American community. They are highly profitable. They are highly competitive. They have done great despite the ways in which economic developers and subsidies have overlooked them. And yet, when it comes to economic development, when you talk with an economic developer for any length of time, they will tell you that their mission is to attract and retain business. And when you unpack that term, attract and retain, it’s really all about global companies. So a tiny fraction of what constitutes a community’s economy is what in fact is driving economic development. And it’s totally backwards. So, what I’ve been arguing is that we have to figure out ways of nurturing and strengthening and getting capital into local business. And if we do that and, we can really enhance jobs, income, wealth and tax receipts.

Eve: [00:04:49] We’ve got that backwards. Do we have it backwards at the local level, at the state level? What about the federal level?

Michael: [00:04:55] Every level conceivable has it backwards. At the state and local level, it’s estimated that something near 100 billion dollars per year is spent on attraction, corporate attraction. At the federal level, it’s not really corporate attraction, but what you see is all of these subsidies, which are largely going to larger businesses, big Ag, big cattle, big water, big coal, big oil and gas. I mean, you name it. And small businesses in the end are getting the crumbs. So, yeah, I think this is a systematic problem and requires some systematic solutions.

Eve: [00:05:43] How did you get interested in this?

Michael: [00:05:46] I became interested in this in a circuitous way, so I was graduated from law school in 1982 and really detested the idea of becoming a lawyer. So, I started a nonprofit in the field of peace and justice. It was called the Center for Innovative Diplomacy. And one of the things that we did in the ten or so years that this organization lasted, is we organized several thousand mayors and city council members across the United States to get involved in what we called municipal foreign policy. So, the involvement of cities and say in nuclear free zones or anti-apartheid campaigns or human rights initiatives. And I got very excited about this way of influencing international policy. But I started to think about how to get involved in economic development through these tools. And I had a partnership with an organization based in Europe that was then called Towns and Development. And you can think of Towns and Development as sort of sister cities with attitude. So, they had thousands of links between northern and southern cities built around economic development, and Towns and Development asked me to write a critique, a sort of retrospective of what at that point was more than a decade of work. And at the end of that critique, I said, you guys are doing marvelous work. You have great principles for economic development. The problem is, is that your practice of economic development has no relationship to the principles. That is, if the northern city sends a big company to the southern partner, you celebrate that as a big success. But in fact, success needed to be measured in greater self-reliance. And it was that moment that I realized I needed to pivot and start working on a whole different field. So, I wrote a book in the mid 90’s called ‘Going Local,’ and I thought it would be a one-off book. I would, you know, write it, be done. But it opened so many interesting doors that that’s really what I’ve been doing ever since.

Eve: [00:08:19] What would be good outcomes if we move towards more localized economies?

Michael: [00:08:26] If you look at the evidence out there of lots of different studies, we know that communities with a higher density of locally-owned business have higher per capita job growth rate. They have less poverty. They have more civic engagement, higher voting participation, higher rates of volunteership. We know from an EPA study that locally-owned smokestack businesses pollute about one tenth as much as their absentee-owned counterparts. We know that locally-owned businesses are the dynamism of what promotes entrepreneurship and what promotes people really being committed and excited about a stable city. So, I feel like the list is very long and compelling. And so, I really feel like if we had a world of more localized economies, we would be wealthier, we would be more equitable and we would be less likely to go to war with one another.

Eve: [00:09:37] I have to ask. Is there a gold standard city or community out there that you would point to for localized economies?

Michael: [00:09:45] I have become familiar through studies that I do with many local governments. I’ve become familiar with several hundred local governments. And honestly, there’s none that I would give better than a B or B minus to.

Eve: [00:10:03] Oh, OK.

Michael: [00:10:05] And I think part of the problem is the pernicious impact of these outdated ideas about economic development. And so what a typical city you look at, say, a Portland or a Seattle, which nominally seems like a very green kind of city. And they have all of these departments working on recycling and storm water management and energy efficiency. And by those criteria, these cities are looking really good. And then they have economic development departments that are filled with dinosaurs that all they want to do is spend vast amounts of public money to attract global companies.

Eve: [00:10:52] Yeah.

Michael: [00:10:53] And they systematically ignore their local businesses.

