• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Say hello
Rethink Real Estate. For Good.

Rethink Real Estate. For Good.

  • Podcast
  • Posts
  • In the news
  • Speaking and media
    • About Eve
    • Speaking requests
    • Speaking engagements
    • Press kit
  • Investment opportunities

Finance

Gower Crowd.

December 7, 2022

Adam Gower founded GowerCrowd in 2014 to provide developers with resources to help raise money online for real estate crowdfunding deals. His platform provides lots of educational materials and training courses for both developers and investors, mostly geared towards high net worth individuals. Adam also hosts a podcast show called The Real Estate Crowdfunding Show, Syndication in the Digital Age where he speaks to the founders of crowdfunding platforms, attorneys, professors, investors and more, all on the topic of crowdfunding.

Adam has over 30 years of experience in finance and investment, and has taught many individuals how to build wealth and earn passive income through  investing in real estate. His career in real estate was launched in 1982 when he took a job with an electrician and quickly developed  an interest in real estate finance.

His past career included a stint as President of Universal Studios in Japan in the 1990s, where he was primarily responsible for Universal’s real estate development in the Asia Pacific region. He returned to the U.S. and worked for a series of banks – East West Bank, Gaw Capital and Colony Capital – until the passing of the JOBS Act in 2012. In 2013, he founded Castlewell Properties, an organization to assist developers in navigating the JOBS Act. Adam has written five books on real estate crowdfunding and you can find them all here.

Read the podcast transcript here

Eve Picker: [00:00:06] Hi there. Thanks for joining me on Rethink Real Estate. For Good. I’m Eve Picker and I’m on a mission to make real estate work for everyone. I love real estate. Real estate makes places good or bad, rich or poor, beautiful or not. In this show, I’m interviewing the disruptors, those creative thinkers and doers that are shrugging off the status quo in order to build better for everyone. And speaking of building better, I’m very excited to share that my company, Small Change, is now raising capital through a community round that is open to the public. Small Change is a leading equity crowdfunding platform for impact investment in real estate. For as little as $250, anyone 18 and over can invest in Small Change, helping to fuel our growth as we disrupt the old boys club of capital that routinely ignores so many qualified people and projects. Please visit wefunder.com/smallchange to review the full details of our raise and to make an investment if you can. And remember, investing is risky. Don’t invest more than you can afford to lose.

Eve: [00:01:44] My guest today is Adam Gower, founder of Gower Crowd. On his platform, Adam shares his decades of experience in finance and development with developers, showing them how to raise money online for real estate Crowdfunding deals. Content rich, his platform includes educational materials and training courses for both developers and investors alike. Adam also hosts a podcast show called The Real Estate Crowdfunding Show: Syndication in the Digital Age, where he speaks with the founders of crowdfunding platforms, attorneys, professors, investors and more, all on the topic of crowdfunding. And he’s written five books as well. Opinionated, straightforward, with lots of information to share, that’s what you’ll hear when you listen in. If you’d like to join me in my quest to rethink real estate, there are two simple things you can do, share this podcast and go to rethinkrealestateforgood.co, where you can subscribe to be the first to hear about my podcasts, blog posts and other goodies.

Eve: [00:03:01] Hi Adam. It’s really great to finally catch up, it’s been a while.

Adam Gower: [00:03:05] It has. It’s a pleasure to see you again. It has been far too long.

Eve: [00:03:08] Yeah, it has. So, you know, I’ve always thought you have a pretty unusual background. From Ph.D. to Universal Studios in Japan to author and then real estate crowdfunding. So, can you connect the dots for me?

Adam: [00:03:22] Oh, my goodness. Yes. Well, actually, chronologically, it wasn’t quite that order. So, I’ll try and do it. I’ll try and do it as fast as I can, which is not good, because talking about myself is my favorite topic. And I can talk for hours, you know, on that subject. But basically, I started pulling wires for an electrician 40 years ago. Oh, my goodness. Summer of 1982. And then from there I did some finance for multifamily developer in San Diego, raising money from Japanese investors. And then, yes, I ended up in Japan during the nineties and was hired by Universal Studios. I was [speaks in Japanese], which made me president and CEO of Asia Pacific for Universal Studios. It’s actually a JV with Paramount Studios. And then I came back and started doing my own developments, got a PhD, you’re quite right, in banking and banking history and risk mitigation, how to mitigate risk in the banking world. And then in around 2012, started doing seed investing, actually seed and angel investing after the global financial crisis had recovered.

Eve: [00:04:45] Oh I didn’t know you did that. That’s interesting.

Adam: [00:04:47] I did. I did a little seed investing and that’s what got me interested in digital marketing, because all these 20-something-year-olds were talking a foreign language. It was the language of digital marketing. So, when the JOBS Act passed and you and I first met, right, you are absolutely one of the first leaders of the crowd here in my [inaudible]

Eve: [00:05:09] I think I shocked you with all the regulations. I remember the conversations like you saying, you can’t do that. Why not?

Adam: [00:05:17] I tell you what, I was so blown away that you did it because I downloaded, it wasn’t the JOBS act, but I remember downloading Reg CF to see if I could figure it out. It was [inaudible], and I printed it!

Eve: [00:05:31] The first time I read it, I read 650 pages, it was like, what is this?

Adam: [00:05:39] I actually printed the thing. It was like, that was a ream of paper, 500 pages or more, and I gave up. There’s no way I’m going to get past the introduction. I’ve got no… The preamble was too long for me, so I didn’t bother. But what I did realize at that time was that there was an intersection between commercial real estate, capital formation and digital marketing. And so, that was where I started to develop expertise in helping sponsors to raise money online, as you know, primarily accredited investors for Reg D offerings. But we just, we do all the digital marketing. That’s what we do for sponsors, and platforms sometimes as well.

Eve: [00:06:23] So, on your site you say the best way to invest in real estate is by crowdfunding. So, tell me why you believe that.

Adam: [00:06:33] So, you know, during my career I’ve raised over a half a billion dollars in capital, as you know.

Eve: [00:06:41] Can you send a little bit of that my way?

Adam: [00:06:43] It’s unfortunate, most of it I did for other people. I’ve very seldom done it for myself. I usually do it as an employee or as, you know, as a whatever, anyway, as a hired gun to help them raise money. But it was always in person, Eve. It was just this painful process of having to meet people one at a time. One of the first terms that I heard when I was in San Diego doing this, I forget who said it, but I can see his face and I can hear his voice saying it’s a dog and pony show. So, we got to go and do a dog and pony show. And that’s what it was. It was, you had to know people. You had to establish a relationship. You had to meet them in person. It was just this incredibly long, painful process of networking, relationship development. As soon as crowdfunding became legal, it just allows you to now, to do that, to transition that entire process online where you can, you know, I don’t want to say literally, but you can effectively be in front of everyone all the time, everywhere. Everyone, everywhere, all the time. So, you still have to go through that attract and nurture process, but by doing it online, by crowdfunding it, it just makes your time that much more efficient. You don’t have to do it one person at a time. You know, the other thing that’s interesting about crowdfunding is that everybody, I don’t know if there’s a video podcast or audio, but I’m going to wave my phone in front…

Eve: [00:08:22] It’s not going to be a video.

Adam: [00:08:24] I’m waving my phone…

Eve: [00:08:26] He’s waving his phone.

Adam: [00:08:28] …as a prop to say what people don’t want, you know, as a sponsor, nobody, no sponsor wants to sit down through a one- or two-hour pitch meeting with one investor after another. It’s time consuming and tedious and you never know.

Eve: [00:08:44] And honestly, I think there’s very few investors who want to go through that too.

Adam: [00:08:47] And that’s the point. Investors don’t want that.

Eve: [00:08:50] And as an investor, you know, I might very well be interested, but the more you try and sell me, the more I’m going to run screaming from me.

Adam: [00:08:58] It puts you off. Investors don’t want that either. Nobody wants that in this world. Everybody wants to be able to, at the very minimum, be able to research and evaluate a sponsor and a deal anonymously. That’s the key thing they want.

Eve: [00:09:16] Anonymously and on their own time and with enough time to absorb it, right?

Adam: [00:09:20] Yes, that’s right.

Eve: [00:09:22] So, it works for both ends. So, really, crowdfunding, the JOBS act, really took investing from behind closed doors out into the open. And it stopped that miserable process. And it also gave opportunities to people who’d never been part of it before. Right?

Adam: [00:09:38] Exactly. Yeah, exactly. It opened up the world to, you know the other thing that it did, Eve, was that it opened the book of real estate syndication. It was a closed book. Closed shop. If you knew the right people and were a member of the right country club, both figuratively and literally…

Eve: [00:09:59] If you were the right gender, if you were the right race.

Adam: [00:10:02] Right gender, and the right race.

Eve: [00:10:04] Yeah. So, all of that was closed, right?

