• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Say hello
Rethink Real Estate. For Good.

Rethink Real Estate. For Good.

  • Podcast
  • Posts
  • In the news
  • Speaking and media
    • About Eve
    • Speaking requests
    • Speaking engagements
    • Press kit
  • Investment opportunities

Affordable housing

Smart money is on impact.

April 27, 2020

Simply put, impact investing is the practice of using investment dollars to generate positive social or environmental impacts in addition to offering a competitive financial return. The idea that we can do far more with our money than merely reap monetary dividends is important, and has grown popular recently, steadily gaining traction with investors, whether small or large. As we increasingly wrestle with broad and difficult societal issues like affordable housing and climate change, issues that will impact the lives of millions of people, so too are we learning that impact investing can be an essential part of the solution.

Impact investing does not mean giving up on a good financial return. We’ve long known that what’s good for people and the environment is ultimately good for businesses and economic growth as well. And the competitive returns that investors are getting through impact investing only serves to reinforce this. This reality is highlighted by the fact that every day more institutional investors are committing an ever-growing pool of their funds to impact investing. As an example, one of the largest financial companies in the U.S., Prudential, has an Impact Investment division that should serve as a model of impact investing at the institutional level.

Catalytic and creative

In their Impact division, Prudential Financial has built a distinct portfolio of investments with the goal of both making money and having a social impact through each of those investments. The focus of this portfolio is specifically on projects that can lead to catalytic change. These investments can be higher risk and are often declined by their traditional portfolios.

Prudential has invested about $1 billion dollars into impact investments. Typically, when an institutional investor reaches a milestone like this, they’ll aspire to the goal of growing that portfolio, to say $10 million. Ommeed Sathe, the Vice President of Impact Investing at Prudential and engineer of their impact portfolio, thinks that’s the easy option to take. Instead, he’d like to push the envelope and focus on growing impact by seeking ever more catalytic and creative projects. These might include minority developers, in neighborhoods that have seen little investment or building-types that defy the norm. This is an encouraging and unusual goal for a large investment fund that hopefully will inspire other institutional funds to follow suit.

The portfolio overseen by Ommeed and his team is currently focused on both real estate and business investments, all of which would be considered socially conscious or beneficial. On the business side, companies have a social purpose, are financially inclusive, do work to retrain and reskill our workforce, and are working on sustainability. For example, in Washington D.C., they helped fund improvements to green infrastructure and create the first tradable stormwater credits, not unlike carbon tax and trade mechanisms, but done at the local level. Real estate investments include affordable housing, redevelopment and brand-new development projects that have the potential to transform the communities in which they are based.

While impact is critical, the driving goal for Prudential is to invest to make a return. These investments are meant to be competitive. But still, the focus of their impact investments portfolio is to invest in assets that more traditional portfolios would normally not invest in, not normally take a risk on.

The takeaway

It is groundbreaking for a large company to invest in this way, and further, to want to expand their reach even more. There is something to be said for the scale of change that institutional dollars can make. If investment funds push more capital into large and necessary projects such as affordable housing and mixed-use developments, especially in communities that need it most, there will be enormous benefit to everyone. And as these funds become more comfortable taking part in catalytic projects, they will discover a wide swath of investment opportunities that they may have previously overlooked. Investing for impact at this scale can have an impact we haven’t imagined before.

Listen to my full interview with Ommeed or go ahead and make your own impact investment.

Image by Rajkiran Pericherla / CC BY-SA 4.0

The power of modular building.

April 20, 2020

As builders, architects, urban planners all look for innovative ways to create both affordable and sustainable housing, some new homeowners have been looking to the efficiencies of modular construction as one potential solution. While pre-fab (for pre-fabrication) is a general term for building components that are created in a factory to be assembled on site, modular construction refers to pre-finished volumes, about 70 percent complete. In other words, entire rooms or floors – modules that can be set down on a property virtually ready to go except for hookups and exterior finish work.

One such example is Module, based in Pittsburgh. Module was co-founded by a trio of young entrepreneurs who were inspired by the idea that everyone should have access to good design. But as opposed to the typical design-build company that gives clients the options of picking from only a few template plans, Module’s team offers turnkey design-build-develop services. They do not build the homes but work with a third-party manufacturer and a third-party contractor, managing the whole process for clients from start to finish, from design to permitting to construction.

Why build this way?

Basic modular, or even pre-fab, construction offers a variety of benefits for the homebuyer. On the one hand, as opposed to designing a home from scratch, which is time-consuming and adds additional cost, a developer or builder can offer a new homebuyer templates based on their needs and budget.

There is also the benefit of a large reduction in construction time, and when done at large scale, construction costs. Modular projects also offer high-quality, factory-based construction, often using eco-friendly materials and energy-efficient, customized designs, all with rapid on-site assembly. Already familiar in countries like Japan, this way of building housing is starting to become popular in the U.S., and most exciting, offers innovative methods for providing affordable and sustainable housing on a large scale. 

One reason for the trend towards pre-fab and modular construction is a shortage of skilled labor in many housing markets. Another is a supply shortage in boom markets, where existing developers cannot build things fast enough. In both cases, components of a building can be constructed anywhere and shipped to the site. This has long been the case, for example, with pre-fabricated roof trusses one often sees being trucked along on the highways.

Module

Brian Gaudio, the CEO of Module, created his company differently. He describes the vision of Module as more of a tech startup company than a design firm, offering their product first and foremost as a service, or process that you can literally order online. “We’re trying to redesign the customer experience,” he says, “and redesign homeownership from the ground up.”

First, Module works to understand the clients’ current needs, learning what they want in a home – everything from space and light, to aesthetics and utility. Second, for clients who already own land, Module evaluates the site location and determines what’s possible based on topography and local zoning rules. If a client needs to purchase a lot, Module offers a curated selection of available lots they know will work with their designs.

Third, the team works to design the client’s home and create a budget. Fourth, Module handles all of the permitting and manages every aspect of the building process. Because they partner with manufacturers and contractors, he says, “we don’t own those parts of the supply chain. But what we do own is the customer experience.”

Finally, and perhaps most importantly, Module plans to grow with their clients, offering the flexibility to add more space as needed with additions that are made to grow a home to order.

The future

Modular construction offers exciting solutions for both affordable and sustainable housing. There are a number of innovative options available now, and while some companies offer services nationwide, it’s also worth exploring local companies to learn about options in your area.

Listen to our interview with Module founder, Brian Gaudio, to learn more about how Module is bringing their unique modular process to the Pittsburgh area. 

Image courtesy of Module Housing

First in. Towards growth.

April 1, 2020

Lance Chimka, who became Director of Allegheny County Economic Development (ACED) in 2018, oversees an agency responsible for business expansion, planning, community and real estate development, and affordable housing projects for the second most populous county in Pennsylvania.  

Born and bred in Pittsburgh, Lance has long been familiar with the changes the region has gone through in its shift from a deeply embedded, industrial economy to one grounded in medical research, higher education and technologies such as robotics and cybersecurity. Soon after taking over at ACED, he noted that the local economy is hitting an important juncture, one in which Pittsburgh and local municipalities need to think beyond “eds and meds,” adding that a decade after the 2008 financial crisis “we’re in an economic expansion, but we’re not seeing some of the growth that other benchmark cities are seeing.”

Lance previously worked within the Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development where he was Regional Director of the Governor’s Action Team, focusing on removing barriers to development, investment and job growth in the 11-county southwestern Pennsylvania region. And prior to working for the state, Lance led community development programs, commercial lending, business attraction and expansion activities for the ACED for a number of years.

Lance is certified as an Economic Development Finance Professional and he served in the U.S. Peace Corps, in Turkmenistan.

Information and Links

  • Lance is really proud of ACED’s partnership with RIDC to help the startup, Fifth Season, build a vertical farm in Braddock, PA. The project was profiled by Fast Company and won a NAIOP light industrial project of the year award.
  • Lance loves Pittsburgh International Airport’s microgrid project – he thinks it is both important and under-rated. Forbes loves it too.
  • And he’s inspired by the tech entrepreneurs that have led Pittsburgh into the forefront of the innovation economy, like Duolingo, MeeterFeeder or Thread.
Read the podcast transcript here

Eve Picker: [00:00:18] Hi there. Thanks so much for joining me today for the latest episode of Impact Real Estate Investing.

[00:00:24] My guest today is Lance Chimka. Lance is the relatively new and extremely energetic director of Allegheny County’s Economic Development Department, in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. He has a very contemporary take on what government ought to be doing, and that includes investing in real estate to advance the economy. Lance is building a collaborative team environment, working with developers throughout the county, lending where banks dare not go, always with his eye on economic development growth, and always with the thought of how our region can do better. Learn how Lance and his team are supporting development in a not-quite-market rate environment.