Eve: [00:10:56] Yeah, I live in a place like that.

Michael: [00:10:58] Pittsburgh. Yes. And, you know, in Pittsburgh has despite that, I think, become a more self reliant community. I mean, they turned, but …

Eve: [00:11:11] But you know, Michael, I think that’s because, isn’t Pittsburgh, the birthplace of community development corporations?

Michael: [00:11:18] Yes.

Eve: [00:11:20] Community development activity is very, very big here. And that’s almost like their own little localized economy. So, that may be part of the difference. Does that make sense?

Michael: [00:11:31] I think it does. And I think the other thing, I mean, I’m not intimately familiar with Pittsburgh, but one of the things as a visitor that I have noted about it is that it’s really a city of amazing neighborhoods.

Eve: [00:11:46] Yes, it is. Yep.

Michael: [00:11:47] And the definition of those neighborhoods.

Eve: [00:11:50] Physically quite distinct.

Michael: [00:11:52] Yes. I think that makes a difference, too, because people then self organize around that sense of neighborhood well-being.

Eve: [00:12:01] I think that’s right. It’s one of the things I’ve always thought about, like in when I go visit San Francisco, which is a beautiful city, one neighborhood bleeds into the other. And I’ve come to really love the very distinct neighborhood personalities here and the character, the buildings, and it’s really interesting. Yeah.

Michael: [00:12:20] I lived in San Francisco for about 10 years and I used to say to people, it’s a terrible place to visit because the only way you can enjoy San Francisco is by slowly taking it in, walking the streets, going from neighborhood to neighborhood. And there’s no way you can do justice to that as a tourist going to Alcatraz.

Eve: [00:12:47] Right. Yeah, well, that’s how I prefer to visit cities anyway. Would there be any bad outcomes if we move towards localized economies? Like what would we be missing?

Michael: [00:12:57] So, there are different conceptions of localization.  And I believe that critics of localization have in their head what I would call a theory of ‘dumb localization.’ And what it is, is it, looks at, say, what Brazil did in the 1960s with the idea that, oh, we need to build up our internal economy, we’ll put up trade barriers, we’ll put up technology transfer limits, we’ll punish people for coming into the country with long visa processes. And by that process, we will build up more internal self-reliance. That’s the way globalization fanatics think about localization. And if we do that, we will become poorer, and countries will become backward, and we will miss out. So, I really think that localization has to be defined in more market terms, that localization means consumers freely finding great local deals and goods and services and freely choosing those. It means businesses expanding to meet local needs. It means governments getting rid of subsidies that are currently favoring global businesses.

Eve: [00:14:27] So, if you were the mayor of a city that was a D on your scale, what would you do to make it an A, an A local economy?

Michael: [00:14:38] The first thing I would do is I would announce that we were not giving a penny of subsidy to any business, so that automatically would save me a good deal of money that I could spend on other things. I would create a procurement system that really looked objectively at the impacts of local business when they were potential bidders versus non-local business. And I would realize that the local businesses pay more in taxes and therefore they deserve a boost in the procurement process that objectively reflects that. I would change my city’s investment policies so that rather than putting money out in the global economy, I would, like the cities of Tucson or Phoenix, put my money in local banks so it could be re-lent to support various economic development projects. I would think about how to use municipal bonds and municipal powers of creating investment funds in order to foster various kinds of economic development projects like affordable housing or local food projects. So, there’s a long list of things that cities could do that really is hard to find any city that’s doing that right now.

Eve: [00:16:03] I mean, honestly, one of my pet peeves is most cities look outside their borders for the best consultants, whereas they often have a lot of talent inside. And that’s also one way to increase the economy of a city. And it’s a very weird dynamic, but I think you’re probably right. There are tons of things you could do.

Michael: [00:16:23] I’ve experienced that here. I live in Montgomery County, Maryland, and I can’t tell you the number of times I have bid on Montgomery County contracts. And they go for some …

Eve: [00:16:35] Oh, yeah, I can imagine.

Michael: [00:16:37] … competitive person a hundred miles away, and they lose out on the tax benefits.

Eve: [00:16:42] Yeah, I may as well be invisible in Pittsburgh, I think.