Adam: [00:10:07] You had to have the right connections. But even if you did, you had no access to information about what was fair market, what made sense. They had no basis for comparison when the guy at the country club recommended or tried to pitch you on a deal, you just didn’t know. Today, with crowdfunding, you can go online and see hundreds of deals and compare them all, apples for apples. And that way you can determine not only what fits your investment profile better, but also which of them are treating you the fairest, right at the end of the day. And so, really the world changed. It became a lot more transparent and easier to transact, better for everyone.

Eve: [00:10:55] So, do you think it’s becoming more widely accepted? Like we’ve been at this for a few years now, you and I.

Adam: [00:11:03] Yeah, most definitely. You know, we’ve talked about this a lot, and a couple of years ago, we, it just suddenly occurred to me that everybody, all the insiders in this, the industry insiders, know that the industry is growing by leaps and bounds. We just know it, right? But there were no data that quantified it. There’s one source that looks at regulation crowdfunding and analyzes that, but it’s a relatively, it’s important, but it’s a relatively small part of online syndication. So, we did some analysis of SEC data.

Adam: [00:11:48] We actually downloaded a million data points and I wrote a book. And so, two years ago we discovered, and it’s two years ago already, it’s a long time ago already. The crowdfunding, so, by crowdfunding I don’t mean regulation crowdfunding. I mean online syndication, in general, to include regulation crowdfunding. But Reg D, 506 Cs as well, and Reg As, and realized that actually it was starting, it had become, and even then, two years ago, 25% of all capital raised for all private equity deals was through online syndication. In other words, it was happening.

Eve: [00:12:27] Is this in real estate or across the board?

Adam: [00:12:30] In real estate. So, it’s rapidly becoming the dominant form of capital formation.

Eve: [00:12:37] That’s really interesting. So, what do you think holds people back, especially new investors, from investing in real estate?

Adam: [00:12:45] Yeah, I think, so, that’s a good question, actually, because that question.

Eve: [00:12:50] I only have good questions.

Adam: [00:12:53] And hopefully I can compliment them.

Eve: [00:12:56] I’m just joking.

Adam: [00:12:58] So, I think that that, I would answer that question differently today than I would have done at the beginning of the year. At the beginning of the year, I would say to you that the primary barrier to entry for a new investor, somebody who is considering investing in real estate, is education. Lack of understanding, a lack of appreciation for what real estate is, just, you know, having no experience or background, being used to stocks and bonds and just sticking with what they, you know, their comfort level. That has changed profoundly in the last six months, particularly. Because what’s happened, when we’re seeing this in the data that we gather through the work that we do in marketing offerings. But what’s happened is that you have a stock market collapse that has wiped out huge amounts of people’s net worth. You’ve got interest rates climbing, which is eroding the value of people’s homes, so they feel like their homes aren’t worth as much.

Adam: [00:14:02] And of course, inflation is also having that erosive effect on people’s savings. So, people today, versus where they were nine months ago, feel less wealthy than they did. So, they are significantly more cautious today about anything at all because they feel like if, you know, nine months ago an investor, you could say to an investor, you know, you should diversify. And an investor would think, yeah, you know what, that makes sense. I’ve made so much money in the stock market, why don’t I take some of those winnings and diversify into real estate? Today, the mentality is, wait a minute, I don’t want to sell anything at a loss, right, just to diversify into real estate.

Eve: [00:14:47] Just want to stay in there and stick it out.

Adam: [00:14:49] Yeah. It’s just made it harder. And we’ve seen this dynamic Eve, because we do, some months we spend up to $150,000 a month in Facebook ads across all of our campaigns, not just for Gower Crowd, but for our clients. And what we saw happened fairly early this year, once the inflation kicked in and interest rates went up and the stock market came down, war in the Ukraine. And all this kind of compounding effect, was that the cost of acquiring a new accredited investor lead almost doubled. In other words, it became harder for people were not reacting to the exact same messaging as they were at the beginning of the year because they’re more cautious.

Eve: [00:15:35] So, my next question would be, okay, that’s investors in general. But what holds people back from investing through crowdfunding platforms?

Adam: [00:15:43] I think, again, I think the same answer is there’s just lack of awareness.

Eve: [00:15:47] I would have argued that I think crowdfunding platforms also attract a different demographic. So, I think there are still a fair number of people who don’t trust a crowdfunding platform, who are used to investing in that old-fashioned, behind closed doors. way that… Yeah, I think, I really wonder whether that shift has really happened.

Adam: [00:16:13] It’s interesting you say that because I, we’re immersed in this industry. And so, everybody we speak to knows that for the most part, sometimes, you know, like you do, I also get sponsors coming to me to help them. We get investors coming in and, but everybody has heard of it and is interested, at the very minimum, or has engaged in online syndication and crowdfunding. So, it blows me away when I talk to people who I know are accredited investors. They ask me, what do you do for a living? And I tell them, and they’ve never heard of it. Absolutely.

Eve: [00:16:51] I know, I know. That happens. And that’s really, I feel like, I haven’t done the research on it, that really, where wealth is held hasn’t really shifted to crowdfunding platforms yet. Does that make sense?

Adam: [00:17:08] Yeah, I think so. It’s still an alternative, you know, for real estate, it’s still an alternative asset. So, for most people, it’s never going to take up a huge proportion of that portfolio. It’s not a high priority, it’s a diversion from the usual investments. The only people I know who are heavily overexposed in some cases 100% exposed to real estate are the sponsors themselves. That’s like, they have, they might have a few dollars in stocks and bonds because they feel like they should have, but for the most part, their net worth is entirely based on their commercial real estate real estate investment. But most people it’s, you know, it’s a kind of a flutter on the sign.

Eve: [00:17:57] As a real estate developer I can attest to that. That’s where my money is, in my projects. But my husband and I, together, we’re diversified.

Adam: [00:18:09] Between the two of you. I’m the same with my wife as well. It’s the same thing. She has these stocks and bonds. I have some stocks and bonds as well. I never pay any attention to them. I’ve got no idea what they are, how they work, nothing at all. Zero. And whenever I have a financial planner, he calls me, he likes to have these lengthy, he’s a super nice guy, likes to have these lengthy discussions about my portfolio because he wants to tee me up to asking my approval to do something. Should I buy this? Sell that for… I would say, before we even start, the answer is yes, whatever you want. Let’s get that out of the way for whatever you advise, yes. Can’t think in that sense. But most people don’t.

Eve: [00:18:55] Yes. Okay, so walk me through the services you provide at the Gower Crowd. What type of services do people come to you for?

Adam: [00:19:05] So, what we do primarily is we build, the easiest way to describe it is that we build tailor made crowdfunding platforms. Again, to be clear, these are not regulation CF. We’re not FINRA, SEC. None of our clients do any of that, right. So, these are typically sponsors.

Eve: [00:19:24] So, this is just basically like the old-fashioned private placement investment opportunity now on a website instead. Because it’s permitted, it’s a 506 C offering.

Adam: [00:19:36] Not just that. No, not really. Actually, we build systems that elevate a sponsor’s visibility, so that they become known and recognized as an authority in the industry, so that when an investor comes to them and does research on them, goes to their LinkedIn profile, goes to their website, looks on Facebook, goes to Twitter, goes to YouTube, wherever they are, they realize that they are a leader in the field. The websites used to be, they have no functionality, websites have no, typically they’re just a couple of pretty pictures and a contact page. Well, the websites that we build have full functionality, lead generation forms, lead generation funnels. So, when somebody comes to the website, they can sign up to get on a newsletter. They then get automated emails from the sponsor so that the entire process of finding investors and nurturing them is fully automated for the sponsor, so they can get on with the business of going out and finding deals, buying them and executing of business plans and investors literally come to them. They don’t have to go out and find investors. Investors come to them.

Eve: [00:20:59] Well they are going out to find them because you’re building a marketing campaign around them, right? It’s not about a particular project, but it’s about the sponsor.

Adam: [00:21:08] Yes, that’s right. But it works on autopilot. So, once we switch the machine on, the machine, just cast this net and investors gravitate towards it and come to the website. They do their research, they sign up. And so, the sponsor, it used to be that used to have to go out. You join a country club, or you’d go to a networking event, or you go to a conference. You remember business cards? I used to go to conferences. My primary goal was to get as many business cards as I could, and then I’d follow up with them. That’s all I did. I just, I’d collect business cards, stacks, and then I’d follow up. I’d say, it was nice to meet you at the conference. And then I realized, you know what? I don’t need to go to those conferences. All I need is a list of everybody there. I write to them, and I’ll say, it was nice to meet you at the conference, because no one remembers anyway. Everybody. No one’s got a clue. This is the same thing, essentially. You’re just casting out and people, they come to you, they find you online, they come to you, they get to know, like, and trust you, and become predisposed to investing. Those are the, that’s what we build for our clients. We build the platforms, but we also teach people how to build them themselves. So, that’s kind of the main distinction. And then we do marketing, active marketing for clients.

Eve: [00:22:32] So, what’s the biggest misconception that developers have about marketing or crowdfunding platforms when they come to you that you have to break through?

Adam: [00:22:41] Yeah, I think.

Eve: [00:22:44] That marketing support is probably the number one thing.

