• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Say hello
Rethink Real Estate. For Good.

Rethink Real Estate. For Good.

  • Podcast
  • Posts
  • In the news
  • Speaking and media
    • About Eve
    • Speaking requests
    • Speaking engagements
    • Press kit
  • Investment opportunities

Impact

Back to the Future!

October 14, 2020

Christopher Leinberger has had a singular career embedded in urban land use issues – as a strategist, teacher, developer, researcher and author. Recently retired from academia, he most recently taught at George Washington University as the Charles Bendit Distinguished Scholar & Research Professor and chair of the Center for Real Estate and Urban Analysis. His new venture is a startup, Places Platform, developing tools and methodologies to measure economic, social equity and environmental conditions in cities and metropolitan areas.

Growing up in the 1960s and 70s, Chris learned early the value of connecting coursework and theory with hands-on community engagement. Although he first put his business degree to work in the corporate world, Chris found he wanted to run his own organization and opted to take over management of Robert Charles Lesser & Co (now RCLCo), a one-office real estate consulting firm in Southern California, first as executive vice president, then as an owner and managing director. By 2000, RCLCo had become one of the largest real estate advisory firms in the U.S., with four offices nationally. Chris then moved to work as a developer full-time, co-founding the Arcadia Land Company, for which he is still a managing partner.

From 2005-18, Chris served as a fellow at Brookings’ Metropolitan Policy Program researching, writing and speaking on issues of walkable urbanism and metropolitan governance. He also helped found LOCUS (Responsible Real Estate Developers and Investors), serving as president from 2008-16, to help push political advocacy at the federal and regional level for a walkable urban future. In addition to George Washington University, Chris has taught at the University of Michigan, University of New Mexico and Harvard Graduate School of Design. He is the author of two books, Strategic Planning for Real Estate Development Companies (1994) and The Option of Urbanism, Investing in a New American Dream (2008).

Insights and Inspirations

  • There are no new ideas.
  • “Back to the Future” got it right.
  • We should be able to urge cities into an upward spiral by providing them with data, showing what returns best results.
  • “NIMBYS are the most pernicious force in urbanism. In large part, they have caused the housing shortage and crisis we are in.”
  • Equity should be patient money in the capital stack.

Information and Links

  • Everything you possibly want to know about Chris is on his website.
  • His most recent book is The Option of Urbanism, Investing in a New American Dream.
Read the podcast transcript here

Eve Picker: [00:00:17] Hi there. Thanks so much for joining me today for the latest episode of Impact Real Estate Investing. My guest today is Christopher Leinberger. Chris has had a singular career working on urban land use issues, as a strategist, teacher, developer, researcher and author.

Eve: [00:00:47] Growing up in the 1960s and 70s, Chris was actively involved in community affairs and social change issues. He learned the value of connecting coursework and theory with hands-on community engagement early on. Although he first put his business degree to work in the corporate world, Chris found he wanted to run his own organization and opted to take over management, and then ownership, of Robert Charles Lesser & Company, now RCLCo. At the time, it was a one-office, real estate consulting firm in Southern California. RCLCo became one of the largest real estate advisory firms in the U.S., with four offices nationally, by 2000. Chris’s new venture is a startup – Places Platform. This is a project he audaciously hopes will become “the Bloomberg of real estate and the built environment,” developing tools and methodologies to measure economic, social equity and environmental conditions in cities and metropolitan areas. Be sure to go to EvePicker.com to find out more about Chris on the show notes page for this episode. And be sure to sign up for my newsletter so you can access information about impact real estate investing and get the latest news about the exciting projects on my crowdfunding platform, Small Change.

Eve: [00:02:25] So, welcome to the show, Christopher. It’s really nice to have you here.

Christopher Leinberger: [00:02:29] Really pleased to have a chance to chat with you.

Eve: [00:02:32] I read some of your bios, and the common theme in your development work is the one you discovered when you were eight years old, the value of well-developed, walkable urban land. And I’m wondering how that theme came to take center stage in your professional life?

Chris: [00:02:50] Well, it took me about 20 years to realize that that was what was driving me, from the age of eight – how we build our cities and why are certain blocks, certain places, vital and other places are not. And I didn’t know that at age eight. But that’s the basis of urban economics. But I thought that was just kind of a childhood fancy. And after business school, I went to work for two corporations and found out very quickly that I make a terrible employee and went to work with a small consulting firm in Beverly Hills, California, that I eventually bought three years later, Robert Charles Lesser and Company. And that, basically, was a firm that I could now explore how we build our cities and what makes certain places vital and others not so.

Eve: [00:03:47] And what did you discover along the way? It must have been pretty difficult setting out on this path.

Chris: [00:03:55] Well, certainly, this is back in the early 80s, and drivable suburban development was the thing in vogue. And in fact, this consulting firm, which did market studies, financial feasibility, I introduced strategic planning for both real estate companies and places, like downtowns. And I expanded the company from just a West Coast operation to a national, in fact, you know, we did a lot of work abroad, until I sold the company in 2000. It’s still very active today. It’s much bigger than when I was running it, back in 2000. But it was a little depressing to look at the fact that the market seemed to only want masterplanned communities and subdivisions and, you know, strip malls. And that’s what we were doing in the 80s. The market studies and the financial feasibility were all about, you know, this drivable suburban stuff that we in this country invented. But then towards the end of the 80s, it really kind of started with a project I did in Downtown Chattanooga, which was a strategy for Downtown Chattanooga, the first downtown strategy I’ve ever done. And we pulled this strategy together with the city, with the place manager, River Valley Partners, and the county and the banking community and all sorts of … and the great civic sector, just a remarkable civic sector. And we put together a strategy. 14 points to it. And within three years, 13 of the 14 were done.

Eve: [00:05:37] Wow.

Chris: [00:05:37] And it was off to the races. And so, I’ve stayed in, I’ve stayed involved with Downtown Chattanooga for the last 30 years. It’s just been a remarkable turnaround. So, there I found that, good lord, people actually may want this walkable, urban stuff that, that really was so attractive to me when I was eight.

Eve: [00:05:55] Right. Yeah, I think I always dreamed about living above a coffee shop in a downtown.

Chris: [00:06:04] I always dreamed of living on a penthouse of a 1920s apartment building, you know, condo, co-op, whatever, and having a deck all around you and having the cage elevator take you up to it, and so …

Eve: [00:06:21] Fabulous.

Chris: [00:06:22] Anyway, I got the cage elevator. The building I live in, it’s five stories on Mass Ave, and it has the oldest elevator in town, which is a cage elevator that comes right up to our floor.

Eve: [00:06:35] How about the deck all around? No?

Chris: [00:06:38] No, didn’t get that. The ‘deck all around’ is just about to become about 108 solar panels.

Eve: [00:06:45] Oh wow, and I got the coffee shop after about 20 years of trying so … Just an aside, I’m especially in awe of your advisory role in Walk Score, which is a tool that I use every day, apparently with four million other people. So, that’s an amazing tool that’s emerged out of your interest, as well.

Chris: [00:07:06] Yes, I was on the initial board of Walk Score before, and then, of course, it was bought by Redfin, so that board went away. But I have loved the folks at Walk Score. I still use them, you know, in my research at Brookings and George Washington University. And now, in my next phase of life with Places Platform, which is my startup, that is basically Sim City for real, and Walk Score is foundational to that.

Eve: [00:07:37] So, I use it. I developed a Change Index for my crowdfunding platform, Small Change, and I use it to identify, you know, where projects are that walk in the door are located, like every day. It’s a fabulous tool.

Chris: [00:07:51] It’s remarkable. And the other thing that a number of us have found is that in walkable urban places, Walk Score above 60 yields tremendous value enhancement. You know, here in D.C., on the for-sale residential side, one Walk Score point above 60 yields about a 10-dollar-per-square-foot increase in value of a house or a condo.

Eve: [00:08:22] That’s pretty amazing.

Chris: [00:08:22] That’s huge. Places Platform just did our beta test in Grand Rapids, Michigan. So, this is a Midwestern town, small Midwestern town, not exactly a bi-coastal sort of place. And in the office market, one Walk Score point increases office valuations by a buck a square foot.

Eve: [00:08:44] Wow.

Chris: [00:08:45] And that’s, again, for a town that an office sells for 180 to 200 bucks per square foot, one Walk Score point equals a one percent increase in valuation. That’s pretty significant.

Eve: [00:08:58] So, I’m proud to say my Walk Score is, I think, 99.

Chris: [00:09:01] Wow, well that’s impressive. My Walk Score’s 92. I live within about four blocks of Dupont Circle.

Eve: [00:09:11] I live downtown in Pittsburgh, so you really, no, that’s pretty simple.

Chris: [00:09:14] Yes, it’s great.

Eve: [00:09:16] You know, I first became aware of your work when, when I was struggling with a capital stack for a little catalytic development project. And I heard about the Albuquerque project and ‘patient money,’ and those of us who do this sort of development know that it’s very difficult to get traditional financing to accomplish groundbreaking projects. And I just love you to talk a little bit about how you approached that when you started that project, and, in general.

Chris: [00:09:45] It starts with an understanding that there is no such thing as new ideas. As you may have also seen or heard, my favorite urban movie is “Back to the Future,” and it’s the most important urban movie ever made that is popular because it shows the two ways of building: drivable sub-urban and walkable urban, in three different time periods. The 1950s, which was really a reflection of the early 20th century, 1985 when the movie came out, which showed how we completely disinvested in our downtowns and all the energy, and all the money, shifted to regional malls and business parks, and, of course, subdivisions. And then the near distant future, that again this 1980s view of the near distant future, which showed downtowns coming back. And the suburbs going into decline, and who’d have thunk that …

Eve: [00:10:46] Yeh.

Chris: [00:10:46] … in the 1980s. Well, that near distant future was 2015. So, these writers of the movie nailed it, and none of us in the 1980s were thinking that the cities were going to come back that quickly and that well. So, you look at how we used to finance, and much of the money in the capital stack… You know, the capital stack is going to be comprised of two basic categories – equity, you know, cash at risk, and debt, money you get from banks at very cheap interest rates. So, by definition, the equity is the risk capital and it goes in first and comes out last. And with a ‘Back to the Future’ financing approach, that, you’ve got to have 40, 50, 60 percent of your capital stack being equity, and most of that being ‘patient equity.’ It’s not looking for an internal rate of return of 25 percent. It’s going to be put in. It’s going to get paid back when the project matures. You know, don’t bother measuring it. Just recognize that it’s there for the mid- and long-term. And if you realize that, in walkable urban real estate, you can make a bloody fortune. But you just can’t make it in three to five years.