Michael: [00:16:45] Well, you’re not invisible to me and to the rest of the country, so that’s the good news.

Eve: [00:16:49] That’s the problem, right?  That we want to shift to local. So, OK. And how do you think the pandemic, I have to talk about this, might impact this trajectory? Because I have a feeling in some ways it might actually help.

Michael: [00:17:05] I think it has helped. And what I’ve noticed is that most of the cities that I’m working with have at least put the word resilience into their vocabulary and are thinking about how they can make their communities more resilient. What they haven’t realized yet is that resilience is the opposite of what David Ricardo advocated in ‘comparative advantage,’ and which is, it’s a subtlety, but at some point they’re going to realize, oh, yeah, resilience means more diversity of business. It means greater self-reliance. It means greater localization. It means what we’re doing in economic development is a little bit outdated. So, that’s going to take some time to work its way through the system. But ultimately, it will be a very good thing because we’ll be resilient not just against the next pandemic, but will be resilient on the next capital flight and the next climate catastrophe and so forth.

Eve: [00:18:11] Yeah, one of the things that’s been fascinating me about the pandemic, which I think feeds into this, is there’s definitely people moving out of cities. Not that I believe the cities will die. There’s always going to be room in Tokyo and Paris, okay, but there’s definitely a shift back to smaller places. And that means that there’ll be money in those places. And often there are main streets which are very underutilized. And I’m hopeful that those small local economies will be revitalized. That would be a good outcome in amongst this misery, right?

Michael: [00:18:44] Absolutely. I was in North Carolina. I shouldn’t have traveled there in the pandemic, but…

Eve: [00:18:51] No, that’s for sure.

Michael: [00:18:53] … I made the decision to go there when one of the curves was on the down slope. But it was a was a discussion with economic developers in the Charlotte area about how to heal the urban-rural divide. So, I did a lot of reading and thinking about this. And I actually agree with you that, I mean, if you look at the literature out there, there is an assumption that rural is dead and people are moving to the cities. And to some extent that has been true. But I think what you’re observing is really happening. That there is a turning point that has happened in rural America that a lot of people don’t appreciate. That Internet connectivity has come to much of rural America, not all of it, but much of it, that people of color, particularly immigrants are beginning to move there because it’s a cheaper place to live. And that’s diversifying rural America. We’re also seeing a lot of retirees going there and they bring Social Security and their pension savings, and that money drives the economy in different ways. So, yeah, and if you add resilience to the mix, you really see why for, not all Americans, and you’re right, you know, the great cities are still going to be great cities. But for some Americans, some fraction of millions of Americans, they will move into rural America.

Eve: [00:20:25] Yeah, we still have financing issues for investing in rural America. We have an offering on our platform right now that could not find a loan, and were told over and over again by banks that we don’t lend in rural areas. And so I think, you know, the whole financing system behind everything is also part of this story. Right?

Michael: [00:20:47] It’s another form of redlining, isn’t it?

Michael: [00:20:50] Yeah, it is. OK, well, I want to move on to regulation crowdfunding, which is the love of my life. And I know that you’ve been involved in it since day one, before I was. And I’d love you to tell us about that journey.

Michael: [00:21:04] Yeah. So. As I said earlier, one of the things that I have found fascinating in the whole discourse about local economy is that every answer to a question opens up new questions. And as I, in the 1990s and early 2000s was sort of thinking about how do we change economic development policy, I started to pay attention to the capital system and started to see how difficult it was for a small business to raise grassroots capital. And my very specific experience with this is, for about two years, and I think this was maybe 2001 to 2003, I tried to start a chicken company in the Eastern Shore of Maryland and it was going to be called Bay Friendly Chicken. It was to offer a greener alternative to what the bionic chicken that Tyson and Perdue were offering. And I started to think about ways of raising money. And I’d have meetings with securities attorneys and learn just how extraordinarily difficult …

Eve: [00:22:32] Ridiculous.

Michael: [00:22:32] And expensive it was to even get a penny of money from a grassroots investor.

Eve: [00:22:38] Yeh.