Adam: [00:22:47] Yeah, it’s like, moving into, I think first of all, speed, it’s one of the main things I like to emphasize is, this is not a quick fix. It does not happen quickly. I mean, you know that as well as anybody in the country, Eve. It takes a long time; you’ve got to have patience and you’ve got to work at it. So, speed of turnaround is important. And the other thing is the process of being online and being visible for some people is, some people thrive on it, relish it. Other people are hyper protective of their, overprotective of their, brand and their identity. They think it has to be perfect, has to be polished like Hollywood in every possible regard. And it doesn’t, I mean, it just doesn’t. People don’t expect perfection. In fact, if they see perfection, there’s, it creates…

Eve: [00:23:49] A fake facade.

Adam: [00:23:52] Exactly. Don’t worry about, you know.

Eve: [00:23:55] A little authenticity is good, right?

Adam: [00:23:57] Exactly. Warts and all. Don’t worry about it. It’s okay. Zoom recordings are perfectly fine for the online world. You don’t need to have a Hollywood studio and lighting and lights, camera, action to get good. People don’t care. What your investors care about is the message, not the way, not the quality, the way you deliver it. They want to be able to access it on a phone, on their computer, in their car. They just want easy access to it. They don’t care if the shirt you’ve got is the same shirt you wore yesterday, for example, or that it’s, you know, a perfectly high-quality video.

Eve: [00:24:40] I’ve got to ask you a question. What does a really bad real estate crowdfunding campaign look like to you?

Adam: [00:24:48] You know, that is also an interesting question. That is in the eye of the beholder. So, I will tell you that the really easy, the really easy answer to that is something that is, well, there’s actually a few answers. One that’s hypey, that’s just hypey. And over promises.

Eve: [00:25:14] That’s just not permitted. So, you know, no matter which rule you’re using, the SEC won’t like that, right?

Adam: [00:25:20] Doesn’t mean people don’t do it, a lot.

Eve: [00:25:22] I know, I know.

Adam: [00:25:24] So, that is one bad campaign. And investors should be very, very cautious of something that promises the earth, even if it has the CYA language, right? Like projected returns. Be very, very careful. So, that’s one thing. Overhype, too flashy, non-authentic, too polished. I see some stuff out there where I just know people are playing games. Bad. Like, you know, I’m not going to mention…

Eve: [00:25:54] No names.

Eve: [00:25:54] I’m not going to, but some really bad stuff. So, that’s the first thing. The other things that make for a bad campaign, bad copy. You still have to have good written content. Your content still has to be well-written. It doesn’t need to be hype, but it needs to be well written, you know, and there’s lots of people that just don’t know how to do that properly. So, I see a lot of badly written, badly structured campaigns. Another thing that people get wrong is the way that their website is structured. There is an optimal way to structure your website. It’s not that difficult to have a well-structured website, but a lot of people don’t know. It’s something that we teach, I actually wrote a small book on the topic because it’s such an easy thing to do well. So, that’s another thing that people make mistakes with. Yeah.

Eve: [00:26:58] So, what’s a great one look like?

Adam: [00:27:00] It’s the way it’s structured, Eve. It’s the architecture of the website. So, the key components are going to be, you’ve got to have a good catch phrase on the front page. It’s called the Big Idea. So, the big idea is a catch phrase that speaks to what is, the only thing that your prospects, the only thing that’s going, the conversation that your prospect is having in their own mind. And that conversation is always and only ever going to be what’s in it for me. So, whatever your tagline is, whatever your headline is on your home page, should speak to that, period. Because you’ve got about a half a second for somebody to land on your website, during which they will decide whether or not they want to learn more or to leave. So, you’ve got to have a good headline that is easy to understand.

Adam: [00:27:53] And if you want a pro tip, there are three terms that should be, at least two of them, ideally three of them, that should be included in that. The word you or yours. And you are speaking directly to the person that lands on your website. Second is the word real estate. So, somebody knows it’s a real estate website. And third, the word invest or investing or investment, some derivation of the word invest so that people know that you are talking to them directly about real estate investing. And ideally it should be aspirational in some way. And then the second thing, three key components. There’s more, these are the really important ones. The second thing is that underneath that you need to have a lead generation button, a button that says basically, give me your name and email so you can learn more, basically. It doesn’t say that, might say, learn more, join the waitlist, sign up, you know, get access.

Eve: [00:28:50] Right, right.

Adam: [00:28:51] But then what should pop up is something that says gain access to X, Y, Z, whatever your lead magnets is, and then ask for name, first name, email address. And then ideally, you want to ask whether or not somebody is accredited or not, and then you bifurcate them inside your automated emails that then go out once somebody submits that form. And the third thing that is critically important on a real estate sponsor’s website is content. Content is king, Content is king. You’ve got to have good content because your prospects are going to want to research you. So, don’t let them go off to somebody else’s website to learn about real estate. You have to teach them yourself. Otherwise, they’ll do research online, they’ll find somebody else’s client, probably one of my clients or yours, and they will invest with that person, not with you. So, those are the three most important things.

Eve: [00:29:48] So unfortunately, the content piece for Regulation Crowdfunding is very difficult to put in place on a funding portal, which is really only supposed to be doing the business of raising money through those offerings. And we’ve actually had to move our content off. So, yeah.

Adam: [00:30:06] You can’t have educational content.

Eve: [00:30:08] Well, yeah, you can have educational, but it’s got to be really very neutral educational content. So, blog posts and a lot of activity are very difficult because FINRA wants to track it all, makes it difficult. So, anyway, that’s an aside. It’s an interesting little wart about that particular rule.

Adam: [00:30:33] Well, that’s for regulation CF, let’s just be clear about it.

Eve: [00:30:36] Right, right, right. Let’s be absolutely clear. So, we actually have a second site. This one, Rethink Real Estate for Good. That’s where we have our content, because we can generate content there, we always need to be cognizant with the same business, but a little more freely.

Adam: [00:30:52] Yeah.

Eve: [00:30:55] So, what trajectory then, do you see for real estate crowdfunding? What’s in that crystal ball?

Adam: [00:31:02] It’s not that difficult to see what’s going to happen. And we could, I’ve been predicting this ever since the beginning. I’m not the only one. There are few of us that think similarly to what’s going to happen. But the difference between now and ever since the beginning of real estate crowdfunding or online syndication, the difference is it’s going to happen now, right? It’s like happening now. So, this, what is going to happen is that a lot of newcomers to commercial real estate and new sponsors to commercial real estate, I hate to say it, are going to lose their shirts. When they do, their investors are going to lose everything. It’s just going to happen, end of story. I mean, we’ve got interest rates have gone from sub threes to north of six. That wipes out equity, period. And as cap rates increase, that’s just going to wipe out equity across a broad range of asset classes. There are some tailwinds for certain asset classes, multifamily being one where you’ve had this incredible build up, incredible inflation of rents that will cushion some of that blow. But there are a lot of inexperienced commercial real estate sponsors who have raised a lot of money, who will lose everything and their investors will lose everything. So, it’s going to create a huge, it’s going to tarnish the industry, the reputation of the industry, because it will, you know, what do you call it? It’s a black mark that will be, that will stereotypically be applied to all sponsors and everybody that raises money online and to crowdfunding in general.

Adam: [00:32:43] So, those people who have been cautious, who have been frustrated at the excesses that some sponsors have taken online, right, the liberties that some inexperienced sponsors have taken on, we talked about this a bit earlier, the hype, the hype promises, even with the projected returns, all the hype and all that stuff, when those people lose money, that will rub off on even those who have been cautious, prudent. And so, we’re going to see that, with no doubt at all, going into 2023 is going to be a very tough year for the real estate crowdfunding industry as a whole. But those who have been conservative, prudent, careful, multi cycle sponsors who know this is, they’ve defended, have set up defenses already, because they don’t want it to happen again to them. We’ve seen it before and have been careful and held back despite the temptation to compete with the hype mongers right over the last few years. Those people will survive, and those people will prevail and they will get bigger and stronger going through this downturn and coming out the other side a much stronger than they were before. And the same will go for the platforms.

Eve: [00:34:07] So, the big thing here is stay away from the hype mongers.

Adam: [00:34:11] Yeah, I think you’d just be, you know, if it seems too good to be true, it is.

Eve: [00:34:16] It is too good to be true.

Adam: [00:34:17] Yeah, and it always has been. Yeah. But knowing what that is is difficult. You know, it’s difficult. Real estate is a high return, high risk industry. It doesn’t need to be high risk. It can be mitigated. But when it’s lower risk, the returns are going to be lower. So…

Eve: [00:34:35] Right.

Adam: [00:34:36] My advice to investors today is, you know, there’s those that have already kind of been seduced, if you like, into believing that higher returns come with no pain.

Eve: [00:34:45] Well, I think they were seduced a long time ago. I mean, I think the promise of high returns has been falling for the last few years anyway. The developers we talk to, when you hear an investor say, oh, I can get 20 to 25% internal rate of return, the developers I talked to for the last two years have been saying those days are long gone. So yeah, I think you have to be cautious.

