• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Say hello
Rethink Real Estate. For Good.

Rethink Real Estate. For Good.

  • Podcast
  • Posts
  • In the news
  • Speaking and media
    • About Eve
    • Speaking requests
    • Speaking engagements
    • Press kit
  • Investment opportunities

Equity

Manufactured authenticity.

March 27, 2024

Scott Snodgrass is a founding partner of Meristem Communities, a Houston-based real estate development firm committed to creating Places for People™️ with mindful, fine-grained developments. Meristem is a resiliency-focused developer whose guiding principles create human-centric design by thoughtfully, sustainably, and holistically connecting the land and its natural resources with people.

Scott is an innovative entrepreneur and former farmer who leads with respect for the land and the environment, carefully strategizing an interconnected resilience of all systems—natural, human, and built. His vision has always been to create neighborhoods that honor and nurture local ecosystems, empowering people to live a more holistic way of life with renewed appreciation for their natural surroundings. This vision is being brought to fruition in Indigo, one of Meristem’s first developments in the suburbs of Houston, designed with a foundational connection to agriculture and built around a human-scale working farm and pasture. The Meristem belief is that it’s the sum of a thousand small decisions that create more engaging, more interesting, and more livable neighborhoods.

Alongside his work at Meristem, Scott works collaboratively with developers and consultants to create unique and exceptional agricultural amenities (agrihoods) within master-planned communities through Agmenity. He has become a thought leader in the national agrihood movement, regularly speaking on the topic at regional and national conferences. Scott is a member of several community organizations including the Urban Land Institute (ULI), currently serving on a national committee and most recently contributed to their 2018 ULI Agrihood Report. Scott holds a Bachelor of Arts in political science and government from The University of Texas at Austin.

Read the podcast transcript here

Eve Picker: [00:00:06] Hi there. Thanks for joining me on Rethink Real Estate. For Good. I’m Eve Picker and I’m on a mission to make real estate work for everyone. I love real estate. Real estate makes places good or bad, rich, or poor, beautiful, or not. In this show, I’m interviewing the disruptors, those creative thinkers and doers that are shrugging off the status quo in order to build better for everyone.

Eve: [00:00:43] In real estate development, envisioning how future societies will live can often feel like masterminding a high-tech work of science fiction. Just outside of Houston, a new development of the future is emerging. But instead of flying cars and skyscraping utopias, this version of Tomorrowland has its roots firmly and sustainably planted in days gone by. Indigo, a 235-acre community, is being developed by Scott Snodgrass and his partner Clayton Garrett, both farmers. They have thoughtfully gone against the norm in every aspect of this project, focusing first and foremost on people and a human scale to encourage interaction. Downsized lots and homes, a working farm, the integration of small businesses, careful attention paid to embracing everyone all make this project one worth watching. You’ll want to listen in to learn more.

Eve: [00:01:54] Hi, Scott. It’s really nice to have you join me today.

Scott Snodgrass: [00:01:57] Thank you so much for having me. I’ve been a big fan of yours and the podcast, at least for the past couple of years, and so, excited to be able to join today.

Eve: [00:02:06] Oh thank you. You’ve been heard to say that in community development, envisioning how future societies will live can often feel like masterminding a high-tech work of science fiction. Why is that?

Scott: [00:02:21] Well, uh, we don’t really know what the future holds for how people are going to live, but I think that we have maybe 40,000 years or something of history with how people live. And certainly, in modern history, we have some great analogues to look back at and so, I think it’s really about learning with what we’ve done in the past, but then also applying the technological changes we’ve had to the future. We’re a little slow to adopt some technologies. I think it’s real easy to see technologies and think it’s the future. And these sexy technologies that are always being sold by some company for some high price and you have to sign up for their subscription, and they own all of your data and all that. And we’re a little wary of that. But I do think that as we look into the future, sometimes we are doing the same thing that a science fiction writer would do in imagining what the world’s going to be like in the future.

Eve: [00:03:16] That’s true. So, and you are a former farmer amongst other things. How does a former farmer become a real estate developer?