[00:01:11] Be sure to go to EvePicker.com to find out more about Lance on the show notes page for this episode. And be sure to sign up for my newsletter so you can access information about impact real estate investing and get the latest news about the exciting projects on my crowdfunding platform, Small Change.

Eve: [00:01:37] Hi, Lance. I’m really excited for the opportunity to talk to you today.

Lance Chimka: [00:01:41] Pleasure’s all mine, Eve. Thank you. I’m honored that you would have me on.

Eve: [00:01:45] We’re gonna have a great time.

Lance: [00:01:46] Absolutely. We usually do.

Eve: [00:01:48] In a not a lot of time, you’ve gone from being an intern at Allegheny County Economic Development to the organization’s director. And then you did a few odd jobs in-between. And that’s a pretty meteoric rise, wouldn’t you say?

Lance: [00:02:06] Ah, yeah. I mean, I guess it has been pretty quick. It sometimes didn’t feel that way. But I think the cool thing about that is that whole progression is absolutely vital to some of the stuff I want to get done, now. I wouldn’t have changed that course, at all. Like, understanding kind of the daily struggles of interns in my office absolutely directly informs how I work on efficiency measures here, for example. It’s been incredible and I’ve been really lucky to have incredible mentors along the way that have taught me a lot. That was one of my favorite things about public sector work, is it touches so much, that you’re able to, you’re able to learn.

Eve: [00:02:45] What led you to pursue a life in government service? Was it that first internship that you just liked so much?

Lance: [00:02:52] When I was pursuing an undergrad degree in finance, it was kind of in the boom times, the 2000s, and I didn’t want to take that route. Kinda always been a volunteer at heart, and so I joined the Peace Corps, and that was kind of the start of my real public service. And I just kind of knew, I came back to go to CMU and get a policy degree and just kind of always knew, in my heart of hearts, I would always be in some kind of public servant role. Not necessarily in government work, but that’s the path that I’ve chosen to this day, and it’s been incredibly rewarding.

Eve: [00:03:27] So, that what drives you, yeah. So, for listeners who haven’t connected the dots yet, Lance and I share a hometown, Pittsburgh, and a few decades ago, Pittsburgh was pretty well all but written off. You can listen to my podcast interview with Tom Murphy that I think just went live and you’ll get to hear the turnaround mayor talk about where we were then and what it took to shake that image. And that brings me to a statement that I read, that you made, Lance, which was, “we’re in economic expansion, but we’re not seeing some of the other growth that other benchmark cities are seeing.” And I’m just wondering what you meant by that?

Lance: [00:04:09] Not to, not to recap what you probably talked with Mayor Murphy about, but to get from the doldrums of 1983, which is really the trough of our local economy.

Eve: [00:04:19] It was the bottom, right? Yeah.

Lance: [00:04:21] Yeah. To where we’re at now, has been an amazing transformation, right? It’s been all about diversification and it’s, of a regional economy. And then we, now we have these five primary industry sectors: in financial services, IT, energy, advanced manufacturing and healthcare. And that’s really, really important because in recessionary periods, that diversified economy is very robust, and makes us the darling, and outperform benchmark cities in recessionary periods. However, the problem is that in expansionary economies we lack the kind of exponential growth that some of our other cities experience. It’s just kind of the nature of our economy currently, is slow and steady wins the race, which is fine. I think my goal is on the macro economic end, is to not throw the baby out with the bathwater, keep the diversification, keep the slow, steady growth, but then really experience some of the upside of expansionary times, which we’re in now. And I think the key to that is, and I’m really optimistic about the future of our economy, is across those five industry sectors. You have artificial intelligence, which we are an absolute worldwide hub of, cuts across all of those. And robotics, cuts across three of those, in advanced manufacturing, health care and energy. So, those eight intersection points that I think are the key to experiencing upside growth, and that’s some of the stuff I’m excited to work on.

Eve: [00:05:56] How do you work on that? How do you improve that?

Lance: [00:05:59] Great question. Especially like, how does government do that? The risk profiles associated with investments in startups are probably too, you know, too risky of an investment for governments to be making. And not to mention, we don’t have that skill set. But I think there are a lot of other ways we can invest in the city in a way to encourage that kind of growth. One of those ways is in real estate development, right? If you take something like biotech, right? A lot of times you’ve got companies that need wet lab space. You have extremely long periods to get through clinical trials. You have really expensive buildings that, you know, because of the nature of the beast, you have your non-credit tenants. So, I think when we’re making investments in real estate, we need to incentivize those kind of assets in buildings that aren’t going to happen in the open market. That’s just one example. We lack high-bay space for robotics. Some other specialty real estate that I think the public sector can play a role in: mitigating the risks for developers who have non-credit tenants, and making sure that building stock is available. Speculative development is another thing we’ve classically underperformed on. And in the kind of pace of the current economy, like, people are not waiting around 18 months to build a building, they want turnkey space ready to go. So, we’re working on a number of things to make sure that those types of building stock in speculative development is allowed for. And a lot of that is investment through tax abatements, and direct investment, and site assembly that I do here in this office. So, that’s just one example in real estate. I think you can find other examples in public infrastructure, amenities, recreational space, and being really intentional about how we connect our tech hubs through infrastructure work. Whether that’s public transit, or whether that’s, you know, really compelling a multi-modal streetscape design. Things like that.

Eve: [00:08:03] Quite a lot to think about, isn’t there?

Lance: [00:08:04] Yeah. Yeah. Keeps ’em busy.

Eve: [00:08:06] So, you also served as an advisor on Pittsburgh’s Amazon HQ2 proposal. And I’m wondering in retrospect how you feel about making it to the top 20 list, but not as an Amazon final city pick.

Lance: [00:08:20] Yeah, I mean, I feel great about it, because I think we extracted all the marketing benefit from it without any of the really, really, really painful stuff that might have been associated with it. I am proud of our approach to that. I think it was, hey, here’s a suite of stuff that we, as every Pittsburgher, there’s wide agreement that we need to invest in. And we don’t have a revenue stream to do that. So, let’s take that suite of things we need to invest in and treat this gargantuan investment coming our way as the revenue stream. You know, and I think it helped kind of distill that suite of, that wish list, if you will, for us. And now, ok, we might not have the revenue stream, but at least it helped distill what we want to be as a city, forcing us to go through that process. And I think it was overwhelming positive experience.

Eve: [00:09:13] What’s the top of the list that we should become?

Lance: [00:09:16] I think the two things that kind of rose to the top, given the time in our city and the way things are trending, are people want a really robust public transit network. I think that was clear. People want and are concerned about rapidly appreciating real estate values in some of our residential markets. And that would be exacerbated by a huge investment like that. And so I think it really rallied people around public transit, and around affordable housing. Which I think is a positive thing, you know?

Eve: [00:09:48] Yeah, no, I agree.

Lance: [00:09:50] It’s great that affordable housing is suddenly cool again. You know?

Eve: [00:09:53] Yeah.

Lance: [00:09:54] This is fantastic. People working in this field are like, wow, this great sea change, like, in a really short period of time.

Eve: [00:10:01] Yeah, that’s true. Affordable housing is a really hot button issue now, isn’t it? Everywhere.

Lance: [00:10:06] Yeah, no doubt. And it’s great. And I think ultimately, you know, we did not land that investment. I think predominately it was a numbers game, right? A population numbers game. You’re talking about …

Eve: [00:10:18] Yes.

Lance: [00:10:18] … a gigantic pool of workers, and being a small middle market city was tough for us to absorb that, A., and, you know, the facts that matters are we have zero population growth and a two million metro area, and it went to a place with a 20 million metro area and five percent growth. And a, what a, maybe a 12 million metro area, and like 10 percent growth down in D.C., right?

Eve: [00:10:42] Right.

Lance: [00:10:42] At the end of the day it was all about …

Eve: [00:10:45] The numbers.

Lance: [00:10:46] … you know, the numbers, demographics, bodies, population. And that put a fine point that we need to work on that as well, right? That’s a huge Achilles heel for us is a lack of population growth.

Eve: [00:10:56] It is and it isn’t. I mean, that part of Pittsburgh’s charm is its size. When you talk about what should Pittsburgh become, I think you should also think about what it shouldn’t become, right?

Lance: [00:11:07] Sure.

Eve: [00:11:07] It’s a pretty beautiful and rather unique city. And each city has its own strengths. I don’t know. For me, cities go beyond numbers, but perhaps not for Amazon.

Lance: [00:11:17] Yeah, well, exactly. I think, despite what they would tell you, I think they had to take a very analytic approach to that.

Eve: [00:11:23] Yes.

Lance: [00:11:24] And it’s something that like charm and culture and beauty were probably not heavily weighted …

Eve: [00:11:31] No.

Lance: [00:11:31] … on that algorithm scale, right? So. But I agree with you.

Eve: [00:11:35] Probably mobility and housing stock were right up there.

Lance: [00:11:38] Mm hmm. I imagine.

