• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Say hello
Rethink Real Estate. For Good.

Rethink Real Estate. For Good.

  • Podcast
  • Posts
  • In the news
  • Speaking and media
    • About Eve
    • Speaking requests
    • Speaking engagements
    • Press kit
  • Investment opportunities

Climate

Mass timber for the masses.

April 7, 2021

Scott Ehlert is the co-founder of Fabric Workshop, a company focused on low carbon, mass timber building technologies for California’s livable future. Scott is designing a proprietary hollow core mass timber plate, column, and wall system that uses 50% less wood fiber and will cost 10-35% less overall than for a CLT (cross laminated timber) structure. The system will also provide installation benefits like integrated MEP (mechanical, electrical, plumbing), acoustic insulation and fire performance. And, as if that is not enough, Scott is also designing a robotic fabrication facility to anchor a new wood product innovation campus, in California.

Scott’s background is an unlikely one for an entrepreneur in mass timber. He spent years in the  production and logistics management of concerts, private and corporate events, and national experiential marketing campaigns before pivoting to system design strategies that leveraged research, data and design to meet high-level business objectives.

While consulting for some of the largest companies in the real estate and construction space, Scott recognized a massive need for desirable middle-income housing that wasn’t being met by the market. So, he left his agency and started on the journey of what would become Fabric Workshop.

This is a story of sheer stick-to-itness!

Insights and Inspirations

  • The mass timber industry is actually being accelerated by forest fires. The neglected undergrowth throughout 32 million square miles of forest in California, has became the perfect kindling for infernos. California (and Scott) are determined to turn that kindling into an industry.
  • Scott is focused on the “next generation” of mass timber products. This is a “cassette system” – a hollow-core system of wood housing building systems, insulation and more. These systems are already being used in Japan and Europe with great success.
  • Kick-starting an industry around this model could both reduce building costs and potentially aid in filling the huge deficit of housing in California.
  • And if this is not enough of a challenge to solve, Scott is also designing and building an automated and robotic manufacturing facility to build his cassette systems.

Information and Links

  • The Nature Conservancy: Let’s stop megafires before they start!
  • Scott also wanted to point to this New York Times article about leaps forward in construction and design using engineered wood.
  • And this piece from ProPublica, on ways to keep people and homes safer from wildfires.
Read the podcast transcript here

Eve Picker: [00:00:14] Hi there, thanks for joining me on Rethink Real Estate. I’m on a mission to make real estate work for everyone. Real estate can help to solve climate change, can house people affordably, can create beautiful streetscapes, unify neighborhoods and enliven cities. So I’m on a journey to find the most creative thinkers and doers out there. I’m not the only one who wants to rethink real estate. You can learn more about me at EvePicker.com or you can find me at SmallChange.co, a real estate crowdfunding platform with impact real estate investment opportunities open for investment right now. And if you want to support this podcast, join me at Patreon.com/rethinkrealestate, where there are special opportunities for my friends and followers.

Eve: [00:01:18] Today, I’m talking with Scott Ehlert, co-founder of Fabric Workshop, a company focused on low carbon, mass timber building technologies for California’s livable future. Scott is designing a proprietary hollow core mass timber plate column and wall system that uses 50 percent less wood fiber and will cost ten to 35 percent less overall than for a CLT structure. His system will also provide installation benefits like integrated MEP, acoustic and fire performance. And as if that is not enough, Scott is also designing a robotic fabrication facility to anchor a new wood product innovation campus in California to help in the state’s wildfire efforts. Scott’s background is an unlikely one for an entrepreneur in mass timber. He spent years in the production and logistics management of concerts, private and corporate events, and national experiential marketing campaigns before pivoting to system design strategies that leveraged research, data and design to meet high level business objectives. While consulting for some of the largest companies in the real estate and construction space, Scott recognized a massive need for desirable middle-income housing that wasn’t being met by the market. So, he left his agency and started on the journey of what would become Fabric Workshop. This is a story of sheer stick-to-it-ness.

Eve: [00:03:04] If you’d like to join me in my quest to rethink real estate, there are two simple things you can do. Share this podcast or go to Patreon.com/rethinkrealestate to learn about special opportunities for my friends and followers and subscribe if you can.

Eve: [00:03:33] Hello Scott, I’m so pleased to have you on my show.

Scott Ehlert: [00:03:37] Thank you. Yeah, good to be here.

Eve: [00:03:39] So you’ve had a fascinating and pretty astounding career, from concert and event management to design and strategic consulting, to property technology. So, I wanted to start with what you’re doing right now. What are you doing right now?

Scott: [00:03:57] Yeah, great question. Yeah. So we are, I’ve created a company called Fabric Workshop and we are pioneering a new next generation mass timber manufacturer. We manufacture in California and a fabrication, a digital and robotic fabrication facility to bring those next generation Messmer panels to life.

Eve: [00:04:20] So what does the next generation mass timber panel mean?

Scott: [00:04:26] Yeah, so, you know, we kind of started our journey looking at the cost of housing. And, you know, as you mentioned, I worked as a design strategy consultant for many years and I kind of had run my course in that in that career and was looking for something new and something for, you know, a bit more impactful. And really started looking at housing, which was the most kinda pressing thing in my life as I was starting a family and seeing how so many of my friends and peers in California were leaving the state because of the cost of housing or were in a constant state of financial and mental pressure due to housing. And I also consulted with quite a few really large companies, just by chance in my design consulting days, worked with some of the largest companies in the housing and real estate space in the United States and just saw this, you know, kind of looming existential crisis around housing affordability. And, you know, when the housing affordability comes up, we love to kind of cut out the perennial teachers and firefighters, as you know, our benchmarks for who can afford housing. But what we were seeing was that housing was really kind of impacting bankers and doctors. We were you were talking to doctors who were having to have roommates in the Bay Area because they couldn’t afford the housing.

Eve: [00:05:54] Wow.

Scott: [00:05:54] And so there was this kind of big, big question of like, how do we make housing? How do we create housing in California that’s affordable to middle income folks we traditionally call the middle-class. And so that started us down a really long journey and looking at just a year long process of just listening and asking questions and sitting in the back of rooms and talking with as many folks in the in the industry as possible. And it became really clear that how we build and the type of projects we build were really kind of fundamental to, this seems kind of obvious, the kind of fundamental to the cost of housing. And so, you know, we really started to look at how we can build things differently and what with the technologies available out there to help them offset these costs.

Eve: [00:06:53] So let’s back up a bit. Like for some people listening, they may not know what mass timber is, which is kind of all the rage in the architecture building industry, but perhaps not something that most people know about.

Scott: [00:07:06] Yes, so mass timber is kind of the catchall phrase for what is a range of engineered wood products similar to glulam beams. The most prominent is cross-laminated timber or CLT. And that’s, the that’s the type that you’ll see turning up most often. And what CLT is, is just that, it’s cross-thatched, and kind of cross-threaded dimensional lumber, 2x6s and 2x4s, laid out in a giant press with glue. And then that press puts extreme pressure on those panels and that glue and turns it into essentially a giant butcher block. It turns it into a more or less a solid piece of wood. And those panels can be 12 feet tall and 12 inches wide and 40 feet long or larger, in some cases.

Eve: [00:08:00] Smaller, non-structural pieces of wood, glued together and engineered in such a way that they become much larger structural elements.

Scott: [00:08:09] Yes. And then they take on some really incredible structural properties. So, you know, they are stronger and lighter than steel. Stronger and lighter than concrete. You know, it’s an incredible product. It has been widely adopted in Europe and into East Asia and Japan. And it’s just starting to kind of trickle up in the United States. And as you said, it’s kind of all the rage right now. Everybody’s talking about CLT and there’s a lot of hopes and prayers being put on CLT as the, you know, the silver bullet that’s going to save us from our cost of housing.

Eve: [00:08:46] So it’s cheaper than steel and other structural elements. Is that what you’re saying?

Scott: [00:08:52] Um, no, that’s kind of the problem, that’s the that’s the challenge with it, is that while it does have these incredible attributes, you know, speed of construction is one of them. You know, these are essentially printed building panels. You know, you can get an entire wall or, you know, five, half a dozen panels to make an entire floor plate of a large building. And so you’re seeing buildings, you know, eight story buildings go up in two weeks. Right. It’s all crammed in. It’s all kind of flat packed like, an IKEA footer. Pre-cut, pre-manufactured, there’s no saws on site, no hammers. You know, nobody’s doing anything manual on site. They’re just essentially cramming these giant plates into place and a small crew catching the plates and then screwing them into place with some really advanced metal connectors to hold this together.

Eve: [00:09:51] But the materials themselves are expensive…

Scott: [00:09:54] Right.

Eve: [00:09:55] But you’re saving, you’re saving time on the site. You’re saving uncertainties like weather. Because they are factory built.

Scott: [00:10:03] Yes, exactly.

Eve: [00:10:05]  Insurance you’re saving.

Scott: [00:10:09] Yeah. Insurance is still kind of a question mark. It’s still very new in the US. So, the insurance has not quite caught up yet, but it is completely a completely safe product that has to go through a very rigorous testing process called PRG 320. And that is the fire certification process. And it’s also been the new international building codes updates around mass timber and CLT. So they’re able to build much larger buildings now. So, you know, 18 plus stories, large warehouse facilities, distribution centers, you know, these very large type two, type four type structures can now be built with mass timber.

Eve: [00:10:47] So, in balance then, if you can save all of these site costs, will it provide a less expensive solution? And especially for, you know, what you’re focused on, which is what I understand, the missing middle housing, those smaller infill lots that maybe are not as efficient as a huge 800-unit building, but certainly helped to kind of just stitch cities together, right?

Scott: [00:11:17] Yeah, exactly. So, when we were looking at CLT, we want to have all of the benefits of CLT, but without the biggest drawback and the biggest drawback of CLT, or there’s a couple of other variants like DLT, which is dowel laminated timber, which is they use wooden dowels to connect the boards together, or NLT, which is nail laminated timber, which is just that the boards are stuck together with nails. The biggest drawback with them is, with those technologies, is they just use a lot of wood. There’s just no way around it. It’s a giant butcher block and so, you know, and it uses dimensional lumber, the same lumber that stick frame builders use and modular builders use. You know, when you go to Home Depot and buy, you know, Doug fir for your deck, that’s the same stuff that goes into CLT. And so, you know, it’s a commodity product and they’re using a lot of commodity product. It’s susceptible to high prices and that there’s just no way around that. And so, you know, I don’t know how anybody that started a CLT project a year ago is going to make those projects pencil today. What, the cost of dimensional lumber up to, what, two hundred percent or something like that over year over year. Right?

Eve: [00:12:34] Why is it up so high?

Scott: [00:12:36] Yeah, so…

Eve: [00:12:37] I’m sorry. I’m completely new to this so I’m learning.

Scott: [00:12:40] Absolutely. Yeah. Yeah. No, this is you know, we are we are incredibly focused on the forestry and supply side. You know, we are kind of a hybrid between a housing prefab re-manufacturer and a forestry company, in particular the wildfire side, so I can definitely share more on that. And so, yes, you know, the implications on the lumber costs are, have a big, big impact. And lumber prices were already going up, right, there was just limited supply. There’s limited companies involved in the forestry space. And everybody’s going out to the same suppliers, like, you know, in the US. Dimensional lumber on the West Coast comes primarily from British Columbia, Washington and Oregon. And Idaho and Montana to a lesser extent. But those are the three kind of major producing markets and everybody’s buying it. Right. And even if you’re on the East Coast, a lot of people want that, like the aesthetic and material qualities of West Coast feedstock. And it’s primarily Doug fir. That’s what everybody wants. And so there’s just high demand, it’s just a supply and demand, and then Covid came and just threw a giant wrench into all of that. The mills shut down, the logging shut down, and everybody thought the housing and construction industry would collapse with Covid. But just the opposite happened. There was a huge remodel boom, a huge push for new homes in the suburbs. People were trying to get more space. And so the macron effects of that are that an industry that was already under high demand pressures is now under extreme demand pressures. And then they took their capacity offline for a period of time with Covid. And now they’re just trying to play catch up. And the industry in 2019 is already at record highs. And now we are just, it’s just through the roof, you know, OSB board, plywood of all that down the stack is all impacted by this. And so, when prices are just really high so CLT or DLT, NLT that’s just going to be less price competitive now than they were before.

Eve: [00:15:00] Interesting. So let’s go back to what you’re trying to solve and what your solution looks like. And then we can talk about how the last year has impacted that.

Scott: [00:15:11] Yeah, absolutely. Yeah. So, you know, that use of material is kind of fundamental to our approach. And, you know, we were really pursuing a CLT based product initially. But when we, when that reality of the the material cost, the fiber cost, just was the 100 pound gorilla in the room, there’s no way around it. It’s going to just do more research. Kind of went back to the table and some to look at those more mature markets in Europe and Japan and started to see this kind of, as I was saying, the next generation of mass timber products coming out where they’ve already kind of gone through that and recognize that, you know, a CFT panel is not necessarily the ideal product for a lot of building types, particularly smaller and faster buildings. And so what they’re using now is what are kind of known as cassette systems. They, these are a panelized approach, just like CLT, but they’re taking the fiber out. And so, what they’re doing is, they’ll be more or less there’s like two kind of sandwich layers, a top and a bottom and then a structure on the inside of those two sandwich pieces that give it the structural integrity. So you get a box-like panel with a hollow core and that removes a substantial amount you know 50, 60 percent of the fiber, from those panels, driving the cost down while still maintaining the structural integrity of a full kind of solid wood panel.

Eve: [00:16:47] Like a hollow core door, but not as flimsy?

Scott: [00:16:53] Exactly. A hollow core door that you could build an eight-story building out of.

Eve: [00:16:58] Yeah, yeah.

Scott: [00:16:58] There’s a membrane, a structure on the inside of that hollow core that gives it its strength. Ingenuity at play here. Companies are now taking advantage of that cavity to include things that would normally be exposed in a CLT building. So, CLT with the solid wood in place, all of your MEP systems, your electrical, your plumbing, your lighting, all of that can’t run in the middle of the plate. It’s solid wood. Right. And so it has to be hung underneath or run in interior walls or both in most cases. But with these hollow core cassette systems, you can actually run those MEP systems inside the cavity of the floor plate. So, it gives it a much cleaner and tight aesthetic.

Eve: [00:17:46] Yeah, yeah.

Scott: [00:17:48] And then you can also add additional elements to those cavities. So you can add acoustic materials, you can add insulating materials to increase the R value. You can add seismic and fire safety materials in there. And so you can actually get a much thinner for floor plate overall than CLT, where you have to then just have any piece stuff hanging beneath it. With CLT, a lot of that insulating and acoustic and dampening performance has to be laid on top. And it’s generally a really thick concrete layer that’s poured on top of the wood panel. So, a lot of people with CLT they think that you get to see all the wood, but in most cases you don’t. Actually, on the floor plate it’s kind of covered in five inches of concrete and gypsum and all that stuff. So, the cassette systems are a really genius kind of approach to a lot of those challenges with CLT.