Scott: [00:03:24] It’s a great question. It’s the one that most people ask, right away off the start. But my business partner and I, we have a company called Agmenity, and it manages farms for master plan community developers, hospitals, school districts, cities and counties. And so, we had experience in agriculture and started that company as a service company to help incorporate agriculture into more real estate developments and have been doing that work since 2015. And we had, our first project is called Harvest Green. It’s here in Houston. The real estate developer was just a wonderful company and their general manager on the project, Shay Shafi, was just an incredibly generous guy. And he brought us into every single development meeting, you know, so every week or every two weeks for years. And sometimes…

Eve: [00:04:18] You caught the bug!

Scott: [00:04:19] Right. We were like, why are we here talking about engineering? And he said, well, hey, this whole like, agriculture in a community thing is relatively new in the modern framework. And so we want to make sure that we’re catching any of those conflict points. And so we got to see the behind the scenes. And we got to ask questions about, well, why are you making this decision and why are you making that decision? And Clayton and I, my business partner, we had always felt like what could be more impactful on someone’s life than the food they eat. Nothing, right? And then we saw this whole real estate development world and said, oh, wow. Like, real estate development actually has a lot to do with what food people eat and a whole host of other things. And so, this is also incredibly impactful work. So, we hired a COO at Agmenity who does a tremendous job, runs the company better than we ever did or could and is really leading that company in a growth throughout the country right now. And so, Clayton and I have been able to focus at Meristem Communities and put our energy there and really work on our first project, Indigo.

Eve: [00:05:23] And so Meristem Communities you launched with your partner. And how long ago was that?

Scott: [00:05:28] Now we just launched meristem in 2021. We owned a piece of property, um, that we had had a large-scale farm on, and we were starting to be surrounded by suburban development outside of Houston. And so, that farm was never going to grow to the full size of the property we had purchased, we realized. And so, we said, okay, well, what do we do with the rest of this property? And so, we had been walking alongside real estate developers and we said, well, let’s look at this. And we started talking to some folks about some mixed-use and sports parks and light industrial even. And none of it felt quite right. And then Covid hit, and everything stopped for a while. And then single-family real estate caught on fire, for good and for bad. And we said, okay, well, this is kind of our only option right now. And frankly, because of the demand that home builders had for lots at that time, it put us in a position where two farmers could become real estate developers because the home builders were so desperate for lots. And that was really the key that opened up financing and all the other agreements that we needed to get moving.

Eve: [00:06:38] Interesting. So, then I have to ask you, does this community differ from conventional urban plan communities? And if it does, how?

Scott: [00:06:48] Certainly for Houston, it is shockingly different, we discovered right away. Our conversations with our home builders weren’t easy, even though their demand for lots was so high. But, you know, we’ve done a number of things at Indigo that are different than the norm. You know, first off, we do have agriculture incorporated into the community. How could two farmers, you know, develop a community that didn’t have agriculture? So, we knew we had to do that, but we actually don’t find ourselves talking about it that much, related to Indigo. We see the big differences that we have are really our focus on walkability, and that means using homes that have their garages on alleys and the front doors either on the street or on a green space. And that was a very difficult framework for the Houston development world to understand. For whatever reason, Houston has just rarely had any alleys since the 50s or 60s. The city’s abandoned a lot of them in the urban core and master plan community developers just haven’t used them. And so, you know, we can easily travel around the country and see alley-loaded neighborhoods. You know, the traditional neighborhood design framework all around the country. Dallas even has a lot of it. And so, it was easy to go see it but we had a hard time getting our, our builders on board with doing that. So that was kind of the first hurdle and something we were doing that was very different. And then the second part of that was smaller…

Eve: [00:08:14] So actually let’s back up. So, the importance of alleys means that, you know, no driveways on the front, the front of the houses are really for people, not for cars and, and trash and cars are relegated to the alley. Right?

Scott: [00:08:29] Yeah. So, our tagline at Meristem Communities is places for people. And you know, we imagine a world where cars, corporations and capital are not the primary stakeholders. And those other three things are tools that humans can use to achieve their goals, but they’re not the primary stakeholders. And unfortunately, our real estate system, as you know and talk about all the time, is currently built for cars, corporations and capital. And so, we believe that it’s an important shift in the design framework as you’re designing a community to look at people first. So yes, garages on the back. That reduces our curb cuts and our conflict points for vehicles and for for driveways and sidewalks. Yeah.

Eve: [00:09:12] And people. Safer for kids.

Scott: [00:09:13] Yep. Safer for kids and all that. It allows us to have on-street parking and a lot more of it because we don’t have all of those curb cuts now, for the driveways. And it also means that when cars pull off of the road onto the alley, there’s a very limited number of cars on those alleys as well, because they serve small pockets of homes. And so even those spaces are relatively safe as well.