Eve: [00:11:39] You’ve barely started, but what would you like to accomplish at ACED?

Lance: [00:11:44] Oh, boy, I mean, a lot. So, our two-fold mission is this: one, is the work on the macro economic health of the city, which is really about building a diverse and growing regional economy that’s opportunity rich for everyone to tap into, right? And we addressed some of that already. The other part of our mission is much more neighborhood-based. And that’s, you know, we want to create healthy and vibrant communities. So, all of our investments, and we make those investments in the areas of housing, and industrial and commercial development, infrastructure development, parks and rec, things of that nature, all of our investments are done with that two-fold mission. So, there’s certainly a lot of things I think we can do and be more creative with the tools we have. You know, I’m a big proponent of good government, too, and I think there’s a lot we can do to make the public sector meet the needs of our citizens in a more efficient and customer-friendly way. So, that’s the other kind of side of this that I will work on is, not only mission delivery, but just, you know, government efficiency is a twisted hobby of mine that I like, I like working on.

Eve: [00:12:55] Ha! That’s a really great hobby.

Lance: [00:12:57] Yeah. I mean, everyone needs a hobby.

Eve: [00:12:59] Yeah.

Lance: [00:13:00] And to be more specific, again, I talked about the real estate assets that I think we need to incentivize. A big concern of mine is if you put communities, you can kind of classify them broadly in three buckets. And that’s, there are tons of communities that are thriving, and we need to support them. There are a number of communities that are revitalizing that need special attention. There are a lot of communities, they need stabilization. We need triage. And a lot of that is direct fallout from the 1983 exodus of people with any sort of social mobility leaving the city.

Eve: [00:13:37] Yeah. Yeah.

Lance: [00:13:37] And we have certain areas that, they have zero market. Land value is negative, right? And that presents a whole slew of economic and social problems that go along with that. And we really need to support those communities. At the same time, kind of leaving the development breadcrumbs from areas of high opportunity to establish markets, and you kind of need to string those investments along. It’s going to be a while until I can take the strength of the market that is the Strip District, for now, and pool it across the Allegheny Valley, right? And pool it down into the Mon Valley.

Eve: [00:14:14] Yeah.

Lance: [00:14:14] And in the process establish beachheads in Etna. And I need to establish that beachhead in Etna before I can really get to Tarentum and New Kensington, right? Same thing goes for the Mon Valley. I really need to establish a strong beachhead in Wilkinsburg and Braddock until I can really talk about strength of market in places like Clairton. In the meantime, we need to make sure that we are treating those communities with the respect that they deserve in addressing the blight and disinvestment they’re struggling with, and doing that in a really smart and strategic way.

Eve: [00:14:46] Well, it must be really tough making decisions because you can’t have endless resources, I’m sure. And then you have to decide where to direct those resources. And for people who don’t know who are listening, Pittsburgh was around 700,000 people strong and really lost more than half of its population in the 1980s. And it’s now still hovering just over 300,000. Although family units are smaller now.

Lance: [00:15:16] Yes.

Eve: [00:15:16] It’s still a lot of vacancy, right?

Lance: [00:15:18] Yeah, absolutely. And so, you know, there’s some opportunity there. You know, to some extent, affordable housing price per square foot is a supply demand calculation, right?

Eve: [00:15:27] Yes.

Lance: [00:15:28] The problem is the areas that are close to job centers, well-served by public transit, and have amenities like grocery stores. We’re seeing rapid appreciation there, and obviously, because they’re more desirable places to live. So, we need to make investments to ensure that those are mixed-income communities. And we also have the opportunity, though, that a lot of other cities don’t, to make proactive preservation investments in areas that have naturally occurring affordable housing. And we’re doing both of those things on the housing investment side.

Eve: [00:16:00] Real estate development is a major component of your work.

Lance: [00:16:04] Oh, yeah. I would say most of what we do has a real estate component to it. Now, one of the things we’re trying to get more engaged in, that we traditionally have not, is the workforce development arena. You know, I think one of the big transitions we talked about, like the change in public opinion around affordable housing … the innovation economy has forced site selection to go from a predominately site- and building-centric approach to predominately talent-based approach. And we, I think in the past, in the economic development community, have taken a very hands-off approach saying, hey, there are specialists in workforce development, we’re going to let them do their thing, and we’ll just, we’ll build the stuff, invest in those tangible building products. I don’t think that model works anymore. I think the workforce challenge and the future of work is such an acute need that we really need an all-hands-on-deck approach. And the more resources everyone can leverage, that and, the better. I’m just finalizing my budgets for next year and we’re probably making close to a million dollars in investments in workforce development, which doesn’t have a land and building component to it. And I’m proud of that. And I think that’s something we’ll continue to invest more heavily in. And that’s everything from workforce readiness of teens, to adults with barriers to employment, getting re-educated and prepared for the workforce. You know, we need to attack this from all angles.

Eve: [00:17:33] I was going to ask, is there a rhyme or reason to the projects you become involved in. But I think I’m hearing that your organization, you really play the role as almost a pioneer investor early on when perhaps it’s a little bit uncomfortable for private money to be involved?

Lance: [00:17:51] Oh, no doubt.

Eve: [00:17:52] Yeah.

Lance: [00:17:52] Yeah, absolutely. Our investments, I think, are predominately … well, one, we take first mover investments in site assembly. Right? For example. So, one of my big hypotheses was that people say there is no market, no real estate market in Braddock, right?

Eve: [00:18:14] Mmm Hmm.

Lance: [00:18:14] And I challenge that. I think it’s the fact that the available real estate is not the right kind of real estate. So, for example, we assembled 60 tax-delinquent, single-family structures, demolished them, consolidated them into one five-acre parcel, and worked with a very creative developer on a take-down period that worked for the finances of that kind of constrained market. And they built a 60,000 square foot high-bay light industrial building. It’s probably the first new industrial development in Braddock in, I couldn’t even tell you how long. This is a place that suffered 90 percent of population loss.

Eve: [00:18:52] Yes.

Lance: [00:18:52] Those are the type of things, in that case, we were a first mover and then worked on aggressive land conveyance strategy with the developer. And now the great thing is we have new tax base in Braddock, we new job base in Braddock, and almost more importantly, I have a comp now, I have established that land has value in Braddock.

Eve: [00:19:12] Oh yes, that’s very important.

Lance: [00:19:14] And previously that didn’t exist. So, that’s something we did in 2019. They’re going to take occupancy first quarter of 2020, and, yeah, we’re really proud of that kind of work. So, sometimes our investments are in that realm. Other times were physical investments, either through tax leverage finance or direct investment, and yes, we assume a much higher risk profile than our private sector partners.

Eve: [00:19:35] And have you been able to convince some banks to come along on the ride with you?

Lance: [00:19:39] Yeah. And I think as long as you understand their underwriting criteria, and their approach, they’re great partners. You just have to understand what their sweet spot is and work around it. We underwrite our investments in a very similar way that banks do, on the risk end. The difference being, one, we’re willing to assume more risk. And two, on the return end we think much more broadly about returns. It’s not just about debt coverage ratio. It’s about tax base expansion. It isn’t necessarily going to pay us, but is a return to the project because it’s a mission-based return.

Eve: [00:20:16] It’s a return to the region, right? As well.

Lance: [00:20:17] Exactly. We love working with banks and traditional funders. And we have the ability to be more flexible to allow them to meet their underwriting goals and and still participate in the project.

Eve: [00:20:28] What sort of projects do you hope to see more of? I mean, if things go really well and your investments pay off in the way you want them to. What sort of projects are you hoping to see arise independently in the next five years, let’s say?

Lance: [00:20:42] Yeah, I think if we do a couple of projects like that, that light industrial building in Braddock then … that’s the goal, is that you would then establish a market and I can then start making similar investments in Duquesne and McKeesport. And like I said, you just pull that market down to maybe less centrally located areas. So, yeah, more spec buildings, more high-bay light industrial for robotics industry, more wet lab for biotech and life sciences. You know, hopefully, some of our development community starts to realize that you can stand in Lawrenceville in 40 dollar square foot space and look across the river at 15 dollar square foot space. And …

Eve: [00:21:19] Yes.

Lance: [00:21:21] … start to recognize that arbitrage opportunity. Because these communities, they’re fantastic, unique, beautiful places. They are open to development. They are, you know, they’re wonderful places to do work. And they’re right adjacent to the urban core. So, you know, rethink your idea of proximity and let’s do some great projects in some of these communities that are maybe overlooked in a lot of cases.

Eve: [00:21:47] And then most importantly, it’s pretty fun to be at the leading edge, right?

Lance: [00:21:51] I think so! Sometimes, you know, that’s when you don’t have a comp and the bank starts to get real nervous …

Eve: [00:21:58] I know, I know.

Lance: [00:21:58] … that’s when, you know, they don’t find it as much fun as I do. But yeah. I mean, that’s part of the fun, is there’s additional challenge there, but it can be really, really rewarding if you pull something off.