Adam: [00:35:13] Absolutely. Yeah, exactly. And the internal rate of return is such a manipulable metric, anyway.

Eve: [00:35:22] We’re not allowed to talk about them, if we’re members of FINRA at all.

Adam: [00:35:25] Well, it’s a good thing, because it’s just so easy to manipulate the IRR, we’ve got to look way, way beyond. And probably the best thing to look at is the experience of the sponsor. How many sites.

Eve: [00:35:38] I was just going to come back to this. You said before, the experience of the sponsor matters, and I think that probably is like a key thing. There’s got to be some experience that is relevant to the project, right? Not like, well, I built three single houses and now I’m going to do a retail strip mall, you know, or whatever. It’s going to be somewhat relevant experience, right?

Adam: [00:36:03] The other thing that’s important to look at is, really the biggest killer in real estate, is debt, the amounts of debt. And if somebody is just layered upon, put layer upon layer of debt on something, you know, they’re going to be able to show those high returns, but it’s going to put their…

Eve: [00:36:22] It’s all going to go to the bank, yeah.

Adam: [00:36:25] Delivering is going to be much harder. So, the best thing, look at people who have lower debt. Even people at, say, sub 50%, 30, 40% debt. If you got sponsors that are talking about that kind of debt, their return profile is going to be significantly lower, but much, much more likely to achieve the returns.

Eve: [00:36:46] But you know what’s interesting about that, that is a targeted neighborhood profile that you’re talking about. So, if you go into a neighborhood that hasn’t had much investment and where city or state wants to have it and they add second to third mortgages that come from an urban redevelopment authority or grants or matching facade grants, etc., then you can lower the debt. So interestingly, I think that those sorts of investments or those sorts of projects that are in, not the hot markets, might actually survive because they have that sort of, I don’t want to forecast anything, but they have that sort of profile. They tend to have sub 50% traditional bank debt.

Adam: [00:37:38] Yeah, that’s, it’s just so important because people talk about the capital stack. I think the language that is used when you talk about the capital stack is misleading. What they say is, they say the first to be paid and then the second to be paid. So, the language that is used when you talk about the bank is the first to be paid and then the equity holders are paid next, is a positive spin on what the capital stack is.

Eve: [00:38:07] Right.

Adam: [00:38:07] But really, what the capital stack means is, being in first position, they have the first right to take the project away from everybody else. That’s what the capital stack is.

Eve: [00:38:21] Now you’re scaring me.

Adam: [00:38:23] That is the power of foreclosure to wipe out all the other investors. That’s what the capital stack means. So, the higher the level of debt, the more people that are there who can take over the project wipe you out.

Eve: [00:38:39] Yes.

Adam: [00:38:40] That’s why the capital stack is, I think the language that’s used is misguiding. It’s not first paid, it’s first right to wipe everybody else out. And that’s why you want to have less debt.

Eve: [00:38:52] Okay. Okay. So, I’m going to ask you one more question that we’ve talked about offline and say, why don’t we ask online? So, if you were to go about helping Small Change my funding portal, double its investor base, what would that campaign look like?

Adam: [00:39:08] Yes, that’s a very good question. So, I would say it depends on how much money you want to spend. So, I’ll give you a range of options. First of all, get on as many podcasts as you can. I know you’ve got your own podcasts. Podcasts are incredibly powerful. Podcasts are micro and nano influencers. You get on as many real estate podcasts as you can. They stay out there forever, it’s a fantastic way of building your visibility and developing a network of more investors, and it’s totally free. It’s just your time. That’s number one. Another thing that you can do is, of course you can do paid advertising. So, we are including non-accredited investors. Gosh, in total I would say our cost of getting investors is running, probably including non-accredited investors, probably sub $20 to $25 a lead. That’s a lead. That’s not an investment.

Eve: [00:40:11] And that’s actually someone who ends up investing?

Adam: [00:40:14] No, not somebody who ends up investing. That’s a lead.

Eve: [00:40:17] A lead. And then what percentage of those convert to investors.

Adam: [00:40:21] So, we only do accredited investors and it’s significantly more for accredited investors. And the accredited investors are running up to $100 a lead. And then we find that the total cost of converting an accredited investor on their first deal is between $3500 and $4500. And the average investment for an accredited investor is between, if your minimum is 25,000, it’s going to be 45,000 to 50,000. If your minimum is 50,000, then the average is going to be 80,000 to 100,000. So, it runs, it ends up being between 3% and 4% the cost of your marketing budget.

Eve: [00:41:00] Okay.

Adam: [00:41:01] Right. Sorry. Not three, 3 to 4% the total amount that you raise should be your marketing budget.

Eve: [00:41:09] But you think it’s higher for non-accredited investors?

Adam: [00:41:12] Well, I don’t know because I haven’t really worked the non-accredited investor market, I imagine…

Eve: [00:41:17] It might be the same.

Adam: [00:41:18] It might, it’s not going to be far off.

Eve: [00:41:20] Because they’re just investing maybe smaller amounts and more of them.

Adam: [00:41:25] Yes, more often. But here’s the thing, you know. We’re talking about first investment within the first 60 to 90 days. Within the first 60 days, you want to be getting, you want to be converting your prospects into actually investing. So, those numbers apply to that period. That group of people will reinvest if you treat them properly and your cost of acquiring them, the second time, is zero.

Eve: [00:41:51] I mean, we’ve noticed that on our platform too. We have a larger and larger base of people, actually, who’ve invested over three times and many more times than that. So, they become very loyal customers. And so, our responsibility is to make sure the opportunities we put on the site are as good as we can get. Right?

Adam: [00:42:10] And also, follow up communication is vital as well. As long as you communicate effectively, it’s really important to communicate with people that will inspire them to invest multiple times. So, those are the basic numbers. I was just, something else came to mind for you that you could try. The other thing that works really well and I, there’s a lot of options, I’m trying to think of the least expensive options.

Eve: [00:42:38] Well, actually, Adam, you taught me well, because full disclosure, Adam helped me way back and helped me to launch this podcast, which has been successful, but also a huge learning experience for me. So, thank you very much. And also, you taught me about always on campaigns, which was evergreen, always on campaigns, which I think is a remarkable tool for people who don’t have the time to be on Twitter and Facebook every day, five times a day, and we’re still doing that. Maybe you want to explain an always on campaign.

Adam: [00:43:15] Yes. So, in digital marketing, the concept is the funnel, so it’s a funnel. And at the top of the funnel, you want top of funnel tactics to get people into your network. Include podcasts, paid advertising, paid webinars, paid email blasts, paid marketing in general. And there’s a whole range of different ways that you can drive traffic to your funnels. Now, each one of them. And then if you have multiple funnels, that will attract different people, but they’re all automated. So, for example, you might have a white paper giveaway, or you might have a case study giveaway, or a PDF about something, or a video training about something, and for each one of those lead magnets, you create social media posts.

Adam: [00:44:07] And so, for a webinar, you might have 20, an evergreen webinar or a PDF, you might have 20 or 30 posts, and then for another one, you might have 20 or 30 posts. So, in the end you’re going to have hundreds of posts that go out on social media automated. They are posted on social media. And people see them, they click on the link and when they sign up to get your PDF, boom, you got their name, email, address, whether or not they are accredited and then you trigger automated emails. It is so powerful to do that because once you build that machine, leads just keep coming in all the time. I probably get ten new leads every single day and I don’t do anything for them. But you know, the funny thing is, as well…

Eve: [00:44:54] Well, you have, you’ve done a lot for them. That’s not true. But you’ve built all of this. But the thing that fascinates me about it is that, you know, social media is very, very fast moving, right? Especially Twitter. So, if you were to natively post something there today, the good chance is that most of the people, you know, will not see it. So, if you put it in an always on campaign, it’s going to pop up some other time and you might catch a few more people who didn’t see it the first time.

Adam: [00:45:21] Exactly. The other thing that’s cool about an always on campaign, an automated posting campaign is that when somebody does research on you, they go to your Twitter account, they go to your LinkedIn account, they go to Facebook account, what do they see? Post after post, after post, all of them super cool, all of them top of funnel stuff. They might glance across the first ten and the 11th one. They think that’s really cool. That’s really interesting.

Eve: [00:45:50] Yeah.

Adam: [00:45:52] That’s the one that inspires them to give you their name and email address. But more than that, I see all these different posts and all this high value content educational stuff that you’re putting out there. They know you’re the real deal, right? And come to know that you are. You can be trusted that you really working at it. You’re not sitting in some basement in, you know, somewhere. Who the heck knows, right? In a, you know, basement somewhere and you know, scamming them, you’re the real deal. And they also think of you as an authority. They realize that you are a leader of the crowd just as you are, Eve. Right. I mean, it’s my first book, right on crowdfunding.

Eve: [00:46:33] That’s right. Yeah.

Adam: [00:46:34] There’s a lot of people in it.