Eve: [00:09:35] That’s a really major urban planning feature, but I feel like I need to go back a step and ask you what your vision was. Like, what’s the overall vision for this community, and where did you draw inspiration from? Aside from the farm?

Scott: [00:09:51] And we have this conversation a lot too, like. Our PR team will ask, you know, what’s the theme of the community? And we keep coming back to it’s places for people. That really is the theme. You have to do everything. You can’t just pick one thing to do. And so, we’re incorporating agriculture into our development. We’re using alleys. We’re creating safer streets. Wherever our sidewalks cross the street we have a raised pedestrian crossing or a raised intersection table. We have narrower streets, we have on street parking, we have bulb-outs. We have all these things to create a safer environment for people and focus on that. And then we’ve also done the mixing of uses by having residential and retail and other commercial in the same space and, you know, bringing that into the neighborhood instead of pushing it out onto the major thoroughfare adjacent to our neighborhood and turning its back to the community, we’ve really brought that retail into the community and had it face the community and be really central there. And so, I think you have to do all those things. So, places for people really is the theme but then walkability and safe streets has to be an important part of that.

Eve: [00:11:00] So how big is this community? How many homes are we talking about? How many people?

Scott: [00:11:04] So we have 235 acres within the development. More than 60% of that is open space. So, we have a 25-acre lake. We have, you know, miles of walking trails and sidewalks and everything. And we also have these, we basically created a street grid and then took out every other street and made it a green space. And so, homes still front on those green spaces, and they’re served by the alleys in the back. So, we have a lot of open space there. We have, uh, 661 homes for sale. And then, and that’s a range of attached and detached and cottages and more traditional single-family homes for our market. And then we also have about 150 apartment units, but they’re distributed through a number of buildings. We have these mansion apartments that are six- and seven-unit apartments that just look like a banker’s house, that we’re putting on some of the green spaces. And then we have some, like, smaller 30-unit buildings of micro units that look like brownstones that are in what we call Indigo Commons, which is the real town center, mixed-use area of the neighborhood.

Eve: [00:12:17] And so you’re under construction, right?

Scott: [00:12:21] Correct.

Eve: [00:12:21] How far into this project are you? What percentage complete and how many people live there?

Scott: [00:12:27] So, we don’t have anyone living yet, but our section one, the model homes for the community are going to start construction here in just a few weeks. So, all of section one, which is a little more than a third of the community, all of the storm sewer, the sanitary sewer, water lines, all that’s in the water plant. And, you know, we built our own water plant and wastewater treatment plant because we didn’t have services in our area. And so, all of that is in and the paving starts this week. And so, they’re moving real quick for us. Hopefully the weather holds up for us and they’ll be out there pouring concrete for the next 30 days or so, and then we’ll have those first 265 lots available for sale. And I’ll tell you, we’ve been doing some really intentional, small-scale and intimate cultivation of the potential home buyers. And our home builders are saying the demand is intense and we believe that we’re going to sell out really quickly. So, we’re already getting section two ready. And construction for section two will start in just a few months here.

Eve: [00:13:28] And so, I have to ask how affordable are these homes?

Scott: [00:13:32] So, we are in the probably least affordable quadrant of the city. And again, partially that’s what allowed us as, you know, two simple farmers to deal. But also, what we’ve done is compare ourselves to the communities around us and if we wanted to push towards affordability, what could we do? Because Houston’s always been very affordable compared to the rest of the country but during Covid it changed quite a bit. And so, we’ve seen the same thing now where your firefighters, police officers, teachers, social workers can no longer, or anyone working in retail, can no longer afford to live even in the communities where they work. And it felt really wrong for a community to tell the people serving it they had to go somewhere else. That just felt inhuman. And so, we said, okay, we’ve got to find a way to solve for that problem. And so, one of the ways we did that was by pushing for smaller lot size, because we saw an opportunity where lots in Houston had become huge, you know, mostly in the 70s and 80s and 90s and that mostly that’s wasted space. People aren’t using those portions of their lots. So what we did was really densify our neighborhood, compared to the suburbs, you know, 3.2, 3.4, maybe four units per acre is the standard in the suburbs. I think we’re at almost eight units per acre. And then if you look at like, you know, net density in some smaller pockets in the neighborhood, we even flirt with 20 units per acre in our most dense areas. And so that’s a very different calculation. And that’s just on the first side.