Eve: [00:18:44] And it means less time on site, by the sounds of it.

Scott: [00:18:48] It does, yes. But the flip side of all of this is that it does add complexity and you do have to be in much deeper coordination with your trades very early in the process to coordinate where all of those runs are going through those plates so that the connection points on site are all, you know, when you when you’re doing a small prefabricated, a lot of it’s going to be automated. And so, the tolerances are down to the millimeter. So things have to be tight. There’s no change orders, I guess. So there’s no saws, there’s no handsaws or circular saws on site to fix problems. Everything has to be really, really tight. So that really, kind of, front loads the design and the engineering process. And all of the trades have to be at the table very early. And so, it’s a very different process than a standard site build construction. You know, that’s the trade-off. Is that the process that has to adapt to the material.

Eve: [00:19:47] Just listening to you speak of it sounds to me like you might be enjoying that process.

Scott: [00:19:53] Yes, very much so. Yes. As somebody that that worked in design and system design and customer experience design, you know, all of that thinking is really, you know, and you can see the outcomes, right?

Eve: [00:20:07] Yes.

Scott: [00:20:08] You know, you can go and tour these sites in in Europe and parts of Australia, where they’re being, you know the sophisticated approaches, is happening in Japan and particularly Central Europe, where this market is very mature. I mean, you’re seeing build costs in major urban markets, you know, down to 140-150 dollars a square foot.

Eve: [00:20:29] Oh, that’s extraordinary.

Scott: [00:20:31] Whereas in San Francisco, you’re at, what, 750-850 a square foot for a poor-quality building.

Eve: [00:20:39] Yeah.

Scott: [00:20:39] That’s what we’re kind of chasing. Right. Like that’s the that’s the end goal is to build out the system that can drive towards those better pricing outcomes and make housing more affordable.

Eve: [00:20:50] Where are you in your process right now? You’ve been at this for how long?

Scott: [00:20:56] We’re now officially into year three, so it’s a long and winding road. As I mentioned, with our company, with Fabric Workshop, there’s this really big wildfire and forestry component to it. So, we are focused very much on the California market. We’re based in California. We by no means will turn clients away, that’s in a neighboring state. But the challenge in California is so enormous that we feel like that so many other housing starts to take on like a national approach. And we feel that we just need to be very specific to California and the codes and the and the challenges and the crisis that that’s at hand here and that it’s a big enough opportunity that it can justify that. The new housing element numbers are coming in across the state. And, you know, we’re going to need two million units of housing in the next, within the next 10 years. You know, it’s just a staggering number of housing. And so that that volume actually presents a really powerful opportunity to impact another, maybe bigger crisis at hand in the state of California. And that’s the wildfire situation here. And so, I don’t know, I’m sure you’ve seen that on the news.

Eve: [00:22:21] Oh, yeah. I mean, I’m Australian, I don’t know if you realize from my accent, so I’ve lived with it.

Scott: [00:22:27] Yes, that’s right. Right. So, yeah, in California, you know, five of California’s six largest fires in modern history were all, all happened last year. And they were all burning at the same time. Right. When four million acres of forest burned across the state last year, which was double the previous record, which was just in the previous couple of years. You know, it’s just really staggering, right? There was nearly ten thousand separate fires across California last year. And the fire season is growing, right? Climate change, drought is driving more extreme fire seasons. And so, we’re now seeing fire season in 2020 is 75 days longer than it was 20 years ago, just 20 years ago. And that’s two months longer, two and a half months longer. And so there’s this overarching kind of pressing need to fix that. And one of the best things that we can do is to get this excess unnatural growth out of our forests and turn it into wood products. So our forests in California are completely overgrown, grossly overgrown, naturally overgrown. We have, for the last hundred years, we’ve taken a policy of complete fire suppression.

Eve: [00:23:52] That’s really interesting. Yeah, because fire is an actual regeneration of forests and that’s what was brought up on me.

Scott: [00:24:02] Exactly.

Scott: [00:24:02] They happen for a reason. So, you have to just control them.

Scott: [00:24:07] Yes. Yes. And so we actually have to go back to a natural fire cycle where we’re not stopping fires. We’re actually letting fires happen. But in order for that to take place without being so destructive, like they are now, is we have to get all of that overgrowth that was the result of stopping fires in the forests.

Eve: [00:24:26] That’s really interesting, though.

Scott: [00:24:28] Yeah.

Eve: [00:24:29] But my question is, is why were they stopped? I’ve always thought that the push of, you know, the spread of cities into forests. I mean, I’ve seen it in Australia, you know, as housing popped up in amongst the forests. Of course, you want to stop fires there. And that also exacerbated the problem because, you know, you have this push and pull between people who want to live in those places and the natural the natural forest. It’s a mess.

Scott: [00:24:58] Yeah, right it is. Yeah. That’s a huge, huge driver to it that that growth is called the WUI. It’s the WUI and that’s the wilderness urban interface. And that that growth, particularly since the 90s, has just been exponential as we’ve continued to sprawl ever farther outward in California. We’ve pushed our towns and cities, the perimeter, more and more into that WUI. And so that’s been a big, big driver as well as the, you know, the agricultural, livestock and forestry industries in the 20th century. They didn’t want fires. And you combine that with just a…

Eve: [00:25:44] Yeah

Scott: [00:25:44] Very. What’s the term? I mean, what’s the word? How do you describe it?

Eve: [00:25:48] It’s a manmade problem.

Scott: [00:25:51] Yeah, yeah. And just a desire to control nature, you know, is man’s desire , the man emphasis there to control nature and dictate, basically saying fires are evil and treating them as a as an enemy that needed to be defeated.

Eve: [00:26:07] When I was young in Sydney, Australia. I mean, I remember bush fires. Like Sydney’s a huge….

Scott: [00:26:12] Bush fires. Yeah.

Eve: [00:26:12] I remember in the middle of the city, seeing just red and grey sky all around me. But there wasn’t the pain and misery of today because not, there was not nearly as much suburban housing – it pushed into the wilderness.

Scott: [00:26:31] Yeah. Yep. Yep. And that’s the same here. That’s just an overarching problem that needs to be solved. And there’s really no easy solution to it. The state now has about 33 million acres of forest, which is bigger than Oregon, and 13 million of them are considered very high risk. These are drought affected, beetle infected, because of lots of dead trees, and they have just this extreme level of overgrowth and that overgrowth are small and medium diameter trees. Those are the trees that normally would have been cleaned out by natural wildfires. And because there was no natural wildfires, they just exploded. And what they do, the small and medium diameter trees, they’re much more susceptible to fire, but they’re also tall enough to carry the fire into the canopies of the healthy, strong trees. And that’s where we get these infernos that then get the wind picks up in the canopy and carries it from tree to tree. And it just creates these, this tinder box. So, we have to get those small and medium diameter trees out of the forest. And right now, they have no value. They’re used for livestock, mulch, woodchips in your yard. And that’s not a valuable enough product to justify the cost of thinning, mechanical thinning. And mechanical thinning is a laborious, hard job. You have to, you know, carry chainsaws and particularly if we want to take a much more ecological approach to forestry thinning and not clear cut and carve up all of these fire roads that cause horrible erosion. The state’s trying to avoid the forestry problems of the past. So, it’s all done, a lot of that has to be done by hand, much more mechanical.

Eve: [00:28:20] 32 million acres, manually cleared.

Scott: [00:28:24] It’s staggering.

Eve: [00:28:25] It’s really staggering. How long does it take?

Scott: [00:28:28] Yeah, the goal of the California Forest Management Task Force, which is kind of the broad extra agency group that’s trying to address this challenge, their goal is a million acres per year by 2025. And right now – in 2019, we had 114 thousand acres – so we’re off by a factor of ten.

Eve: [00:28:47] Wow. That’s like one hundred years we’re looking at and more.

Scott: [00:28:52] That’s right. And what’s going to be left in California in 100 years of we’re burning four million acres a year. And it’s not just, this is not an abstract any more. Our water, for all of those cities comes from these forests and with these forest fires that you can grossly impact our water supply. The carbon impact of this. Right, 2020, there was 112 million metric tons of carbon were released by the 2020 wildfires. Which is 30 percent more than all the power plants that generated power that year. So, the health and that’s how you get into the asthma and respiratory issues of all that wildfire smoke. I mean, the implications of our society are bleak. And so, we have to figure out ways to get those small and medium diameter trees out of the forests. And that’s why we really kind of looked at, you know, not only these cassette systems, but getting away from dimensional lumber and really kind of focusing on veneer-based products. So, there’s another sub product of mass timber known as laminated veneer lumber or mass plywood panels, mass plywood. MPP is a brand from an Oregon company called Freres Brothers. And what they do is instead of cutting the log into 2x4s and having a bunch of scraps left over, is they put the log on a peeler and they peel the log and turn it into a big, long sheet. And then they glue those sheets together versus gluing 2x4s together. And that’s something that you can do, that’s, a that’s a vehicle for these small and medium diameter trees, whereas 2×4 dimensional lumber is not really feasible. And so they can peel logs, you know, down to six to eight inches and turn them into veneers. And so that’s what we’re really focused on, is these veneer-based structural products. Both floor plates, floor and ceiling plates and wall plates as well. That’s where we see our role in the forestry and the wildfire piece is creating market side demand for these small and medium diameter trees and putting them into really advanced, these really advanced cassette-based plate systems.

Eve: [00:31:14] Interesting. So I’m going to back up one more time. I sense a two-parter is coming on here. This is fascinating because…

Scott: [00:31:24] Yeah.

Eve: [00:31:24] I heard somewhere in amongst all the impact finance center information that there is a company out focusing on small diameter timber products. I can’t remember the name of the company, in California.

Scott: [00:31:38] So, we pitched at that event. So you might have, is that our pitch that you’re referring to?

Eve: [00:31:44] No, I think there’s another company I talked to so, we can come back to that.

Scott: [00:31:50] Yeah, yeah.

Eve: [00:31:51] But I’ve heard of people focusing on specifically that product and now it’s all falling into place for me. Personally, I didn’t know all of this. It’s really fascinating. But the importance of using that small diameter timber is becoming pretty clear.

Scott: [00:32:07] Uh huh. The great thing is that it could actually go into a very valuable product for the construction industry, the building industry. Incredibly green product, right? Very, very high embedded carbon in the veneer-based products, much lower travel times if we’re sourcing our wood from our local forest and putting it into buildings in Los Angeles and Sacramento and San Jose. Think of all the truckloads from British Columbia and northern British Columbia that we’re saving, right. And all that diesel fuel that gets burned. So, this really big upstream and downstream and benefits to sourcing this wood from California.

Eve: [00:32:51] Sounds like a whole new industry can emerge.

Scott: [00:32:54] That’s the goal, right. And that’s what the state is trying to incentivize is a re-ignition. I hate to use fire related terminology when talking about this stuff, but like, we kind of rekindling, that’s another one, restarting a forestry industry in California, which is really kind of on its last breath. Like, in the last 45 years, 70 percent of wood processing facilities in California closed. So, there’s really no eco system to actually process this. There’s no LBL manufacturers in California. There’s no plywood manufacturers in California. There’s very few mills left in California. There’s very few loggers left in California. And so we’re kind of having to start from scratch. And what the state is working on is incentivizing and creating these wood products, wood innovation campuses, across the state to bring this industry back. And to bring it back with a much greater kind of technological focus and an environmental and ecological focus. And so that things are done right. And so we’re at very early days of that. You know, we are not going to try to get into the manufacturing side of the LBL panels. It’s a very capital heavy side and there’s a reason why most of the companies that get into that, you know, they have three or four family generations that have been in the logging industry or they’ve been around for 150 years. You know, there are companies that just know how to do that and to manage those supply chains and to manage that production. And so we’re focused on it being a remanufacture of those products. And so, if we can help, you know, kind of show that there’s demand for this for this LBL and MPP type panels in California, hopefully we can then lure a manufacturer to the state, with our some of our demand, and get them active in the state and thinning our forests.

Eve: [00:34:58] So, Scott, you’ve bitten off a huge project, like where are you? You said you’re in the third year.

Scott: [00:35:04] Yes.

Eve: [00:35:06] I mean, where are you in the process of building a company?

Scott: [00:35:09] Yeah, yep. So, it is a very meaty challenge and myself and everybody that’s on our team is up for that challenge. That’s why we’re all here. We all understand the enormity of it and the, and the urgency of it. And that’s what motivates us every day. And the fact is, there’s not a lot of other companies doing this is yes, it’s an opportunity, but it’s also drives us to lead and to show that it can be done. And so, you know, we have to take advantage of the resources that we have. This is all bootstrapped at this point and self-funded, as you said, this is a big, meaty challenge. So, it’s really hard for investors to kind of wrap their head around it or see an exit to liquidity event in the near term. So fundraising has been a challenge, but that’s really not a deterrent to us in the slightest bit. And so, we have to focus on what we can sell for.

Eve: [00:36:08] Well, you have to eat. It’s going to be a little bit of a deterrent, right?

Scott: [00:36:13] Well, you know, the spouses of entrepreneurs do a lot of the heavy lifting. Right? And so, I have a really, my wife is an incredible partner and she’s also an entrepreneur, though a much more successful one. And she’s able to carry us through this kind of start-up period. But what’s great is that our story and our kind of mission is bringing a lot of really amazing people to the table. We are working with a company, for example, called Hacker Architects up in Portland, and they are an incredibly experienced, one of the most experienced architecture firms in North America working with mass timber. And they are becoming friends. Right. Like they they’ve really been a key supporter of our mission. And it really kind of backed us up and provided a lot of design assist and are really helping the design of our building system, because we have to think of this as a holistic building where we can put these different wood materials throughout the building. And so that’s just one example. We’ve got a whole network, whole ecosystem of companies that all share our same values and recognize the enormity of the problems that we’re solving. And so, we’ve built this great network of aligned allies that are helping us drive this forward. So, like I said, we’re a small kind of bootstrap team, but we’ve got some really great friends. And, you know, we are in the R&D phase and getting closer to a first prototypes. We originally had our first building construction project penciled as supposed to break ground this year, as a single-family home in the Tahoe region. Unfortunately, that project kind of fell through, just wasn’t the right application. And so, we decided to kind of shift focus. But ideally, we’d like to get a project off the ground here sometime this year with our investor pool that we do have and get a proof of concept project on paper this year and breaking ground next year. So that’s really what we’re what we’re driving for at this point.

Eve: [00:38:22] What is good proof of concept look like at this point?