Eve: [00:46:35] Yeah. Yeah. Well, it’s all a lot of work. What I like about always on campaigns is, I don’t know that it’s less work, but it’s targeted work. So, you don’t always, you don’t have the stress of having to think about the next post all the time. So, you can create this bucket of work that you complete. And then you let it loose, so to speak. Right? So, I thought that was very powerful. And the podcasting is also very powerful, but I see it as an educational experience as well. Anyway. So, I have no more questions for you. Do you have any for me? 3 minutes and we’re done.

Adam: [00:47:11] What’s going on in the world of Regulation Crowdfunding.

Eve: [00:47:16] So, Regulation Crowdfunding took a couple of shifts this year, over the last year or two that were great. One was that the upper limit of target for a sponsor or an issuer is now $5 million every 365 days, which was an enormous improvement over 1.7 million. And also, accredited investors can now invest as much as they like, and you do not need to verify their status. They can self-verify. So, it’s actually more seamless than the offering that you typically do with sponsors. There’s no verification, it’s just a self-verification. So, that is a big wow, I think. So, you can use for everyone. But non-accredited investors still are limited as to how much they can invest. However, those limits were changed as well. They used to be the lesser of a percentage of income or net worth, and now it’s the greater of. So there have been little shifts that have pushed, you know, raising more money, raising larger amounts, permitting investors to invest more.

Eve: [00:48:26] And then last week, the SEC adjusted the cap for the three tiers in raising money for issuers around financial statements. So, if you want to raise up to 107,000 until last week and now up to 124,000, you don’t need any financial statements except a self-verified one. When you’re raising money as an issuer, let’s say you only want to raise a little bit, so you can now raise up to 124,000 with self-verified financial statements. As a first-time issuer, if you want to raise more than that, you can now raise up to 1.235 million with third-party financial review. Of course, if you’re a real estate developer and you have a brand-new entity, it’s going to be a third party financial review of nothing. But nevertheless, you need to have that, right. And then if you want to raise over 1.235 million, you have to have a third-party audit completed.

Adam: [00:49:28] I see.

Eve: [00:49:28] So, those are the…

Adam: [00:49:31] Kind of the changes. Have you noticed it materially harder to raise money this year since all this market turmoil or not in Ref CF?

Eve: [00:49:42] Yes, maybe it’s very hard to track that. It’s possible. Our projects are so varied that it’s, I mean, if we had hundreds of them and I could put them in buckets, I might be able to track that. But they’re so varied, our common denominator is impact and real estate, not the product that’s being offered or the opportunity that’s being offered. So, it can vary from a very traditional waterfall to 2% debt. It’s really a big variation. So, it’s hard to say. I don’t know. We’ll see in a few months. I had one issuer come back to me who completed a raise earlier this year saying that he wanted to raise more money because debt was just harder for him to get. So, definitely, which means less debt from a bank, more equity required. So, definitely some shifts like that, I don’t know yet.

Adam: [00:50:39] Yeah. Lending has definitely tightened up.

Eve: [00:50:42] So Adam, you know, in the 2008, 2009 downturn, I had a portfolio that actually performed very well, and I barely noticed it because the buildings I had were small and boutique and unique, and there was always someone who would rent a space. And so, it didn’t have the impact that I think other buildings, properties had. So, I don’t know the answer to that. Does anyone really, you know? I don’t know.

Adam: [00:51:14] Let’s just stay closely in touch over the next few months.

Eve: [00:51:17] So, let me ask you, what’s your really big, hairy, audacious goal with the Gower Crowd?

Adam: [00:51:23] I think to educate more. I send out a lot of high value educational content that I don’t sell. So, I actually, we’ve got a lot of really first class training materials and I’ve just been, I’ve not really been particularly proactive in giving people access to it. So, I think that’s what we’re going to be doing. It’s exactly what I’m going to be doing for the rest of the day and tomorrow, is putting together some funnels that say, look, we’ve got this great stuff that is for sale. So, take a look at it. If you want to test the… have a look at it, try it. If you don’t like, I give you money back. But I’m going make more effort to sell more of them.

Eve: [00:52:13] Yeah, yeah.

Adam: [00:52:13] Yeah, it’s really good stuff and it just, we’ve restricted it to private clients mostly. But in this market, I just think more people need access to it. They’re going to need help. And so, we’re going to release more of that.

Eve: [00:52:28] I should really check it out to see if you have anything that works for non-accredited investors in terms of educational, because I agree with you. I think education is key.

Adam: [00:52:38] Yeah. All right. Yeah, we…

Eve: [00:52:41] We can talk more about that.

Adam: [00:52:42] Sure.

Eve: [00:52:43] Well, thank you very, very much. And we’re going to talk again.

Adam: [00:52:47] Such a pleasure seeing Eve. It’s been far too long. Thank you so much for inviting me on the show.

Eve: [00:53:06] I hope you enjoyed today’s guest and our deep dive. You can find out more about this episode or others you might have missed on the show notes page at RethinkRealEstateforGood.co. There’s lots to listen to there. You can support this podcast by sharing it with others, posting about it on social media or leaving a rating and review. To catch all the latest from me you can follow me on LinkedIn. Even better, if you’re ready to dabble in some impact investing yourself head on over to wefunder.com/smallchange, where you can invest directly in Small Change and our mission to democratize capital formation to create impact in commercial real estate development. A special thanks to David Allardice for his excellent editing of this podcast and original music, and a big thanks to you for spending your time with me today. We’ll talk again soon. But for now, this is Eve Picker signing off to go make some change.

Image courtesy of Adam Gower

In support of Crowdfunding.

October 10, 2022

Crowdfunding for equity, or Regulation Crowdfunding (Reg CF), came about as part of the 2012 Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act. The legislation aimed to make raising capital easier for startups and small businesses while providing opportunities for investors and entrepreneurs.

Crowdfunding has had its teething problems and is still evolving. For starters, Reg CF took four and a half years to write and implement, only launching in the middle of 2016. Enter the Crowdfunding Professional Association (CfPA). Established in 2012, just after the signing of the JOBS Act, the CfPA’s mission was to create a trade association for this new and emerging industry. Dedicated to equitable representation for the Crowdfunding industry globally, it also supports the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) on rule making.

In practical terms, CfPA provides the industry with education, professional networking opportunities and the tools needed to promote industry best practices.

CfPA’s board includes consultants, journalists, authors, technology experts, and Samson Williams, the current board president, an expert in Blockchain, AI, Cryptocurrencies and FinTech and the space economy!  Samson is an Adjunct Professor at University of New Hampshire School of Law, and Columbia University, and is Chief Data Scientist, Milky Way Economy, LLC, monetizing the data of the Space Economy. You can hear Samson on all these subjects and more in this podcast.

‘The Crowd’ by gyro, licensed by Canva,

$3.22 Trillion.

September 26, 2022

“We want to champion the power of investing, and the power of female investment, in order to demonstrate that inclusivity and diversity matters—and that the time to act is now.” Hanneke Smits, CEO, BNY Mellon Investment Management.

The 2021 report The Pathway to Inclusive Investment was compiled from 8,000 interviews with women and men, 100 asset management firms representing assets of US$60 trillion, and an independent advisory panel. The report found that if women invested at the same rate as men, an extra $3.22 trillion could become available for investment.

What is stopping women from investing?

  • Engagement. Only 28 percent of women worldwide feel confident about investing. This varies with different countries and cultures and with age. Data suggests that younger women are more engaged with investing.
  • Income. Globally, women believe that they need almost $50,000 a year of disposable income before they invest any of that money. In the US, that amount is even higher.
  • High risk.There is always some risk in investing, but 45 percent of women believe that any investment is too risky.

We know that women are more likely to invest in causes that they believe in and are motivated by the impact that their investments make. 55 percent of women say they would invest (or invest more) if the impact of their investment aligned with their personal values.This is particularly so with young women investors (under30) who see their money as a powerful force for good.

More women investing might change the world!

So many things have changed over the last few years but some industries such as the investment industry are slow in moving along. It’s time to move the focus from a male audience to a diverse one, and to find a way to reach women, with their different motivations. Giving women financial power and control over their wealth will benefit everyone.

Slaying Gentrification.

June 29, 2022

David Kemper wanted to find a way to safeguard established renters against gentrification. His goal was to build a real-estate investment model that both stabilized existing rents and gave a voice to that community. Too many have suffered from racism and disinvestment in their neighborhoods. Across the country, communities are being torn apart because residents are being priced out of the neighborhoods they have called home for decades. Just as resources and new opportunities come to a community, its longtime inhabitants often get pushed out.

So David and his team are working towards an alternative: cities with inclusive, mixed-income neighborhoods. These diverse and dynamic neighborhoods will deliver better economic, social, and health outcomes, especially for lower-income residents. The model they have developed, MINT (or Mixed-Income Neighborhood Trust), is a sophisticated and replicable ownership model. Each MINT develops, owns, and operates a rental housing and retail portfolio. MINTs harness the money coming into communities to keep rent affordable for existing residents. Trust Neighborhoods, David’s non-profit, works with neighborhood-focused organizations to facilitate the formation of each MINT with the goal of a self-sustaining organization, run by the neighborhoods themselves. This gives neighborhoods equal footing with developers contributing to the gentrification taking place.