Eve: [00:15:10] What were the zoning restrictions you have to contend with to get there?

Scott: [00:15:15] Most of our property was in the unincorporated county, and the county that we’re in has very little in the way of requirements for subdivisions or development. So, it’s kind of the wild, wild West out here.

Eve: [00:15:26] And that reminds me of, I don’t know if you ever used to play SimCity.

Scott: [00:15:29] Yeah, yeah.

Eve: [00:15:31] I just, you know, no restrictions.

Scott: [00:15:35] Yep.

Eve: [00:15:36] Insanity. Yeah.

Scott: [00:15:38] Yeah. So, then we, but we did have a portion of our property that was in the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the city of Richmond, which is our closest jurisdiction. We reached out to Richmond and said, hey, we’d love ultimately for our neighborhood to be a part of the city. So, we worked with them on a development agreement, and they have the right to annex our property in about ten years when we’re done with the development process. And that development agreement, so their, their minimum lot size was 6000ft², in the city of Richmond. And through our development agreement, we got that down.

Eve: [00:16:11] That’s a really huge.

Scott: [00:16:13] Right. Yeah. It’s big for the minimum. Right.

Eve: [00:16:15] Yes. Yeah,

Scott: [00:16:16] Maybe a maximum. It’d be okay. So, we worked with them and got that down to 2000ft², which is allowing us to do some cottage homes that are in that, like 950 to 1450 square footage range. That really serve, and that’s what we saw, was the suburbs of Houston have almost entirely been built for two parents with children families. There’s just so many homes built for that family formation, which in Texas is now like 20% of our family formation.

Eve: [00:16:49] Oh that’s really interesting.

Scott: [00:16:50] So the other 80% of family formations or household formations we’re just ignoring. People who want to live together, who aren’t married and have trouble with financing. You know, we have single parent families who affording a giant home like that can be really difficult. You know, all these different formations, you know, like couples who don’t want to have kids, which is more and more common today. And so, like, why are we only building these five-bedroom, you know, mini mansions in the suburbs? So, we shifted everything down on lot square footage and home square footage to create more of an ecosystem so that we’re providing homes for that wider range of people. And then especially wanted to do the aging in place concept where you could buy your first home in our neighborhood, you could rent here, then you can buy your first home in our neighborhood, and then you can size up your home as your family grows and size down as it doesn’t, as it shrinks and create all of that in one place for people.

Eve: [00:17:47] This is pretty challenging stuff that you’ve tackled for two farmers. First time real estate development. I have to ask, there’s a lot of infrastructure to put in place. How challenging was it to put the funds together for this project?

Scott: [00:18:01] I think we’re very persistent and we’re very persuasive. And then the market was really hot at that time. Like, we have the privilege of that and the privilege of both being white males, which does make a difference when you’re trying to get financing.

Eve: [00:18:15] Definitely.

Scott: [00:18:16] Absolutely. And then at the same time we were just willing to take no for an answer over and over again and go to the next person. And so we heard no, a bunch of times. We didn’t fit the traditional needs. You know, everybody understandably wanted a huge chunk of cash equity in the deal. And we didn’t have any money, we’re farmers, and we didn’t know anybody who was going to do that for us. And we didn’t want to go out and find an equity partner who would ultimately control the decision making. We wanted that to be us. So, we just kept working and working until we found a private lender that was willing to take on our deal, that was trying to move more into Texas. They had been developers in the past, which we really loved because they understood the development process. They’ve been very flexible. They are not very cheap. And I think that is the place that people need to get over that mental hurdle that, in our minds, we will pay for flexibility over and over and over again because it really brings resilience. When you lock yourself into this tiny little box of requirements and allow that lender or the bank to pull the rug out from under you whenever they decide to, that’s a tenuous place to be that we didn’t want to be. And so, we are happy to pay very high interest rates for very large sums of money for a long time in order to get the flexibility that we need. So, sure, we take a haircut in our profit at the end. And I think that’s what most people struggle with. But it does make our development more resilient.

Eve: [00:19:44] So you will have a working farm in this community?

Scott: [00:19:48] Yeah.

Eve: [00:19:48] How does that go?