Eve: [00:22:08] I agree. Totally agree. Yeah. We’ve also talked about how to empower people in these communities to be part of the change, the rapid change that’s occurring in cities like Pittsburgh. And I am wondering why you think that’s important?

Lance: [00:22:23] One of the big challenges we face as a society is disproportionate allocation of not only income, if you look at wealth, right? It becomes even more staggeringly problematic. So, we’re not trying to establish markets for, just because, just for tax base, right? Hopefully, the idea is then, by establishing market you can assist in families building wealth, right? And we want people to be able to participate in the benefits of these hopefully catalytic investments we’re making. How best to do that is a challenge. You know, obviously, it’s easy when you have homeownership, high levels of homeownership, because that’s, you know, your biggest asset that appreciates with change in real estate market.

Eve: [00:23:17] Yeah.

Lance: [00:23:17] If people have that asset and they want to cash out and participate in that upside return, well, great. You know, that’s building equity, that’s building wealth. And hopefully that’s life changing for the family that chooses to do that. I think the problem, because when people are very culturally, emotionally and kind of societally invested, but don’t have that asset to participate in the appreciation, how to plug those people in to our changing communities and make sure that they participate. And that’s where, you know, lots of novel ideas that I think we’ve been talking about, about microlending, and, you know, equity returns back to neighborhoods, start to become really, really compelling for that kind of segment of society and something that I really want to learn more about, and try and institute some really progressive things on that front.

Eve: [00:24:10] I’ve been talking to some people over the last year who also believe that making a space for those people, like a physical space, is really important. And they do that in different ways. Like maybe a community space or … there’s a developer that I know who very purposefully will create retail space and then look for someone in the neighborhood to fill it and really help them build their business into that space. And that, I suppose that’s another very concrete way to involve community and make them feel like they belong, right?

Lance: [00:24:47] Yeah. No, absolutely. Absolutely. And, you know, maybe that’s a, you know, a silver lining on the challenges to retail real estate now is that mixed-use buildings are kind of hoping that’s a break even spot? Right?

Eve: [00:25:01] Yeah.

Lance: [00:25:02] And so what you have is then, is a really affordable commercial …

Eve: [00:25:05] Right.

Lance: [00:25:05] … property for people to move into. You know, locally-owned, sole proprietorship businesses that provide a higher return back to the, to the owner.

Eve: [00:25:17] Yeah, yeah.

Lance: [00:25:17] Hopefully we can continue that.

Eve: [00:25:19] Yeah. And so, like, I have to ask, what’s, you know, your background? You mentioned a little bit about it, but what did you study? What got you to this place?

Lance: [00:25:29] Yeah. I grew up in Pittsburgh, to a … I was the youngest of four.

Eve: [00:25:35] You were the baby.

Lance: [00:25:36] I was the baby and I probably act like it too much. But, you know, my first education was growing up in incredibly hilarious and brilliant family. So, you know, my parents were really hardworking, great people. I went to a mix of public and Catholic schools when I was a kid. I studied finance in Washington, D.C., The Catholic University of America. Went overseas and lived in Turkmenistan for three years, which was arguably the most educative of all of my educational experience. And I came back to CMU to get a policy degree with the intention of going back to do more international development work, because I found it just fascinating. But really fell back in love with my hometown, recognized that there were parts of my city that were in as much need or possibly greater need than what we consider to be some of the, you know, the most poverty stricken places on earth. And that didn’t sit great with me. Yeah, all of those different educational life experiences, it kind of like, let me down this path. And, you know, people, like I said I have had great work mentors that have given me chances to work on stuff. I’ve just been incredibly lucky.

Eve: [00:26:51] I have a feeling it’s not just luck, but we can go with that.

Lance: [00:26:53] I think it’s mostly luck. It’s mostly luck. But yeah, like I say, it goes back to my parents. I do work hard at it because I love it. It never quite feels like work, you know. Some days it does.

Eve: [00:27:04] Yes.

Lance: [00:27:05] Most of the time it doesn’t.

Eve: [00:27:06] That’s great. And do you think on the whole, socially responsible real estate is necessary in today’s development landscape. Outside of the work you do, like everyday developers? What do you think that should look like?

Lance: [00:27:20] There’s crappy real estate development and there’s good real estate development, right?

Eve: [00:27:23] Yes.

Lance: [00:27:24] I think good real estate development is about placemaking, and placemaking is about integration into the community. Not just, you know, from a contextual design standpoint, but from a ‘community needs’ standpoint. And I think enlightened developers get that. Enlightened developers know that incorporating that kind of philosophy in the development usually leads to higher returns, too. So, I think it can be done well and it can be done profitably, right?

Eve: [00:27:52] Right.

Lance: [00:27:52] It just requires a kind of a philosophy, a mindset, and the ability to listen to people a little bit more. But in the end, they have a much better project to show for it.

Eve: [00:28:03] Creating something that’s responsible isn’t really swallowing a bitter pill, right?

Lance: [00:28:09] No, definitely not. Especially when you have your friendly local government economic development person to help you along the way and hopefully chip in where necessary.

Eve: [00:28:20] And are there any current trends in real estate that you think are interesting or most important to the future of our cities?

Lance: [00:28:28] Well, I mean, I think it’s interesting, you know, being the hub of technology that we are. I think the design considerations around places like parking garages, for example, I think are really interesting. Because the rate of technological change is forcing people to consider the fact that this structure could achieve obsolescence in five, 10 years.

Eve: [00:28:52] Yeah.

Lance: [00:28:52] Which, what previously was considered a 50 year asset. So, I find that inherently fascinating.

Eve: [00:28:58] It is fascinating, isn’t it? I just start thinking about, well, what could you do with a parking garage?

Lance: [00:29:04] Yeah, right.

Eve: [00:29:04] How many housing units could you put into those little slots?

Lance: [00:29:08] Precisely. And are they going to be livable, you know?

Eve: [00:29:10] Yeah.

Lance: [00:29:10] And how do you remediate the oil afterward? You know?

Eve: [00:29:12] That’s right.

Lance: [00:29:12] It’s a … it’s a really interesting thing. So, you see people spec-ing in higher ceiling heights than they would have previously. Flat floor plates. All these different design considerations that I find fascinating. And even more fascinating because we’re on the bleeding edge of all of the autonomous vehicle technology that is going to lead to obsolescence of those buildings. So, yeah, I mean, that’s one that I find fascinating. What else?

Eve: [00:29:39] I’m watching zoning changes across the country, and across the world. I’m pretty fascinated to see how quickly that’s going to move along. When you have cities, you know, basically outlawing single family homes. That’s quite a statement.

Lance: [00:29:53] Yes. I think Pittsburgh in particular is being very progressive in some ways with, you know, allowing for accessory dwelling units, which I know you’re probably an advocate for, and …

Eve: [00:30:05] Yeah.

Lance: [00:30:06] … and, you know, what they’ve done with the RIV district, for example, and ensuring access to the waterfront, I think is some really good things. However, in some city neighborhoods, and this gets even more acutely problematic when you move out to maybe smaller municipal governments that haven’t updated their zoning and code in a while. The thing that I find problematic is if you ask the average 10 people on the street what the vision for new development their community would look like? And then you show them what current zoning allows for, they would be horrified, right?

Eve: [00:30:40] Yes, yeah, I think that’s true in most places.

Lance: [00:30:43] It’s a huge disconnect and it’s worrisome to me.

Eve: [00:30:47] Yeah, I mean, how do, you know, it’s really expensive updating a zoning code. I’ve been involved in that. It’s a really big deal.

Lance: [00:30:53] It is. And when you multiply that by 130 municipalities with wide, varying levels of, kind of, capacity. It’s … yeah, it’s really a daunting task.

Eve: [00:31:05] Yeah. And one sign-off question, then. Given all of the possibilities, what comes next for ACED, and for you?

Lance: [00:31:14] I am very project focused. And I believe that markets are built one great project at a time and I try not to let the enormity of the challenges, you know, get me down, right? It’s just one good project at a time. We’re focused on that every day, and we’re focused on being innovative and creative every day. And there are a ton of innovative and creative people in Pittsburgh that we need to partner with and work with to solve these problems. Like I said, it’s all hands on deck.

Eve: [00:31:48] Well, thank you very much. I really enjoyed that conversation. I can’t wait to see what you do next.

Lance: [00:31:52] Awesome. Thank you so much, Eve.

Eve: [00:31:54] That was Lance Chimka. Lance is embracing his role as the head of an economic development department with energy. Our conversation reflects the way that Lance thinks. Broad and diverse ideas to get at very particular economic problems. Lance is focused on growth, first and foremost. Making sure that Pittsburgh’s growth matches other cities. But at the same time, he wants to make sure that no one is left behind. So, he thinks a lot about how to empower communities in the path of rapid change, and how to change the disproportionate allocation of wealth. I’ll be interested to see the impact that Lance’s leadership will have.