Scott: [00:38:25] Yes. So, we’re looking at a small multi-family project and that’s the market that we’re going after is a unique market in the industry. Most of the construction industry and the prefab industry is really kind of set up to focus on how we build in the United States today, which is sprawl or tall. Right? Like it’s single-family homes on the peripheral cities, or it’s a big giant two hundred unit podium structures or towers in the urban core. And Fabric, we see the opportunity, especially considering the sheer scale of the housing need and how fast that housing needs to be produced and brought to market. We really see the opportunity in that missing middle upper missing middle range, small to medium lot, three to eight story buildings. So that’s really our key focus and really kind of unique, a bit more unique in the marketplace. And so we want to, we want to get a proof of concept project of at least four units. It doesn’t have to be huge. It just needs to show how the systems kind of work together and kind of bring that to life in an infill type application.

Eve: [00:39:42] I’m excited to see it.

Scott: [00:39:44] Yeah.

Eve: [00:39:44] Are you going to act as your own developer or are you looking for a developer who will use your system?

Scott: [00:39:51] Yeah, it’s kind of like yes and…

Eve: [00:39:55] Yes, I know.

Scott: [00:39:56] If we yes, either, you know, we are talking to more and more developers. We are finding that network of of young kind of independent developers, baby developers, I’ve heard that kind of term kind of thrown around, you know, the folks that are producing like the 20-unit buildings and the odd 16-plex. Right. Like those small buildings. And we’re building that network. And hopefully we can bring a developer partner to the table sooner rather than later. But we’re also kind of setting ourselves up for self-developing our first project. And that’s what we were going to do on that single family home. We were going to develop that through our, through one of our investors, but we kind of shifted and would like to ideally bring on a development partner that knows that process better than we do. You know, we’re not developers.

Eve: [00:40:47] And so you might stretch yourself very thin during trying to do both.

Scott: [00:40:52] Yes, exactly. And we have to kind of kind of focus on what our value add is. And the development side is not it today, who knows down the road where this goes. But as of now, ideally, we have a partner that can, that can really kind of drive this through that to the development process.

Eve: [00:41:11] So you’ve talked about these materials looking very sleek. What does that first project going to look like?

Scott: [00:41:18] Yeah, I wish I could show you some of the renderings, the absolutely beautiful renderings that Hacker put together for us. One of the advantages of focusing on this smaller type three, type five building typology is that the fire code and the fire ratings aren’t as strict with the CLT. So we can leave a lot more of that with the mass timber, we can leave a lot more of that exposed. So, you’ll see a lot of exposed natural wood elements. So wooden ceilings, heavy timber beams, well it will have the aesthetic about heavy timber beams, but it’s actually LDM. A lot of the columns in the beams will be exposed and even wall panels can be of exposed wood to them. So, a very natural and a minimal, what’s the term a soft minimal kind of aesthetics to them and and very high precision tolerances on that minimalism, right, like that’s kind of what separates good minimalism from bad minimalism is the execution and the precision of it. And because everything is cut in a factory, the aesthetic is just really tight and really clean. And so we’re really looking forward to bringing that to life.

Eve: [00:42:37] Do you have the renderings on the website you’d like to share?

Scott: [00:42:40] Yeah, on our website we have a few renderings on there. So you can kind of get a sense out of the real aesthetic and that that would be our proof of concept project. Each developer will have that choice that they want to drywall over those exposed wood elements they can. But our preference would be to leave them exposed. And there’s a lot of really interesting data back to that benefits of mass timber. There’s a lot of really interesting data around the biophilia benefits of mass timber, where people get that sense of serenity and calm. Like being in a forest.

Eve: [00:43:16] Yes.

Scott: [00:43:17] In a mass timber house, they are really cool buildings. I don’t know if you’ve had a chance to spend time in one. But they do have a a dampness to them, not not wet, damp, but just materially damp. And so sound travels differently. And you do get the sense that you’re in the forest. It’s really, it’s a really cool experience.

Eve: [00:43:37] So I’m going to go back.  You’re in Truckee. Right. And I’m wondering…

Scott: [00:43:41] That’s correct. Yes.

Eve: [00:43:42] Why are you in Truckee?

Scott: [00:43:44] I asked myself that question sometimes, too. I love Truckee, but I’m definitely a city kid. So, Truckee is more or less a one road town. And so, I do feel a little stir crazy here sometimes, but it is a great place. And I have two young kids, four and six years old, and just this is a big playground for them. So, we ended up in Truckee a long time, a decade and a half in San Francisco, three years down in Los Angeles, and then had to get out of L.A. and Truckee was supposed to be a one year stopover on the way back to the bay. But, shocker, the cost of housing was so high in the bay that we couldn’t afford anything there so we could afford something in Truckee, Truckee at the time. So we were able to…

Eve: [00:44:34] You’re living the Californian dream.

Scott: [00:44:36] Yeah. More or less trying to.

Eve: [00:44:40] Okay. So tell me, I’m going to move to shift gears a little bit and just ask you, are there any other current trends out there or innovations in real estate development or construction that you believe are really important for our future?

Scott: [00:44:54] Yeah, and so a couple, yeah, so one thing that we are bringing in house we have, this is a capability that we are, as we speak, kind of building out a facility is the fabrication side of construction and particularly automated and robotic fabrication. That is the piece that’s going to have prefab construction kind of realize the benefits that it kind of promised the world when it came out a few decades ago. You know, from pricing to quality control, robotic fabrication is going to be a huge piece of this. And we are actively building that capacity out in California, will be a leader in that space here in the state. And particularly as more and more construction will go towards wood-based construction to offset the carbon and environmental impacts of concrete and steel. You know, we firmly believe that wood construction is the future of construction. And so, to make that a reality, you have to have a much more advanced fabrication capabilities like you see across Switzerland and Austria and Germany and Sweden, for example.

Eve: [00:46:10] Right. Right.

Scott: [00:46:11] And so that’s going to be a big piece. Right. And then, you know, I do believe fundamentally that we are seeing the cracks in the dam when it comes to planning and zoning in particular. I think that the sea change and our laws and regulations on what gets built and where is going to happen very quickly, much faster than I think a lot of people give it credit for. You know, we are slowly starting to see the end of single family only zoning. When I first really started thinking about creating the housing company in 2014, most of them really talk about like, oh, yeah, houses are expensive in nice parts of the city. But that was kind of the attitude. And now fast forward seven years and it’s a topic in our presidential campaigns. It’s just becoming a fundamental issue in this country. And I think that the 20th century experiment of highly segregated neighborhoods, housing over here, business over there, commerce over here. Single family based, car based, an entirely car-based society, car exclusive society. I really fundamentally believe that that is coming to an end in California and that those changes are going to happen. It’s going to build and then is going to happen really rapidly.

Eve: [00:47:36] Wow. I have one final question for you, and that is, what is your big, hairy, audacious goal?

Scott: [00:47:43] Yeah, I and I would say, you know, not as ambitious to say we want to build a new city out of wood, but definitely, you know, a neighborhood out of wood. That’s kind of our big goal is to build a five 600-unit community, all sustainably sourced, locally sourced, sustainably sourced timber neighborhood. And we’re seeing those neighborhoods pop up in Europe and Japan and they are incredibly inspiring. They are walkable, human scaled, car free, no carbon passive house technology. And I would love to just get my hands on a decrepit shopping mall in central Sacramento and convert that into the neighborhood. A vibrant, diverse, mixed income neighborhood in in Sacramento, for example. And that’s our big, big goal that we’re driving towards.

Eve: [00:48:41] Oh, I’m really excited for you. It sounds amazing. And I hope sometime in the future we’ll get to host one of your projects on Small Change.

Scott: [00:48:51] Would absolutely love that. Yes.

Eve: [00:48:53] Thank you so much, Scott.

Scott: [00:48:55] Yes, thank you, Eve. Really appreciate the time. And I’m honored to be on your podcast and be part of this group. So thank you.

Eve: [00:49:11] That was Scott Ehlert of Fabric Workshop. Scott pivoted his life and career in a way that most people do not dare. He is making all bets on an industry that doesn’t quite exist yet and technology that he needs to design. While other housing developers try to crack the construction affordability code using the same old building systems, Scott has spent years planning how to become a housing developer using a brand new building system, one that he has designed and one that he will manufacture. We’ll be hearing more about Scott. I’m sure.Eve: [00:49:58] You can find out more about this episode on the show notes page at EvePicker.com, or you can find other episodes you might have missed, or you can show your support at Patreon.com/rethinkrealestate, where you can learn about special opportunities for my friends and followers. A special thanks to David Allardice for his excellent editing of this podcast and original music. And thanks to you for spending your time with me today. We’ll talk again soon. But for now, this is Eve Picker signing off to go make some change.

Image courtesy of Fabric Workshop/Scott Ehlert

The impact accelerator.

March 3, 2021

From ecologist to impact investment guru, Dr. Stephanie Gripne has had a singular career arc. Originally trained in wildlife management and conservation, she went on to work on issues surrounding the built environment, in conservation real estate, environmental markets, and in the wonky world of financing strategies and historic tax credits. At the same time she was working as a research fellow, studying impact investing and philanthropy, and she became involved in the Colorado impact investing scene.

In 2012, it all came together when she founded the Impact Finance Center (IFC), based in Denver, as a nonprofit academic center with a mission to identify, train and activate philanthropists and investors to become impact investors. In 2019, the IFC added on an Impact Investing Institute, to provide education to organizations, family offices, foundations and other funding groups. Today, Stephanie’s big, hairy audacious goal is to move a trillion dollars into impact investing.  

Stephanie believes that impact investing is all about educating people – and the IFC is quickly becoming the go-to place for every level of investor, from the well-endowed non-profit world to individuals who have never invested before. We know you’ll be hearing more from Stephanie and the IFC, for sure.

Insights and Inspirations

  • Stephanie wants the Impact Finance Center to be the place to go for agenda-free and trustworthy investor education.
  • The Impact Finance Center is an accelerator for impact investors.
  • Stephanie believes there is a gigantic audience of potential impact investors out there we can reach.
  • The IFC provides impact education through portfolio evaluation, educational offerings (with 200 classes online), training and an ever-growing number of themed impact investor clubs.
  • And you should check out the Impact Real Estate Investing Club.
Read the podcast transcript here

Eve Picker: [00:00:14] Hi there. Thanks for joining me on Rethink Real Estate. I’m on a mission to make real estate work for everyone. Real estate can help to solve climate change, can house people affordably, can create beautiful streetscapes, unify neighborhoods and enliven cities. So, I’m on a journey to find the most creative thinkers and doers out there. I’m not the only one who wants to rethink real estate. You can learn more about me at EvePicker.com, or you can find me at SmallChange.co, a real estate crowdfunding platform with impact real estate investment opportunities open for investment right now. And if you want to support this podcast, join me at Patreon.com/RethinkRealEstate, where there are special opportunities for my friends and followers.

Eve: [00:01:09] Today, I’m talking with Dr. Stephanie Gripne. In what seems to be an improbable amount of time, Stephanie has gone from ecologist to impact investment guru. Her big, hairy, audacious goal is to move a trillion dollars into impact investing. Ten years ago, about four years after getting her doctorate, she became director of the Initiative for Sustainable Development at the University of Colorado’s Real Estate Center. There she was immersed in issues surrounding the built environment and socially responsible investing. In 2012, she took the leap and founded the Impact Finance Center as a nonprofit academic center with a mission to identify, train and activate philanthropists and investors to become impact investors. I’ve already learned a lot from Stephanie, but I’m going to learn more and so might you. So, listen in. If you’d like to join me in my quest to rethink real estate there are two simple things you can do. Share this podcast. Or go to Patreon.com/RethinkRealEstate to learn about special opportunities for my friends and followers, and subscribe if you can.

Eve: [00:02:40] Stephanie, I’m so happy to talk to you today.

Stephanie Gripne: [00:02:44] Eve, I am so happy to talk with you today.

Eve: [00:02:47] So, you have a supremely cool resume and it’s pretty clear how driven you are. There’s a lot to talk about, but I wanted to start by talking about what you’re working on today. You lead the Impact Finance Center. What is that?

Stephanie: [00:03:01] That’s a great question, Eve. For those of you in the audience who have heard of an accelerator, you might have heard of TechStars or 500 startups or Y Combinator. Those accelerators are essentially boot camps for people who want to start a startup or a small business. So, they identify, educate and invest in entrepreneurs. When I was a professor in 2010-12 at the University of Colorado at the Leeds School of Business, I was actually the director of the Initiative for Sustainable Real Estate Development. I just kept wondering why isn’t there more money flowing into good things? And I finally kept unpeeling the onion and realizing there are not entities out there providing investor education that is non-conflicted or trustworthy, in that most of the investor education is actually trying to get your business. So, it comes from Wall Street and they’re trying to become your investment adviser or raise a fund. And so, my hypothesis was that if we started providing non-conflicted investor education from the inside of a nonprofit, where we weren’t going to try to raise a fund or become your investment advisor, we could actually educate and activate these investors. So, going back to the accelerator analogy, Impact Finance Center is essentially an accelerator for impact investors. Instead of identifying, educating and investing in entrepreneurs, we identify and educate individuals and organizations who want to become impact investors. And those typically are: private foundations, community foundations, high net worth individuals, companies and family offices.

Eve: [00:04:51] So, that’s really how you and I started talking way back on the plane ramp, where we met, right?

Stephanie: [00:04:58] That is true. We did mean on a plane ramp in California. And yes, we are. I had been following the crowdfunding movement for some time and figuring out what my role in it was going to be.

Eve: [00:05:10] How do you accomplish investor education and accelerate those impact investors? What is it you actually do?

Stephanie: [00:05:17] That’s a great question. We really offer five ways for people to get education. One, and this is the the holy grail of it all, is we can evaluate your investment advisor portfolio, and that is pretty brutal. We evaluated a 100 million dollar foundation in Seattle and found out their investment advisor had charged them in excess of fees of one million dollars over five years to underperform by five million dollars.

Eve: [00:05:49] Ohhh.

Stephanie: [00:05:49] We have a 15 million dollar foundation in Denver … where we evaluated their investment advisor and found out they had been charged in excess of fees of $240,000 over seven years to underperform by 1.4 million dollars. So, we have, that is number one. We can evaluate your portfolio and investment advisor for governance and fees and evidence-based decision evaluation and impact. And then, the next phase is just education. We’re putting our 200 classes online. We have 47 recorded webinars up there. So, if you’re a do-it-yourselfer … sign on our Impact Investing Institute and train yourself. We also offer one-on-one training, small group training and large group training.

Eve: [00:06:39] Wow. That’s a lot of work, Stephanie. When did you launch the center?