Scott: [00:19:50] It’s 42 acres. And really, what most people will experience is the front three and a half acres, which are right at the entrance to the community, and it bumps right up into the town square area. And that’s the vegetable farm. So that’s where vegetables and flowers will be grown. That’s where people can go and buy some vegetables from the farm. They can take classes, they can interact with the farmers, maybe even have their own little plot to grow some vegetables in. And then the, on the back side of the property, the remainder of the farm is pasture and orchards. And so we will probably have laying hens, you know, hundreds and hundreds of laying hens and do egg production on the farm as well. And we’ll have some programming back there, but in a more limited basis that’ll mostly be a farmer’s work area on the back side of the farm.

Eve: [00:20:38] It sounds idyllic. And then also, where did you get your inspiration from for the architecture for the community, like, and what is the architecture like?

Scott: [00:20:48] We have a funny phrase we find ourselves using more and more, and that phrase is manufactured authenticity.

Eve: [00:20:54] Kind of like Disneyland, right?

Scott: [00:20:57] Yeah, in some ways. And there’s some parts of Disneyland that Disney did really well. Right? And really speak to people. There’s other parts of it that are cloying, I would say and, you know, are saccharine. But what we wanted to do, because we were developing what was just entirely farmland, not a single tree on our property, no structures at all. We felt like for people to feel like it was a place we needed to create some age, some patina on the community. So, we’ve done a few different things. You know, one, we went out and bought two 50-foot-tall live oak trees and had them planted at the property, and that was not cheap. But doing that, you know, at least makes it feel like something was here before. And then as we planned the architecture of our buildings, like the first commercial building we’re building is called the filling station. And so, it’s a little bit tongue in cheek that it was a 1930s Art Deco gas station. And then all of the decorations on it had been stripped off. It had been stripped back to its basic form, and it was no longer a gas station. It wasn’t serving cars now, now it’s serving people. So, it’s a general store, coffee, beer, wine, light breakfast and lunch options and then sells vegetables from the farm, eggs, pickles, jams and jellies, all that. And acts as the third place for the community to really activate at the beginning, where there’s cafe seating and it’s like, come hang out here, use the Wi-Fi, do whatever. So, the architecture of that building was really intentional, that it refers not only to an architectural style of the past, but also acts like it had been adaptive, reused, at some point in the future. And that goes all the way to like, choosing a polished concrete floor finish. You know, where do you incorporate some concrete block, like would have been in those buildings before so that you can see it, even if that’s not our modern construction method? So, there’s some touches to it that are Disney but what we’re hoping to do is really just give people that subconscious feeling of like, this isn’t a brand new whitewashed, you know, place. There’s some age here to, to help the community form in the beginning.

Eve: [00:23:11] And so how do you balance, like, modern amenities with this notion of small-town living?

Scott: [00:23:17] Part of that is actually doing your research on amenities and finding out what people want, and then looking at life cycle cost and value to the community. You know, in Houston, we’ve had an amenity arms race over the years, and people in other places in the country are shocked when they hear how low our association fees are compared to the amenities people get. Usually when I say we’re $1,700, they say, oh, $1,700 a month. That’s a that’s a little bit high. But we’ve seen numbers like that, and we say, no, $1,700 a year, is our cost. It’s shocking to people. And so, we wanted to, like we do with so many other things, go counterculture on that a little bit and say, what do people actually want? So, in Houston, every community has a pool, but those pools are only open three months a year. They cost millions of dollars to install, and they cost like a quarter million a year to staff and maintain. And so, we looked at that and said, okay, well, is there really the value? Like I have three elementary aged kids and we have eight pools we can go to in our neighborhood, which is ridiculous. But we go like 5 or 6 times a year. So, the amount of money that I’m paying in HOA fees towards that pool, it probably doesn’t calculate out to where it actually makes sense. And so we decided not to build a pool at Indigo.

Scott: [00:24:35] We have an amenity lake that is like a nature lake that you can swim in that we’re putting a dock on so if you want to swim, you can go there. But also, if you just desperately want to go to a pool, there are private pool clubs in the area, or you can go to a fitness center with a pool and those sorts of things. So, part of it was like getting rid of the big plays. In Houston these crystal lagoons have become all the rage, where people spend $10 million building a beach. You know, it’s an enormous pool, essentially. And we didn’t want to saddle our residents with that kind of debt. And we feel like with those big giant plays may get you a bunch of media coverage, but they’re really risky long term. So, we’ve downsized our amenities and done more of them and spread them out more throughout the community. So, it’s little things like a couple of bocce ball courts here and a natural children’s playground over here, and a small dog park over here, and a meditation maze over here, and some moving water and wind chimes over here. And really just spread those out and diffuse them throughout the community so that they’re more easily accessible. And that’s a part of the walkability. And they’re, I guess, maybe a little more equitably spread out throughout the community too, so that everyone has access to them, but not saddling the community with any specific, really large-scale debt.