Eve: [00:32:46] You can find out more about impact real estate investing and access the show notes for today’s episode at my website, EvePicker.com. While you’re there, sign up for my newsletter to find out more about how to make money in real estate while building better cities.

[00:33:12] Thank you so much for spending your time with me today. And thank you, Lance, for sharing your thoughts with me. We’ll talk again soon. But for now, this is Eve Picker signing off to go make some change.

Image courtesy of Lance Chimka

Back to wood construction.

March 16, 2020

As the creation of affordable and sustainable housing becomes increasingly urgent, focus has shifted to innovative ways to meet these goals. I found one such example in Amsterdam where Marc Koehler and his design team develop creative solutions for urban living through their Superlofts Project. Broadly speaking, a Superlofts project starts with the bare structural frame of the building. Each future resident designs her own home, which is then inserted into that framework, making a vertical village. This interactive process is a rather wonderful flexible and community-centric model for the creation of urban co-living.

Not satisfied with creating just a flexible living model, Marc’s team also strives to improve the sustainability of each of their projects. One way they are considering this it to move towards heavy timber construction. Their first timber project is already under development – a six-story building in the Netherlands. This push highlights the growing awareness of the benefits of engineered wood materials even for large-scale projects.

The benefit of using timber

For Marc, the two primary benefits of building with timber are flexibility and sustainability. The Superlofts vision is intended to offer flexibility in the design and configurations of buildings. Using timber adds to that goal, since timber construction makes it far easier to alter the configuration of a building. Wood is easily adaptable and can be reconfigured with minimal costs.

By contrast, concrete structures limit changes in unit and building configurations, making it more difficult to offer changes to living arrangements as families grow (or contract). By transitioning from concrete to timber, Marc believes his projects will become more like a Tetris game, with living spaces that can easily be connected and reconnected in a multitude of ways. This flexibility reduces waste and makes future adjustments far more efficient.

Simply put, building with timber is a sustainable practice. First, unlike many building materials, wood is organic – a natural material. This means that it is non-toxic and ages naturally. Second, it’s a renewable building material. As long as more trees are planted to replace those that are used, it serves as a renewable resource. Third, wood stores carbon dioxide, which otherwise would be released into the atmosphere. This means that as long as the timber is being used, it’s retaining that carbon dioxide, stopping it from being added to the atmosphere. Lastly, because wood is a good insulator, using it leads to more energy efficient buildings.

How tall can timber buildings be?

It has long been imagined that wood construction was limited to just a few stories. It’s so light and flexible that it’s generally not considered for taller buildings, which are more typically constructed of steel and concrete. However, engineering innovations are quickly producing wood products that have greater structural integrity, leading to a wave of new, tall heavy timber designs.

On the other side of the world, in Toronto, Sidewalk Labs has developed a digital proof-of-concept for a 35-story all-wood building. The design incorporates cross-brace frames, a technique often used in high-rise construction, along with cross-laminated timber beams. By using structural, diamond-shaped supports on the exterior, additional space is freed up on the interior. To keep the building from rocking, the design does have a steel mass damper, but this is the only non-wood component used in the structure.

Superlofts’ vision for mass timber is all-embracing.  Marc and his team realize that timber today not only has the structural integrity needed to build larger structures along with its important sustainability features, but it also provides the potential to easily adapt a building during its lifetime.  And that is something they are interested in exploring.

To learn more about why and how Marc is using timber in his new project, listen to our podcast interview here.

Image by PIRO4D from Pixabay

Scaling up.

March 11, 2020

Brian Gaudio believes that everyone deserves access to good design. The inspiration for starting Module came while he was directing Within Formal Cities – a documentary about the housing crisis in South America, which debuted in 2016. Brian, then a college senior, saw the broader possibility of modular “pay-as-you-go” design. As opposed to simply designing yet another prototype for affordable housing, he decided to create a startup around it. And so Module was born.

Brian Gaudio and his team are based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The three principals bring eclectic experiences in affordable housing, urban design, theme rides, industrial product design, tiny houses and small scale interior remodeling to the table. At Module they have turned that expertise into creating perfect little housing solutions that meet zero energy standards, and are smaller and flexible so that they can grow with a family’s needs.

Module envisions houses half of the typical size of American houses being built today, working as infill and affordable housing solutions – 600 s.f. to 1,600 s.f. – the smallest model could be erected on a 20-foot wide city lot, a standard lot width in Pittsburgh. New homes reimagined for a newly reimagined city. Rooms (and floors) can be added (like Legos) as needed, a concept that has been around for a number of decades as a path to home ownership, with sustainability a critical added component. Their first house was built to Passive House standards, but they’re using the Zero Energy Ready standard now, since it is easier to work with.

Prior to starting Module, Brian was a Fulbright Scholar in Santiago, Dominican Republic, where he led an urban design research initiative. He has lectured and given presentations for the American Institute of Architects, the Rockefeller Foundation, and numerous universities in the US and abroad. Brian has design experience in both the for-profit and nonprofit world. He worked in Blue Sky Department at Walt Disney Imagineering where he helped create new ride concepts for the Disney Parks, and he served as an architectural intern at the Gulf Coast Community Design Studio. Brian graduated Summa Cum Laude from North Carolina State University with a Bachelor of Architecture where he was a Park Scholar, started a non-profit organization, and was a finalist for the Harry S Truman Scholarship.

Insights and Inspirations

  • Module wants to build 100 units in the next four years. Brian’s goal is to make change through scale.
  • Brian thinks the Friday Morning Serial at the Gulf Coast Community Design Studio is one of the most engaging and inclusive community experiences he has experienced.
  • A close second is Pittsburgh’s Open Streets.

Information and Links

  • Module sells houses that grow with their owners.
  • Module’s mixed income housing project that’s in construction on Black Street is in partnership with the Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh and the Bloomfield Garfield Corporation.
  • Brian co-directed a documentary on the housing crisis in South America.
  • The Gulf Coast Community Design Studio is doing great place-based work in Biloxi, Mississippi.
Read the podcast transcript here

Eve: Hi there. Thanks so much for joining me today for the latest episode of Impact Real Estate Investing.

Eve: [00:00:06] My guest today is Brian Gaudio, founder of Module Housing. While working on a documentary about the housing crisis in South America, Brian, then just a college senior, saw the broader possibility of modular pay-as-you-go design. As opposed to simply designing yet another prototype for affordable housing, he decided to create a startup around it. And so Module focuses on perfect little housing solutions that meet zero-energy standards, and are smaller and flexible, so that they can grow with a family’s needs.

Eve: [00:00:53] Be sure to go to EvePicker.com to find out more about Brian on the show notes page for this episode. And be sure to sign up for my newsletter so you can access information about impact real estate investing, and get the latest news about the exciting projects on my crowdfunding platform, Small Change.

Eve: [00:01:9] Hi, Brian. Thanks for joining me today.

Brian Gaudio: [00:01:24] Hi Eve, thanks for having me.

Eve: [00:01:29] It’s a pleasure. So, I’ve been watching you build your company, Module, for a few years now, and I’m really excited to talk to you about it. You’ve decided to focus your life’s work on designing modular housing, affordable-by-design housing. And that was a pretty bold move straight out of school. So, what problem are you trying to solve?

Brian: [00:01:47] It is a big problem. And it’s a problem that, in school I was always, you know, in studios I would always be thinking about. It was something that was rattling in the back of my head, was how do we bring good design to more people, right? In architecture school we’re often told how important design is. And then we get out in the real world and we realize how the designers need to have a larger seat at the table. So, in my work after school, it was always trying to answer that question of how can we bring good design to more people. And there may be non-traditional ways to do that, is what I’ve been learning.

Eve: [00:02:20] That was the biggest problem. But I think I also read that you became very interested in affordable housing issues during your Fulbright Fellowship. You want to tell us a little bit about that?

Brian: [00:02:30] Yes. In school I actually was studying under one of the fathers of community design and participatory design, Henry Sanoff. He had founded an organization called the EDRA, the Environmental Design Research Association. So, I was sort of a student of his and a student of Brian Bell, who had started the Public Interest Design Institute, in the United States. So, it was really learning from folks who were leaders in the public interest design space. So, after school, I tried to pursue that as a career and worked at the Gulf Coast Community Design Studio doing affordable housing and disaster recovery housing, as an intern there. For those who don’t know, Biloxi, Mississippi, on the Gulf Coast, is not too far from New Orleans. And when Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans, it also hit Biloxi. So, I spent a little bit of time on affordable housing in Biloxi, Mississippi. And then, also, after that, went to the Dominican Republic and did a Fulbright scholarship trying to understand housing affordability as it relates to disaster recovery and urban design, in general. I was working in a neighborhood that was alongside of the, a waterway that during some of the tropical storms, people would be washed away, and housing would be wiped away.