Stephanie: [00:06:43] I was a professor at University of Colorado in 2010-12. And I realized then, once I had essentially collected evidence and accidentally discovered that the financial return of a grant is negative 100 percent loss. I determined that this impact investing was legal; and determined that, also, that people were interested, but there wasn’t a place for them to go learn. And then, the other piece, I realized, is asking somebody to do a first investment, cutting a 25,000 dollar check, even if you have a lot of money, is scary. And so, the key was, that’s in my, I use a baseball analogy, that’s a major league investment. And so, how do you create a T-ball opportunity for people to learn by doing. And so, that’s either using simulations like business case competitions or kind of monopoly. We do some simulation type activities, where you get to pretend you’re an investor or you actually do a small dollar amount. And we often have people take money they would have donated and pool it together in a giving circle model, and then they learn how to invest together.

Eve: [00:07:55] Interesting. Interesting. Who are you trying to reach? Like, who do you think your audience is? How big is it?

Stephanie: [00:08:04] Our audience is gigantic. If you just Google the number of millionaires in states like Colorado or Georgia or Massachusetts, and you’ll see a range from 150,000 millionaires to over a million millionaires … that’s a great question, Eve. People often ask me, oh, would you rather not work with a foundation or, versus a high net worth individual? And there’s two criteria that we look to partner with people. One, they have to be motivated and willing to take action. If you’re going to be on the slow boat will still help you, but you don’t get to be first in line. So, you have to be willing to move and take action. And the second thing is, you have to be an independent thinker. If you’re somebody who likes to have the crowd go first and you join the crowd, you’re probably not the right individual organization to come find us. And so, those are difficult to go find. But it’s great. We’re really nice about it. When people get stuck, we’re like, hey, it’s OK, go back and do this homework, and when you’re ready to get back into it, move forward. But what that means, Eve,  is that I have worked with foundations where 20 trustees, oftentimes family members, are in unison, and I’ve worked with a grumpy high-net worth individual that’s difficult to move. So, it doesn’t have to be an individual or a foundation or a family office or a corporation. It just has to be a willingness to take action.

Eve: [00:09:29] And beyond the gigantic audience of accredited investors, as you know, they are only about three percent of the population, there is now a growing audience of people who’ve never invested before and sit in the non-accredited group. So it’s huge, right?

Stephanie: [00:09:45] It’s endless. And it’s interesting, because I was trying to think the other day about how I got started. And I know my dad, when I was 12 or 13 years old, we invested in Micron Together Technology Company. I’m 47 years old. I don’t know how I found, it had to have been at the library, found a book on Motley Fool that taught direct investing. So, direct investing with public companies. And I still have some of those stocks I first invested in. But I actually did an investment in Enron, because it was a renewable energy company. So, I kind of like to think of myself as an early adopter in the modern-day crowdfunding.

Eve: [00:10:25] Since have you started seeing a shift towards impact investing?

Stephanie: [00:10:30] Oh, absolutely. In Colorado, for example, we started the Center in 2012, and I’ll go back and answer your your last question in a little bit. When we started the Center, I realized when I was at University of Colorado when I had that ‘aha’ moment that, wow, people do need education, and I thought every entrepreneurship center needs an innovative finance center. And then I took a step back, and I’m like, wait, every university that’s going to struggle financially needs innovative finance center to stay financially viable. And then I took a step back, and I thought, wait, every association of, I call them ‘clubs of money,’ a community foundation association, a YPO, family office association. They need this curriculum too. And there was, at the time, only 15 centers and really only two of us that actually do transactions. And so, that was my idea, to leave in 2012 and then start a nonprofit, multi-university academic center where we could essentially provide a curriculum in a box. And just to give you a sense of how long it takes to get going, at least in Colorado …

Eve: [00:11:46] Are you telling me how long it takes to get going?

Stephanie: [00:11:48] Well, just to just have a sense, in 2010-12, our first two transactions we supported were the Museum of Contemporary Art and the Alliance Center, and those both were real estate transactions, and one was a foundation and a couple of board members. So, they got 101 percent return. And we financed the Museum of Contemporary Art and saved them 550,000 a year. The other one was a project I led with the Alliance Center in partnership with the Denver Foundation, and we used a donor-advised fund to do a loan at zero and one percent that essentially saved that nonprofit six million dollars and gave the donor 101 percent return. I worked on those two transactions for three years and they all moved when the bills were due. They tried everything else for years and years and years. And then, when the adjustable rate mortgage was going to be due, or the building renovation COP bill was going to be due, that’s when they were finally willing to move. So, that there was a negative-like desperation as the birthplace of innovation. It took three years for two transactions. And I do believe Colorado’s probably done 100 impact investment transactions in the last three months.

Eve: [00:13:02] Wow. The story you’re telling is much like mine. I think if you build something new and I suppose on the cutting edge, it takes a really long time and you have to have stick-to-it-ness. Right. Just have to keep going.

Stephanie: [00:13:15] You do. You have to have the Stockdale paradox. You have to have this eternal knowledge you will prevail in the end. And I had great advice from a friend, Dan, whose dad said, you need to stick past three and a half years and go to five years. Most people give up at three and a half years. And there’s a great metaphor. It’s like paddling an iceberg with flippers on. It takes a long time to get that iceberg going.

Eve: [00:13:38] Yeah, it really does. It can be a little depressing but there it is.

Stephanie: [00:13:42] Um-Hmm.

Eve: [00:13:42] This is a pretty unusual place for a Ph.D. in forestry to end up. That’s what you have, right?

Stephanie: [00:13:49] Yes.

Eve: [00:13:49] So I have read about Fish and Wildlife and spotted owls on your resume. Tell me about the journey that took you from wildlife to impact investment.

Stephanie: [00:14:01] It was great. I was watching an interview this morning with Heather McGhee, and she’s approaching this conversation from a race issue. I grew up in an environmental issue, and she’s framing it using a zero sum game. And I grew up in central Idaho, in Sun Valley, Idaho. And there was a zero sum framing where it was, either we either could save the endangered species of the wolves and the salmon, or we could have jobs. And I just remember knowing deeply in my heart that there was enough resources for both of them, and my friends would literally threaten the lives of my other friends with guns. And there was a river guide I used to work for that, a bunch of the river guides, made a sticker that said ‘Happiness is the fisheries’ biologists’ face on a milk carton.’ And it was a very tumultuous, and in some ways, violent way to grow up. And I just I didn’t know. I thought it was about the wildlife at that point. And now I’m really clear it was a resource allocation issue. And I deeply believe there’s enough money for communities and the environment and jobs. And so, that just has motivated me since I was 16 and I’ll never forget. I do like woodworking. And I announced when I was 16 or 17 that I was going to become a carpenter and make furniture. And my dad, who was incredibly supportive, my late dad, of whatever I would choose, said Stephanie, what about architect? I said, I said no. I said, what about wildlife biologist? And my dad said, you have a mind for business, Stephanie. Why don’t you go make a lot of money and then you can have influence on the environment. And my dad, actually, he was a workout guy that would take companies through bankruptcy, but the last 10 years of his career, he took a company out of bankruptcy, a precast concrete company. So, for 10 years, my family made every precast concrete box in the state of Idaho, electrical box, etc., and air conditioner pad. And I said, Dad, I just don’t have the constitution to do it the way you did it. I’m not willing to go make money in whatever way I can and then do what I want to do. I’m going to do what I want to do along the way.

Eve: [00:16:22] Yeah, I think this must be part of being a parent, not really understanding what your kids are doing. Right. What would be good outcomes, do you think, if more people invest in important change making projects, what are the outcomes you hope for?

Stephanie: [00:16:41] I’ll actually, answer that question and continue my last answer a little bit. My dad would end up being quite wealthy, becoming homeless for two years, and then at 24 years of age, he would come back to live with me. And so, the roles were reversed, for those of you who cared for your parents, except my roles were reversed for me when I was 24. And I remember I was doing my Ph.D. in seven states with ranchers and, a socioeconomic analysis, a conservation project, and I got to study with my hero, the chief of the Forest Service, Dr. Jack Ward Thomas. I was also working for the Forest Service in multiple roles all around the country based out of Lander, Wyoming. And my mom came down with pancreatic cancer and my dad was living with us in a home in Lander, Wyoming. And I remember coming home one day and I said, I don’t care if you walk dogs or volunteer or you get a job, but you can’t just stay in this basement apartment. You have to do something. And he would get a real estate license and a mortgage broker license. And he didn’t cost a lot of money to support him at that time because he was living in a basement apartment of our house. And so, essentially what we did is we were used to being poor graduate students. And so, instead of taking all the excess money of having two salaries and a grad’s stipend, we would buy a house. You could buy a house in Lander, Wyoming, for six to eight thousand dollars from down payment, 120,000 dollars house from 2000-2005.

Eve: [00:18:17] Wow.

Stephanie: [00:18:18] And the reason I’m saying this is my mom passed in 2003 and I wasn’t emotionally ready to sell the house. My sister was. So, I bought the house from my sister. And I think most of us, our road to becoming an investor in a meaningful way, is that second house. The first house is, I made it. I’m an adult. I’m building wealth. But that’s a, it’s a very different experience to get your second house. And I don’t know that I would have offensively purchased my second house. It kind of came to me because my mom passed. But once that second one happened, I talked to several people who’ve had this experience, you’re like, wait a minute, I can do this. I can own an asset and make money. And so, we bought a third house and then, on the fourth or fifth house, my dad came home and he said, Stephers, he’s like, there’s these families coming into our mortgage business. A lot of them have bad credit, but there are some that have bad credit that actually used to have good credit. They just had a medical situation and they didn’t have the right medical insurance. And now they’re in this bankruptcy called a medical bankruptcy. So they’re not allowed to buy a house or car, even though they are people who paid their bills. And so we ended up doing a lease option with these families and we had a family meeting and agreed that we wanted a 10 percent return. And so we would set aside 10 percent of their rent as a partial equity. And if the house appreciated above 10 percent return during their medical bankruptcy, essentially get the upside of that. And the houses during that time period appreciated fifteen to twenty five percent. So we got the joy of philanthropy, a job for my dad, an amazing tenant, a solid 10 percent return, and they got dignity. Got to move into their home three to five years early and get partial equity upside. And so I think that all of us are on this quest of connection and meaning. And when you realize, like I did then at twenty four, twenty five years of age, that you can do well by doing good. I don’t think most of us can go back from that.

Eve: [00:20:27] I think you’re a rock star. You probably made some friends for life as well in that process, right.

Stephanie: [00:20:34] Absolutely. That was about three hundred transactions ago and I’m I have lots of friends along the way. Three to four hundred. I’ve lost count. I kind of stopped keeping count after two hundred. As as my colleague Todd James says, 60 percent of what we do has been visible and behind the scenes. So there’s a lot of lovely, incredible, awesome people out there that don’t even know that we were helping push and pull to make their dreams happen. And, you know, it’s it’s it’s an incredible role to play in people’s lives.

Eve: [00:21:03] You really did shift from fish and wildlife to real estate, and then you dragged me into it recently, which I’m really enjoying. But we’re working together on one of your many projects, which you didn’t mention before when you talked about the five ways to educate people. You’re also creating impact investing clubs, which are really fascinating, they’re themed clubs where potential impact investors gather and you’re educating them with a particular focus. And we’re on the journey of building a real estate impact investing club.

Stephanie: [00:21:38] We are, Eve. I didn’t mention this at the beginning. So Impact Finance Center does two things. We identify, educate and activate individuals and organizations to become impact investors and we also build what we call community infrastructure, which can be replicated, scaled and customized. And in that bucket of community infrastructure, you just mentioned investor clubs, which is one piece of it. We also stood up the first statewide marketplace for impact investing, which is the second time I met you when you came out to Impact Days.

Eve: [00:22:11] That’s right. Yeah.

Stephanie: [00:22:11] Our Impact Days, and that’s, you can think of it is, imagine everybody who needed money in the state, doing good, shows up and they create a farmer’s market booth and we activate new investors and organize existing investors and we bring the investors to go shopping in the farmer’s market. We call that Impactings. A Bodega is a subset of that marketplace. And that’s what we’re branding as our Investor Clubs. And then we also have two hundred classes, which we refer to as our Impact Investing Institute. And one of the most exciting pieces of infrastructure that we created was, are you familiar with The Who’s Who Under 40 that business journals do?

Eve: [00:22:49] Yes, yep.

Stephanie: [00:22:50] Yeah. We reached out to our business journal and we said we’re going to do Who’s Who in impact investing for the Rocky Mountain region. Do you want to be our media partner? And that was exciting because the first year we did it, we had 300 people apply.

Eve: [00:23:03] Oh, wow, that’s great.

Stephanie: [00:23:05] The second year that we had 1,300, and so that builds the book. And then the last piece, which is really the key, is our impact investing, giving circle or investor accelerator, and that’s in partnership with civil society organizations like Community Foundations. So, right now we have 34 women that could be middle-income or high-net worth, or connected to a company or family office or foundation, who are major league when it comes to intelligence, and major league when it comes to alignment, and major league when it comes to admission, and major league when it comes to access to money. But they’ve never actually written a check to support a sutainable real estate project, or a small business, or a startup. And so in this case, we make it low cost, easy and fun. We say, let’s participate in a giving circle, donate two thousand dollars in and we end up getting a kitty of seventy five thousand to one hundred and fifty thousand and we say, who needs money? And this year we had a 111 women apply, 112 women apply, for over 50 million dollars of need. And then we go through a selection process and they do due diligence, and they invest in a couple investments for their first investments. Because it’s a pooled donor-advised fund that the Women’s Foundation of Colorado, they don’t get the money back, it’s essentially a learned by doing fund experience where hopefully they walk in is that as a donor, they walk out as an investor and then they say, I want to join the investor club. So, yes, Eve, the investor clubs are…

Eve: [00:24:38] This is especially important, this educational piece, because because women don’t invest. And I can tell you that with certainty on Small Change, women, just a tiny minority of investors. It really kind of puzzles me.

Stephanie: [00:24:53] You know, it’s interesting because I am counting on my fingers right now and hopefully going to my toes. I have several women who will be investing in Lyneir’s project who have been spreading the good news on Lyneir and some of the other great offerings you have on Small Change right now. And I’ll be completely honest with you, we we started the Investor Club as a response to Colorado’s CDFIs, Community Financial Development Institutions and nonprofit lenders, who basically said Steph, that’s been great. The three year pilot, we had a goal to move one hundred million. We’re up to three hundred million. Success. But we need to still keep helping raise capital for the CDFI’s and non-profit lenders. And so the first Investor Club was a Main Street Lender Club. The second one was our Indigenous Investor Club. And then the third one was with the federal government’s Sustainable Forestry Mass Timber CLT Investor Club that connects with real estate. And now we’re starting clubs in California and Massachusetts and with the New York CDFIs.   But I have to say Eve Picker, the most popular one, has been the Real Estate Investor Club.

Eve: [00:26:02] This was unexpected, wasn’t it? We have to keep up.

Stephanie: [00:26:06] Yeah, I was only mildly surprised. I saw there’s a quest to need. Nobody gets paid to do the work we’re doing. I think that’s the difficult part.  If Wall Street had figured out how to get paid to educate investors we would have money flowing like hotcakes to Main Street investments.