Eve: [00:12:18] But we have pretty impatient investors right now who want to make that sort of return quickly. Two years.

Chris: [00:12:25] Oh, yeah, oh yeah.

Eve: [00:12:26] That’s frustrating for me with my platform, because, you know, some … these projects that I think are so important for the future have a very hard time getting equity.

Chris: [00:12:41] So, you have to be creative, of course, and most the important thing to be creative about is making sure that the land invested in your deal is invested patiently. So, the best example… I’m in partnership with Robert Davis in my development company. Now, we’re both, at this point, limited partners with our development company, which is called Arcadia Land Company, based in Center City, Philadelphia. But Robert’s best known for the project, Seaside, on the panhandle of Florida. And it’s the first New Urbanist project. And Robert got 80 acres from his grandfather as his inheritance on what was then known as the Redneck Riviera. This is where the country boys from Alabama would go down to the beach and drink. And Robert looked at this as a patient equity investment, and slowly but surely came up with a great urban plan, and slowly invested in the infrastructure, block by block. And he sold his first one eighth of an acre lot for ten thousand dollars. He sold his last one eighth of an acre lot for two million dollars …

Eve: [00:14:02] Oh wow.

Chris: [00:14:02] … 25 years later.

Eve: [00:14:04] Wow.

Chris: [00:14:04] And he still owns Downtown Seaside. It’s worth a bloody fortune, with condo prices at 1,500 bucks a square foot. That’s what the ancients knew how to do. And that’s what the Grosvenors in London knew how to do 400 years ago. They were just, you know, farmers that happened to own this farm that became the West End of London. And they never sold the land. They just had long-term leases, and became one of the top 20 wealthiest families on the planet because they invested long-term. So, we have lots of examples, just not that many currently, as we have this ‘get rich quick’ mentality

Eve: [00:14:49] We really do, don’t we? Interesting. What’s your favorite project that you’ve worked on?

Chris: [00:14:56] My second project. I was still running and owning Robert Charles Lesser and Company and got hired by a Seattle family to redevelop a shipyard in Kirkland, Washington, right on Lake Washington, right across Lake Washington from Downtown Seattle. They built Liberty ships there during the Second World War. And this family also happened to own the Seattle Seahawks at the time, and they had their practice field there. And so, they asked me to figure out what to do with it. And we came up with this pretty, at that point, wacky idea of high density, mixed use, walkable urban – a new marina, office, hotel, retail around a plaza, rental apartments, condos, and from day one, decked parking, highly expensive to build, so we could get the kind of density that we needed. And the east side of the Seattle metro area, at that point, you did not charge for parking. So, this was an incredible investment with zero return as far as the parking goes. And everybody, you know, Urban Land looked at it and said, you’re crazy. And I mean, even the office brokers who have no skin in the game, said this is crazy. And we came up with this set of recommendations. And the family, the Skinner family, old mine family up in Seattle, said to me, great idea! Now can you build it? And I said, holy smokes, I’m a consultant. What, do you want me to do something? So for about two years, I was the fee developer and it came out of the ground, it just … to this day, it gets the highest office rents and rental apartment rents in the northwest of the U.S.. Because of its high density, walkable, urban nature.

Eve: [00:16:57] Wow. And you were hooked, right?

Chris: [00:17:00] Oh, yeah, I saw the power of it. It was just really impressive. And, you know, this is your ultimate doing well while doing good. And you can feel really proud of Carillon Point, which is what it’s called … because it’s a long-term keeper. And I asked the family, so, you know, why do you want to do something that’s, that’s so unconventional from the finance point of view? And they said, well, we’ve been around Seattle for 100 years. Our family’s going to be around for at least another 100 years. We’re building with 100 year perspective.

Eve: [00:17:30] Wow. So, then what led you to launch Places Platform?

Chris: [00:17:35] This is kind of a culmination of all the work I’ve done, going back to age eight. You know, I mentioned earlier, it’s the Sim City for real estate and place management and city management. It also could be viewed as the Bloomberg of real estate. Michael Bloomberg, with his original company that made him worth 40, 50 billion dollars, basically created a data set, a database of all the stock and bond markets back in the 70s and 80s, that … and so on one screen in front of you, or actually two or three screens, you could understand anything about any stock or bond that was being traded on public markets worldwide. And that was a huge step forward. Well, real estate is worth about twice as much as all the publicly traded assets in this country, of all the publicly traded companies. And we are not yet at that point, but we have 100 percent database of all the real estate, we’re real close, and that’s what Places Platform is creating. Working with Walk Score, working with Co-Star, working with Zillow and Collateral Analytics, and a variety of other databases that are in their silos, we’re bringing them all together. And we’re looking at it from an economic performance point of view …  meaning we can do gross regional product, GRP, at the place level, at the city level. At this point, we can’t get GRP below the metro level, at least officially, you know, throughout the country. But Places can take it down and tell you what the GRP is of Downtown D.C.. We look at the net fiscal impact, how much does the city net at the place level? How much does Downtown D.C. make for the city of the District of Columbia? The revenues coming in from property taxes and income taxes and sales taxes and all the rest, minus the cost of services, the net fiscal impact. And these walkable urban places almost always make the bulk of the money for a city to pay for public schools, and to pay for welfare and other social benefits. And then, of course, we look at the real estate valuations for all the real estate.

Chris: [00:20:05] We also have three other metrics. One is social equity. What does it mean for somebody who is a low-income household? We also look at it from a public health point of view, and particularly with COVID. And the fourth one that we have not yet developed is, of course, environmental. So, what Places Platform is trying to do is to have a quadruple bottom line. To analyze public policy, infrastructure investment, major real estate development, and understand and quantify what the economic, social equity, public health and environmental, you know, hopefully benefits, are from those investments.

Eve: [00:20:47] Is your hope that this information will propel cities towards the right sort of development?

Chris: [00:20:57] That’s it. I’ve come to realize in my career that there’s either a downward spiral for cities or an upward spiral. And the 80s and into the 90s was the downward spiral. No matter what you did, no matter what federal program, whether it be UDAG grants or Model Cities or you name it, redevelopment, there was a downward spiral that no matter what you did, no matter how much money you spent, it would not change the downward spiral. Well, we’re now in this upward spiral, with, you know, the market share gains for walkable, urban development is just through the roof, and the price premiums are two, three, four times the price per square foot of drivable suburban places. So, we have this upward spiral. And I have found that the upward spiral, if you have correct public policy, can both give you economic returns and social equity returns and public health returns and environmental returns. And this will be a measurement tool to make sure you are achieving all four of those returns. You do not have to sacrifice social equity for these economic returns.

Eve: [00:22:15] So, then I have to ask the dreaded question, do you think that COVID-19 is more than a blip on that upward spiral?

Chris: [00:22:25] To be flip? It is just a speed  bump, it is just a blip that, you know, a year or two from now we’ll look back and just say, that was kind of a weird couple of years. But having said that, I’m not saying that a lot of changes are being sped up. Changes that were in place …

Eve: [00:22:46] Compressed. Yep. Yep.

Chris: [00:22:48] The head of global research for Cushman and Wakefield asked me a couple of months ago to work with them to help figure out what’s the ‘future of office’ in the U.S.. And so we’re in the middle of that work right now, and certainly there’s going to be an impact, particularly on the office market. There’s going to be, in my mind, it’s pretty clear, that there’s going to be a repricing, i.e., a reduction in value of offices. It’s going to affect different metro areas differently, and we’re going to be looking at it, looking at the 30 largest metros to figure out what the impact will be in each of those 30 metros. But, like with every crisis, there’s opportunity, and the opportunity, if we see a repricing and a reduction in occupancy in the office space as more people work from home, and, you know, it’s not going to be 100 percent work from home. We know that. But it will be more than what we had, which is about 11 percent in 2018, according to the census, worked from home during the most recent week that that survey was conducted. It’ll be higher than 11 percent.

Eve: [00:24:07] Yeh, yeh.

Chris: [00:24:07] So, those offices will experience a lot of pain. And the other thing is, that then allows that office space, which is in remarkably great locations, particularly the walkable urban space, to be recycled, probably as residential.

Eve: [00:24:28] Yeah.

Chris: [00:24:28] We are short anywhere from seven to 12 million housing units in this country. That we’ve not allowed the real estate development community to build. We have mandated that they could not build them. And that has created this horrendous affordable housing and homeless situation. And so a lot of those office spaces, as well as a lot of the hotels, are going to become assets that we can convert into housing in great walkable urban locations.

Eve: [00:25:03] Right, right. Aside from that are there any other current trends in real estate that you believe are most important for the future of cities?

Chris: [00:25:12] Yeah. We collectively in real estate and the built environment, you know, urbanists, in general, we really need to address, forcefully, the need to ‘up-zone.’ Up-zone land, and in particular, in cores and corridors. The cores are walkable urban places, both in center cities, but in particular the urbanizing suburbs. Probably 50 percent of new walkable urban development will be in urbanizing suburbs. Metro D.C. is leading the way, not just in this country, but worldwide in the urbanization of the suburbs in Arlington and, you know, downtown Bethesda, Silver Spring, Reston Town Center, National Landing, National Harbor. But it’s a massive up-zoning battle …

Eve: [00:26:07] Yeh.

Chris: [00:26:07] … fought by NIMBYs. NIMBYs are the most pernicious force in urbanism right now, and I am quite ashamed of my generation, I’m a baby-boomer, that are leading the NIMBY charge and it’s the most selfish movement ever. And they’re basically saying, you can’t come here. And if I stop you from coming here, my house is worth more. And it’s all in the land. So, we need to flood the market with more up-zoned, walkable urban land. But it’s only going to be a small percentage of total metro land. Here in D.C. only two percent of the metro area is walkable urban. That’s it. Two percent. And that’s where all the action is.

Eve: [00:26:55] You know, you’re probably familiar with this, but over the last 10 years or so, I visit Melbourne, Australia regularly, and they up-zoned their key commercial corridors in the way you’re describing. And it’s been really interesting to watch it. Are you familiar with that?

Chris: [00:27:10] Very much so. I’ve been to Melbourne quite a bit.

Eve: [00:27:13] Yeh, yeh.

Chris: [00:27:13] You may have run into Mike Day, who’s the leading urban planner in Australia, who’s based there, and he has an urban planning firm that is the largest in the country. And he and I have been working together, particularly in Melbourne and Sydney. Yeh, they really need to up-zone. I mean, they obviously, you know …

Eve: [00:27:32] Oh yeh, Melbourne is sprawling badly.