Eve: [00:25:55] Yes, yeah. So, who will live there and where are they going to come from?

Scott: [00:25:59] So we did a lot of research at the beginning. We used a company called Kantar that has a giant database of demographics, looked at who lives in our area, which generation do they fall into? And then they even segment each generation by behavior. So, for example, there’s a millennial segment that’s a little more career-oriented, that’s a little more go, go, go. Then there’s another segment. So, I’m in that segment. My business partner Clayton’s in the other segment, which is a little more family oriented, a little more self-care oriented. And so, you know, it’s interesting to see the different segments and how they’re, how they want to live. So, my segment might be happier in a town home in an urban area. My business partner’s, you know, his segment might be a little bit more happy in a home, a smaller home, but with a little bit more of a lot around it and not attached. So, we did that research. Then we went out and looked at who’s in our area of those segments and then designed our home types for them. And then, we actually had 700 people answer a survey with questions about amenities and other things in our community and got amazing feedback from that that we incorporated into what we were doing. And then we took all of that to our home builders and said, here’s really what we want to see for the homes in this area. And we have architectural guidelines that control what they can build. We control the square footage band. We approve the elevations for the homes, what they look like on their facades and all of that. And then the goal is that once we get that done, we can hand it over to the homeowners’ association, and then the control can relax. And we want people to be able to have their own impact on what their home looks like.

Eve: [00:27:46] So how do baby boomers and seniors fit into your plan?

Scott: [00:27:51] Well, I mean, baby boomers are such a huge part of the population right now. And a lot of them, I’m sure everyone’s seen the articles are holding on to to larger homes and not moving out of them. And that’s creating a little bit of a scarcity for homes, for families that are growing. And I think one of the reasons is that they haven’t been given alternatives, other than the age qualified 55 and up communities and we’ve had conversations with a lot of people who don’t want to live in one of those.

Eve: [00:28:19] Me included.

Scott: [00:28:21] Right? They want to be around younger people and specifically probably even their families. And so, at Indigo, we’ve tried to design the community again, where it’s a complete community with opportunities for everyone. So, we looked at what are some good housing types for people who are downsizing, empty-nesters, aging populations. You know, there’s things like more one-story buildings, or if it’s a two-story, try to make sure your primary suites on the ground floor, and then looking at the the walkability for those homes as well. Mobility is different for every different person. But there’s some commonalities and so for people who are a little bit older, having a place to rest every 150ft or so is really critical. And so, we’ve tried to design our walking network so that there is both shade and places to stop and rest as you make your way from your home to the different places throughout the community.

Eve: [00:29:17] So what about cultural and racial diversity?

Scott: [00:29:21] Our county is the second most diverse county in the country after Queens, I think. And so, it is 25% white, 25% Black, 25% Hispanic, and 25% Asian. And the Asian population is incredibly diverse itself with a lot of Indian and Pakistani, Chinese and Vietnamese populations in our area. And so, we feel like, really fortunate to be in a place like that. Yet at the same time, the suburban neighborhoods can still be fairly white in our area. And so I think some of that is like the messaging that you present to the world when you’re asking people to come join you. So, we’ve been really intentional with our marketing team. And we took our entire design team, including marketing through some DEI workshops and learning about cultural differences and how we can approach things maybe differently with that, with cultural differences in mind. And that’s been, I think, really impactful so far in the narrative that we’re telling, making sure that our marketing materials are representative of the communities around us and the people that we are inviting to come join us. And then we’re even working on a home-buyer resources guide. Basically, if people come to try and buy a home in Indigo and are, either think they won’t qualify to buy the home or try and don’t qualify, we have some secondary resources that are designed to overcome the hurdles that people of color and women and other class distinctions have faced in real estate. I mean, I think real estate is in the top 2 or 3, you know, racist and classist…

[00:31:05] Oh yeah,

[00:31:06] Institutions that we have in the country easily. Right? I mean, the prison system.