Michael: [00:22:38] And I started to think about what the rationale of this was. And they would say, well, you know, we don’t want grandma to be buying swampland in Florida. It’s always grandma. It’s always Florida. It’s always swampland. And look, I have a mother who is 97, 98 now. I don’t want her buying swampland in Florida. But what does my mother do with her money? My mother goes to the local casino. She lives in St. Louis. And when she goes to the casino, do they say to her, Mrs. Shuman, excuse me, but are you an accredited gambler? No. I mean, and she is not an accredited gambler. She is, you know, she is one of tens of millions of Americans who enter into thousands of casinos and they can lose everything independent of their income.

Eve: [00:23:40] Yes.

Michael: [00:23:41] And yet we never regulate that. And so that contradiction was like a chicken bone in my throat. And 2008 crisis came and I said, you know, I’m going to start writing about this. So, I wrote a piece for the Federal Reserve. They have a community journal.

Eve: [00:24:00] Okay.

Michael: [00:24:01] And basically made the suggestion that there should be a 100 dollar exemption in securities law, that any human being should be able to put 100 hundred dollars into a business with absolutely no legal work whatsoever. Lawyer Free Zone. And some friends of mine kind of got wind of this. They wrote a rule-making petition to the SEC, Securities and Exchange Commission, and hundreds of people wrote letters in support. So, that was sort of the beginning of a lot of conversations and there were other people who were simultaneously doing similar conversations. And then, I remember there was a hearing on Capitol Hill about a proposed crowdfunding bill introduced by Patrick McHenry, conservative of North Carolina. And I remember the head of the SEC was being grilled by Tea Party Republicans. And I was sitting in the room watching this. And they asked her, they said, you know, you’ve got a proposal in front of you for a one hundred dollar exemption. What have you done with it? And at this point, unemployment in the country was running at about 10 percent because of the Great Recession. And she responded with such condescension and contempt and said, look, we get these kinds of proposals all the time. And, yeah, you know, we’ll get around to them …

[00:25:47] Oooh.

[00:25:47] … and the Congresspeople left and right, were, like, outraged. We have unprecedented unemployment. We know that local businesses can help fix this. And yet you in the SEC are systematically ignoring the simplest of reforms. That committee voted unanimously in favor of McHenry’s proposal and the House supermajority passed it. Now, where McHenry went with crowdfunding was not where I suggested. He actually originally suggested a ten thousand dollar exemption for people. And then it got whittled back to two thousand dollars. And all of these additional regulatory things got put on it. So, it was half a loaf, but it was something. And I think crowdfunding has been a qualified success. The bill was passed in 2012. It took four unnecessary years of haggling for the SEC and FINRA to put forward rules for implementation. But in the four years since, the data show 700,000 people putting in almost half a billion dollars into several thousand companies and projects, and that the beneficiaries have been overwhelmingly, disproportionately companies led by women and people of color. I think it’s doing some good things out there.

Eve: [00:27:26] Yeah, no, I agree. Well, this is what we use on our platform. And I think it also helps for us, those real estate developers who are doing really innovative and necessary projects, sometimes small, that most banks don’t want to deal with. And so, that also propels the economy forward. When you have someone thinking about how to deal with the affordable housing crisis and they can’t get a loan for their project idea, that’s a problem. So, there’s lots of ways that this has helped. It’s a fantastic rule, but it’s got a long way to go. What’s the silliest thing, do you think about this rule? I can probably give you a lot of those, but I’d like to know what you think.

Michael: [00:28:12] What’s the silliest thing about the rule? Well, the silliest thing is something they just fixed. And it wasn’t so much that it was implicit in this rule. It was a long standing piece of securities law. But they finally, in their discretion, got rid of it. And that was prohibiting businesses and grassroots investors, from having conversations before the formality of the issue was done. And this idea in securities law that communication will somehow pollute the marketplace has got it fundamentally backwards. Communication is what lays the foundation for a marketplace. And when there is a conversation between a real estate project and a grassroots investor before there is any formal transaction, it should be a moment of celebration, not a moment of repression. And when the SEC finally, finally, finally put in some rule changes in the first week of November, which most people overlooked because there was an election happening.

Eve: [00:29:25] Oh, I didn’t overlook it.

Michael: [00:29:27] Of course, what election?