Chris: [00:27:34] Oh, god, it is horrendous. And the same with Sydney. But, you know, their downtowns are among the top five on the planet.

Eve: [00:27:43] Yeah, they’re fabulous.

Chris: [00:27:44] When you get out of the downtowns, and it’s just suburban hell.

Eve: [00:27:47] Not all of it. Like Melbourne has a really great train network and a wonderful bike network that really connects some of the neighborhoods around downtown, really, pretty well, which is, you know, one good thing.

Chris: [00:28:01] Well, the downtown and the downtown adjacent places are tremendous in Melbourne, as you know better than I, you know, the region of Melbourne is comprised of, like in the U.S., many, many, many jurisdictions. And so the center city is one jurisdiction, downtown and downtown adjacent. So, then all those suburban jurisdictions just don’t get it …

Eve: [00:28:27] Yeh.

Chris: [00:28:27] …and they are beginning to get it. A lot of efforts going into it. So, I have no doubt that they’re moving in the right direction.

Eve: [00:28:35] Well, a city like Melbourne, too, I think it’s one of the fastest growing metros … It’s certainly the fastest growing in Australia, and …

Chris: [00:28:42] And it’s such a lovely place. It is just …

Eve: [00:28:44] It’s a lovely place.

Chris: [00:28:45] Charming as can be. Remarkable people.

Eve: [00:28:49] Ok, then, do you think equity crowdfunding can play a role in building communities for everyone? We’re talking about social equity and how people can get a stake in their own community.

Chris: [00:29:02] I think it’s a critically important trend. And again, it’s ‘Back to the Future.’ This is how we used to build the great real estate. I always used to wonder back in the 80s when I was really trying to noodle through how did the ancients of the late 19th, early 20th century build these buildings that were so well built? They were over-engineered. They were architecturally significant. They were built for the ages as opposed to the junk that we were putting up in the 80s and 90s that were, you know, just slam bang, thank you, ma’am. Throw them up. Assume that in 10, 12 years they’re going to become a slum, and you didn’t care because you got your money out. And it was because of crowd funding. And it was local folks coming together to build, in particular, you see this with hotels that, every city needed a glamour hotel that would show off the best of that city. And all the business folks would come together and put in money to build this hotel, to demonstrate that this city has come of age. And those hotels are with us today as the grand, marvelous anchors of our downtowns. Every city throughout the country has one. But the same thing applies to much of the commercial real estate, that a lot of small investors came along and dropped in the equivalent of a thousand dollars and they owned a little piece of their community. And that did a lot of things. One is they would economically benefit from the vitality. They would walk past it and they could say to their friends, I own that building. Point of pride. That’s the great thing about real estate, is that, you know, unlike software development, which is viper … just vaporware, you can point to a stick and brick building and say, I own that. Great pride, great emotional return. And it also gives you a reason to care about and patronize your hometown. It’s the ultimate doing well while doing good.

Eve: [00:31:10] Yeah, I think you’ve described exactly why I started a crowdfunding platform. In Pittsburgh, you know, in the neighborhood I lived in for a long time, some of my neighbors would just band together to buy a vacant house to make sure that it wouldn’t fall into a slumlord’s hands. And, you know, that was exactly in that era. And I was, I was pretty impressed with that. I thought it was pretty fabulous.

Chris: [00:31:36] Yeh, yeh, I’ve seen that kind of thing happen throughout the country. Chattanooga, again, my favorite small town, has an organization called Chattanooga Neighborhood Enterprises that has redeveloped low-income neighborhoods surrounding downtown with zero, zero displacement.

Eve: [00:31:56] Wow.

Chris: [00:31:56] And it’s just remarkable. You know, there’s so many great examples out there now, over the last 20, 30 years.

Eve: [00:32:04] Well, I’ve really, really enjoyed talking to you. And I can’t wait to see how your new venture evolves. Thank you very much for joining me.

Chris: [00:32:11] It’s been very good to catch up with you.

Eve: [00:32:13] Thank you. Bye.

Chris: [00:32:13] Bye. Bye.

Eve: [00:32:26] That was Chris Leinberger. His fascination with cities started at a very early age and evolved into an astounding career working on urban land issues as a strategist, teacher, developer, researcher and author. He built an enormous advisory company and then moved on to focus on development as a co-founder of the Arcadia Land Company, a progressive New Urbanist development company for which he is still a managing partner. I hope you enjoyed listening to this interview as much as I enjoyed recording it. You can find out more about impact real estate investing and access to the show notes for today’s episode at my website, EvePicker.com. While you’re there, sign up for my newsletter to find out more about how to make money in real estate while building better cities.

Eve: [00:33:20] Thank you so much for spending your time with me today. And thank you, Chris, for sharing your thoughts. We’ll talk again soon. But for now, this is Eve Picker signing off to go make some change.

Image courtesy of Chris Leinberger

Jumpstarting a community.

October 7, 2020

Ken Weinstein is a highly respected entrepreneur and developer based in the Philadelphia metro area. He is the founder and president of Philly Office Retail, an organization which has renovated and restored over 300 vacant and deteriorated properties and now owns and manages more than 800,000 square feet of space. “I was really inspired by my landlady,” he once said, “She had renovated six properties with her own two hands. I thought, ‘How cool is that? I want to do that.”

When Ken moved to Germantown he was drawn to the neighborhood’s architectural integrity and began renovating properties there. By 2000, he had moved onto larger projects and today his office is working to renovate six historically significant factory buildings on Germantown’s southern border, near the recently renovated Wayne Junction Train Station which serves 321,000 passengers annually.

But wait. Ken is also widely known for creating Jumpstart Germantown, a 12-hour boot camp for aspiring developers. Since launching Jumpstart, in 2015, other city neighborhoods (West Philly, Southwest, Kensington, Tioga and Hunting Park) have all started their own programs using Ken’s as a model. Developers from Camden to New Orleans have also expressed interest in starting Jumpstart programs. As of this podcast, Jumpstart Germantown has graduated 850 people, with hundreds of applications pending, and 85% of the program participants being African American or women.

Still not satisfied, Ken launched a Jumpstart Germantown Loan program that offers financing for the acquisition and renovation of residential properties in Germantown and its adjacent neighborhoods. Ken has said, “We can train and mentor aspiring developers all day, but if you can’t loan them money, they’re not going to get very far.” To date, they have loaned around $20 million.

Over the years, Ken has been honored with numerous leadership, business and social impact awards from Philadelphia organizations. He co-founded the Mt. Airy Business Improvement District and has chaired the Philadelphia Housing Development Corporation. Ken has also created four restaurants including the Cresheim Cottage Cafe, a renovated 300-year-old house on Germantown Ave, and the Trolley Car Diner, a 1952 stainless-steel diner moved and reinstalled in Philadelphia from Wilkes Barre.

Insights and Inspirations

  • Triple Bottom Line (or PPP – People, Profit, Planet) is a win-win-win for the developer, the community and the tenant.
  • Park a block down from your project when you visit your project. Introduce yourself, tell people what you’re doing, why you’re doing it. Interact with the community.

Information and Links

  • Listen in to the Jumpstart Philly Real Estate Radio Show.
  • Ken’s love for the game of table tennis encouraged him to found and operate the Philadelphia region’s only full time table tennis club.
  • Ken also wants to point to the Philadelphia Housing Development Corporation and the Preservation Alliance for Greater Philadelphia, both of whom he has worked closely with for years.
Read the podcast transcript here

Eve Picker: [00:00:10] Hi there. Thanks so much for joining me today for the latest episode of Impact Real Estate Investing.

Eve: [00:00:17] My guest today is Ken Weinstein, the CEO of Philly Office Retail, ordinary by name only. Ken has built his company into one that serves the neighborhood it invests in, always tackling underutilized and blighted properties and turning them back to good use. But that’s not quite enough for Ken. He launched a boot camp for wannabe developers in his neighborhood, called Jumpstart Germantown. To date, he has trained 850 of them, and a half a dozen other neighborhoods have started their own program using his open source program information. Still not satisfied, Ken has also launched a loan program and lends to developers that cannot get bank financing. He’s a powerhouse. Listen in.

Eve: [00:01:10] Be sure to go to EvePicker.com to find out more about Ken on the show notes page for this episode, and be sure to sign up for my newsletter so you can access information about impact real estate investing and get the latest news about the exciting projects on my crowdfunding platform, Small Change.

Eve: [00:01:35] Welcome to the show, Ken. I’m really eager to talk to you.

Ken Weinstein: [00:01:38] Thank you, Eve.

Eve: [00:01:38] You are a very prolific developer by the sounds of it and also a prolific entrepreneur, I really want to hear about everything you’re working on. Maybe we could start with your real estate projects. I’m wondering what led you to tackle the very challenging work of restoring vacant and blighted properties?

Ken: [00:01:57] Yeah, it’s been a passion of mine for over 30 years now and I started part time for first 15, 17 years, of my real estate career. And for the first 10 years, I started exclusively in renovating vacant residential properties for the first, you know, mostly single family duplexes, triplexes, and then about 20 years ago switched over to renovating vacant commercial properties, which is what we still do today. But my passion over the years has been blight removal. I grew up in the suburbs of New York City and North Jersey, and we didn’t have blight. So, when I moved to Philadelphia, which is a community I very much love, I couldn’t understand why and how there was blighted properties and I set out to do something about that.

Eve: [00:02:53] Oh, that’s interesting, that’s kind of the way I see it. I grew up in a pretty suburban area as well, and we didn’t have blight, so moving to Pittsburgh was pretty much the same experience of you moving to Philly, I think.

Ken: [00:03:06] Sounds about right. Yeah, I came here in the late 80s and have not left.

Eve: [00:03:11] You know, what’s your key development focus now and what neighborhoods you focus on?

Ken: [00:03:16] Well, over time, like a lot of developers, our projects got larger and larger. So, you know, we used to do train stations and storefronts and small mixed-use projects. Now we’ve moved on to schools and churches and former factory buildings. We find that we now have the expertise, of course, to get those things done. But it also takes the same amount of time to buy and renovate a storefront, a vacant storefront, as it does a larger, either former office building or factory building. So, we’ve tended to go towards the larger projects. We focus almost entirely on what I call ‘middle neighborhoods,’ not your most struggling neighborhoods that are hard to rent at the end of the day after you renovate, and also not the hottest neighborhoods. In Philadelphia that means everything sort of surrounding Center City. Those areas have already been largely gentrified; there’s less need for us to come in and try to maintain and improve the community in which we’re working. So, we’re focusing on those middle neighborhoods, which are probably about 50 percent of Philadelphia.