Eve: [00:03:49] Hmm, wow.

Brian: [00:03:50] So, that research was really thinking about housing from the perspective of, where is it safe to have people housed? And what do you do when a neighborhood exists in a place that is really at risk, when we think about environmental and natural disasters? So, that was some of the kind of affordable housing work and research I was doing right out of school.

Eve: [00:04:15] That’s pretty intense work. So, how does that tie into what you’re doing today? I mean, what got you from there to where you are today, building small modular homes.

Brian: [00:04:28] Being exposed to these different methods of practice … so, in Biloxi, Mississippi, I was working for a nonprofit architecture firm that was an arm of Mississippi State University. So, I was exposed to this business model of a nonprofit architecture firm. And then at the Fulbright, it was really a bit more of an academic endeavor. Technically, the Fulbright’s under the U.S. Department of State, but you work with the local university. So, again, thinking about some of these issues from a, an academic perspective, I would call it. And then after that, I had spent a little bit of time with a friend directing a documentary, again, trying to educate ourselves on the problem of housing affordability. So, in that documentary, we interviewed a lot of architects, governments, designers, businesses about the housing crisis in other countries, specifically in South America. And it was in this kind of three, four years or so of, I would call it, a research phase, of understanding what are the practices and models that other organizations and groups are taking as it relates to housing affordability and what things worked from those models and what things didn’t work. And I guess how that ties into Module, what we’re doing today was, while these nonprofit architecture centers, these design centers, can work really well at a neighborhood scale, the question I always had was how can we move beyond the neighborhood scale and effect change at a greater scale? You know, at the city scale, and at the state scale, and eventually at the scale of a, you know, a country like the United States? How do we take some of those principles that worked really well at the neighborhood scale, but may not be able to affect thousands of people?That’s really why we chose to start Module, not as an architecture practice, but as a startup company. The idea being that you could scale faster through alternative capital means and have ultimately a greater impact once we do reach that scale. So, that’s kind of how those experiences influenced starting Module.

Eve: [00:06:29] That’s a really interesting path. I know you also were a company in Alphalab, which is a, I suppose, a startup accelerator. Has that worked for you, as a startup company, rather than a building company?

Brian: [00:06:44] Yeah, it’s a very good question because we went through, so you are referring to Alphalab and for those who are not in Pittsburgh, Alphalab is a startup accelerator, kind of like TechStars or Y Combinator, where they give early stage companies, basically folks with an idea and maybe a business plan, some initial seed capital, typically 50,000 dollars and some free office space and mentorship, to basically start to try to build their own business. A lot of the businesses in that accelerator program were tech businesses. So, think about software as a service company, SaaS companies like Slack, for example, you know, being the typical type of company that’s supported by an accelerator. So, I think we learned a lot about asking questions and testing our hypothesis through that accelerator program. And we were able to raise some initial angel capital, I would call it, in the Pittsburgh startup community and get our name out there and, you know, learn how to market, create a website and things like that. I think we also learned that as we look at investors and ways to support our business, you know, a typical venture capital investor is not likely the right kind of investor for a company like Module because they look to 10x their money in five years, which, we’re building a different kind of business than that. So, those are some of the things we learned from Alphalab.

Eve: [00:07:06] Yeah, interesting. So, you don’t think you’re a unicorn, like the rest of us, right?

Brian: [00:07:07] Right. No. Not in the traditional sense, no.

Eve: [00:07:18] So, what distinguishes your product, your modular housing products, from other products in the marketplace.

Brian: [00:08:26] So, as we think about off-site construction, modular housing, prefab construction, there are many companies now who are pursuing this as a business model. And I think we identify with the overall trend. The reason why so many people are pursuing modular or prefab construction is the labor shortage is getting worse and worse. And Eve, I know in your business, you’re doing a lot of development. So, I’m sure you’re familiar with the shortage of qualified skilled labor here in Pittsburgh. But at a national scale, we have that challenge. So, the labor shortage is real. And then we have a supply shortage, as well, in certain markets. So, they can’t build things fast enough. And so that’s really why prefab or off-site construction has started to take off. So, parts of the home or the development are built in a factory environment, shipped to site, installed with a crane on a traditional foundation. So, as we think about our company, Module, and what differentiates us, we are really thinking about the entire customer experience. So, we’re offering turnkey design-build-develop services. So, we’re not a manufacturer of homes. We work with a third-party manufacturer and we work with a third-party contractor. So, we don’t own those parts of the supply chain. But what we do own is the customer experience. And we’re trying to really redesign the customer experience, and redesign homeownership from the ground up, because we think the typical way that the top ten voters in the country do it are very dated. The floorplans they are using are dated, the construction methods that they’re using are dated often times. And today’s consumer is used to the convenience of making purchases online and browsing of things online. And they want things now, and they want help. A lot of customers expect to have, kind of the user experience that they go through purchasing a computer or something, in all of the purchases in their lives. And not many builders can offer that experience. So, I’d say that’s one thing that’s really unique about us as a company is the customer experience that we’re building through our web application. If you go to our website ModuleHousing.com, you can see some of that. That’s one thing that’s unique about our product. I would say the other thing is all of our homes are certified by the U.S. Department of Energy as zero energy-ready. We build to that spec. It’s a sustainability spec. And we chose it because we believe it offers the best bang for your buck as we think about customers. So, while LEED and Passive House may be, sometimes those certification programs can be really challenging and costly to do. We feel that the Zero Energy Ready Home program offers some of the benefits of lower operating costs in your house at a much more reasonable price point.

Eve: [00:011:11] So, it’s an energy program for everyday people.

Brian: [00:11:15] Mmm hmm. Exactly.

Eve: [00:11:16] Yeah, interesting. What is your process? Can you describe that?

Brian: [00:11:19] Yes. So, we work with, I’ll call it, several types of customers. We work with individual home buyers. So, folks who want to purchase one of our homes or build a home with us. And then we will also work with real estate investors or mom-and-pop developers, I’ll call it. So, these are folks who may have purchased land recently. They may have fixed up some houses or have some rental units, but they’re not a new construction contractor. But they own land and they’re looking to do something with it. We service, I’ll call it, mom-and-pop developers and home buyers. And we’ll do two types of processes. One is, if you’re a home buyer, you come to our website and you fill out a form on our website. And on that form you’ll share here’s my current needs, my future needs, my financial health, and here’s some of the areas that I’m thinking about owning a home in the city of Pittsburgh. And we have a proprietary GIS database of every vacant lot in Allegheny County. We’re able to basically help that customer find the right lot for them, help them purchase that lot, and then help them build a home with us. So, we’ll take them through the process from zoning approval, permitting, financing, estimating, and we will basically hold their hand through the process, through construction administration, until we’ve turned over the keys to their house. So that’s really a turnkey service that we offer. And then, the other type of process we have is as a developer. So, we as a developer on spec, will go out and purchase land and build multiple units at once and then sell those units to customers. We’re working on a project right now in Garfield, in Pittsburgh, where we are building four units, it’s a mixed-income project, and we’ll be selling those, those will be on the market, those will be finished this summer. And that’s where we are going out as a company, acquiring the land, financing the project, and then customers will come in and have a traditional mortgage when they purchase the homes.

Eve: [00:13:12] And as these homes affordable compared to others? Where they sit in the marketplace?

Brian: [00:13:19] We will build for multiple income brackets. For instance, this project in Garfield is a good example, where we have a home that will be sold to a buyer making 80 percent or less of area median income. So, that home will be sold for 183,000 dollars. I believe that’s the list price right now. And that’s only for income-qualified buyers, who meet certain income limits. And we’re able to do that because we had partnered with a nonprofit community development group in the neighborhood and Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh, and we were able to secure a subsidy to subsidize the cost of that home to a buyer in the neighborhood. So, in that case, we’re serving a kind of, for sale, affordable, 80-percent AMI customer. But our bread and butter products, our market rate product is going to be anywhere from the mid-threes to 500,000 dollars for a home. And to give listeners some context, as we track the new construction in the city of Pittsburgh, a lot of the new construction that’s going up in the East End of Pittsburgh is going to be 600 to 800,000 dollars. So, that’s kind of the going rate for a new construction builder-grade home in the East End of Pittsburgh. And because we’re building less square footage and we’re building, basically, in neighborhoods just next door to those, we’re able to provide what we believe is a better quality product at a price point, let’s call it the 400,000 dollar range, for our client.

Eve: [00:14:53] That’s somewhat affordable, and partnerships to really create serious affordability. But like everything else we’ve heard and know, it’s very difficult to build truly affordable housing without subsidies, if not impossible. This is another example of it. You really need a subsidy to make that work, right?

Brian: [00:15:11] Absolutely. I think coming out of school and you’re thinking, you know, as I am thinking about myself graduating from school, I’d be like, wow, you know, we can design anything and we’ll find a way to make naturally-occurring affordable housing with just great design. Then you realize affordable housing is really about financing, you know, and the capital stack. So, that’s one lesson we’ve learned over the past four years.