David and his co-founders started Trust Neighborhoods in 2019 and have since launched three MINT pilots in Kansas City, Missouri and in Tulsa, Oklahoma and Fresno, California. They have already shown to be beneficial. But they are just getting started. Neighborhood Trust is growing, and they hope to work with neighborhoods across the country, forming MINTs in each city and protecting community members who have too often been overlooked. 

Read the podcast transcript here

Eve Picker: [00:00:08] Hi there. Thanks for joining me on Rethink Real Estate. For Good. I’m Eve Picker and I’m on a mission to make real estate work for everyone. I love real estate. Real estate makes places good or bad, rich or poor, beautiful or not. In this show, I’m interviewing the disruptors, those creative thinkers and doers that are shrugging off the status quo, in order to build better for everyone. If you haven’t already, check out all of my podcasts at our website RethinkRealEstateForGood.co, or you can find them at your favorite podcast station. You’ll find lots worth listening to, I’m sure.

Eve: [00:01:00] David Kemper wanted to find a way to safeguard established renters against gentrification. His goal was to build a real estate investment model that both stabilized existing rents and gave a voice to that community. The model he landed on, MINT, or mixed income Neighborhood Trust, is a sophisticated and replicable ownership model. Each MINT develops, owns and operates a rental housing and retail portfolio. Trust Neighborhoods, David’s non-profit, works with neighborhood focused organizations to facilitate the formation of each MINT, with the goal of creating a self-sustaining organization run by the neighborhoods themselves. Trust Neighborhoods is still new, but David has said that they hope to expand their reach and work with neighborhoods around the country. Listen in to learn more.

Eve: [00:02:01] If you’d like to join me in my quest to rethink real estate, there are two simple things you can do, share this podcast and go torethinkrealestateforgood.co, where you can subscribe to be the first to hear about my podcasts, blog posts and other goodies.

Eve: [00:02:30] Hello, David. Thanks very much for joining me today.

David Kemper: [00:02:33] Thanks very much for having me on.

Eve: [00:02:35] You launched something called Trust Neighborhoods in 2019. And I wanted to ask you first, what problem are you trying to solve?

David: [00:02:45] Yeah. I’m one part of the three of us who are leadership at Trust Neighborhoods is Kavya Shankar and Jason Dehaemers, and the problem we’re trying to solve is that you have neighborhoods which have experienced disinvestment over decades, often from racist reasons, that now are finally having investment come into them and becoming a higher opportunity, both by public efforts, by private efforts and a lot of efforts on the part of current residents. But just as those neighborhoods are becoming higher opportunity, the very residents which are most deserving of participating in that and have often contributed so much to creating that experience a second injustice of being displaced from that neighborhood, not only denying them that experience of living in a higher opportunity neighborhood, but often even creating harm beyond that prevention of opportunity and around that problem is why we started working with neighborhoods through our nonprofit Trust Neighborhoods to help set up these mixed income neighborhood trusts.

Eve: [00:03:41] When did this need become clear to you? What’s the journey you took?

David: [00:03:46] We followed different paths in the leadership team. My particular path was through working at New York City government in affordable housing, and that was first in a department there called Housing Preservation Development, where I got to do a lot of refinancing of LI-tech which low-income housing tax credit deals and HUD multifamily deals, which is really the current meat and potatoes of American affordable housing finance. And you both saw how those worked at volume and the non-profits and neighborhood-based organizations that use them and also where it wasn’t working, which is especially around what real pinpoint anti-displacement looked like.

David: [00:04:22] The city of New York at the time was then interested with the arrival of de Blasio and really pinpointing neighborhoods where likely gentrification would create displacement. And a lot of the effort was around creating inclusionary zoning to prevent that displacement. And I had the good fortune to be part of the team who was working on that, and then a new team that was set up in capital planning in the city planning department and trying to work with neighborhoods facing that pressure to proactively prevent displacement. But there’s kind of this rhetoric in New York, which is wonderful, but, you know, New York is everywhere. And there’s this idea that they would build a model and it would work for the whole country. And I grew up in Kansas City and have stayed deeply appreciative and tuned into a lot of cities like it. And you see this phenomenon playing out across the country, including Pittsburgh, certainly very familiar with it.

Eve: [00:05:12] Oh, yeah.

David: [00:05:13] And the mechanism is not going to be that you’re going to prevent displacement by incentivizing what’s going to happen when a five-story building is torn down for a ten-story building. A lot of the displacement and change in ownership and lack of control is happening long before that. So, the same principles are playing out, but you really need to focus on building a different kind of set of tools. And fortunately, both found others who cared about, and we had the time to work on this, but most of all spent time with a lot of neighborhood based organizations in neighborhoods that had either undergone gentrification or facing it. And really sat down with them and said, what are your pain points? How are you spending your days? What are you looking at for tools? And almost consistently you had this need identified of saying, if we could just have our own ownership group, that could really do cross-subsidy in our neighborhood in a way that we could raise outside capital akin to the developers we’re competing against that can move at the speed of the market. It’s not applying for a grant for a house that gets receipt that that grant was received months after the house was sold and really do it at the scale at which we were experiencing displacement. And bit by bit, we worked with some neighborhood partners on honing that model, launching pilots, and now we’re working to get out across the country.

Eve: [00:06:31] And that model, you call it MINT, right?

David: [00:06:35] We call it MINT, a mixed income neighborhood trust.

Eve: [00:06:38] So tell me precisely how it works.

David: [00:06:40] In some ways, it’s very simple. Some ways a little more complex. We help the neighborhood set up this mixed income neighborhood trust. It is an LLC which has all of its voting shares controlled by something called a perpetual purpose trust that is somewhat distinctive from some uses of trust models where there’s not national trust, there’s a legal trust which is assigned to a purpose agreement which controls all the votes of this new entity. That trust then has a trustee group which has the existing neighbor based organization on there and resident representation and adheres to a purpose agreement which we work with residents, the neighborhood based organization, on writing when we’re setting this up, which really identifies what anti displacement means, what protect me belonging means what long term financial sustainability for this new institution looks like and then really build in also details and nuances, that are particular for each neighborhood. That serves as a long term constitution that then this operating company of the Mixed Income Neighborhood Trust has to adhere to as it buys, develops, and then long term owns a mixed income portfolio, which today we’re entirely focused on housing in a way that prevents the displacement of residents in that neighborhood.

Eve: [00:07:57] So the trust is actually a developer.

David: [00:08:00] In some ways. It’s a vehicle to allow a neighborhood to serve in a developer function for its neighborhood. And the way we’ve set up is that each mixed income neighborhood trust will have a general management function, which is essentially a budget line that goes back to the neighborhood-based organization. So you aren’t building duplicative new institutions. You’re really building the capacity of groups that have been on the ground, have legitimacy, have been doing the hard work, and too often are then excluded from actually having that level of control and autonomy within their neighborhood as it experiences this kind of pressure. So really important for us is not just hitting numbers on preservation of affordable units, but really also changing power structures in these neighborhoods where especially women and people of color have been precluded for so long.

Eve: [00:08:50] I’m trying to wrap my head around this. It sounds pretty powerful. So if a new developer comes to the neighborhood and purchases a property outright, what control does this Trust or MINT have?

David: [00:09:04] It is just in parallel with that. There’s no outright authority it has. It’s more putting the neighborhood on more equal footing with a lot of more conventional developers that may be participating in a neighborhood that is facing gentrification.

Eve: [00:09:17] I see, okay. And so, how is a MINT portfolio designed?

David: [00:09:23] So one of the one of the key things we begin with is really doing an analysis with the neighborhood-based organization of what does protecting displacement need, what is the real need in the neighborhood. An example of this is one of the first neighborhoods we worked with was in Kansas City, Missouri, in the northeast section of neighborhoods there, and the neighborhoods called Lykins. And from a parcel view of housing in that neighborhood, they have 1700 units of housing and 900 of those are rental housing with basically zero regulated within that. They are next to a neighborhood that has had some of the fastest rising rents in the city. They’re beginning to experience that same pressure coming on the side of them. So, the beginning was talking with residents saying, look, you have 900 households that are renting in this neighborhood at this average rate. What does it look like to make sure that those households, some of those will move into homeownership? Some of those will not be necessarily having their income rise as fast as the market is rising. What does it mean to protect them from displacement and then working with them to identify how can we maximize the preservation of those units? What does cross-subsidy look like from likely rising rents and unrestricted units we put under that same ownership group? So it self-finances affordability, which works for a subset of neighborhoods and then saying also what is feasible?

David: [00:10:40] In terms of what are rehab partners or construction partners you can work with and what kind of volume can they work with? What is the churn happening in a market? Is this a neighborhood where you’re seeing hundreds of units bought and sold every month or is this something where you’re seeing a dozen bought and sold every month and then putting together a capital stack that makes that feasible. We really do that whole hands-on diligence process with them and service a lot of the short term capacity which a lot of neighborhood based organizations just don’t have to set up that kind of vehicle. But then once it’s set up with that governance, with those partnerships in place for renovation, for property management, and that scope of of what they want to be building in as their own ownership, as much as possible we then build their own autonomy to be running that and attuned at the neighborhood level as they build that ownership and manage it in an accountable way long term.