Eve: [00:04:36] Wow. OK. Tell us about a favorite project that you’ve worked on and what it looks like.

Ken: [00:04:41] Yeah, there are so many. Hard to pick just one, but a couple of years ago, there’s probably been a few years ago now, we took a vacant St. Peter’s Church campus in Upper Germantown, which is a neighborhood that I’ve particularly focused on. And it’s about a one and a half acre campus, a total of four buildings, three of them historic, from the late 1800s. Historically designated properties, so there was a lot of requirements on what we could and couldn’t do to the property. But it had been sitting vacant for about 10 years. Two of the buildings in particular were very close to coming down on their own. So, it was very tired and risky project. We purchased it for less than $500,000, put about six million construction dollars into the project, saved these four wonderful historic structures, and we did a long term lease with a Waldorf school …

Eve: [00:05:49] Oh, nice.

Ken: [00:05:50] … which continues to occupy the property five years later. So, it’s a classic win-win-win strategy that we’ve used over time to save this property that otherwise would have gone under if we hadn’t bought the property.

Eve: [00:06:07] Yeah, yeah. So, what’s the most important thing you strive to accomplish with every project you do?

Ken: [00:06:14] You know, like I said, my passion is blight removal, so, you know, to me it’s relatively easy to buy a vacant piece of land and do new construction. It’s more difficult and more needed to renovate and do adaptive reuse on an existing building. So, that’s what we try to focus on. But more than anything, we try to do, you know, what’s now a common term, PPP – People, Profit, Planet – also sometimes referred to as Triple Bottom Line investing, and try to create, just like the Waldorf example, a win-win-win for the developer, the community and the tenant. And I’m not going to tell you all of our projects benefit all three, but most of them do. And that’s what we strive for. The developer should make a reasonable profit and cover overhead. Otherwise, we’re not going to get commercial loans to do our projects. The community should see jobs, should see a better quality of life, should see blight removal. The tax base should be increased to pay for services for the city. There should be amenities involved, you know, people in the neighborhood should enjoy whatever tenant is coming into the property. You can’t just improve the property, you also have to improve the neighborhood at the same time. And then, lastly, and what a lot of developers, I think, miss, is the tenant also needs to benefit from the project. There needs to be reasonable rent. We are unique in that we offer a 100 percent fit out for a lot of tenants so that startup tenants, in particular, can come into our properties. We help our tenants with initial marketing. And we also help to place them in the right spot, you know. Just because someone comes to us and says, I’m a startup restaurant, can you find me a location? We’re going to put them in a location that we think makes sense because we know and understand the community.

Eve: [00:08:20] Great. So, what’s the biggest challenge you’ve had?

Ken: [00:08:24] Over time, that changes sometimes or very often, the biggest challenge is finding tenants in the past that has held us up a lot. Currently, I would say, a challenge is construction. Construction costs are going up …

Eve: [00:08:40] Yeh.

Ken: [00:08:40] … Hard to find experienced carpenters, in particular. So, it’s held us back. You know, that we have tenants that are waiting for their properties to be fit out and we need to make that happen more quickly. Another challenge right now is, you know, during the pandemic, is financing.

Eve: [00:08:59] Yeh.

Ken: [00:08:59] Financing seems to be fairly easy for multifamily housing, but most of our projects are commercial in nature …

Eve: [00:09:08] Yeh.

Ken: [00:09:08] … and financing is not so easy. I am fully confident that will come out of this and financing for commercial will be a lot easier a year from now. But until then, we’re going to have to fight and get a little more creative.

Eve: [00:09:22] Yeah, I’ve been hearing the same thing from many people. That’s really interesting. So, now I’d like to dive into the other things you do because all of that doesn’t seem to be enough for you, in that …

Ken: [00:09:35] Never enough (laughter).

Eve: [00:09:35] No, no, I wonder when you sleep (laughter). So, in 2015, you started a really fascinating program called Jumpstart. I’d like you to tell me a little bit about it and why you developed it.

Ken: [00:09:52] They are very excited about this project. And, you know, like a lot of projects, you see a need and you respond to that need and you don’t know if it’s going to make it or fall on its face. And, so here is a project that we started that just excelled and took off beyond my wildest dream. It’s called the Jumpstart Germantown, and now Jumpstart Philly. But what we set out to do is train, network, mentor and loan money to a new group of real estate developers that have had trouble breaking into the industry. We started this, like you said, in 2015, and it really came out of a lot of people knocking on my door and emailing me and calling me, and saying, “Hey, I love what you do. Can you show me how to do it, too?” And of course, we all love to pay it forward, so, we say yes and we sit down with people for an hour at a time, and … but at the end of the day, I just felt like I was their cheerleader. “Hey, here’s how I got started. You can do it, too. Good luck. Stay in touch.” I wasn’t helping anybody get started in real estate development. So, what we did, I started to say ‘no’ to those requests and instead put together a 12-hour curriculum that I can take people through, hand them off to a mentor after they graduate from our program, and then loan them money to get started with their first, second, third project. Because we all know that traditional banks don’t like to lend to newbie developers without a lot of experience. So, it’s just been incredibly successful. We have graduated 850 people so far through our …

Eve: [00:11:37] Wow.

Ken: [00:11:38] … Jumpstart Germantown program. We have lent them over twenty million dollars …

Eve: [00:11:43] Oh wow.

Ken: [00:11:44] … for 200 projects. And then, it’s been so successful, and we’ve made all of our resources and our workbook and other materials ‘open source,’ that other neighborhoods have picked up on this model and have run with it. So, there’s now six other Jumpstart programs in Philadelphia that other people run and there are Jumpstart programs in Norristown, Pennsylvania, and Wilmington, Delaware, that will be starting this fall.

Eve: [00:12:15] Wow.

Ken: [00:12:15] So, we’re just really excited that people see the value in this model. And we have changed a lot of lives and removed a lot of blight from the communities in which we serve.

Eve: [00:12:26] So 850 people, who are they and why do they want to become developers?

Ken: [00:12:32] That’s a good question. You got to be a little crazy …

Eve: [00:12:34] Yeh, you really do.

Ken: [00:12:34] … to become a developer.

Eve: [00:12:37] Yes.

Ken: [00:12:37] And part of what we talk about in the beginning of the training program is what is real estate development and who is best apt to do it? You know, what traits are needed to be a successful real estate developer? And one of the things we talk about, or one of the things we focus on, is risk. Because that’s what is true of every real estate developer. If you’re not willing to take risk, if you’re not willing to take the last 20,0000 dollars you have in your bank account and put it into a project, you probably should not be a real estate developer. And that’s OK. No judgment. Real estate development is not made for everybody, but it does attract a certain group of people. And once people get a taste for it, it’s addictive. You know, people keep going with projects …

Eve: [00:13:22] That’s for sure.

Ken: [00:13:24] Yeah. Some people have done, gone through Jumpstart and they were intending on doing one project and they liked it so much, they’re now going to do one a year. Or we’ve had dozens of people who have quit their day jobs and gone into real estate full-time.

Eve: [00:13:39] Oh wow.

Ken: [00:13:39] But there’s no one group of people for Jumpstart. When I first started it, I thought, oh, you know, it’ll be young people, the next generation. Turns out it’s everybody. It’s contractors who retired who want to benefit from the fruits of their labors. It’s realtors who know how to source properties, but don’t know the other six steps of real estate development. So, it’s just a variety of people. But one thing has been really wonderful is that more than 85 percent of our graduates have been women or people of color who are traditionally left out of the real estate development process.

Eve: [00:14:22] That’s fantastic.

Ken: [00:14:23] So, it’s great that, just organically, that we’ve been able to attract that group of people.

Eve: [00:14:29] That’s really pretty fabulous. So if you can hammer one thing into new or an old developer’s head aside from risk, what would that be?

Ken: [00:14:40] It’s knowing what you’re doing, willingness to take risk, but a lot of what we also cover … You know, there’s a lot of get rich quick kind of schemes out there, and people that show you how to flip properties quickly. The reason why our Jumpstart program is different, and something that I say to everyone who wants to be a real estate developer, is keep the community in mind when you are developing properties. There’s a lot of developers out there, as you know, to get started, they put their head down, and they literally walk to and from their properties as quickly as possible. They park right in front of their property so they don’t have to interact with neighbors or talk to people. No. We’re teaching you park a block down from your project when you visit your project. You go door-to-door, initially, when you start your project, introduce yourself, tell people what you’re doing, why you’re doing it. Interact with the community. Don’t be like that elected official that waits till it’s election time to go door-to-door and ask for people’s support and vote. No. Introduce yourself to the community, get to know the community so that when you do go through zoning or you need support from a community member, they already know you, they already trust you. And definitely, as I said earlier, think about the impact that you’re having on the community as you develop. Because you can’t just do it in order to make a profit. You really need to do it in order to improve the community in which you’re investing. And then you’ll invest and benefit much more in the future.

Eve: [00:16:29] Yeah, that’s a great thought. Great advice.

Ken: [00:16:32] Thank you.

Eve: [00:16:33] So, are there current trends in real estate development that you think are the most important for the future of our cities?

Ken: [00:16:41] Yeah, it’s … interesting, obviously, with the pandemic trend is an interesting topic right now. Because there’s trends, I think, that will exist for the next year that will not be long-term trends. There’s a lot of people suggesting that everyone needs larger houses and people are going to move to the burbs because of the pandemic. I think that’s all short-term. I think, and what I’m hearing is that long-term, the cities are still going to be the place that people want to be, that people will return to public transit, that people will want to live and work within walking distance of a train station. So, those are the things that we’re still focusing on. Again, they may not be true for the next year during the pandemic, but they are certainly trends that had started a few years ago that I believe will continue, and developers should pay attention to that.

Eve: [00:17:41] So, stay the course, right.

Ken: [00:17:43] Stay the course. Exactly.

Eve: [00:17:45] Yeah, I feel pretty much the same way. But I think at the moment people are so scared of the unknown that it’s difficult to predict the next year.

Ken: [00:17:54] Right.

Eve: [00:17:55] So, your whole life is wrapped up in what really is impact real estate development. Do you think there’s a best approach towards impact real estate development and investment? Is there something that we could be doing better? People talk a lot about impact goals, but I really wonder how many people actually follow through.

Ken: [00:18:15] Yeah. And it’s hard because banks in particular push you or force you to think about the financial bottom line.