Eve: [00:26:23] And, you know, it’s been pretty stunning because some on our club meeting announcements for mid-March, there’s something like 1,800 people signed up on LinkedIn and I have no idea where they’re coming from. It’s pretty big. It’s pretty astounding, so we better put on a really good show, right.

Stephanie: [00:26:43] Yeah, it’s well it’s easy to do. I mean, people who are either investing or working in community real estate, creating real estate, affordable housing, mass timber CLT, all of the all the good stuff. Is there some of the most inspiring people you’ve ever met.

Eve: [00:26:58] Yes, I agree.

Stephanie: [00:26:58] So so it’s pretty much you just have to set the stage and let them shine.

Eve: [00:27:04] Let me ask you, so what happens to the club meeting and how it happened? What’s your formula?

Stephanie: [00:27:10] Yeah. And and for those of you who are familiar and who’ve gone to like a pitch competition or an expo, that’s what I think about it. I think it is essentially a virtual farmer’s market. And our goal is investor education specifically and also some social venture education. But what we want to do is we do an investor panel and we want to showcase different types of investors so people can see themselves in the crowd and go, wait, they’re just like me. I could do that, too. And so really, that’s about getting diverse, interesting investors up there so we can make it seem more accessible to people sitting in the crowd that they can go from not identifying as an investor to becoming an investor. And then the same is true for the social ventures like community real estate projects. It’s a way to educate people about what’s possible. Most people I mean, Eve, you know better than anybody, but if you and I walked out of our front door right now and and just talk to the next hundred people that walked by and said, are you an investor? All of them are investors, but most of them would probably we’d probably get five to ten of them who would say that they identify as an investor?

Eve: [00:28:24] Yeah, maybe less, actually.

Stephanie: [00:28:27] Maybe less. And that is the challenge. Like I remember when Mitt Romney was running for president, the Mormon Church put up signs, they had a campaign and put up billboards and they put up everyday faces and they called I’m a Mormon campaign. And I feel like we need to put up do a similar campaign, that I’m an Investor campaign.

Eve: [00:28:46] Yeah, that’s right. I think that’s a great idea because an investor could be someone who invests ten bucks in their friend’s startup or an investor can be someone who invests a million dollars into something big.

Stephanie: [00:28:59] I would even argue a mom who goes to the grocery store and decides which milk she’s going to buy for her child as an investor. She’s invested in the supply chain of…

Eve: [00:29:08] Oh, yeah.

Stephanie: [00:29:09] Are you buying organic or not organic or how are the companies trading?

Eve: [00:29:13] Or if they decide to go purchase at a farmer’s market instead of the grocery store.

Stephanie: [00:29:18] Every time a dollar changes hands, you’re an investor.

Eve: [00:29:24] Yes. I think you have a broader description of investor than I think of. But you’re right. So the club meetings are like a mixture of panels with investors, large and small, talking about their experiences and what it means to them and social ventures. And then a little pitch round right. Of deals that are looking for money.

Stephanie: [00:29:43] Yeah. So we we essentially, because we’re in Covid, we can’t do this in person. And so I think that’s to the benefit of this, Eve.

Eve: [00:29:50] I agree.

Stephanie: [00:29:52] And because in Colorado, when you came out to Colorado, Impact Days, we physically have a farmer’s market, you know, where…

Eve: [00:29:59] I don’t want to travel that much. I kind of like this Zoom thing.

Stephanie: [00:30:02] Absolutely. So we’re essentially putting the farmer’s market online. And so we created an investor catalog. And it’s really the social venture panel is to give five to 12 minutes casually for people to learn about a couple of the investment opportunities. And then we do a speed round of two minutes. And it’s shocking to me sometimes that people actually shine better in the two minutes than they do when they’re given seven to ten minutes.

Eve: [00:30:29] Yeah, it’s pretty fun. And people get an opportunity to ask questions, too. I think it’s exciting for me. I mean, what’s your ultimate goal with these clubs? What would be a fantastic outcome in five years for you?

Stephanie: [00:30:41] I’ll put my geeky academic entrepreneur hat on for a second. We actually wrote a paper called Laying the Groundwork for the National Impact Investing Marketplace. So we published in the Foundation Review. And we’re pretty confident now that if you take our infrastructure and combine it with some other infrastructure, such as Lenny Lavis up in Seattle, he has realized impact investor flow, a Fleg regenerative accelerator. If you take some of our joint infrastructure together, we can actually completely fix the capital markets and move a trillion dollars into impact. I can do it two ways. I can go fundraise 20 million dollars and take what we did in Colorado and expand it to all 50 states. Or we can earn money from some of our social ventures, such as our Impact Investing Institute, and use it to self-fund our expansion to all 50 states. So what’s exciting about the Investor Clubs is most of our Investor Clubs are actually being purchased or supported by foundations who want to do economic development and Covid recovery. Federal government, USDA, Forest Service. And we’ve had interest in state governments, too. So I think if I was in state government or foundation interested or family office interest in Covid recovery or a corporation, I would be basically investing in as many Impact Investing Giving Circles and Investor Clubs as I could afford to support. I think that getting one percent of our wealth to invest in Main Street as an example in Colorado, that would be five billion dollars that could be leveraged through CDFI’s and banks for a 15 billion to 50 billion dollar year investment. It wouldn’t take much, just one percent of the wealth.

Eve: [00:32:27] Um-hmm. Fantastic. I’m going to change gears again. Just ask a few more questions to wrap up and they’re about you. And what do you love doing the most and why?

Stephanie: [00:32:39] I love most partner dancing. Ballroom dancing is my favorite joy in the whole world. Which I feel like it’s going to be the last activity that comes back to us after Covid. So I’m sort of isolated. I’m single in Denver, Colorado, and I Waltz and Cha-Cha and Two-step and learning the Latin dances and I Swing and I just can’t wait to get back to partner dancing.

Eve: [00:33:04] So I have to ask, have you watched my very favorite Australian movie called Strictly Ballroom?

Stephanie: [00:33:09] I have seen Strictly Ballroom. Yes.

Eve: [00:33:13] So, the Star of Strictly Ballroom used to live next to me in Sydney.

Stephanie: [00:33:17] Well, I can’t wait to be traveling with you to Sydney.

Eve: [00:33:20] I don’t think he lives there any more.

Stephanie: [00:33:24] We can go have lunch.

Eve: [00:33:24] And what are you excited about the most?

Stephanie: [00:33:27] I am excited, two things. Is, as I used to feel like that from 2012-20, I felt like I know there’s an answer and we just have to develop the answer. And now I feel like the answers there. All the puzzle pieces are on the table. Now, we just have to put the puzzle pieces together. And so I’m excited about all of the amazing impact investors and all the amazing social ventures out there. There is so much goodness and love and light and inspiring people who are showing up in the impossible ways to make the world a better place. And so I’m very fortunate in that I get to hear from people with resources and people needing resources, doing amazing things and have the the joy of being able to connect them together. And our phone has just been ringing off the hook. Especially a lot of middle aged white women, just between the combination of the global pandemic and our civil rights crisis have just called. And many of them have got a text once that says, what can I do to help my sisters of color immediately? And she made an investment quickly. I had another woman call. We do a fellowship of ten sessions. And on her first session, she’s like, I’m ready to make a first hundred thousand dollar investment today. I’m like, OK, there we go. And so, yeah. So it’s just great to see how many people are showing up and going, now’s the time. I can’t wait any longer.

Eve: [00:34:59] It’s been really wonderful talking to you and I really can’t wait to see what becomes of the Impact Finance Center and our club and what’s next for you.

Stephanie: [00:35:09] Oh, well, and likewise, Eve. I just want to give a gratitude and compliment to you, because I don’t know that we’ve discussed this, but when this movement was getting off the ground, I was very aware there’s a role to activate new investors, educate and organize existing investors and build the financial fintech solution. And I chose to be on the education of investor side, and I couldn’t be more happy to be collaborating with you. You’re just somebody who is a visionary and a joy and has incredible integrity. And I think,

Eve: [00:35:44] I’m blushing now.

Stephanie: [00:35:45] Oh, I think that what you do and what I do are two pieces…

Eve: [00:35:51] Perfect match.

Stephanie: [00:35:51] Of a puzzle that literally will democratize and provide that pathway to solve the problems that I had as a 15 year old, 16 year old watching.

Eve: [00:36:01] You know, you’re right. I mean, I think investor education is the most difficult part of what I do, and I can’t do that and investor education. So I’m extremely grateful to have you around.

Stephanie: [00:36:14] Well, let’s go find what should our goal be in the next five years.

Eve: [00:36:18] We should build humongous impact investor club and just showcase thousands of projects. And, you know, I’d have to quantify that goal clearly.

Stephanie: [00:36:30] Well, I’m going put a goal out for us. It’s February 18, 2021. How about a year from now, our goal will be able to have a list of twenty thousand investors that are actively investing in and community real estate.

Eve: [00:36:43] I think that’s a fantastic goal. I’m happy to add to it.

Stephanie: [00:36:48] Fantastic. It’s a true honor and joy to be in partnership with you.

Eve: [00:36:51] Thank you.

Stephanie: [00:36:52] Thank you.

Eve: [00:37:04] That was Dr. Stephanie Gripne. Stephanie believes that impact investing is all about educating people – trustworthy, non-conflicted investor education. The Impact Financial Center is quickly becoming the go-to place for just this type of education and for every level of investor, from foundations to individuals who have never invested before. You’ll be hearing more about the Impact Finance Center, I’m sure. Please share this podcast so that more people learn about Stephanie and the Impact Finance Center. You can find out more about this episode on the show notes page at EvePicker.com, or you can find other episodes you might have missed. Or you can show your support at Patreon.com /RethinkRealEstate, where you can learn about special opportunities for my friends and followers. A special thanks to David Allardice for his excellent editing of this podcast and original music. And thanks to you for spending your time with me today. We’ll talk again soon, but for now, this is Eve Picker, signing off to go make some change.

Image courtesy of Dr. Stephanie Gripne/IFC and CO Impact Days

Why modular construction?

February 22, 2021

Modular construction is the construction of buildings using modules or prefabricated sections. Manufactured off-site, using assembly line production, modules are fabricated from standard building materials and are built to meet or exceed the building codes of conventional buildings. They can be manufactured without compromising on quality and can meet sophisticated design specifications, including matching existing building aesthetics. After manufacture, the modules are delivered to the building site where they are installed in any specified configuration before being connected together to make an entire building. After assembly, modular buildings are effectively identical to conventional site-built buildings.

If you have been paying attention to the conversation about affordable housing or environmental sustainability in construction, you may have heard of modular construction.

Here are some advantages:

  • Manufacturing can occur at the same time as foundation and site work, reducing construction time
  • Factory manufacture means less waste as inventory is controlled and building materials are weather protected
  • Factory manufacture also reduces the risk of weather delays
  • Prefabrication causes less site disturbance
  • Modular buildings can be disassembled and recycled reducing the overall demand for building materials as well as energy use
  • Manufacturing in a factory-controlled environment means less air pollution


Scott Flynn founded  indieDwell, a modular home company that grew from a one per quarter build to 10 per week in the first four years. IndieDwell began by focusing on affordable modular homes made from shipping containers. Although shipping containers are an amazing form of recycling,  they’re very complicated to use, especially for commercial projects which have more restrictive codes. So, because indieDwell’s mission is to put as many people into high quality, healthy homes as possible, they are in the process of switching to a steel studded frame system. Like the shipping containers before them, the modules will be high performance, energy efficient, durable and sustainable. And the new modules will lower the price of homes even further.

Scott is manufacturing change. Listen in to my podcast conversation with Scott to learn more.

Image from PxHere

The Bridge.

February 17, 2021

Garry Gilliam may be best known for playing in the National Football League, first for the Seattle Seahawks, then the San Francisco 49ers, but today he has a second career as an impact real estate developer. Originally from Harrisburg, at age eight Garry was sent to the Milton Hersey School, a private philanthropic boarding school for orphans and low income children based in nearby Hershey, PA, where he excelled. That model of community is one part of the inspiration for The Bridge, a new real estate development company that is working to acquire old properties like schools, malls, and warehouses, in order to turn them into sustainable communities in the inner city. Each project will be planned as self-contained, mixed-use “Eco-Villages” with housing, commercial/retail space, co-working, urban agriculture, innovation/education center and entertainment. A place to “work, eat, live, learn and play.”

The Bridge came about as a joint effort with Garry’s friends, both from Penn State and the Hershey School, to give back to their hometown community. Their first project began when they leased the Bishop McDevitt Building in Harrisburg, in 2019, to create co-working, maker and event spaces, and this summer they finished their initial fundraising. The complete rehabilitation will include about 50 units of sustainable, zero-energy housing, commercial areas and indoor urban agriculture. The Bridge also hopes to acquire five to 30 acres in Harrisburg for sustainable Eco-Village campuses that can produce healthy fresh food, clean water and renewable energy.

After starting in Harrisburg, the partners then hope to expand to other cities, going into low-income neighborhoods and turning to other athletes and influencers of color to invest in and lead each project. So … watch this space!

Insights and Inspirations

  • Just watch Garry talk about The Bridge. Seriously.
  • Garry wants to invest $1.5B over the next 20 years into 20 different cities with The Bridge.
  • Harrisburg is ripe for impactful development with historical issues that many cities face, including redlining, neighborhoods that are food deserts, and general lack of resources for many school districts.
  • The goal with The Bridge is to find a model that works not just in his hometown, but everywhere.

Information and Links

  • Garry wants to highlight three amazing people: Milton Hershey, Nipsey Hussle and Charles Mully. You can read a little about each of them here.
  • And he gives a shoutout to a book by spiritual teacher David Deida, The Way of the Superior Man.
Read the podcast transcript here

Eve Picker: [00:00:05] Hi there. Thanks so much for joining me today for the latest episode of Impact Real Estate Investing.

Eve: [00:00:11] My guest today is Gary Gilliam. Gary is perhaps best known for his starring role in football. He entered the NFL in 2014 after signing with the Seattle Seahawks, a superstar climax to a very long journey, which we talk about in the podcast. But today’s focus, The Bridge, came about as a joint effort with friends to give back to their hometown, Harrisburg. There they will take an obsolete school building, the Bishop McDevitt Building and repurpose it for 21st century needs. It will become an eco-village with about 50 units of sustainable, zero energy, housing, commercial uses and indoor urban agriculture. Their broader goal is to acquire five to 30 acres for sustainable eco-village campuses that will produce healthy, fresh food, clean water and renewable energy. Gary doesn’t plan to stop there. Over the next 10 years, he hopes to invest one point five billion dollars (1.5) in 20 different cities. He’ll turn to other athletes and influences of color to invest in and lead each project.