Eve: [00:11:27] So tell me, how long does it take to go through this process, from thinking about it to actually forming a group that’s governing itself?

David: [00:11:36] Yeah, I mean, we’re kind of figuring it out. We did the two pilots. We are in the midst of a third one right now. We’re in the midst of a fourth one right now. So, we’re learning exactly what the long term process looks like. It’s probably about nine months to a year in terms of our experience, but it may be that right now, I think one of the bigger bottlenecks has been capital appetite, especially for more philanthropic sources. And we’re building it so that long term can take in non-philanthropic sources that are okay with low returns, which certainly can move faster. We don’t know what looks like if that bottleneck is not there for how fast it happens.

Eve: [00:12:12] Interesting. So, the pilots, where are your pilots and where’s the third one? Kansas City and.

David: [00:12:17] Our pilots are in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Certainly, a really meaningful place to get to work, especially in 2021 with the memorial of the race massacre there. And then in Kansas City, which is also where we’re based and very meaningful to work with a neighborhood in our own home in a way that is disciplining and really holds us to doing quality work. The third, which is currently in formation, is in Fresno, in central Fresno with some really great neighborhoods there as the downtown is experiencing growth and preserving a lot of housing stock as well as hopefully providing alternative to owners that have been in the neighborhood they would like to have purchased out.

Eve: [00:12:58] So how far are these experiments in? Like the the MINTs are formed? Have they purchased properties? What are they doing?

David: [00:13:08] Yeah. As noted, Trust Neighborhoods came together in 2019. We really worked with the neighborhoods and the pilots and on the whole scoping and 2020 and both those pilots launched in early 2021. So, they’re just over a year old right now. But both have really seen promising signs so far. They both control well over a dozen units of housing. I think the one can see is almost up to two dozen now.

Eve: [00:13:30] Wow.

David: [00:13:30] And out of that is some real glimmers of hope, both in terms of just operational efficacy, seeing the governance really have resonance in that governance. But most importantly, some of those of early glimmers of impact, like the Mixed Income Neighborhood Trust in Tulsa, which was set up with Growing Together, which is focused in the Kendall-Whittier neighborhood, is the Kendall-Whittier Neighborhood Trust and I was actually just out there last week as they did a celebratory open house for another one of the renovated units that’s open, and had both residents and contractors and funders and everyone all together having paletas really feeling the promise of the work. But alongside things like that were it’s a deep renovation project, they’ve had ones where they’ve just bought housing that was for sale in the neighborhood and been an alternative to a lot of what are kind of unsavory buyers and sellers in that neighborhood, and there was one that was selling and a they bought it and the seller told them, you know, every other buyer told us they were going to clear out the residents in these units in order to renovate them and re rent them at a higher rate.

David: [00:14:37] And instead the Kendall-Whittier Neighborhood Trust was able to own them and have all the residents stay in place along with the budget, to actually improve the quality of those units of housing discovered families that are in the school, which is a place based school that would have told you’re not able to come back to your school with your kids on a couple of months’ notice of a new school year. So, it was a real change to instead get a knock on the door from the Kendall-Whittier Neighborhood Trust saying, hey, look, you’re not only in a safe place versus this threat which is facing you, but we’re also here to make sure that you’re not displaced as this neighborhood continues to become a better place.

Eve: [00:15:17] That’s very powerful. So how do you plan to scale? I mean, how many neighborhoods will be successful?

David: [00:15:24] Yeah, that’s a lot of a lot of our focus is yeah. From the beginning which which may be distinctive in some ways is that we really have had an eye toward saying we are not content if this happens for a dozen units in one neighborhood, the scale of the need in just one neighbor is larger, that the scale of need across the country is hundreds of neighborhoods which are very rapidly changing. And we at this point get a lot of cold outreach from neighborhoods across the country that say, we’re interested using this model, we’ve heard about you, can we work together? Our biggest limit on that side is our own capacity of a team as we grow that team and grow our own operational ability.

David: [00:15:59] But we’re really focused on building our own team to be this short-term service, which is a big piece, is really being able to step in and work with neighborhoods across the country on setting it up. A big part is building long term capital supplies. We’ve had a generous supporter who has come in for funding the design of a fund that will be the national with ready capital, which we hope will solve that bottleneck issue and help build that overall market, which can bring in a lot of capital which is not usually participated in both community governance models and models focused on anti-displacement and changing power structures in this way. And then a big piece is just learning from each neighborhood trust and really powerfully having them start to build their own peer group in a way that is self-reinforcing, builds us as a better support partner, but also can build on their own experiences, lessons learned interpretations from those governance bodies of what anti displacement really looks like and very hard decision making moments. And then also step in as they discover things which are even more valuable to each neighborhood trust. And already the two pilots have met and compared notes. And we think it will only get stronger as you have more and more mixed income neighborhood trusts in the country working these neighborhoods for the residents.

Eve: [00:17:14] So that was one of the questions I have. Like, community engagement is really hard. Do you experience friction when you set up one of these? Like what does it take to get everyone on board?

David: [00:17:29] Community engagement is hard, but what we’ve been doing with the Mixed Income Neighborhood Trust is so different from a lot of what more conventional community engagement is. I think the place to pinpoint there is, we are helping the neighborhood-based organization set up these entities that have residents in long term governance. And that is very different from a typical project where there is a community engagement period, which then ends and residents never have another maybe not even another voice, much less any actual real power in that institution or project. And residents are smart, and they get it. And if they think they have a six-month engagement process to try to convey all the complexity of experience in a neighborhood and any possible thing in this, that will be a very hard process. And instead, with this both, I think we’ve worked with really great partners on designing community engagement, which both make for very productive sessions, where people come into it already with a sense of having had time to do one on ones with everyone and talk through their experience and have that as a, as a jumping off point. But then the most important thing is they then step into the actual governance long term. So, there’s a real ability to keep on iterating and having a voice in the model and in this new institution in their neighborhood. That’s actually something I think we thought was going to be a lot harder and has been really energizing to spend time with residents who just get this and are excited to have this kind of institution as a vehicle for creating this kind of change in their neighborhood.

Eve: [00:18:56] So how big is your team and what sort of skills are represented at the moment?

David: [00:19:01] Not very big. Five of us full time right now. We’re doing some hires right now.

Eve: [00:19:05] Small but mighty, right?

David: [00:19:07] Yeah. Part of the building up the capacity to actually take on the scale of problem and our skill set is mixed. Kavya had been out in the White House and had done organizing work as well as some amount of investment side work. And then Jason is utterly brilliant all things finance, governance and had really worked more in the investment banking, private equity world and then some corporate governance and just delights in building out an actual new financial structure which is solving for things that are more complex than just making money. And then my background was more in the affordable housing finance community development side. We’ve got two wonderful more junior members of the team, Natalie and Ben, who have both actually come through Venture for America, which has been a great source of team members and a delight to work with.

Eve: [00:19:55] So you’ve been working on this a little while. I’m sure you’re thinking about improvements. How could it be improved and why? It can’t be perfect, right?

David: [00:20:04] A big thing is the pilots in place as they grow. And I think then building out their own governance and being improved in that way.

Eve: [00:20:13] This is a pretty entrepreneurial idea. So, entrepreneurs never sit still for very long.

David: [00:20:18] Yeah, I think a big part of the improvement also is building that peer group in terms of having the neighborhood trusts speak to each other more. Building out just a lot of the capital familiarity. Right. There’s a risky moment at the beginning of saying, can you put money into a new vehicle that is creating this kind of impact, and will that really work? And as we start to see them work, that makes it so it’s a lot easier for the next one to say, yes, I want to see that happen too. I think as each neighborhood-based organization kind of learns what what means to be taking this on and building into their existing institution. And as you varied organizations right now, they’re, one is a neighbor association, one is one of the purpose-built communities, one is a CDC. So, as you start to have a peer group of different kinds of neighborhood focused organizations that are using this, that will make it even better.

Eve: [00:21:06] And do you think this is really unique? Is there anyone else doing similar work?

David: [00:21:11] There are aspects that are unique in their aspects that are very familiar. A lot of the land trust community and world, I think, is using community land trust towards similar spirit and functions. But I think unique here is the ability to use the outside capital, the outright control of the land versus separation, the focus on, there’s a lot of renters being displaced, There’s a big focus of this, versus a lot of CLTs tend to have more home ownership focus. We early on have met with a lot of peers across the country that we sort of think are doing relevant, familiar work. And a big part of ours is not having too much pride of authorship of really learning for others. A part of that early on is we were calling this a mixed income land trust and we spent time with the Kensington Corridor Trusts out in Philadelphia. And they said, hey, look, you know, we’re really trying to establish more the terminology of a neighborhood trust here. And we said, sure, great, we don’t we don’t have any pride of term here.