Eve: [00:18:25] Yes.

Ken: [00:18:25] And if you’re a caring person, you want to think about something larger than that. So, you really have to buck the trend in order to continue to think about the community. Is there any one way to do impactful real estate? No. I’m the last person to say you got to do exactly what I’m doing if you want to be impactful. No. There’s a lot of ways to be impactful. We are all sort of watching each other and learning from each other. And we all know who are the impactful developers within a community. We can learn from each other, but there are lots of different ways of being impactful, and it really depends on what your goals are, what your niche is, and what resources you have. So, some of us have more funding than others. So, I know that you’re very involved in crowdfunding, which is awesome. And if you have less dollars, you need to focus more on crowdfunding, which certainly has its benefits.

Eve: [00:19:27] Yeah, I really wonder when we reach a tipping point, because it’s really still so many buildings going up that do not benefit communities.

Ken: [00:19:35] Right.

Eve: [00:19:35] I mean, the large majority of them, I think, developers like you are still few and far between. And I’d love to be able to imagine 10 years from now it’ll tip the other way, but I’m probably too hopeful.

Ken: [00:19:50] Well, that is, you know, I didn’t say it, but that really is one of the goals of the Jumpstart program, is by showing newbie developers how to be impactful, how to care about the community while developing, up front, we’re hoping to turn that trend. I would agree. Right now, most developers are not focusing on how to be impactful. But I am hopeful that if we can train newbie developers and aspiring developers in a better way, that will change five or 10 years from now.

Eve: [00:20:26] Yeah, it’s almost like you need a Restart program …

Ken: [00:20:31] Yes.

Eve: [00:20:31] … for the old developers.

Ken: [00:20:32] Yes. Well, funny you mention that because we are starting up a what we’re calling Jumpstart 2.0, which is taking developers that have done 10 or more residential properties and helping them through a 21-hour program, graduate to commercial real estate, which is a specialized niche, as you know.

Eve: [00:20:55] Interesting.

Ken: [00:20:56] So, yes, in some ways it is a reset because we’re going to show them how to be impactful in commercial neighbourhoods.

Eve: [00:21:04] Well, that’s great. How do you think we can build better cities and neighborhoods for everyone, aside from all the work you’re doing? I mean, I think you’re pointing towards a way to do it, but is there anything else we’re missing?

Ken: [00:21:17] Yeah, there’s a multitude of answers to your question, of course. Part of it which we’re starting is training, mentoring, networking and funding for women and people of color, in particular, so we can diversify the network of real estate developers. But part of it is that government needs to step in, not in an obstructive way, but in a way that’s relatively easy, to help keep tenants in their apartments and  houses so they don’t get displaced when neighborhoods become hot. Better loan programs for homeowners, so, again, that they can buy and stay in the neighborhood of their choice. Government needs to help us make sure that neighborhoods don’t get gentrified while we’re improving neighborhoods. So, it’s not just up to the developers to get it done.

Eve: [00:22:15] Yeah, I always think about people on a fixed income, when a neighborhood gentrifies, and they own a property and they’re forced out. That really is within government’s purview, to change the way that property taxes are implemented.

Ken: [00:22:29] Yeah, that’s absolutely right. Although I do focus more on the tenant because tenants are much more quickly and immediately …

Eve: [00:22:39] Displaced, yeh.

Ken: [00:22:39] … displaced. Exactly.

Eve: [00:22:41] Yeah. Yeah yeah.

Ken: [00:22:42] Homeowners are much more slowly displaced.

Eve: [00:22:46] Yes. That’s a really difficult problem.

Ken: [00:22:49] And then again, it’s up to the developers or government. But we should not be encouraging what I call ‘urban renewal,’ you know, the knocking down of a whole bunch of properties in order to build new. We should be focusing on the reuse of properties, in particular, the adaptive reuse.

Eve: [00:23:09] Right, right. Right. And then, you know, you mentioned crowdfunding. Do you think, you know, I have noticed over the last few months a real uptick in developers reaching out to us. And I’ve heard them say that banks have basically shut down. And yet we need creative new solutions right now more than ever. I mean, how do we deal with that? Banks are really retreating and we need these projects. Can crowdfunding really play a role?

Ken: [00:23:39] Yeah, absolutely, and I have not used crowdfunding yet, but I am, like I said, the developers watch each other. So, I’m watching Philadelphia projects done by Mosaic Partners …

Eve: [00:23:53] Oh yeh.

Ken: [00:23:53] … Leslie Smallwood and Greg Reeves, who speak highly of you, and you know how they’ve been able to use it. But again, I want to, I do want to make clear that I think the financing issue right now and the lack of banks wanting to finance is short-term. Right. And as soon as we move out of this pandemic, those funds will keep flowing again.

Eve: [00:24:15] It hasn’t been short term for projects that make a change, like, let’s talk about a first time investment in a neighborhood after 10 or 15 years. That’s the sort of project the bank has been veering away from for the last decade, at least, if not longer, because they want to see an appraisal, they want to make sure the project is going to cash flow. If it’s something new and innovative, they’re not comfortable there.

Ken: [00:24:40] Right.

Eve: [00:24:40] That’s been the case for a long time.

Ken: [00:24:44] Yeah, right now, we’re in a totally different world, to be honest. It has totally clamped down. So, that’s why I’m distinguishing now versus a few years ago. There has absolutely, banks don’t want to use the word redlining, but we all know that illegal redlining continues, even though it is officially, on the books, illegal. But we do catch banks and insurance companies that veer away from middle and struggling neighborhoods when they shouldn’t be.

Eve: [00:25:17] Yeah.

Ken: [00:25:17] And to me, more of how they do it, and the crime is that they veer away from aspiring developers and newbie developers …

Eve: [00:25:28] Yeh.

Ken: [00:25:28] … who are focusing on these middle and struggling neighborhoods. So, they’re blaming it on lack of experience when many of us know that the real reason why they’re rejecting it is where the property is located. So …

Eve: [00:25:44] Yeah, yeah.

Ken: [00:25:46] … it’s absolutely a problem. But crowdfunding, as you said, is one way to break through that and to raise equity for projects that are otherwise not being funded.

Eve: [00:25:58] Or maybe your Jumpstart loan program, which sounds amazing.

Ken: [00:26:01] Yeah, it is very much geared towards providing those loans that the banks won’t do. If someone can be bankable and can get their own loan, please go out and do it.

Eve: [00:26:13] Yeah, yeah, exactly.

Ken: [00:26:15] We’re not looking to do every loan because we have limited resources. But if you are unable to get a loan because you lack experience, or because your credit is not good enough, or you are developing in a neighborhood that’s not attractive to banks, then absolutely, we want to fund those projects.

Eve: [00:26:37] Yeah, yeah. So, what’s next for you, besides all of this?

Ken: [00:26:42] You never know. I think our projects continue to get larger and larger. We’re looking at a 150,000 square foot school building right now that we plan to renovate into multifamily housing. But I think Jumpstart also continues to grow, both in Philadelphia and around the country. We’ve heard from folks in Tulsa, Oklahoma, Milwaukee, Chicago, you know, probably a dozen other cities that are interested in starting a Jumpstart program. So, I think it’s a matter of time before this idea goes national and really helps a lot of urban neighborhoods. So, it’s sort of, the sky’s the limit.

Eve: [00:27:31] Yeah, well, I love it. And you may be hearing from someone in Pittsburgh soon. So …

Ken: [00:27:35] Awesome! That would be great.

Eve: [00:27:37] Thank you. I’ve really enjoyed talking to you and thank you very much for sharing all of this with us.

Ken: [00:27:42] Great. Thank you, Eve. It’s nice to be on your podcast. Appreciate it.

Eve: [00:27:54] That was Ken Weinstein. He’s a developer and he’s a teacher, too. He’s trained 850 everyday people on how to develop their own properties. They live in his neighborhood and more often than not, they are Black or women. And he’s lending them money too. “We can train and mentor aspiring developers all day, says Ken, “but if you can’t loan the money, they’re not going to get very far.” You can find out more about impact real estate investing and access the show notes for today’s episode at my website EvePicker.com. While you’re there, sign up for my newsletter to find out more about how to make money in real estate while building better cities. Thank you so much for spending your time with me today.

Eve: [00:28:54] And thank you, Ken, for sharing your thoughts. We’ll talk again soon. But for now, this is Eve Picker signing off to go make some change.

Image courtesy of Ken Weinstein

Adaptive re-use.

October 5, 2020

To adaptively re-use a building is to re-imagine and re-purpose it. Often old, historic buildings have outlived their original purpose. They can be demolished or brought back to life and adapted to contemporary life. And there are compelling reasons to re-use historic buildings.

Sustainable

The adaptive re-use of buildings is inherently green. It’s a form of recycling which uses less energy than new construction and generates less waste than demolition or ground up new construction. The bulk of materials that give the building shape don’t need to be manufactured, procured or transported – they’re already on site and in place. Typically they are higher quality materials which would be prohibitively expensive to purchase today or, in the case of old growth forest, no longer even available. A hundred years ago building standards were also higher. A century-old building might outlast a brand new one.

Less urban sprawl

Urban sprawl can be contained by the re-use of existing old or abandoned buildings. Many older buildings are located in dense, walkable neighborhoods with good access to transit. Warehouses and factories in cities around the world have been converted to a myriad of uses, including co-working offices and some of the coolest homes. Industrial waterfronts in many cities have transformed struggling and forgotten areas into vibrant neighborhoods. And even unused railway trestles have been converted into linear parks providing much-needed outdoor space as well as pedestrian links between neighborhoods.

Lots of character

Historic buildings are a tangible part of the past, providing cultural enrichment to communities and allowing residents to take pride in the history of their place. The revival of urban downtown areas and historic buildings has often resulted in higher property values. People seem drawn to local history, to the warmth of old materials or maybe to older buildings just because they are more interesting.

As long ago as 1961, Jane Jacobs asserted that small businesses, like stores, restaurants, neighborhood pubs and small start-ups thrive in old buildings. Maybe she was right. A newer study from the Preservation Green Lab shows that cities with older, smaller buildings have higher density, a greater number of small businesses, more entrepreneurial activity, more diversity and more affordable housing.

Affordable

Avra Jain, who co-founded the Vagabond Group, is a wildly creative Miami developer, passionate about adaptive re-use projects. She has earned a reputation for identifying the next IT neighborhood. Her remake of the abandoned 195O’s Vagabond Hotel on Biscayne Boulevard in Miami changed the course of that neighborhood forever. The historic MiMo District was born. But Avra wants to push adaptive reuse even further. Her personal passion is to convert these abandoned and historic motels into reimagined, affordable housing communities. She’s tackling both the restoration of significant architecture and the making of affordable housing in a very unique way.