Eve: [00:01:35] Be sure to go to Evepicker.com to find out more about Gary on the show notes page for this episode and be sure to sign up for my newsletter so you can access information about impact real estate investing and get the latest news about the exciting projects on my crowdfunding platform, Small Change.

Eve: [00:01:59] All right, Gary, thanks so much for joining me on this show.

Gary Gilliam: [00:02:08] Yeah, thanks for having me.

Eve: [00:02:09] So I’m very excited to talk to you. Someone shared your really wonderful video, What is The Bridge Eco-village, with me. And there’s really there’s so much passion and love in that video. I really just wanted to hear more about the project.

Gary: [00:02:26] Yeah. Yeah, definitely. That video specifically was featuring our pilot location in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. So, The Bridge Eco-village is a for-purpose real estate development company. The model that is also in that video is our B model in which we acquire old schools, malls, warehouses and convert them into eco-villages. And to us, an eco-village is essentially a mixed use development that has spaces for you to work, eat, live, learn and play. So that workspace, co-working spaces, maker-space, an area for entrepreneurs to come for incubation acceleration, what have you, that each branch is actually urban agriculture, the growing food with aeroponics and hydroponics, or growing food without soil, which allows us to grow food year round and also control the environment so we get bigger and higher yields and actually higher nutritional value as well. So that’s where we live is housing, affordable housing as well as luxury housing. It’s important for everybody to be together. That LERN Branch is actually our non-profit, which is Empower at the Bridge Foundation, which is a heavy focus into financial literacy, teaching people how to repair their credit. Also a heavy focus into job training, mostly like contractual work, so plumbing, electrician work, things like that, and then also sustainable business practices and research and development.

Gary: [00:03:51] Then within that play branch, the last branch is entertainment. So that’s providing a space for people to have zip lines and batting cages, electric go-carts, virtual reality areas. So providing entertainment spaces to the local community. So The Bridge Eco-village, essentially a community center or village aspect, mixed use development. The eco aspect actually comes from the way that we are building mostly through our ITW branch, but for the entire building itself. So solar panels not just looking to be net zero, but striving to be net positive in our energy. We have water collection which doubles with how efficient our water usage is within our farming aspect. We actually save ninety five percent more water than what traditional farmers do. And then within our our waste and our carbon, we actually have a bio waste food digester. We can bring in fresh food waste from outside sources, convert that into nutrients and also more energy. So not just, you know, closing the energy loop, the waste loop, the water loop, carbon loop, so building things sustainably and our build environment. But to us, it’s not just about the word sustainable. It’s really about kind of playing chess and thinking ahead and making things that are built to last. So for us, sustainability really means longevity, which is why we’re looking to convert these older good bone schools and malls and do something great with them.

Eve: [00:05:12] You have my head spinning. Any any one of these things is a pretty significant business to start. And for those who are listening, I mean, you’ve you’ve moved a career from professional football to basically community visionary. And so let’s step back a bit. I mean, how did that transformation happen and where did the seed of the idea for The Bridge begin?

Gary: [00:05:38] Way back, actually. So when I was eight years old, I actually was enrolled into a private boarding school for orphans. I’m not an orphan, so I’ll give a little bit of history about the school itself. So Milton Hershey School, founded by Hershey’s Chocolate, the great chocolate chairman Milton Hershey, not only was he into chocolate, but he also founded this school back in 1909 for little white orphan boys. It was called the Hershey Industrial School for Boys. And that’s what the school was up to the 60’s when black males were admitted, to the 70’s and 80’s females were admitted. And by the time that I went in late 90s, it was no longer just for orphans. But your family had to be below the poverty line, single parent homes, still your orphans, foster kids, the like. And what the school does is it provides a fully cost free education. You live on campus, cost free your clothes, your food, everything, and then they double it up. And when you graduate from the high school, whatever college you get accepted to, they provide you with a pretty significant scholarship, anywhere from eighty thousand to one hundred thousand dollars to go toward that education.

Eve: [00:06:47] Wow.

Gary: [00:06:48] So, that’s really the true inspiration of the work, eat, live, learn, play model. One the school, but but on a bigger scale, the town itself. So there was nothing in that farm town of Hershey wasn’t being called Hershey until Milton Hershey himself went there and established this town. Now there’s a four theme park, stadiums, theaters, obviously the entire school just it’s now a one stop shop for everything that he provided for his workers. But now it’s an entertainment space for everybody. So, that work, eat, live, learn, play model definitely comes from the town. And then also on a microcosm of the school itself, providing all the opportunities and resources that the kids needed that would have never gotten those opportunities or resources before.

Eve: [00:07:29] I bet Hershey would love to hear this story, right?

Gary: [00:07:32] Yeah, yeah.

Eve: [00:07:33] That’s a great seed to plant. So then you went on to have a professional career in football and I suppose came back to your hometown, right? That’s Harrisburg.

Gary: [00:07:45] Yeah, yeah, yeah. Yep. So I got a full ride scholarship to play at Penn State where I went and played for Joe Paterno and Bill O’Brien. While there, I triple majored in business, advertising and psychology. So made sure that with that full ride I maximize it and got some pieces of paper to my name. So then after that I went to the NFL. I went undrafted actually to the Seattle Seahawks. Earned a starting spot there and played there for three years and ended up getting two new contracts actually with the Forty Niners. And that’s who I most recently played with and now I’m a free agent. I’m taking this year off to stay away from the virus and decided to, you know,  develop The Bridge. A few business plans had already been developed for The Bridge. So you kind of put them together. So, yeah, I went to the NFL, played for a few different teams, and now I’m doing some real estate development. And like you stated, you know, community development.

Eve: [00:08:38] Yes, it’s a lot of fun, isn’t it?

Gary: [00:08:40] Absolutely.

Eve: [00:08:41] Yeah. Where are you starting? Like, physically? What are the buildings like? And you have a first project, I think, in Harrisburg. What does it look like?

Gary: [00:08:50] Yeah. Yeah. So that specific property was built in 1930. It’s an old Catholic school. The Catholic school was there until 2014, so it’s been empty since then. It’s actually the fallout shelter for the city. So it’s got great bones. It’s actually really, really good shape on the inside. A few areas need some work, got to put a sprinkler system in and repair parts of the roof. That’s part of the biggest expense, aside from obviously the renovations that we plan on doing. But, yeah, that the building in terms of the areas, though, that The Bridge itself targets, there are three main requirements. First and foremost, the town or the city or the area is a food desert or within close proximity to a food desert.

Eve: [00:09:37] Um Hm.

Gary: [00:09:37] Our main objective is to convert food deserts into food oases. Food security and food localization are extremely important, not just in the health of individuals, but also in finances and keeping the dollar circulating within your community. So first and foremost, food deserts. Second, we’re targeting places that have home owner occupied rates lower than 45 percent. And then we’re also the third requirement is the local school district there is ranked in the bottom half of the state. So those three things, Venn diagramed out the middle area right there is where The Bridge wants to be. Normally areas that most developers don’t want to go into. Lots of distressed properties, you know, areas that don’t have people that have a lot of disposable income. Those are the exact people that we’re targeting. We’re pitching or constructing this model to really combat systematic oppression. Those things that I just labeled create systematic oppression and keeps whoever lives in those areas down. You don’t have resources there. You don’t have opportunities to get yourself out of those situations. So that’s right where we want to be.

Eve: [00:10:40] Ok, so this first building sounds like a gut rehab. I think I saw pictures of it. It’s pretty gorgeous on your video and it looks pretty big. How big is it and what are you planning to actually build inside that space? And you adding new buildings like I’m an architect. I want to know how the physical structure, what you’re planning.

Gary: [00:11:01] So it’s one hundred and twenty thousand square feet.

Eve: [00:11:05] Oh, that’s pretty big. Yeah.

Gary: [00:11:06] Sitting on eight and a half acres. And it’s currently there’s a ground floor, first floor and a second floor. We plan on building another floor on top, at least one floor. We’re still deciding if we’re going to go a bit higher within that top floor is going to be housing. As of now, we’ve got about 50 units. And that’s a mix of affordable housing as well as luxury housing. As I stated. In the ground floor is actually where our maker-space, music studio, a digital media lab, that’s where those those areas are. So kind of the co-working space.

Eve: [00:11:41] Incubator space.

Gary: [00:11:41] Some co-working offices up on the first floor, as well as some more housing. The gym, there’s a gym. The gym will remain the gym. There’s a nice stage in there and some built-in bleachers. So we’ll refurbish that and people will be able to use that for TED talks and what have you. We’re not going to put a gym floor back into it, but you will be able to do some physical activities in there, pull up curtains, sectioned off the area, use it for different events and what have you. There’ll be a new building actually built connected to the gym, which will house our adventure arcade. So the zip lines, the batting cages, the trampolines and what have you. So that’ll be new build as well as our farm. Which is looking to be anywhere from sixty thousand to seventy thousand square feet, but going vertical. So about six stories high, so only taken up about a third of an acre, but being able to produce the same amount of food that 13 acres does in a traditional farming sense.

Eve: [00:12:34] It sounds like your plans are pretty fleshed out. Like, how far along are you in the development process?

Gary: [00:12:39] Yeah, the conceptual phase is done. We’re getting our land development plan together. We haven’t gotten our full construction drawings together yet. We’re still locking in a few of our different anchor tenants, some of the local entities that want to be a part of our mission and really help the demographic that we’re trying to help too. So we’re making sure we lock in the right anchor tenants there and get their spaces developed the way that they like them. And as of now, we’re raising money. And luckily, being in the NFL, I got to be our main investor. But we’re in the process of opening up to bring more investors in so we can obviously bring this fully to fruition. We just had our groundbreaking actually on November 19 and looking to start construction in the spring.

Eve: [00:13:21] Oh, wow. So you’re really pretty far along.

Gary: [00:13:23] Yeah. Yeah. So we’re we’re moving along, moving, moving, moving right along. We acquired the building last November, so we took the last year to really do a lot of our planning stuff. You know, Covid slowed a few things down.

Eve: [00:13:36] Really slowed things down.

Gary: [00:13:38] Yeah. But allowed us to still meet virtually and get some of our things done.

Eve: [00:13:43] Right.

Gary: [00:13:43] But now we’re obviously entering the next phase and taking it from paper to dirt and steel. It’s going to be paramount that we get there. And so being in March, April, May it will look a little bit better.

Eve: [00:13:53] Yes, hopefully. So what do the locals think?

Gary: [00:13:56] Oh, we’ve got, oh man, tremendous community support. So, what we do, like so The Bridge Eco-village, work, eat, live, learn, play. Right. That’s that’s the model. But the specific amenities within each of those branches is determined by what the community there needs. Right. So, okay yeah, we want a co-working space, if that’s what you guys want, or we want an area like a maker-space. Like, what do you guys want within a maker-space. What do you need. What have you not had access to. You know, so we actually hold a bunch of community panels before we even put together our plan. So that’s what a lot of the last year was too, is getting in touch with local community, local neighborhoods, figuring out what the specific things people want, need, what’s lacking, obviously talking to not just the community, but also to politicians and getting their support. You know, because obviously within the fundraising aspect, there’s a public private partnership. So being able to have their support as we pursue some of those public funds was was very important, you know, and they’re all behind it. Everybody’s super behind, you know, what we’re doing. It’s not like this is some like, you know, come to Jesus thing. This is like, all right, look, we have an old school here, a building that’s been sitting here as a community. We have an opportunity now to put together a plan to really develop this thing as something that we could use and need. And not only that, but then actually create a showcase to show what other communities can do in their places and in their cities with their old buildings.

Eve: [00:15:18] You talked about public private partnerships. Does that include financing partnerships?

Gary: [00:15:23] Yeah, absolutely.

Eve: [00:15:24] So affordable housing dollars or historic tax credits?

Gary: [00:15:29] Yep.

Eve: [00:15:29] Like, how do you bring the capital stuff together? I know these projects are very difficult.

Gary: [00:15:34] Yeah, yeah. No, so a lot. So there’s different grants, obviously, like you mentioned, tax credits, historical tax credits. We actually have a meeting set up with the expert, for historical tax credits. The way we designed our plan, we know we’re not being super intrusive and knocking down a ton of different walls. So, we are  anticipating…

Eve: [00:15:52] Yes, they don’t like that, do they?

Gary: [00:15:57] No, they don’t. That’s the kind of the public side, the private side, a lot of different athletes and entertainers. Right. So. As an athlete, most of us have different, like I’ll speak specifically to the NFL and football. We have our own football camps and we go back home. Right. So, it never really sat well with me, you know, just like, ah man, first of all, the chances of making it to the NFL are very, very, very low. And even if you do make it to the NFL, the chances of you keeping a lot of your money is very, very low. Eighty eight percent of NFL players are bankrupt within just two years of playing.

Eve: [00:16:29] Oh, that’s shocking.

Gary: [00:16:30] Eighty eight percent. Yeah.

Eve: [00:16:32] Why is that?

Gary: [00:16:33] That’s financial literacy and really understanding, you know, just making bad investments. I think you’ve got to have a certain image, spending the money in the wrong places, purchasing liberty.

Eve: [00:16:44] You grow up poor and then you have all this money. And because no one’s ever really taught you how to manage it, it’s too much.

Gary: [00:16:51] Yeah. Yeah. Kind of like, you know, when people win the lottery. Most of them end up same thing, either broke or dead, unfortunately.

Eve: [00:16:58] What a shame. Okay.

Gary: [00:17:00] So, aside from that, which is also an issue, instead of going home and preaching about or having the kids come in and go to these football camps, and them thinking, oh, I want to make it to the NFL and be just like Gary Gilliam, you know, if there’s a kid that that has the potential, by all means, do it. It’s also great for the physical aspect and getting the kids out of the house to do things. But let’s think a little more deeply with it. Let’s let’s really go back and talk about real estate, business, agriculture, leveraging credit. Let’s talk about those things. You can create a lot more millionaires that way than we do with athletics, right? That same drive and tenacity and execution ability that we have in athletics, we can mirror that in the business world, too. So let’s be the face of that. You know, athletes, let’s be the ones that are going back home now and using the money that we’ve gained to then, one, create opportunities for other people to gain money, but also be helping a ton of people. And most of them like it and and they want to get on board. And what The Bridge is, is it’s a model. So it’s not just in Harrisburg. We’ve got a target to hit a bunch of other cities over the next few years. So this thing is about scalability. It’s about impact. Like I stated in the very beginning, it’s a for purpose real estate development company. So really about impacting individual’s lives. But it’s also structured and made in a way that you can make a lot of money with and has a great return too.

Eve: [00:18:20] So then what will success look like to you in five or 10 years, say?