Eve: [00:29:33] But I’m you know, I’m on the federal register every day looking for the thing to be posted.

Michael: [00:29:38] Right. Right. We’re still waiting, aren’t we?

Eve: [00:29:40] Yes. So, for people listening, you know, the rules are not implemented until 60 days after they’re posted on the federal register. And so while there was a vote, it’s still not moving along. Right, Michael?

Michael: [00:29:53] Right. Right. I think $2,200 per person is too low a number. I think it should be higher. I do think it’s getting the number that a company or a project can raise, from a little over a million dollars to five million is a very big step forward.

Eve: [00:30:13] I should probably, like, take a break and just explain to listeners who don’t know about regulation crowdfunding that this is really the first step towards democratizing investment. It’s a rule that permits everyday people, everyone, not just accredited investors, to invest in businesses or real estate projects that developers bring to them, and business owners bring to them. And they do that by requiring platforms, called funding portals, to be registered with the SEC and to be members of FINRA, the Financial Regulatory Agency, to sort of manage this business of putting everyday investors together with businesses. And the rule really started out as having a cap of 1.07 million that businesses could raise every year, and permitting everyone to invest 2,200 a year, not per project, a year. If they want to invest more than that there is a calculation around income and net worth, and it even capped what accredited investors could invest in. Even Warren Buffett is not currently permitted to invest more than 107,000 a year.

Eve: [00:31:24] So, these upgrades raise the cap that you can raise through an offering to five million dollars. And while they do not raise that $2,200 cap, they do raise what unaccredited investors can invest by changing the way the net worth and income calculation is made, which is a good thing. And they also permit accredited investors to invest as much as they want. So, these are pretty big steps forward, right, Michael? And then the thing that you care a lot about is the ‘test the water’ piece, which I agree with you on.

Michael: [00:31:57] Yeah, that’s a very good explanation. And one other thing I would just add for your listeners is that sometimes there’s confusion about donation crowdfunding with investment crowdfunding. And donation crowdfunding on sites like Kickstarter, Indiegogo, that has been always permitted because donations are not securities, and securities are what are heavily regulated and that’s, those regulations are what we are talking about.

Eve: [00:32:27] Right. If you go to Small Change or you go to Wefunder or any of those sites and you invest, you really become an investor in the capital stack of that business or that development project. And there’s an offering made, an offering of what the business owner might return to you because you invest in their projects.

Michael: [00:32:49] Yeah, and I think it’s worth saying to your listeners why this is so revolutionary. And for the last 10 years, at least when I was able to talk to audiences in person, which you can’t do now, still, I would I would ask them three questions. And the first question was, by show of hands, how many of you have mindfully bought something locally, maybe at a farmers market over the last week and almost all the hands go up. People love their local businesses and they love the things in their economy. And then I ask, well, OK, how many of you have a show of hands do your banking at a locally-owned bank or credit union. Half the hands go down. And then I say, those of you with pension funds, how many of you put at least one percent of your pension funds in these local businesses that are 60 to 80 percent of your economy, and all the hands go down. And suddenly people realize, oh, my god, why is that? Why is all of my money going to the global minority of businesses in the economy rather than supporting the projects and the businesses that I love? And it’s all about securities law. So, what this law represents is the beginning of a transformation, so that we are putting our money into the things that matter in our life.

Eve: [00:34:24] Yes, so you know the way I think that the SEC and FINRA missed the mark with this rule is, the amount of due diligence the platforms have to do is really burdensome. And you have to remember that these platforms are startup businesses. They’re small businesses trying to support other small businesses. And a small business can’t afford a full-time compliance officer. And essentially, that’s really what you need to be able to run one of these platforms. So, I think you’re right. If someone is going to invest $2,000 dollars, do you really need to have all of the burden of, I mean, the rule, that if I told you everything we have to do, it’s nuts. We do it because we have to, but it is a lot. So, that’s my pet peeve.

Michael: [00:35:13] Yeah, I think it’s a very important one. And I worry that your platform and many of the other platforms are going to have challenges long-term because the regulatory burdens are so high and that limits your ability to just pay the basic bills and keep the lights on.