Listen to my interview with Avra to learn more about the importance of saving buildings.

Image by Eve Picker

From here to there.

September 30, 2020

Katie Faulkner has been working for twenty-five years on spaces and buildings for education, working, living and healthcare. Design is in her blood.

In 2017, she received the Boston Society of Architect’s Women in Design Award, the criteria of which describe her life, her sentiments and her goals to a ‘T.’ She is a person who exemplifies the highest level of excellence in their contributions to the design community and the built environment, and she has taken the “long and winding road” of an evolving career, develping a collaborative, compassionate, and participatory approach to working with others.

That road includes co-founding a design firm, NADAAA, that has been recognized with many notable awards including the 2014 Holcim Award, an AIA COTE Award, and numerous other accolades. She has also pushed herself to learn new skills outside the confines of the architectural world, including receiving an MBA from Boston University and becoming expert at new building technologies, in particular, mass timber construction.

This year, Katie launched WestFaulkner, motivated by her interest in both mass timber and modular construction, recognizing the potential for each to reduce risk and improve cost control in construction. Underpinning all of her projects is the sentiment that design architecture should be accessible to everyone, regardless of budget. All of her endeavors seek to reconcile the ecological and social impacts of planning and construction work, with a net positive outcome.

Before WestFaulkner, Katie was a Vice President of Design for Katerra, focusing on a mid-rise mass timber housing prototype, and an Associate Principal at Shepley Bulfinch. She received her Master of Architecture from Harvard’s Graduate School of Design and a Master in Building Administration from Boston University.

In 2020 she was named to the American Institute of Architects College of Fellows.

Insights and Inspirations

  • Katie believes design will be disrupted forever by the pandemic.
  • Mass timber is widely used in Europe. In the U.S. it is expensive and not yet widely cost competitive.
  • The use of mass timber is hindered greatly in the U.S. by building codes.
  • Flexibility is an added bonus with mass timber. It’s much easier to reconfigure spaces to shrink and grow with their inhabitants with timber than with concrete or brick, for example.

Information and Links

  • The cross-disciplinary commitment of the Carbon Leadership Forum is of particular interest to Katie. It is a network of architects, engineers, contractors, material suppliers, building owners, and policymakers who are taking bold steps to decarbonize the built environment. Their goal is to accelerate the transformation of the building sector to radically reduce the embodied carbon in building materials and construction through collective action. They do this through research, creating resources, fostering cross-collaboration, and incubating member-led initiatives to bring embodied carbon emissions of buildings down to zero.
  • Katie appreciates the curation of Architecture News Now, which is rich with important industry news, takes a global perspective and brings attention to important news and environmental issues within architecture and design.
  • Outside of architecture Katie is a fabric artist and has particular admiration for women like Anni Albers, Eileen Gray, and Charlotte Perriand. She can lose herself in a gallery of quilts or the stories/work of the quilts from Gees’s Bend. 
Read the podcast transcript here

Eve Picker: [00:00:13] Hi there, thanks so much for joining me today for the latest episode of Impact Real Estate Investing.

Eve: [00:00:20] My guest today is Katie Faulkner, an architect with a 25-year career. She has traveled a long and winding road to find answers to the design issues she cares about – that design and architecture should be accessible to everyone, regardless of budget, and that all projects should have a net positive outcome. Starting with a master’s in architecture degree from Harvard, she added in an MBA and a stint with Kattera diving into the technological aspects of mass timber construction. Her work has earned her many awards. You will want to listen in.

Eve: [00:00:20] Be sure to go to rethinkrealestateforgood.co to find out more about Katie on the show notes page for this episode and be sure to sign up for my newsletter so you can access information about impact real estate investing and get the latest news about the exciting projects on my crowdfunding platform, Small change.

Eve: [00:01:29] Good morning, Katie, I’m really excited to talk to you today.

Katie Faulkner: [00:01:32] Good morning, Eve. Thanks so much for having me.

Eve: [00:01:34] Yeah. So last week I was absolutely spellbound by the fabulous presentation you gave to our lovely Women’s Design Collaborative on the four ways in which COVID will forever affect design. And that presentation, for our listeners, is posted on the Small Change blog roll if they want to take a look. But I wanted to ask you, what inspired you to research and prepare that presentation?

Katie: [00:02:00] Sure. So, Rebecca Martinez and I did this together. Rebecca is located in L.A. and I’m in Boston. And both of us have lost our jobs during this COVID pandemic so we’ve had some time to really focus in on member advancement for the Women’s Development Collaborative. And that’s been great for me because it has opened up a world of development that I’ve long wanted to participate in, but actually as a designer and architect, haven’t done a lot of directly. So, Rebecca and I were brainstorming with Libby, who, you know, is our leader for WDC. And we had been talking about an open letter and a video that Sheryl Durst, who’s the CEO of IIDA, had put out there on the future of design. And she made some pretty bold predictions and so Rebecca and I started debating some of them, and that was really fun.

Katie: [00:02:50] We noticed that designers have been prognosticating since March. Some of the prophecies have seemed kind of silly. Some have been extremely elegant. All have called into question the way we go about our lives, how we interact with our fellow human beings, what we consider to be dangerous, what we consider to be fair, how we support one another. And we found that a lot of the changes that we were seeing had been things that had already been in motion before the pandemic. And what we were witnessing was some kind of acceleration. So, I think you’ve had some of the guests on your show in the past. Even before this you’ve had MASS Design on. They came out early with some restaurant guidelines and some health care standards. Other firms have done the same. The magazine Architizer, the online magazine, had all these articles of sort of X ways that COVID will change Y, you know, how housing will change, how office will change. And then, of course, I always like to give the last word to The New Yorker, which had this article on how the coronavirus will reshape architecture. So, Rebecca and I kind of sat down and we thought about it from our perspective on the West Coast and the East Coast, what were we seeing?

Eve: [00:03:55] And so, what did you find? Maybe the question should be: what are like the most ground-breaking things that you found, the most interesting things you found?

Katie: [00:04:03] We were all over the map because we felt, like, that we could base our one-hour presentation on so many topics that we found interesting, even if we just looked at how she saw L.A. and how I saw Boston. But given where we were in our careers, given that we were really trying to work with women and women in development, we decided to divide the presentation into four areas. Into work, into home, into the ground floor of what I’ll call mixed use development and then in terms of how we were seeing changes on the street. And so that’s how we started, and we began to pull together some studies that maybe had already been underway pre-pandemic but were now really being looked at. People like Heinz Development and CBRE were making some predictions about office. And we were seeing other architects kind of talk about the home. One of the things I think we zeroed in on immediately were how changes of work, our preferences in work. We did a poll of our own group, of our WDC membership, and I think you were there. Not one person in that group felt, like, that they would be going back to the office full-time even after a vaccine. I think that was the most startling discovery we made as we were pulling the presentation together.

Eve: [00:05:23] Interesting. Moving forward in your work, how are you going to act on what you found?

Katie: [00:05:30] Well, interesting. I mean, personally, as I’m launching a firm myself, it’s really given me pause to think about what to invest in. In a normal situation, I would have run right out and subleased some office space as I have a number of friends and colleagues who have small offices who have been great about offering me desk space and resources. But I haven’t needed it because so many of my colleagues and the people I’m collaborating with are not going back to the office. They have families, they’ve got reasons to stay home. So, I don’t think I’ll do that immediately. I’ve spent more time investing in my home office. I’ve spent more time investing in my technology platforms and learning new tools so that I can produce work by myself or produce work with a series of collaborators. So, it’s a little bit of a different model. Again, the technology platforms, I think, were things that we were already all using, but we’ve really accelerated our investment in ways that we might not have seen before.

Eve: [00:06:33] Yeah, and I think in the same way we’ve seen acceleration of businesses that were maybe dying. It’s almost like a compacted 10 years, isn’t it, during this pandemic of things that have changed?

Katie: [00:06:46] Yeah, another thing that surprised us quite a bit was retail. I don’t think anybody is surprised that retail is being challenged during this time, because I think we’ve been watching, over the last decade, retail try to adjust to online competition. But I do think that what we found in a McKinsey report was that, it’s thought that we’re pushing 10 years early in the acceleration of consumer penetration on digital platforms. And by that, I think they mean that there has been this gradual movement to people doing a lot of business online, even things like their health care, more than just ordering groceries or products, actual real penetration to digital platforms. So suddenly, in three months, we’ve moved 10 years forward.

Katie: [00:07:36] So what does that mean for our own mixed-use development? I mean, you and I have talked about this before, that in housing developments, there’s going to be this assumption that there’s an activated street, right? That there’s a ground floor that’s dynamic. Well, if that’s not going to be retail, if that’s not necessarily going to be small business, what’s it going to be? So that, I think, caused Rebecca and I to really take a deeper dive into things like omnichannel retail and what does that look like? Who’s likely to take ground floor? Or maybe things like ground floor housing, maybe? What does that look like? So, that’s interesting. And of course, not everybody is in a highly populated urban area, but I think that still does cause to call into question kind of ground floor housing models. So that was a bit of a discovery for us.

Eve: [00:08:23] And what do you think is going to happen with offices on the whole? I mean, we hear people want to go back to office. They want to go back to work. They don’t like working in isolation, but also isolation might be a little bit safer and cheaper and all of those things.

Katie: [00:08:40] Yeah, that was confusing. I think for me, I’m still on the fence on how that’s going to go. If you look at CBRE or a recent article that I read about Heinz, people in commercial are predicting a decrease in overall office demand for sure. But it seems like they’re predicting, kind of, a small decrease that I’ve read as low as two percent. And the reason they say that is because they think that there’ll be an overall demand for more space in your office. Maybe offices aren’t going to bring the whole group downtown, but when they do, people will want 15 percent more space than they had. I don’t know about that. I mean, it isn’t that I don’t believe people want more space, but the open office was already kind of well underway. That kind of studio model that architects and designers have been used to was really taking over all kinds of office sectors. But that being said, I don’t know that everybody, I’m going to go back to that informal poll that we took just with our own group, I think most of my colleagues don’t think that they’ll go back every day. That maybe they’ll check into their office hub once a week, but they won’t be showing up every day. Now, that begins to call into question things like the nine to five schedule, right? So many of us work in different time zones and we have colleagues that work maybe overseas. Why limit our work to nine to five? If I’ve got parents or children or other pressures, I can get just as much done, but maybe I’m restricted by school hours, et cetera. So now we’re thinking like, whoa, what about the weekend?