Gary: [00:18:26] Yeah, I think success will go back to our three requirements. If that area is no longer a food desert. If the home ownership are higher than forty five percent, significantly higher. And if the school district in that area is then ranked in the top half of the state, then that’s when we know we were successful. And that ripple will be able to be measured. That’s quantifiable. We’ll be able to see that with numbers. And you kind of wonder, OK, well, how does the school district, how does homeownership rates, how does that food desert, how does that relate to the bridge? Well, the school district is directly correlated to homeownership rates and values, which in our LERN branch were heavy on financial literacy, getting people into homes, using FHA loans to get their home owner occupied, taking care of properties, property values go up, more funding to our school districts. Right, these things are linked. So if we’re doing, we’re supposed to do with each bridge location and that means the area surrounding us, none of those things are now issues and we’ll see how far that ripple goes. Which will then allow us to overlap, if need be, other bridge locations so we can start to cover the areas that still have those issues.

Eve: [00:19:32] Those are really great and pragmatic metrics. I think it’ll work really well.

Gary: [00:19:38] Thank you.

Eve: [00:19:38] I have to ask, what’s the biggest challenge you’ve had with this project? Maybe you haven’t had any.

Gary: [00:19:44] The biggest challenge personally would be asking people for money. It’s kind of an odd thing personally, for me to do so, you know, getting over that hump and just kind of like, yeah, you know, this is this is kind of, you know, what we’re doing. And everyone’s always like, well, how can I get involved? It’s like, well, we need capital. That’s that’s that’s a big thing. You know, we’ve kind of assembled The Avengers. If you’ve got expertise, right, in architectural stuff or engineering or marketing or whatever else it is, like, this is obviously something that would be in a lot of different cities and teams are needed in each of those cities to run these living buildings, if you will. So, yeah. So teams and capital.

Eve: [00:20:22] Ok, and what’s your what’s your really big, hairy, audacious goal? You said you wanted to be in a few other cities in a few years. What’s, what does this look like in in 10 years from now, do you think?

Gary: [00:20:33] Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. We’re looking to raise. You want big hairy. Okay.

Eve: [00:20:38] Yeah, Big hairy.

Gary: [00:20:39] Ok, here we go. One point five billion dollars. We want to pump that into 20 different cities over 10 years.

Eve: [00:20:50] Okay.

Gary: [00:20:50] One point five billion dollars to be deployed into 20 different cities over 10 years.

Eve: [00:20:56] That is a lot.

Gary: [00:20:59] Yeah, Big. Hairy. All that.

Eve: [00:21:01] Yeah, this is really great. Well, I’m really excited to see what what happens. I would love to be at your groundbreaking. Who knows if we’ll be through this pandemic by then. I hope I hope it’s over soon. But it really it sounds like a fantastic project. And I want to tell everyone, if they haven’t seen your video, they should go look at it because it’s a pretty wonderful description of what you’re trying to do. I really enjoyed it.

Gary: [00:21:28] Thank you.

Eve: [00:21:29] It’s been really nice talking to you.

Gary: [00:21:31] You as well. Thanks for having me.

Eve: [00:21:43] That was Gary Gilliam. Football star would probably be enough for most people. It’s not enough for Gary, who planned to leverage his extensive and influential network to do some good. To do a lot of good. The community he grew up in, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, is poor and segregated. Gary says it is the epitome of systematic oppression, redlining, food desert, lack of resources for the school district. It’s all here. And it’s been that way since I was young. He wants to find a real solution for those real points of pain, not just in Harrisburg, but all over the world. You can find out more about impact real estate investing and access the show notes for today’s episode at my website, Evepicker.com. While you’re there, sign up for my newsletter to find out more about how to make money in real estate while building better cities. Thank you so much for spending your time with me today. And thank you, Gary, for sharing your thoughts. We’ll talk again soon. But for now, this is Eve Picker signing off to go make some change.

Image courtesy of Garry Gilliam, The Bridge.

Let’s be brave.

February 10, 2021

Diana Lind is a writer, editor, critic and urban advocate. Now heading the Arts and Business Council for Greater Philadelphia, Diana made her mark at Next City, a nonprofit, online news organization focused on urban issues and stories about creating equitable cities. Diana moved to Philadelphia, in 2008, from her hometown of NYC to take over as editor in chief, and she later became the executive director. After Next City she was the founding managing director of the Fels Policy Research Initiative at The University of Pennsylvania, where she worked until joining the Arts and Business Council in 2019. Previously, Diana worked at the Philadelphia Media Network, which owns the Philadelphia Inquirer, and was both a freelance editor for Rizzoli and editor/critic for Architectural Record.

In October, Diana published a new book on the history of and alternatives to the single-family home in the United States, called Brave New Home. Meant as a way to introduce laypeople to the rich (and sometimes troubled) history of housing in the U.S., her book also confronts the housing disparities we must bravely face today. Diana is a frequent public speaker, and has given keynotes or participated in panels at more than 100 events, including major conventions like the World Urban Forum and Smart City Expo. In 2008, she published Brooklyn Modern: Architecture, Interiors & Design, and she has received honors such as the TED City 2.0 prize, the ACLU Stand Up for Freedom award, and a funded residency at Blue Mountain Center. She serves on the boards of Next City and The Philadelphia Citizen.

Insights and Inspirations

  • Let’s be brave, Diana says. And brave we must be to solve the housing crisis.  
  • Governments must bravely tweak their zoning regulations, so that new and affordable housing types can easily be built.  
  • Developers must bravely experiment with their next housing project.  
  • Banks must bravely finance new housing products.  
  • And NIMBYS must bravely accept some change.

Information and Links

  • Be sure to check out Diana’s new book!
  • And she wants to point people to Next City, “the best source of national news about urban innovations.”
  • And, The Philadelphia Citizen, the local solutions journalism website where she is also a board member. It’s a fantastic window into the “good things in Philly” that are happening, and the leaders who are making it so.
Read the podcast transcript here

Eve Picker: [00:00:15] Hi there. Thanks so much for joining me today for the latest episode of Impact Real Estate Investing. My guest today is Diana Lind. She’s written a book called Brave New Home. In it, she explores the history of and alternatives to the single family home in the United States. Her interest in this subject was kindled by her own experiences as a young mother living in a typical single family home which didn’t quite meet her needs. Diana’s past experiences come into full focus with this book. Professionally, she started life as a writer at Architectural Record, kindling an interest in architecture, and her tenure at Next City cemented her interest in urban advocacy. If you’d like to know more about Diana once you’ve listened in, be sure to go to EvePicker.com to find out more on the show notes page for this episode. And be sure to sign up for my newsletter so you can access information about impact real estate investing and get the latest news about the exciting projects on my crowdfunding platform, Small Change.

Eve: [00:01:42] Hi, Diana. I’m really delighted to have you here with me today.

Diana Lind: [00:01:46] Thanks so much for having me.

Eve: [00:01:47] So, you’re a writer and you’ve spent your career deeply immersed in urban issues. And I’m wondering how you became an urban advocate?

Diana : [00:01:57] Sure, I grew up in New York City. So, living in a city and just adoring all of its creativity, its vibrancy, its density, all of these kinds of things, just as part of who I am. But I originally thought I was going to be a novelist or just a journalist. And when I graduated from college, my first job was working at a magazine, but it was working at an architecture magazine. And I didn’t really know very much about architecture, but it was a fantastic experience. I was working for Architectural Record and I still write for them and it’s a fantastic publication. And really from that experience, that was in the early 2000s, it was a period when there was a big focus on kind of the ‘Bilbao effect.’ How could cities use amazing architecture to spark a downtown revitalization in cities around the country? And so, I really went from architecture into becoming very interested in cities and started working at Next City, which was then known as the Next American City Magazine, in Philadelphia. And that’s really when I transitioned from being focused on architecture, to cities and urban policy issues. And I’ve been in that place ever since.

Eve: [00:03:21] So, did you ever get to Bilbao?

Diana : [00:03:23] I did not, no.

Eve: [00:03:25] I did, it’s a really fantastic city. It’s a really interesting city.

Diana : [00:03:32] Yeah. I mean, what is one of the problems with the Bilbao effect’s translation into the U.S. is that I think a lot of people thought, well, you just need an awesome museum by a brand name architect and you need so much more than that.

Eve: [00:03:45] Oh, no. I think the remarkable thing about Bilbao that I really, was burned into my brain, is the use of public squares and how just the culture is very different in American culture. So, in the evening, you know, families would come out into these little urban courtyards and squares and join other families and the kids would be playing and it was fantastic. That’s really what Bilbao is about.

Diana : [00:04:10] Yeah. And also like an economic development strategy, not just an expensive museum. So, I think you need a fuller package. Yeah, for sure.

Eve: [00:04:20] So, tell me about your latest book, Brave New Home.

Diana : [00:04:23] Sure. Brave New Home just came out in October 2020. And the book is really a history of single family housing in the United States and an exploration of how we went from a country that had many more diverse housing options to one dominated by single family homes. And then a forward looking view at what are some alternatives to the single family home and why they’ve become so compelling. And swirling all around this is issues of demographic change, cultural change, ways in which just society has changed and housing has not kept pace. So, the conclusion looks also at how can we address some of the social, economic and environmental issues that we’re facing as a country through better housing policies.

Eve: [00:05:17] So, why did you write the book? What prompted you to write it?

Diana : [00:05:20] I was inspired to write the book first from a personal level. So, I was one of these people in my 20’s and early 30’s who spent very little time at home. And I was always kind of out working or I was going out with friends or going to different cities, things like that. And then when I had my first child, I just started spending so much more time at home and I really started to question how I had come to assume that a certain style of living, the single family row home that we lived in, was the right choice for our family. And also wondered about why it was, being a first-time mother, very difficult in terms of not having connections to people to kind of learn from and talk to, and other families to have dinner with where it wouldn’t matter if your child was screaming or crying. And I’ve found that we have created all of these sort of workarounds to that, like Mommy and Me classes that you pay 20 dollars to participate in. But that, you know, actually housing, multigenerational housing, neighborhoods that were purposefully built to be, you know, more closely knit as communities. These were ways in which we had raised generations in the past, and that was really no longer the case anymore. So, it started with a kind of personal questioning of how housing affects our lives in the way that we just raise families and exist in the world.

Eve: [00:06:55] Right.

Diana : [00:06:56] And then, this was a number of years ago, when really the price appreciation in Philadelphia where I live, and in many other cities, was picking up at a really fast pace. So, I think in 2016, prices went up by about 20 percent in Philadelphia in just one year alone. And so just witnessing…

Eve: [00:07:18] Wow…

Diana : [00:07:18] Yeah, and, you know, and that was not even the most extreme example. I mean, Seattle was probably the leader that year. And so, recognizing that housing was so expensive and there was such a great need for more affordable housing and just absolutely no way that we were going to be able to just sort of subsidize our way out of that, through whether it was new taxes or new government programs, that there had to be some other ways of addressing some of this affordability issue. And then finally, also in the past couple years, obviously, people had been thinking about climate change forever. But, you know, in the past couple of years, it’s become very evident, especially with wildfires in California, that the ways in which we have built into nature and kind of further expanded development has really had an impact on our ability to bring climate change under control. So, the social, economic and environmental issues had been swirling. And really, I wanted to put it together in a book and write about it in a way that would be accessible to people who knew a little bit about housing, but not a ton, perhaps. And also just sort of like a general person who was very curious about some of these issues and needed a bit of like a foundation of understanding the history of housing in the country.

Eve: [00:08:41] Right. You must have learned a lot researching it. What was the most surprising thing you learned?

Diana : [00:08:48] You know, that’s a good question. I don’t know that I was entirely surprised, but I had, of course, imagined that in the past there were more diverse housing options, like obviously knew about boarding houses or single room occupancy type buildings, or inns and taverns and the very beginning of colonial cities and whatnot. What I didn’t realize was that there were just so many variations upon things like apartment hotels that were built to give people a certain amount of privacy in their own apartment. But to have these kind of communal dining rooms where you could connect with your neighbors. And also how, you know, some of these types of communities were not seen as the way that I think they’re portrayed today, as kind of just bourgeois, you know, laziness, but rather a way to address some of the domestic inequality of women always having to take on the laundry, the cleaning of the house, et cetera. And so, some of these kinds of communities where there were amenities built in, were actually seen as feminist projects.

Eve: [00:10:00] That’s amazing.

Diana : [00:10:01] Yeah. And, you know, gender segregated housing that had a mission to provide for professional opportunities and colleagueship among women or men, over and over, and I couldn’t include it all in the book, but just found really interesting examples of, like, housing set aside for sailors that came in the city. Or, you know, just like so many different types. And we think, you know, pretty much today of just like single family housing and senior housing and maybe student housing. And that’s kind of it, you know?

Eve: [00:10:33] I interviewed someone a few months back who built a project, specifically housing for teachers. So, again, a community like that could kind of really lean on each other in a variety of ways. Interesting. You must have learned some troubling things as well. I read a quote. You said, “The housing that we built is built on a model that was created, frankly, with a lot of classist and racist exclusivity and privacy in mind.” So, you know, tell me about them.

Diana : [00:11:03] Sure, yeah, well, when you look at the growth of single family homes, it really started in the early 20th century at a time when there was an influx of immigrants in cities and a lot of the immigrants were not wealthy people living in crowded situations, in tenements and other housing types. And when both a combination of a bunch of different things happened, housing became more affordable to build through some standardizations of technologies and materials and the proliferation of private cars and trolleys and transit systems that would get people out of cities. You know, the real push for these initial suburbs in the beginning of the 20th century were really opportunities for the wealthiest and the whitest to move out of cities.

Eve: [00:12:02] That was catastrophic. Places like Pittsburgh. Right?

Diana : [00:12:06] Um hum, yeah. And that started, you know, really before what we think of as the baby boom period, which really led to suburbanization and very much car oriented suburbs, which then were communities that were built explicitly to exclude people of color, Jewish people and other minority groups. And that was done both legally, first through redlining and then sort of extra legally continued through restrictive covenants that could determine who was able to own a home or not able to own a home. You know, I think a lot of people in the history that has been talked about of this have really thought about the suburbs as being this great opportunity for people to access affordable housing and improve their quality of life. But it was not an opportunity that was available to all people. And many people have read Richard Rothstein’s Color of Law, but that is a whole book on that particular topic and certainly worth reading for that.

Eve: [00:13:12] Ok, so what does housing reform look like to you after writing this book and doing this research?

Diana : [00:13:18] The key thing is recognizing that there are a lot of different demographics in the country that want different styles of housing and we’ve really tried a sort of one size fits all approach to housing through the single family home and pursued that too. I think in some cases boost property values for people to continue to provide the kind of privacy and seclusion that we associate with the American dream, but which is really benefiting a kind of smaller and smaller group of homeowners. And in fact, as more corporate entities come into the single family home investment space, buying up tens of thousands of properties to use them as rental properties or even as flipping options as Zillow and other companies have done, it’s not even homeowners anymore who are pursuing this dream. So recognizing that we need to provide options for people who are in different economic circumstances and have different cultural and social needs is going to be really important. The reform part of it would really be to ensure that there is the zoning that allows for different types of housing, that there are incentives that provide for different types of housing, and that we’re not really only incentivizing the single family home through things like the mortgage interest deduction, through homeownership oriented programs, but that we’re thinking about ways to say legalize and encourage duplexes, because that might be a style of housing particularly suited for multigenerational households or households where someone needs an in-home caretaker or people need access to rental income or all of these various different things. And it’s really not legal in many neighborhoods, residential communities across the country. So I think step one would certainly be reforming the zoning and reforming what kinds of incentives we provide for housing.