Eve: [00:15:33] Yes. And so you’ve been at this for four years. How many houses have you built now?

Brian: [00:15:38] So we’ve finished our first home for a customer last year, in 2019. It was a one bedroom, one bathroom home in Friendship. It was sort of an aging-in-place model. We built it for a clients’ parents. So, almost like an in-law suite, or an accessory dwelling unit, but on a separate property. That project is finished and we are now under construction to complete our next four homes. And those should finish in the summer of this year. And we have some other projects in the pipeline.

Eve: [00:16:08] What’s the big hairy goal for Module?

Brian: [00:16:12] The big goal is really to push the industry. I feel that the way we build homes is dated. From the types of design, to the types of families and household types that a lot builders are serving. We want to push the construction industry to really wake up and understand that there are different types of customers who need to be served and we’re ignoring those customers. So, I think that’s really the goal. Module is a  vehicle to do that. So, as we think about the young first-time homebuyers who are burdened with student loan debt, getting married later, fewer kids, they don’t need to buy the homes that their parents bought in terms of size and programming and things like that. So, we’re trying to push the industry to say, hey, there’s a huge entry level housing need in the country. And there’s also a huge need for baby boomers who are looking to downsize, and they have too much house. And we need to be thinking about these two customer types, because they’re going to be a huge component of the nation’s housing needs. That’s really the ultimate goal for Module, is how can we push the industry forward and provide a demonstration of how a development company can do that responsibly, really.

Eve: [00:17:22] What are your goals just for the next few years? You’ve built a few houses.

Brian: [00:17:26] Yeh.

Eve: [00:17:26] How quickly can you ramp up now? I know how long it takes to get to the point where you get the first one out the door, so now things should speed up a little, right?

Brian: [00:17:35] That’s right. Our goal, we talk about 100 units over the next four years, in Pittsburgh. So, that’s the goal that we’ve set out. And so for us to do that, we have to start taking on larger projects. So, I’m looking at parts of the city where we can do, I’ll call it, impact-scale projects, thinking 20 to 40 units and working with the local neighborhood groups to understand what their needs are and how we can serve them. So, we’ll be finished our first spec project in this summer and we’re looking at projects where we can build 10 or more units. And that’s really what will help us scale faster. We’ll do some of these one-off customers, you know, taking them through the process, just sort of, it’s about brand awareness and it’s about understanding the customer journey. But really, we want to be working on projects where we can assemble sites that build 10 or more units at once.

Eve: [00:18:25] And you think you’re going to stay in Pittsburgh for now.

Brian: [00:18:28] Yes, we will. Obviously, to build thousands of homes, we’re gonna have to get outside of Pittsburgh. But Pittsburgh will be the first market. It’s my hometown. I’m from here originally. And so, we thought it was a worthwhile test market. And what Pittsburgh has some other cities don’t, is we have an insane amount of vacant land that is yet to be built.

Eve: [00:18:59] We really do, don’t we?

Brian: [00:19:00] That’s one asset that we have. So.

Eve: [00:19:01] Yes. Yeah.

Brian: [00:19:05] And that’s one reason why, getting getting projects off the ground, you know, if we were in New York, for instance, getting access to land as an upstart developer might be nearly impossible. And so, there are still parts of the city of Pittsburgh where there are larger parcels of land, and we see that as one benefit of being in Pittsburgh.

Eve: [00:19:14] Great. So, I’m going to shift gears a bit and just talk to you about impact investing, socially responsible real estate. And do you think that’s necessary in today’s development landscape, thinking about the impact of what you build?

Brian: [00:19:28] Absolutely. I think, and one reason, kind of when you talk about a goal of our company or a reason that we were founded, is we feel that often times what gets built in a particular site may be really great for the bottom line of a particular limited partner or, for the preferred return of a particular investor. But that becomes the primary goal of the project. And the folks who end up living in the space, whether they’re buying it or renting it, are an afterthought. And I’m not saying that’s, by no means are all developers that way, but we’ve seen a lot of development projects that really ignore the end user. And I think why I’m excited about impact real estate investing is the ability to bring the end user back to the forefront of the conversation, because we build housing ultimately to shelter people. And I think sometimes people in this industry lose sight of that. So, I think impact investing has the ability to bring the end user back to the forefront of the conversation.

Eve: [00:20:33] Yeah. You know, when you talk about that, are there any current trends in real estate that excite you or interest you the most, that you think might have legs in the future?

Brian: [00:20:43] Trends with respect to impact investing, or just trends in general?

Eve: [00:20:46] Anything, I mean, obviously you think modular housing is important. But anything else out there? I’ve been watching, we’ve seen co-working, for example, really change the landscape. Today, I was reading along those lines about people who are starting to co-purchase homes because they can’t …

Brian: [00:21:07] Yeah.

Eve: [00:21:07] … they can’t afford them individually. So, there are some weird trends emerging in an effort to deal with this housing affordability crisis.

Brian: [00:21:17] Absolutely. Speaking of those trends, I mean, we operate in the startup world, so we do meet a lot of startup companies working on innovative finance models. And there’s a company called Divy, which again, sort of supports co-purchasing of homes. And that’s a company, you can look up Divy. And there’s another company called CoBuy. So, these are finance companies which help either friends or folks who want to purchase a house together. So, that’s one model. There’s been a couple other startups as it relates to purchasing of homes where they will buy the house for you and you will rent from them for a certain period of time, and then with the option to purchase. I don’t remember the name of the company that I was reading about the other day, but that’s another interesting finance play. And then, I follow, obviously, these smaller, you know, lot size movement. So, with what’s happening, California with ADUs really interests me. And then I think it was Minneapolis that out with the single family zoning restrictions …

Brian: [00:22:19] Yeah, that was really interesting. Yeah, they’re really interesting trends, aren’t they? People sort of really adapt to the marketplace in really fascinating ways, beyond just the companies that emerge. People are immensely creative. So. that’s kind of comforting, isn’t it?

Brian: [00:22:36] Yeah, absolutely. There’s a company that’s working on 3D printing of houses, which I am a bit skeptical, I admit, I’m a little bit skeptical of. But I think it’s amazing that we have, now, three or four startup companies that are 3D printing homes. I think of it as a fascinating R&D project. I’m not sure how commercially viable that technology is. But the idea that, you know, it sort of get to the same pain point of modular construction with regards to the labor force.

Eve: [00:23:06] Yeah. I mean, I think …

Brian: [00:23:07] Preprinting the home, that could really save some labor costs.

Eve: [00:22:12] Yeah. I mean, that seems to be the heart of it all. Because when you think about affordable housing, there’s always been the skeptics. It doesn’t really matter what city or state you’re in. There is a gap between the cost of building something and what someone can afford to pay towards that cost. There’s just this financing gap. And until we figure out new technologies in construction and ways to reduce the cost of construction, that gap just isn’t going to disappear. It’s not going to go away.  I don’t see that there’s any other way to make it go away. It’s a really big problem. Yeah, it’s a really big problem. How do you think we need to think about our cities and neighborhoods so we can build better places for everyone?

Brian: [00:23:59] As I think about a neighborhood and a city, sometimes neighborhoods are microcosms of the city. So, for instance, we’re working on a project in Garfield, which is, sits in the East End of Pittsburgh. And Garfield was a neighborhood that still has a significant amount of vacant property and blighted properties. But it’s a neighborhood that’s starting to turn the corner.

Eve: [00:25:26] A few years ago, like, 400 of the 1,700 lots were vacant. That’s a real big number.

Brian: [00:22:24] Yes. And, you know, I think there’s evidence of a neighborhood like that, that’s starting to make significant progress in reducing blight. But the question that everyone has is how do you reduce blight and promote new home ownership and things like that in a neighborhood without pricing out people who are from the neighborhood, or displacing residents. You know, like gentrification happens, it is a thing. Change happens. And managing that change, I think, is something that a neighborhood, like at the neighborhood level, can be done. But then I think there’s, we’re in the city of Pittsburgh. We have to think about managing change, encouraging growth in our city and then trying to manage that in a way. And I was just at an event yesterday with someone from the city of Pittsburgh, a representative from the city, and they talked about the number one need Pittsburgh has is turnkey new construction for people who are relocating to Pittsburgh. And I was really surprised by that statement. But I think it shows that while at a neighborhood level, there may be a particular issues that are really important, at the city level, sometimes those issues can be quite different. And so how did neighborhoods speak to cities and back and forth is a really important dialogue that has to happen.

Eve: [00:25:45] So, do you think a neighborhood like Garfield is managing the change? Because I know it’s changed a lot in the last few years. It was a very poor, underserved neighborhood, and it’s received quite a lot of attention in the last few years.