Eve: [00:35:36] Oh, yeah. I mean, insurance for our platform is over $40,000 a year.

Michael: [00:35:41] Wow.

Eve: [00:35:42] That in itself is huge. I mean, the compliance piece of it, figured that out in the first few years and we have, come to a simplified and efficient system. So, that’s less of a problem for us now. It was excruciating in the early years, but there are expenses that just never go away and it’s hard to catch up with those. Insurance is a really big one because the insurance industry doesn’t understand this. This is a nascent industry that’s emerging and they are going to charge top dollar until there’s thousands of platforms like this.

Michael: [00:36:20] It’s outrageous. But let me just say, I love your platform. I love its personality. I love the things that you are putting on there. I think it’s unique and it’s mission-driven. And I think over time you will enjoy success that many of your competitors do not because they are not mission-driven or they are not distinguishable from one another in the same way yours is. And yours is after mission-oriented real estate. And I think now that the ceiling has been raised from one million to five million, I think a lot more projects are going to be coming on to your site. And that augurs well for your future.

Eve: [00:37:05] Yeah, I hope so. I think the missing piece still, and I’m going to keep that in mind in my dark moments when things are difficult as only they can be in a small business, I think still investor education is the most difficult piece. And there’s a lot for people to learn who’ve never been able to invest like this before. No matter what, they invest in, it’s a leap. And that’s really, I think, probably the hardest part of this. But what would the ultimate end goal be for this ruling in your mind? What should it be?

Michael: [00:37:41] I think currently Americans have about 56 trillion dollars invested in stocks, bonds, mutual funds, pension funds and insurance funds. So, those are all the long-term securities. And right now, about 99 percent of them are in global companies. I would like to see, say, 80 percent of that money in the locally owned businesses and real estate projects that they belong in. And when that happens, I will think we have achieved real success.

Eve: [00:38:20] Wow, that would be amazing.

Michael: [00:38:22] And, you know, it works out per capita. You know, earlier I said that the range, depending on how you define local business, is 60 to 80 percent of the private economy is local. So let’s take 60 percent. So 60 percent of 56 trillion dollars, you know, works out to 30 plus trillion dollars and dividing that by the number of Americans out there, 330 million. It’s about $100,000 per capita. So, I encourage listeners to think about your community, say you live in a 10,000 person community, multiply that number by 100,000 per capita. And that’s what the benefits of local investment could be for your community. It is hard to imagine a more significant stimulus that you could bring to your economy than bringing local investment in.

Eve: [00:39:21] Yeah, you’re right. So, you are a very busy guy. You’re a prolific author, prolific speaker. I think I read somewhere that you speak once a week. Professor, consultant. What do you love doing the most and why?

Michael: [00:39:38] Well, more and more, I love teaching. I mean, I’ve always loved teaching. I taught as a way of paying my bills at law school at Stanford. I taught a writing class. And I still teach now, and I have the privilege for the last four years of teaching at Bard Business School, which is a sustainability-oriented program. And the school is expanding and my course load is expanding. And I’m really, I’m liking that a lot because I think young people now are so much smarter than …

Eve: [00:40:15] Than we were?

Michael: [00:40:16] … the people I remember. I don’t want, Eve, you were very smart person, so I don’t want to say “we.” I’m going to only take this route myself. But when I was, when I was younger, the way that you changed the world was, And this is, again, from the law school perspective, that I would take a job for about $5,000 a year working for Ralph Nader as a Nader’s Raider. And that was doing good. And then, as I understood that world better, I realized, oh, what that world is all about is spending all of your time begging for money from rich people or rich foundations. And that’s how they made ends meet. And I did that for about 20 years and I was pretty good at that, but today’s young people have a different view of the world. They see the way to change the world is through mission-oriented business, and that by having great businesses out there doing great things, they can change the planet faster. And I think they’re right. And so, I love my role as a teacher to support them in that work.

Eve: [00:41:32] And so, like, my final big question is, this is the wrap up question. What’s next for you?