Katie: [00:10:20] It’s a really interesting question to begin to think about how we structure our workday. If we don’t have to be in that physical office space, that the Headquarters becomes more of a network and less of a physical space to be, I’m not so sure. I mean, we’ve listened to other people talk about this kind of glut of office space going into the housing market. So maybe two problems get solved at once. I mean, it’s all very fascinating. I don’t know that the data is there yet, but it certainly gives one pause in terms of how we think about how we’re going to structure our work life balance.

Eve: [00:10:54] You know, I couldn’t really answer that poll because the question for me would have been, were you going to the office 9 to 5? I mean, I lived two floors above my office, and so my schedule was already sometimes at home, sometimes at the office. And that’s going to continue. And I’ve been using Zoom for years. So, for me, it’s really not much of a shift.

Katie: [00:11:17] I have the same issue. I had been practicing with a firm that I co-founded for almost 11 years, and then I’d taken a job with a West Coast construction company with the understanding that I’d move out there when my youngest son graduated from high school. So, from the time I started that job, I was completely remote. I’d go to Seattle a week a month, but otherwise completely Zoom-focused. Because of their West Coast time zone, I’d also adjusted my schedule to match theirs. So, I was already quite comfortable with that as a way of working and it really gave me a sense that people could work almost anywhere as long as they could find the time to come together. So, I think what you’re pointing out is something that was already happening. I mean, the real reasons why we’re not going to the physical office anymore, but I’m not so sure that we actually have to go back, at least in the way that we did. I think people will feel safe eventually when there’s a vaccine, but there’ll be other reasons why we’ll call into question, I mean, why would I battle traffic? Why would I kind of expend that carbon footprint to drive in if I live out of the city? It begins to not make a whole lot of sense.

Eve: [00:12:24] Yeah, yeah. You’re an architect and you obviously care about design very much. And I just wanted to understand why it’s important to you and why you think, I believe you think, it should be important to everyone?

Katie: [00:12:36] Oh, that’s, yeah, so I have been practicing since the late 90s and almost since the beginning have had a real fascination with prefabrication in construction and the ability for construction to be much more efficient in a way that had a much lower carbon footprint. This was, I think, back before, I think even then we all knew that we had a real responsibility to the climate but maybe the climate as a crisis wasn’t screaming at the top of our agenda the way it is now. I think we’ve always, as architects, had a Hippocratic Oath to do no harm. And as time has gone on, it’s been clear that we, as an industry and construction, actually contribute to a good deal of the carbon emissions globally. So even though we, I think, have always been trained to make the world a better place, and I really do fundamentally believe in the power of design to do so, as we’ve matured as designers, as I think data has been made more available to us, we realize that we’ve been as much of the problem as any other industry, if not more so.

Katie: [00:13:48] And I think that we cannot alone, as designers, make a change. But if we begin to look at the way we deliver projects, if we begin to look at the materials that we use and the way that we work as industry, developers, manufacturers, we could do a great deal better in in reducing carbon footprints to the point where our buildings would have not only a zero carbon footprint, but actually would have the ability to be productive. And we’ve seen people do that. What’s been the challenge is that it’s expensive. It’s not for everybody. I think as I’ve gotten to what I think is probably the sort of, you know, final yards of my career, the sort of next 20 years, it’s so important to me that the work that I do be moving us all in a positive direction. And I know that most of my colleagues feel the same way. We’re all looking at issues of storm surge. We’re all looking at issues of climate. We’re all looking at the responsibility of making the world a more sustainable, a more fair and inclusive place. And I’m definitely not alone in that. I think designers kind of bring that passion. I hope so anyway.

Eve: [00:15:00] But I think you’ve gone a little bit further because you worked with, for Katerra, right?

Katie: [00:15:05] I did.

Eve: [00:15:05] On timber housing solutions.

Katie: [00:15:09] That’s right.

Eve: [00:15:10] What is mass timber construction?

Katie: [00:15:13] Oh, well, I’m happy to talk about that. So, in 2011, I launched a firm with a couple of partners called NAADAA. One of them is the designer, who’s fairly well known, Nader Tehrani. And that practice was really focused on design excellence, but design excellence with a really profound engagement with the materials of construction and how construction, kind of the means and methods of construction. So, we were very interested in mass timber when people started talking about that. And it has been a common material in Europe for decades. There are housing, there are examples of schools. Europeans, Austrians, Germany in particular, have done a magnificent job in turning that into an affordable and sustainable way to do all kinds of construction. The US has been behind that, meaning lagging, in that our zoning codes, our building codes did not necessarily make it easy for us to use the material. It’s also not been cost effective. What it is, is mass timber incorporates everything from cross-laminated timber, which is a series of what we’ll call lam stock, general old two by four construction, glued up into layers and then layered upon layers so that it becomes a pretty robust material that can compete with concrete.

Katie: [00:16:31] It’s also glulam which is very typical. Lots of people have been using glulam for years, which is again another glued-up means of using just regular timber stock into something that has a lot more resilience, both structurally and with fire protection. If done well, mass timber can be very sustainable and work very well with forestry management and actually help bring industry to parts of the country that have not necessarily had productive forest for a long time but have a lot of timber. There’s a whole wealth of research that’s being done by the Carbon Leadership Institute or the Carbon Leadership Forum. There are companies like Katerra that have been founded on bringing cross-laminated timber into the mainstream of construction.

[00:17:20] It can be done as a hybrid. It can be done with steel, it can be done with concrete, and even then, still very much lowers the carbon footprint. It isn’t just the material itself, but it’s the ability to do a lot of the fabrication offsite. So, when it comes on site it can get erected relatively quickly. We at NADAAA put together and successfully delivered the first mass timber student residence for Rhode Island School of Design in Providence. That is a hybrid. It’s not completely mass timber and by that, I mean the structure itself is steel, meaning the columns are steel, but the slabs are cross laminated timber. So, you can leave those exposed with certain construction types so you get beautiful ceilings and you can really appreciate the natural wood. Goes up very fast, has much less dust and waste than concrete. It’s a wonderful material and we could do a very deep dive on that in this podcast. I know we’ve talked about the WDC doing something on it. There’s no shortage of information on it. It’s a really fascinating material and I think the challenge now is to find ways to bring it into the market so that everybody can access it, so that it really can be cost effective for housing, for schools, for all kinds of typologies that really need not only carbon with a low footprint, but with a cost price point that that makes it accessible to everybody.

Eve: [00:18:44] You know, I was interviewing an architect in Amsterdam, Superlofts.

Katie: [00:18:49] Oh, yes.

Eve: [00:18:50] In my podcast. And he also brought up another aspect of mass timber that I thought was really fascinating from a design point of view. He was designing communities where he expected people to want to change their spaces, you know, add maybe another unit or subtract a room over time. And mass timber gives you the ability to break through and change the space that someone occupies much more easily than other materials, which I thought was really interesting.

Katie: [00:19:21] You know, we talked a little, we’ve talked a little bit about this, that, again, just getting back to this discussion of acceleration, pre-COVID if we were talking about housing, I would have said the biggest challenges to housing in the next decades are social justice, the delivery method, and then, of course, climate. I mean, those three things could be put to just about any construction type. But that social justice component it’s exactly that. That way that we could deliver housing to people that would give them the flexibility to grow so that maybe when you’re just starting out, it’s just a small household. Maybe it grows to have a family or have a multigenerational component where parents move in or people stay.

Katie Faulkner: [00:20:05] And you’re completely right, mass timber allows for that because it’s this, kind of, terrific almost plug and play kind of construction that you can have the slabs put in place would have structural integrity themselves and have a pretty decent span. And you can kind of leave it as a shell and then outfit it as time goes on with either a timber construction or a hybrid construction of something that’s more of a lighter frame. And it is exactly that. It’s extremely flexible. So, you can build this kind of grid system that’s quite elegant, that allows itself to be a studio, a one bedroom, a two bedroom, a three bedroom. It can be townhouses. So, we’re not yet doing a lot of that here and again, I think that the barrier is market driven. It’s that it’s not yet cost competitive with other construction types. But I think that that’s coming. I think you’re going to see that in housing, this ability for people to get a housing unit, a housing type, and then grow into it. So, your Amsterdam architect is spot on and I think the U.S. will catch up.

Eve: [00:21:10] Yeah, cool. Shifting gears, do you think architecture offers the same opportunities for women as men?

Katie: [00:21:19] I do. I’m very optimistic about architecture, where I’m less optimistic is architecture within the integrated delivery process. So, I really, as an architect coming up, feel that I had a lot of opportunity to grow. I had a lot of support, even though I would often find myself the only woman at the table. When we would get on the job site, as soon as the project would leave the office and expand into the what really is, I guess if I could back up, what really is a project has a great deal more than architecture. Architecture has the ability to bring some vision and really help clients see the potential of their project. But you can never do that without engineers, without the funds, whether that be developer funds or client funds, and certainly without contractors. The world of construction is not necessarily as supportive of women as architecture has been. Architecture is by no means without problem. But I think that if you look at where we are, there are a lot of women in leadership positions and more all the time. I have a lot of role models in architecture who have been women who I’ve looked up to, both well-known and not. But as soon as we leave the office and we go into that world of project delivery, whether it be development or construction, it’s discouraging.

Katie: [00:22:54] I think that I’ve wanted, my leaving NADAAA was difficult to do because I loved it. I love architecture but I really wanted to make an impact and I thought the best way, I think the best way to do that, is to somehow move a little bit more directly into construction and development. That has been extraordinarily difficult as a middle-aged woman or frankly, as a woman at all. That is challenging. And I’m frustrated. I think that women in development, there aren’t very many, you and I have talked about this before. If we really want to look at women run projects, there are great examples where a lot of the leaders are women. But if you dig deep, they’re often backed by firms that are led by men. I’m not saying that that’s a bad thing. There are plenty of very enlightened men. But for women to have these opportunities, I just think that the barriers are huge. We often don’t even really know about development. And when we get there, I don’t know. there’s just, this topic is so rich, but the short answer is, is it’s a challenge for sure.

Eve: [00:24:03] You know, for quite a long period of time I think that was the only female developer in Pittsburgh, which was a little startling to me.