Brian: [00:25:59] I think it is a neighborhood that’s actively managing that change. There are some neighborhoods … we work with a lot of neighborhood groups, and we’re not a nonprofit. Right? We do have a mission behind us, but there are some neighborhoods in the city of Pittsburgh where you talk about development and new construction, and people will just, they don’t want even have a conversation about it. And they’re trying to prevent change from happening. And that can be really challenging for the residents, and for people who want to be working in that neighborhood or living in that neighborhood. So, I think Garfield has done a good job of … and then there’s other neighborhoods on the other side where they’re just sort of like, hey, it’s we’re open for business, you know, no rules and no regulations. So, I think Garfield has done a good job of balancing those two. And I think it’s really up to the local community development organization, because they’re looked at as the kind of voice of the neighborhood. So, how well can that director and the staff people manage those multiple voices? And they need to see, for instance, Garfield talks about, we need to see affordable new construction, but we need to see market rate new construction as well. We don’t say we don’t want that, we need that for our neighborhood. So, I think groups that realize you have to have a balance of those things are always the ones that we like to work with.

Eve: [00:25:19] Yes. So, what community engagement tools have you seen that have worked? You talk a lot about working in communities and making sure that you’re sort of representing what they want. That can be hard, right?

Brian: [00:26:11] Yeah, it can be really hard. In Biloxi, Mississippi, we had different methods for community engagement. One method I really liked was we would host, and this is at our design studio in Biloxi on the main street there, we’d host something called Friday Morning Serial, S-e-r-i-a-l, but we served cereal, so we served cold cereal and coffee. And every Friday we would invite someone from the community to come in and talk about what they’re, what they’re doing, who they are. And we would invite folks from the neighborhood to sit. And it wasn’t a long, wasn’t a TED talk. It wasn’t overly produced. It was come, talk for 15 minutes, and then we’re just gonna have cereal and chat. And honestly, that was the best community engagement I had witnessed, because it was, it was a great organic way for people to start talking to their neighbors and learning about one another. And it wasn’t like this formal presentation of the drawings, OK, here’s the development site, it was a very natural conversation. That was one piece of engagement that I participated in that I thought was really fun.

Eve: [00:27:39] That’s sounds really, that sounds charming.

Brian: [00:27:42] Yeah.

Eve: [00:27:44] We should do that here. That’s really lovely.

Brian: [00:27:47] We should. And perhaps you’ll have the, Elizabeth, she was running Friday Morning Serial at the Gulf Coast. Maybe she’ll be a podcast guest at some point.

Eve: [00:27:57] Oh, very good. Yes.

Brian: [00:27:59] But in Pittsburgh, there’s another kind of non-traditional community engagement. There’s an event every year called Open Streets, where in different neighborhoods, they will shut down the streets to vehicular traffic and let people walk and bike in the middle of the street through different neighborhoods. And we’ve participated in that several times. You know, kind of little pop up booth. And that’s a great way to talk to people and engage with folks, because they’re out there having fun. And it’s another way to get some informal community participation. So, it’s called Open Streets Pittsburgh. And I think it’s a great event.

Eve: [00:29:36] Well, I’m really delighted you mentioned that because, do you know I founded that, I  co-founded that.

Brian: [00:29:43] Oh really? Well, there you go.

Eve: [00:29:45] Yeah.

Brian: [00:29:45] So, did you found it with the intention of doing that?

Eve: [00:29:48] Founded with the intention of opening the streets to everyday people. It’s not rocket science. People were doing it all over the world. Pittsburgh’s always a little bit behind, right? But I’m really thrilled to hear you say that it’s meaningful to you. It’s a great event.

Brian: [00:30:07] And it just activates neighborhoods in a different way. When you’re walking through the streets …

[00:30:111] Amazing.

[00:30:11] … I think they’ve done a good job of putting it in neighborhoods where the folks who typically engage in Open Streets, they might be more cycling-oriented, or like transit advocates, but they’re doing it in neighborhoods now which may have seen a lot of disinvestment over the past 30, 40 years. And I think it’s a great way to get people engaged in the neighborhood.

Eve: [00:30:32] Yeah,.

Brian: [00:30:32] Non-traditional. So good job, Eve, and other co-founders.

Eve: [00:30:43] I did not do alone. But, you know, it’s interesting because streets and roads take up so much of our open space and it’s pretty wonderful to be able to, you know, use it as a park for a short time. Once a month, you know, you just open the space and get rid of the cars, let people go out there, and have exercise classes, or walk, or bike, whatever they want to do. It’s a really wonderful thing. It’s really fabulous. So, I’m glad you enjoy it. But you and I also have talked about equity crowdfunding. And I’m wondering, you know, that’s what I do. And I’m wondering, you know, if you think that would be helpful for engaging a community like Garfield. In what’s happening there?

Brian: [00:31:15] Yeah. Yeah. As I think about equity crowdfunding, or just crowdfunding, in general, you know, part of the model opens up the company to a broader audience. Right? Not as many people participate in real estate deals as to equity crowdfunding deals. And then when you add the marketing component to it, you’re really telling a story. I’ve saw some of the projects that you’ve had on your platform. And Jonathan Tate, he and I have spoken together at a couple of events, and I really think it’s an opportunity to tell the story of a particular project really well. So, in addition to funding the project, I think the narrative that you create and the engagement that you can have in an open, a more open platform, is exciting. That’s when I think about equity crowdfunding.

Eve: [00:32:05] Yeah. I think for me is, my hope had always been that it would be a way to let communities invest in what’s happening around them. And I don’t think it’s working too well for that yet. I think there’s just a very nascent industry and people don’t know very much about it. And I think that maybe investing is a pretty threatening activity for most people who’ve never done it before. So, I hope that over time we can educate people and they understand that investing in their own community could be a really great thing. But that’s down the road, right?

Brian: [00:32:38] Yeah.

Eve: [00:32:38] So, I’m going to wrap up with one question that I really want to ask you, and that is if there was one thing that you could change about real estate development in this country, what would it be?

Brian: [00:32:50] I would change … the people who are thought of as developers, the type, you know … like I am late 20’s white male. Right? So, I may not be like a slicked back hair, like 50s suit-wearing 55-year old guy, who’s a real estate developer. But I think there are many other people who don’t think of real estate development as a career, a path. Whether it’s particular minorities or gender types. I would love to see more diversity in the world of real estate development, because I think the more people that are able to see that as a career and engage in it, then will bring fresh perspectives to the projects that we see developed around our country. And when it’s this, you know, when it’s kind of the majority of folks working in that field or who are perceived as successful in that field, fit one type of persona, then it limits the quality of projects that are going to be executed. So, I’d love to see many more types of people become developers then kind of what we think traditionally of as a developer.

Eve: [00:34:03] Well, I completely agree. And I want to thank you very much for spending your time with me today. It’s fascinating. And I’m sure we’re going to be talking again soon.

Brian: [00:34:12] Absolutely. Thank you very much, Eve. I’ve really enjoyed it.

Eve: [00:34:13] That was Brian Gaudio. As a young student, Brian absorbed ideas from many places. Both Elemental’s incremental housing in Chile, and the 100,000 Houses Project by the Philly-based firm Interface Studio Architects, have influenced his thinking along with the housing crisis in South America which he was exposed to during the filming of his documentary. It’s fascinating how new ideas are developed out of such varied influences.

Eve: [00:34:45] You can find out more about impact real estate investing and access the show notes for today’s episode at my website, EvePicker.com. While you’re there, sign up for my newsletter to find out more about how to make money in real estate while building better cities. Thank you so much for spending your time with me today. And thank you, Brian, for sharing your thoughts. We’ll talk again soon. But for now, this is Eve Picker, signing off to go make some change.

Image courtesy of Brian Gaudio

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

sign up here

APPLY TO BE A PODCAST GUEST

More to See

(no title)

February 22, 2025

Bellevue Montgomery

February 11, 2025

West Lombard

January 28, 2025

FOLLOW

  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Tag Cloud

Affordable housing Climate Community Creative economy Crowdfunding Design Development Environment Equity Finance FinTech Gentrification Impact Investing Mobility Offering Opportunity zones PropTech Technology Visionary Zoning

Footer

©rethinkrealestateforgood.co. The information contained on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this website is intended as investment, legal, tax or accounting strategy or advice, or constitutes an offer to sell, solicit or buy securities.
 
Any projections discussed or made may not be accurate and do not guarantee a specific outcome. All projections or investments are subject to risk due to uncertainty and change, including the risk of loss, and past performance is not indicative of future results. You should make independent decisions and seek independent advice regarding investments or strategies mentioned on this website.

Recent

  • The Mulberry
  • Mount Vernon Plaza
  • The Seven
  • Real estate and women.
  • Oculis Domes.

Search

Categories

Climate Community Crowdfunding Development Equity Fintech Investing Mobility Proptech Visionary

 

Copyright © 2026 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in