David: [00:22:04] We have a really great to actually be part of helping build on what you’re doing. So, we decided to call it a mixed income neighborhood trust. And so a noted MINT kind of sounded nice too. So, that was part of it. We’ve also liked a lot of the shared equity worlds and built out. The Kresge Foundation include us in the community of practice of several groups working on shared equity models, which certainly plays into a lot of what you in Small Change have also been building into and that’s been really great to be part of. And Elwood Hopkins, who’s led that has just been a great champion and convener. And then I think also on, if you see models and neighborhoods facing gentrification that have relatively succeeded in doing cross-subsidy to the benefit of their neighborhoods. Some of those have come out of almost less conventional models than necessarily a community developing corporation. Where if you look at what the Hasadim community has done in South Williamsburg, in New York, it’s experienced massive gentrification pressure, which, because of ownership and cross-subsidy, has in many ways actually made it more affordable for that community through their cross-subsidy and ownership of land. Likewise, you see some of that with some of the Chinatown family societies in New York, and you see a couple of clusters of that in different places in the world. And there are some community development corporations, I think, use their assets. We right now are working with the East Boston Development Corporation in Boston, which has been both an amazing partner to work with and also the way in which they’ve built out the organization ownership and building their own self-financing mechanisms is really in line with what we’d like to see this model enable for more neighborhoods. So, it’s been amazing to get to work with them as a partner in that.

Eve: [00:23:39] So, how many more neighborhoods do you think will have mint in one year or three years from now?

David: [00:23:46] One year. A few, but three years. We’d like to see actually getting up to really doing this at scale.

Eve: [00:23:55] And what does success look like to you?

David: [00:23:57] Success looks like living in a country where we have cities that have mixed income neighborhoods led by especially residents that had been excluded and discriminated against, especially black and brown leadership of institutions that are creating high opportunity neighborhoods that work for everyone. And not only does it hopefully make it so that those neighborhoods become very high opportunity neighborhoods in a way that works for a mix of incomes and identities there, particularly each neighborhood, but also it stops this phenomenon in America where we’ll see investment go into one geography. And there’s almost this assumption that you’ll end up not serving a large chunk of residents who will get displaced somewhere else. And then almost, then you’ll continue to see a cycle where you’re chasing poverty to different geographies, just as all these efforts to try to improve a place come to fruition. Instead, we stop that. I think with half a dozen MINTs in each American city, you could actually create a thing where at the core of each American city are these mixed income neighborhoods which are robust, wonderful, I think could be some of the best neighborhoods in the country. And you also have this window of opportunity, the United States, where we buy deep tragedy of racism and suburban investment. We’ve ended up with the cores of our cities being massively underinvested and undervalued. But, we in many ways are the anomaly in the world on that. And we’re seeing our appetite shift where the cores of our cities are becoming the most valuable places, which is much more akin to everywhere else in the world. It would be a tragedy, I think, to then see us also just have it where if you don’t have the money, you can’t afford to live anywhere near the middle of the city.

Eve: [00:25:39] I think that shift is already happening.

David: [00:25:40] Yeah, we have we have a window of opportunity, I think, for a crucial subset of neighborhoods to at least secure some place near the center of the city that especially carries such deep meaning and current social capital institutions in a way that could create a very different kind of city.

Eve: [00:25:58] I’ve been living in a downtown myself for quite a few years now and have gone from being one of the first residents to one of many who look very affluent to me now. And it’s disturbing. I really feel like the vitality of mixed people using a place is really being wiped out. So, I agree with your argument here. So, I have one more question for you, and that is what keeps you up at night?

David: [00:26:29] Oh, lots of things. At the very beginning, I really did not sleep that well. There’s a lot more stress and things, I think. As we built out a really quality team that’s helped with the sleep. Journaling helps the sleep. You know, you write down your worries.

Eve: [00:26:46] I’m so glad it’s not me alone.

David: [00:26:48] Then you don’t have them bouncing around your head in the middle of the night. I mean, you always you always kind of swing back and forth too, you have this thing where you go, there are moments where you go, oh yeah, this is doing great and we’re going to run with it. There are moments that you go, oh, is something going to hit us that we aren’t expecting and everything’s going to fall apart? And I feel fortunate that more and more of the days are the former.

Eve: [00:27:09] Yes, yeah. Or there are moments where it’s like, why am I doing this? It’s a very hard road.

David: [00:27:16] We’re up against a daunting scale of historical injustice, of momentums, of other forces in the world. So it’s understandable. It’s hard, but there’s also hope.

Eve: [00:27:27] I think you’re also up against greed, unfortunately. So, the gentrification of neighborhoods is going to continue. The question is, is how many can you catch and save? Right.

David: [00:27:39] Yeah. I think the hardest thing for us right now has been when we have neighborhoods that say we really want to work with you, now is the moment. And we’ve just had to say we just don’t have the capacity to work with you right now. And that’s been really hard.

Eve: [00:27:54] That’s heartbreaking.

David: [00:27:55] I remember one very early on going, well, you know, whether or not you work with us, we’re going to be here fighting displacement, our neighborhood. So, it’s not so much are we going to work together and find displacement more? They’re going to be there doing it regardless. It’s just really hard to not have the ability at this point to say yes to everyone and get these in place with the speed which with these words are changing.

Eve: [00:28:20] Is there any like white label option that you can create for do-it-yourselfers?

David: [00:28:26] We’ve occasionally sent along pieces. Unfortunately, it’s just, I think a big reason why we built the team is that a lot of people know all the principles, it’s just, don’t have the capacity in a team that actually will step in and run with it. So, that was, we have no pride of that. We’re happy if someone else wants to do it. Just a big part is building the team to be able to actually say yes to more places and run with it.

Eve: [00:28:52] Well, you’ve chewed off a huge problem, and I really hope you’re super successful and I can’t wait to see where you are in three years. Maybe we’ll have one in Pittsburgh or 2 MINTs.

David: [00:29:05] Yeah, we’d love that.

Eve: [00:29:07] That would be fantastic. Yes. Let me know if you need any introductions.

David: [00:29:12] Yeah, well, if they’re are neighborhood based organizations, this resonates with their priorities and what the neighborhoods are, then. .

Eve: [00:29:18] There’s tons. I feel like someone once told me that community development work started in Pittsburgh. It’s got an enormous number of neighborhood-based organizations. I helped found one myself, a CDC. So, every neighborhood has one. It’s a pretty active place that way.

David: [00:29:37] Well, we’ll follow up. Definitely.

Eve: [00:29:38] Yes, definitely. But thank you very much and congratulations and good luck.

David: [00:29:44] Eve thank you.

Eve: [00:30:01] You can find out more about this episode or others you might have missed on the show notes page at our website RethinkRealEstateForGood.co. There’s lots to listen to there. A special thanks to David Allardice for his excellent editing of this podcast and original music, and thanks to you for spending your time with me today. We’ll talk again soon, but for now, this is Eve Picker signing off to go make some change.

Image courtesy of David Kemper

On making waves.

May 16, 2022

Eve Picker, founder of Small Change, talks to Brian Gaudio of Module Housing.

Eve has a passion for cities and for working on real estate projects that make a positive impact in neighborhoods. Originally from Australia, Eve trained as an architect and has a master’s degree in urban design. She moved to Pittsburgh where she fell in love with the city and, through a series of ‘accidents’, transitioned from architect to real estate developer, building a small but meaningful portfolio of projects.

In 2016, Eve launched Small Change, a real estate crowdfunding platform matching developers with every day investors. The idea was born out of the Jobs Act of 2012 which allowed crowdfunding to be used for investment, rather than just donations. Now people who wanted to make their neighborhoods better could become investors in developing properties on their own streets.

Small Change focuses on impact by scoring every project to ensure that it creates impact in some way. They also tackle a lack of diversity within the real estate industry – over 54% of developers working with Small Change are women and minority developers. And they help those developers raise meaningful funds – up to $5M per year from anyone who is 18 or over.

Listen in to the conversation.

Image from PxHere

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

sign up here

APPLY TO BE A PODCAST GUEST

More to See

Passive House Duplex.

November 20, 2024

The case for social housing.

September 18, 2024

Pittsburgh champion.

September 3, 2024

FOLLOW

  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Tag Cloud

Affordable housing Climate Community Creative economy Crowdfunding Design Development Environment Equity Finance FinTech Gentrification Impact Investing Mobility Offering Opportunity zones PropTech Technology Visionary Zoning

Footer

©rethinkrealestateforgood.co. The information contained on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this website is intended as investment, legal, tax or accounting strategy or advice, or constitutes an offer to sell, solicit or buy securities.
 
Any projections discussed or made may not be accurate and do not guarantee a specific outcome. All projections or investments are subject to risk due to uncertainty and change, including the risk of loss, and past performance is not indicative of future results. You should make independent decisions and seek independent advice regarding investments or strategies mentioned on this website.

Recent

  • Real estate and women.
  • Oculis Domes.
  • Bellevue Montgomery
  • West Lombard
  • Swank Atlanta.

Search

Categories

Climate Community Crowdfunding Development Equity Fintech Investing Mobility Proptech Visionary

 

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in