Katie: [00:24:11] That doesn’t surprise me at all. I mean, that’s frankly, before I even knew about WDC, I had researched you and had seen a project on Small Change and gotten really excited about you as a woman developer. I mean, I’ve contacted women developers all over the country just to meet them, just to kind of find out more, to see how I can get started. Fortunately, I mean, what I will say is that when you do meet people in development who are women or who want to see women succeed, there are a lot of tremendous resources for us. Finding those, though, is difficult. And kind of finding the capital and the wherewithal to start a project, as you know, is challenging.

Eve: [00:24:54] Yes, but don’t give up because it’s a lot of fun.

Katie: [00:24:57] Well, I’m trying, I do, I’m very optimistic and I’m extremely grateful for WDC and for our members because there’s a lot of support there.

Eve: [00:25:05] Yeah, it’s great. Well, I’m going to shift gears again and ask you, I think I know the answer, do you think socially responsible real estate is necessary in today’s development landscape? Essential, not necessary?

Katie: [00:25:19] Oh, I think it’s essential. It really is. I mean, I don’t think that where we are today with our issues of equity and diversity and inclusiveness, I don’t think that’s any accident. I think that the tragedies that brought it to the forefront, that brought people out to the street, that was just something that was waiting to happen. There have been so many challenges to housing, to work, to various industries. I just cannot see that the social challenges and the environmental challenges that we have are not inextricably linked, that when we build anything, we have to look at the neighborhood that it goes in, the group that it is meant to serve. You cannot come into an area as a developer or an architect or a constructor without having the very people that the project is meant to serve at the table. And you cannot but think about the impact of the building on the neighborhood and the neighborhoods of the neighborhood, it’s just not a question anymore.

Katie: [00:26:26] You know, you put something up and the hope is that you make the place better than it was, that you’re giving people opportunities that they didn’t have. We talk about kind of a scorecard, right.? And sort of, how do we look at a project? There’s the environmental component, there’s a jobs component, there’s an inclusiveness component. There’s just such a complex, three-dimensional web. We cannot not do that, no matter what it is that we’re building – a factory, a distribution center – it’s long past time. And I think that as developers, as architects, as builders, we can only do so much. We’re going to have to take a really good look at our land-use restrictions, at our zoning requirements, at the building codes. There’s going to be a lot of work. But I think that the louder the conversation is, the more people that are standing up and saying, hey, wait a minute, I think this is an extraordinary time. I think in many ways we will look back at 2020 as being a year of sea change, a real pivotal year.

Eve: [00:27:29] No, I agree with that. But I think probably my biggest frustration is still finance and…

Katie: [00:27:35] So true.

Eve: [00:27:35] You know, what’s happened in the last month, it’s a very odd phenomenon. Over a period of four months, things were pretty quiet as people grappled with their own situations around the pandemic and whether or not to move forward with their projects. But now, all of a sudden, everyone’s gotten very busy. And I had a conversation with a developer yesterday who is doing a really interesting, worthwhile little project, not so little, actually, and wants to raise money for it. And the proportion of money he wants to raise is actually pretty high. So, my first question is always, can you get a bank loan? Because bank financing is the cheapest money you’re going to get. You should always look for a bank loan before you look for equity. And he said no. The banks here have stopped lending, there’s nowhere for me to go. So, we’re in this time of change, right? And we need to be thinking about the new next things and the way we’re going to live. And our financial institutions seem to be shutting down. That’s big.

Katie: [00:28:47] That is big.

Eve: [00:28:48] They were already not amenable to new ideas because money is lent based on performance of projects just like it before. So, if you’re doing something new, it becomes very difficult to finance something. And we need new now, right?

Katie: [00:29:04] Yeah, I second that. I find that the most frustrating part, well, one of the most frustrating parts about trying to launch new businesses, there is a lot of lip service to supporting new businesses, small businesses, women-run businesses. There aren’t a lot of financial resources there. And you’re right, the first place I would go would be a bank. But if you haven’t done a project before, if you don’t have a track record as a developer, even pre-COVID, you’re just not going to get that loan. So, I don’t know how to solve that problem. I mean, I think that, again, there’s all kinds of places that I can go to offer me training, to offer me, kind of, coaching but where to get the money? Difficult. Very difficult.

Eve: [00:29:54] Very difficult. So, at Small  Change we try to do a little bit of that, but it’s a really big problem to solve. As big as zoning and everything else. Now, I feel really depressed.

Katie: [00:30:05] But you shouldn’t because I actually think that you have stood as an example of what’s possible. I mean, you know, all of these things that crowdfunding brings opportunity to people who a) might not have had access, even just to the equity, but b) wouldn’t have the wherewithal to know how to do it. So even though I think it’s challenging and we’re looking at, we have ambitions maybe to do bigger projects, the fact that you have allowed a group of people who might not have even had access to it, the notion to better understand how to get a project developed, that’s huge. And if those rules change, I mean, that’s really something.

Eve: [00:30:44] Yeah. Yeah. Well, final question. What’s next for you? Well, you’re in the next, right?

Katie: [00:30:51] I think so. I mean, I’m really trying to make lemonade. I, again, I was, it was a little bit of a, well is very much an unplanned shift. I had joined Katerra, which was a big change. I mean, I’ve been an architect in conventional practice for, I like to say over twenty-five years, because as we get to 30 years, that’s starting to sound kind of ridiculously old, but it’s been a long time. So, the notion of moving to a construction company was a really big change and for a number of reasons that didn’t work out. So, I’m trying to go back to kind of what my ambitions always were, were to do an impactful, sustainable, socially responsible architecture and development. I think that architecture as an art can only go so far. And to really be impactful, I’m going to have to enter the world of development and that’s new to me. So, I’ve spent most of the last four months trying to learn more about development, trying to partner with others who are small enough to want to kind of take on a collaboration. It’s very, very challenging in Boston. But to begin to maybe look outside the well-developed metropolitan areas to some other Opportunity Zones that are well served by public transit. It’s been a learning curve for sure, but I’m optimistic. It’s also an incredibly exciting time. I think people are motivated. As you said, we need a new new. That being said, it’s a bit of a, it’s a bit of a cliff that I’m trying to scale. So, let’s check back in a few months. But I’m hopeful that we’ll see some progress.

Eve: [00:32:27] We should try and do a project together. And if there are any, anyone else out there that wants to join us, that would be amazing.

Katie: [00:32:33] It would.

Eve: [00:32:34] My big dream is, sorry gentlemen, but an all-woman-run development project would be just amazing.

Katie: [00:32:45] It would, it would. I think we have a shared ambition there and I believe, I believe we’re going to see it. I’m going say in 2021. So, let’s cross our fingers.

Eve: [00:32:53] I hope so. Well, thank you very much for joining me. I really enjoyed the conversation.

Katie: [00:32:58] Oh, thanks for your interest. It was a pleasure.

Eve: [00:33:07] That was Katie Faulkner. Many architects stay within the confines of prescribed architectural roles. Katie has really stretched herself and now she wants to stretch herself more. She sees real estate development as the ultimate way to take control of the physical landscape. And I’m right there with her. Let’s hope she succeeds and brings her wealth of knowledge and compassion to the real estate development world.

Eve: [00:33:42] You can find out more about impact real estate investing and access the show notes for today’s episode at my website, rethinkrealestateforgood.co. While you’re there, sign up for my newsletter to find out more about how to make money in real estate while building better cities.

Eve: [00:33:59] Thank you so much for spending your time with me today and thank you Katie for sharing your thoughts. We’ll talk again soon but for now, this is Eve Picker signing off to go make some change.

Image courtesy of Katie Faulkner

Reimagining the role of real estate development.

September 28, 2020

The affordable housing crisis in the United States is affecting more people than you might think.

For many Americans, across many income spectrums, a modest apartment is a cost burden and out of reach. There are multiple factors that have contributed to this affordability crisis. Wages have not kept up with rents, fiscal policy has favored homeowners, cars and transport are expensive and take up valuable real estate space and then there’s the rising cost of building affordable housing.

Experiments are being conducted to grapple with this problem in cities around the globe. Berlin is freezing rents, Minneapolis is working towards more affordable housing through updated zoning regulations, New York wants to produce quality affordable housing through careful design, California has passed a law permitting the construction of ADUs (Accessory Dwelling Units ) and many cities, including San Francisco, Boston and Milwaukee, are recapturing highways to provide more land for housing close in. All of this is leading to affordable housing innovation.

Entrepreneurs are working hard to make a difference too. Thibault Manekin founded Seawall Development, a real estate development company, focused on a particular housing niche – affordable housing for teachers. Seawall’s first project, the $20 million Center for Educational Excellence, is an adaptive reuse of a 100,000 square foot vacant factory building. In its reimagined form, the building houses 40 apartments for teachers along with 30,000 square feet of collaborative office space for a variety of non-profits that underpin the success of the school system. Seawall approached the development process collaboratively. They saw this as an opportunity to listen to educators and provide them with affordable, well located housing, shared with like-minded people. And bringing them together with education focused non-profits allowed for further collaboration and sharing of resources. The teachers provided design input for their apartments, chose the amenities for the shared resource center and even chose their own rents based on salaries.

“Everything that we’ve ever done has been built inside out” says Thibault “And what we mean by that is that we start with the end users, the people that are going to be living and working in our buildings. It’s important for us that they have a sense of pride, of authorship and ownership in what’s being created.”

Listen to my interview with Thibault to hear more about Seawall Development’s unusual and wholistic approach to real estate development.

Union Craft Brewing, Baltimore, courtesy of Seawall Development.

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

sign up here

APPLY TO BE A PODCAST GUEST

More to See

(no title)

February 22, 2025

Bellevue Montgomery

February 11, 2025

West Lombard

January 28, 2025

FOLLOW

  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Tag Cloud

Affordable housing Climate Community Creative economy Crowdfunding Design Development Environment Equity Finance FinTech Gentrification Impact Investing Mobility Offering Opportunity zones PropTech Technology Visionary Zoning

Footer

©rethinkrealestateforgood.co. The information contained on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this website is intended as investment, legal, tax or accounting strategy or advice, or constitutes an offer to sell, solicit or buy securities.
 
Any projections discussed or made may not be accurate and do not guarantee a specific outcome. All projections or investments are subject to risk due to uncertainty and change, including the risk of loss, and past performance is not indicative of future results. You should make independent decisions and seek independent advice regarding investments or strategies mentioned on this website.

Recent

  • The Mulberry
  • Mount Vernon Plaza
  • The Seven
  • Real estate and women.
  • Oculis Domes.

Search

Categories

Climate Community Crowdfunding Development Equity Fintech Investing Mobility Proptech Visionary

 

Copyright © 2026 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in