Eve: [00:15:28] Yeah, okay, I suppose that was my next question. What is the impact of zoning on building a more equitable housing landscape is huge.

Diana : [00:15:37] Absolutely. Just yesterday, I was talking with a group of people interested in trying to encourage Philadelphia to reword some of its zoning to allow for accessory dwelling units across the city or in more neighborhoods and make the zoning less restrictive for it. And hearing from developers that were part of the group talking about how it costs time and money to have to deal with zoning variances or the uncertainty about whether a project is going to get it approved, you realize just how these kinds of zoning issues affect the whole pipeline of housing.

Eve: [00:16:19] Enormously. So, we actually have an offering live on Small Change for aiding a developer in Oregon. And there they put an overlay district, I think it statewide, which makes them use by right as long as they conform to a certain size. And he’s built the business around that zoning regulation.

Diana : [00:16:40] Yeah.

Eve: [00:16:40] So that he can move really quickly and create a manufactured unit that is actually half the price, a regular one bedroom unit to build. It’s one hundred and fifteen thousand instead of two hundred and fifty. So they have that in place. But the next problem is that financing them. I mean, you cannot find a bank, a CDFI fund or anyone who really finance these projects.

Diana : [00:17:07] Yeah, I think that’s an interesting issue and something that I talk a little bit about in the book. I give an example of an innovative project in Los Angeles through a nonprofit there, called LA Más. And they were really exploring, along with the city of Los Angeles, how to provide accessory dwelling units that would be both affordable to construct, and affordable to finance and all these kinds of issues. And what they were trying to do was to essentially line up all the parts for the homeowner to make it kind of one stop shopping so that they could have the contractor, the architect, the financing, all as part of a package that you buy into. Because I think one of the other issues is just for so many people, the idea of building an accessory dwelling unit is it’s very difficult. And if you’re not real estate savvy…

Eve: [00:18:02] Oh, it’s impossible. So, this guy actually builds it, installs it, finances it, and then gives them a ground lease. So, the opportunity to buy it at any time, you know, within a 10 year period, I think.

Diana : [00:18:19] Right. So that’s definitely a model that is gaining popularity and with good reason.

Eve: [00:18:24] Yeah, except he can’t finance it. I mean, it’s really difficult like we are with this huge housing need. And while I think people are being extremely creative, developing new models, getting banks and financial institutions to catch up is the next part of the story, right?

Diana : [00:18:46] Yes, absolutely. You know, just today, I got an invite to a webinar about accessory dwelling units with someone from Fannie Mae participating in it. So I think that there is kind of an increasing awareness among our governmental institutions that are financing housing that we need to be more nimble in what types of housing we’re financing and that there’s a I think, a growing awareness among a lot of banks as well. To your point about that statewide overlay in Oregon and some of the reform in California, these are huge markets and there’s a real opportunity there for these banks. So it’s going to become a question of them figuring out sooner rather than later that this is going to be a business opportunity for them. And they would be silly to not participate in that.

Eve: [00:19:38] Yeah, I think what I love most, about ADUs, backyard units, Grandma, in-law units, whatever you want to call them, is that they slip into an existing infrastructure in the neighborhood which has transit options and the grocery store and the school, they just slip in as extra housing without much fuss at all. If you can provide an affordable unit to someone in a great neighborhood that already exists, it’s just a fabulous option and we ought to all be on it.

Diana : [00:20:09] Yeah, yeah, absolutely. You know, something I try to stress in the book is that I don’t think there is a single housing option that’s going to solve the housing crisis. And so, you know, accessory dwelling units, they sort of have their limits. And before this call, you and I were talking a little bit about covid. And it kind of reminds me in some sense of what is increasingly called sort of like the Swiss cheese model, which is the idea that you have to wear a mask, you have to do social distancing, you have to limit the time you’re spending in certain places and that none of these various different safeguards is going to be enough to prevent covid. But when you do them all together, then you actually are able to prevent it relatively well.

Eve: [00:20:49] Make some impact. Yeah, yeah.

Diana : [00:20:51] So I think that’s sort of the same thing with housing, which is like, you know, these accessory dwelling units, they’re not going to solve everything, nor are duplexes, nor multifamily because they’re not going to work in every kind of context, but we have to think about what works in a given context and think about how we might be able to update housing to better provide affordability or some of the kind of needs that people have today.

Eve: [00:21:17] So what about co-living or co-housing, which is an emerging affordable housing trend? And I’ve talked to a variety of developers and I worked with a variety of developers just tackling this in so many different ways. It’s really fascinating.

Diana : [00:21:32] Yeah, so co-living was really picking up a lot of steam before the pandemic. And I have heard that there’s continuing to be some expansion and kind of merging of co-living companies. And I think it is still continuing to be a viable product and will be certainly post pandemic. But co-living, you know, is this idea of people having their own private bedrooms but larger shared spaces with programming and a sort of intentional community aspect to the building or the house, what have you, behind it. And certainly there are a lot of advantages of it and ways in which co-living really responds to demographic needs. And that, again, is sort of one of the thrust of the book is that, you know, there are young people who are not interested in acquiring furniture, are not interested in long leases. They want experiences. They want, you know, an Instagram worthy meal. They want, you know, just different types of things. And this is not to say it’s all people. And certainly it is a wealthier demographic of young people that tend to be living in these kind of traditional co-living spaces. That said, co-living has also, I think, de-stigmatized, shared living in a way in which we haven’t seen in a long time. So the kind of idea that living in a small apartment but having a small studio but having access to all of these amenities and other people, that kind of makes it seem cool. But we’ve seen some developers like Common, for example, which has then now partnered with cities like New York and Atlanta to build shared living and co-living spaces for people who are lower income or who are formerly homeless. So it can transcend one market into another. And I think it’s a really interesting housing type to get to address both some of the social needs that people have for actually connecting with people. You know, young people are like the loneliest generation, especially as more people spend time online. I think really value time in person as well. And so it’s a great way to address some of that social need and also provide some of that density that is going to have economic and environmental benefits too.

Eve: [00:24:01] In markets, like New York City it provides an opportunity for someone to live there. I suppose if you want to call affordably, you know, in a place that really could not afford to live.

Diana : [00:24:11] Right. Yes, that is definitely I think part of the whole idea is that for decades now, people have lived in little shoeboxes in New York and San Francisco, you know, sharing a, say, two bedroom apartment among six young people or what have you. And it’s kind of taking a little bit of that same idea. But but doing it in a more thoughtful way. And, yeah, like people are going to be spending a lot of money on rent anyways to live in a prime neighborhood. This is a way to do that and do it and actually sometimes like a more legal and friendly fashion.

Eve: [00:24:49] Right, right. Right. So are there any other housing trends that you believe are kind of really important for our future?

Diana : [00:24:55] Definitely think that multigenerational housing is one of the sleeper issues in housing that has not really gotten the attention of both the marketplace solutions and government policies. Multigenerational housing, so three or more generations under a roof, was on the rise in the U.S. and at the highest level since the 1950’s, I think in 2018. When the next data dump comes out, I’m very interested to see. I’m sure that it is even higher now. Also, people living with kin has also increased. So not just multiple generations, but living with an aunt and uncle or brother or sister or cousin, that kind of thing. People can, of course, live all in a single family home together in a multigenerational fashion. But, you know, there are a lot of housing types that were traditionally available, like duplexes, like multifamily townhouses that worked quite well for this type of demographic that we could see the renewal of that being very important to support in multigenerational housing. So I think that’s going to be a huge trend in the future.

Eve: [00:26:13] That’s kind of ‘the missing middle,’ right?

Diana : [00:26:15] Mm hmm. Right. Yeah.

Eve: [00:26:17] We’ve touched on this, but what role should developers or communities or city government or even federal government play in building an equitable housing landscape?

Diana : [00:26:28] Well, I think it requires certainly all of these different stakeholders. And the role that developers can play is being willing to experiment with housing types, being willing to test out housing that might work for a niche demographic that actually is quite huge. You know, I think that’s one of the things that we found with co-living, for example. Like, you don’t need all young people to live this way because the millennial generation is the largest generation that exists. But even just a fraction of it is a huge market. So a willingness to look beyond the status quo is going to be important from developers. I think from the government side of things, a willingness to accept that we’re not going to be able to simply create all the affordable housing that we need through the old standard measures of old government programs. It would be great if, as President elect Biden has proposed, that of making Section eight an entitlement that will do a lot to create more affordable housing. But I also think that government needs to recognize that there is a role here to play in changing zoning to adjust. Yes. What might actually flourish more naturally in their city if they adjusted the zoning.

Eve: [00:27:47] I mean, it’s so expensive to change zoning regulations. I was part of a zoning regulation rewrite a couple of decades ago, and it was a huge project.

Diana : [00:27:58] Right.

Eve: [00:27:59] You have all these small places that where did they get the funds from?

Diana : [00:28:05] Right, and that’s where I think some of the state reform is really powerful because then you don’t have the same kinds of issues of small municipalities having to figure out how to change their zoning. I’m thinking more along the lines of larger cities that could adjust their zoning and have processes to look at their planning documents every few years. So I think that’s definitely a way to adjust some of it.

Eve: [00:28:34] Right back to you. What are you currently working on?

Diana : [00:28:39] I sometimes marvel at the fact that I was able to write the book because I have two young kids and I have a full time job. And then there’s been this pandemic which has made everything…

Eve: [00:28:50] Three jobs.

Diana : [00:28:51] Yeah, right. So, I think at the moment I’m really just trying to get the word out about the book and kind of get those ideas out there a bit more. I do have some ideas of what some potential next book could be. Very interested in the discussion about how cities are going to transform as a result of the pandemic and more rather than just the pandemic, the increase in online working and how that is going to change cities and the sort of ways in which retail had been troubled pre pandemic. But that has just been accelerated. So, something about that future of the city question and something I’ve written about a little bit lately, and I could imagine looking at that in a larger format.

Eve: [00:29:41] That would be really interesting.

Diana : [00:29:42] Yeah.

Eve: [00:29:43] I just wanted to go back to one other thing. You grew up in New York City and I think you live in Philly now, right?

Diana : [00:29:48] Yeah.

Eve: [00:29:49] What do you love about Philly and what do you think it needs to do better to become a 21st century metro area.

Diana : [00:29:56] Well, I think Philly is a fantastic city for so many different reasons. I think the reason that I love it currently, which is different than a couple of years ago, is just how amazing its cultural institutions are. I now run something called The Arts and Business Council. That’s my day job, if you will. And so I work with people in the creative sector and also businesses who are interested in getting involved in the creative community as well. So that just makes me really excited about the city seeing how that plays out. I live not too far from many of its big institutions, like the museums and the library, the central branch of the library and some of its great parks. So just all of that kind of like cultural infrastructure is built into, baked into Philly, and that is fantastic. The other thing that I really love about it is that it is a city that is changing, but not at such warp speed. That was definitely something I felt in New York in my early 20’s there. It just felt like the city was changing so fast and it was really disruptive. And so there’s like a nice pace of change here. Where it needs to go in the future? I think it just needs to be a more brave to take a word from the book.

Eve: [00:31:16] Yeah. Brave. I love that word. Everyone gets to be brave.

Diana : [00:31:20] Yes, totally. So that’s a little bit of a motto from the book is like, let’s be brave. And, you know, it’s amazing to see how we’ve closed down some streets for outdoor restaurants and taking up parking spaces for that and stuff like that. It’s just exposed how we could reorganize the city to be more pedestrian friendly, more bicycle friendly, all that kind of stuff. And we’ve not had the focus on that. I also think, you know, just a huge issue is the school system here is facing a huge deficit as a result of the pandemic and just a recognition that this is like the top priority for the city and we have to figure it out and do it right, at this point. There hasn’t been consensus around that, but I just don’t see a way forward for Philly if we don’t solve that. So that is going to need some bold action as well. You know, you can take these ideas and a bunch of different directions. I think we could do a lot more in terms of our transit, in terms of our housing, that would just be less about trying to recapture the status quo, but trying something new because we have no other option at this point.

Eve: [00:32:34] Yeah.

Diana : [00:32:35] Yeah.

Eve: [00:32:36] Well, thank you so much for joining me, Diana. I really enjoyed our conversation. And I want to learn more. And I think your book is now my reading list for the holidays, so I haven’t had time to read it yet, but it sounds really fascinating. I can’t wait to get into it. Thank you so much.

Diana : [00:32:53] Thanks so much. It was great talking with you as well.

Eve: [00:33:03] That was Diana Lind. “Let’s be brave,” she says, and brave we must be to solve this housing crisis. Governments must bravely tweak their zoning regulations so that new and affordable housing types can be easily built. Developers must bravely experiment with their next housing project. Banks must bravely finance new housing products, and NIMBY’s must bravely accept some change. Together, surely we can make a difference.Eve: [00:33:39] You can find out more about impact real estate investing and access the show notes for today’s episode at my website EvePicker.com. While you’re there, sign up for my newsletter to find out more about how to make money in real estate while building better cities. Thank you so much for spending your time with me today. And thank you, Diana, for sharing your thoughts. We’ll talk again soon. But for now, this is Eve Picker signing off to go make some change.

Images courtesy of Diana Lind

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

sign up here

APPLY TO BE A PODCAST GUEST

More to See

Oculis Domes.

February 25, 2025

Bellevue Montgomery

February 11, 2025

West Lombard

January 28, 2025

FOLLOW

  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Tag Cloud

Affordable housing Climate Community Creative economy Crowdfunding Design Development Environment Equity Finance FinTech Gentrification Impact Investing Mobility Offering Opportunity zones PropTech Technology Visionary Zoning

Footer

©rethinkrealestateforgood.co. The information contained on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this website is intended as investment, legal, tax or accounting strategy or advice, or constitutes an offer to sell, solicit or buy securities.
 
Any projections discussed or made may not be accurate and do not guarantee a specific outcome. All projections or investments are subject to risk due to uncertainty and change, including the risk of loss, and past performance is not indicative of future results. You should make independent decisions and seek independent advice regarding investments or strategies mentioned on this website.

Recent

  • Podcast hiatus.
  • The Mulberry
  • Mount Vernon Plaza
  • The Seven
  • Real estate and women.

Search

Categories

Climate Community Crowdfunding Development Equity Fintech Investing Mobility Proptech Visionary

 

Copyright © 2026 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in