Michael: [00:41:39] So, what’s next for me is I am going to try to start soon a very simple newsletter that lists all of the local investment-oriented blogs, and all the local investment-oriented sites, and all the local investment-oriented people to try to get some glue, to hold all these various pieces together. Because I feel like there’s a proliferation of organizations, a proliferation of sites. But the big picture is still not quite there. So, I see a kind of a swan song act as I get into my mid-60s, a swan song act of really being a networker and bringing of people together for this larger cause. So, that’s that’s my next act.

Eve: [00:42:38] Well, I can’t wait to see the list, and I really enjoyed the conversation.

Michael: [00:42:43] I did as well. Thanks so much, Eve.

Eve: [00:42:45] Thank you.

Eve: [00:42:56] That was Michael Shuman. In everything he does, Michael is focused on the little guy or girl. He firmly believes that our robust economy would not be so robust without all of those little Main Street businesses and startups. And so he follows through on that belief every day, in his support of investment crowdfunding, in the lectures he gives, in his teachings, in the books he writes and in his consulting engagements with local governments. You can find out more about impact real estate investing and access to the show notes for today’s episode at my website, EvePicker.com. While you’re there, sign up for my newsletter to find out more about how to make money in real estate while building better cities. Thank you so much for spending your time with me today. And thank you, Michael, for sharing your thoughts. We’ll talk again soon. But for now, this is Eve Picker signing off to go make some change.

Image courtesy of Michael H,. Shuman

Why modular construction?

February 22, 2021

Modular construction is the construction of buildings using modules or prefabricated sections. Manufactured off-site, using assembly line production, modules are fabricated from standard building materials and are built to meet or exceed the building codes of conventional buildings. They can be manufactured without compromising on quality and can meet sophisticated design specifications, including matching existing building aesthetics. After manufacture, the modules are delivered to the building site where they are installed in any specified configuration before being connected together to make an entire building. After assembly, modular buildings are effectively identical to conventional site-built buildings.

If you have been paying attention to the conversation about affordable housing or environmental sustainability in construction, you may have heard of modular construction.

Here are some advantages:

  • Manufacturing can occur at the same time as foundation and site work, reducing construction time
  • Factory manufacture means less waste as inventory is controlled and building materials are weather protected
  • Factory manufacture also reduces the risk of weather delays
  • Prefabrication causes less site disturbance
  • Modular buildings can be disassembled and recycled reducing the overall demand for building materials as well as energy use
  • Manufacturing in a factory-controlled environment means less air pollution


Scott Flynn founded  indieDwell, a modular home company that grew from a one per quarter build to 10 per week in the first four years. IndieDwell began by focusing on affordable modular homes made from shipping containers. Although shipping containers are an amazing form of recycling,  they’re very complicated to use, especially for commercial projects which have more restrictive codes. So, because indieDwell’s mission is to put as many people into high quality, healthy homes as possible, they are in the process of switching to a steel studded frame system. Like the shipping containers before them, the modules will be high performance, energy efficient, durable and sustainable. And the new modules will lower the price of homes even further.

Scott is manufacturing change. Listen in to my podcast conversation with Scott to learn more.

Image from PxHere

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

sign up here

APPLY TO BE A PODCAST GUEST

More to See

The Seven

August 29, 2025

Real estate and women.

February 26, 2025

Oculis Domes.

February 25, 2025

FOLLOW

  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Tag Cloud

Affordable housing Climate Community Creative economy Crowdfunding Design Development Environment Equity Finance FinTech Gentrification Impact Investing Mobility Offering Opportunity zones PropTech Technology Visionary Zoning

Footer

©rethinkrealestateforgood.co. The information contained on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this website is intended as investment, legal, tax or accounting strategy or advice, or constitutes an offer to sell, solicit or buy securities.
 
Any projections discussed or made may not be accurate and do not guarantee a specific outcome. All projections or investments are subject to risk due to uncertainty and change, including the risk of loss, and past performance is not indicative of future results. You should make independent decisions and seek independent advice regarding investments or strategies mentioned on this website.

Recent

  • Vacant Upper Floors: Unlocking Downtown Housing
  • Podcast hiatus.
  • Pop City: Changing the Conversation
  • The Mulberry
  • Mount Vernon Plaza

Search

Categories

Climate Community Crowdfunding Development Equity Fintech Investing Mobility Proptech Visionary

 

Copyright © 2026 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in