Eve: [00:31:10] Maybe the top.

Scott: [00:31:11] Yeah. And so, we want to work against those things in every way that we can. And so, we actually are in the process of building out an equity framework for Indigo and looking at like, what are all the spheres of influence that we have and we’re targeting. So, we have eight strategies that we’re ultimately going to be targeting throughout the community for things that we can do to overcome historic barriers to either renting or real estate ownership.

Eve: [00:31:39] Wow! It sounds to me like farmers do a lot of research. You’re used to that. Yeah. So, what have been some of your biggest challenges and disappointments?

Scott: [00:31:49] Challenges and disappointments?

Eve: [00:31:50] Maybe none?

Scott: [00:31:52] Yeah. No, no, we’ve definitely had challenges. I mean, working with the city, everybody told us that our city was like the worst city to work with in Houston. That’s what the development world said. We found them to be great to work with. It just took a lot of work and time to get them convinced of what we were trying to say, but we brought data to them. You know, narrower streets. It’s the fire chiefs don’t like narrower streets because it restricts access, right? So, then we have conversations about, okay, but a narrower street means slower speeds and means less kids die when they get hit by cars. So let’s balance like, how many home fires do you have in your area? Not very many. Okay, well, maybe more kids are being hit by cars and we should balance that out. So, we just went with those things. It took longer than I think we expected, and I think we’d be a little faster next time. But I also think people need time to wrap their heads around things, and you have to give that to them. So that’s maybe one of the big challenges. And then, you know, there’s a bit of a regret, I’ll say, that in the design of the neighborhood, we didn’t like bleed the retail into the residential part more than we did.

Eve: [00:32:56] I was going to ask about that. What is the retail and where is it? Yeah.

Scott: [00:32:59] So, we have what we call Indigo Commons. It’s right next to the farm. It’s surrounded by the neighborhood. But I wish that, you know, we still have like a street as the dividing line between the mixed use and the residential. And I wish that we had been smarter and had retail on both sides of the street, I think, instead of. And so, take more of that corridor mindset than the block mindset when we were looking at land use. And so, that’s a big regret, is like pulling a few little neighborhood retail places, pulling a restaurant to like a busy corner somewhere in the residential section. I mean, all of our homes are within a seven-minute walk of the commons. So, it’s not like you’re that far away, but it still would be nice to have pulled a few things out. So, I think that’s one thing there. You know, definitely on the commercial side, there’s been some challenges. We have what we call our incremental retail buildings. So, we did the whole household formation conversation on the housing side. And we were getting like halfway through the planning of the mixed-use area. And then we said, wait a minute, we need to do the same thing for businesses that we did over there. What about the barbershop that just wants to have two seats and doesn’t need 2000ft²? Why should they be paying for 2000ft² if they don’t need it? So, we did the same thing and started downsizing and right-sizing. And you know, we’re farmers. We’ve known a lot of chefs in Houston because we sold to a lot of them over the years, and just saw too many extractive relationships between landlords and tenant restaurants, where restaurant gets a little bit of press for the chef having great food, and then all of a sudden, they get slammed and they’re just so busy for a month.

Scott: [00:34:40] And then the landlord says, you know what? Your lease is up in a couple months, we’re going to go ahead and double your rent for next year. And that restaurant may not even be making money. They just appear to be busy and got some press. And so, to fight that a little bit, we wanted to have some tenant-owned retail. And so, we’ve designed these incremental retail buildings. It’s an 800 square foot footprint, 2 or 3 stories. So, 1600 or 2400ft² maximum. The bottom floor has to be active retail. We need the foot traffic for those buildings. But then on the second and third floor, it could be more retail. It could be offices. You could live there. You could lease it out as an apartment, whatever you want to do. And we got that through our jurisdictions and approved. So, it is a little bit like a live/work unit in form. But what I’ll say on the live/work units is most of the places people have done those, they’ve been residences first and they’ve been financed as a residence and then just have the retail. We’ve designed ours to where they work with the Small Business Administration’s 504 and 7A loan programs where you can get a 25-year business mortgage on that property, and you can live there and work there or lease it out or whatever. So, we just wanted to provide a bunch of flexibility. And so, that was a little bit of a challenge to get people to wrap their head around. And even the market has taken a little bit, but now we’re really starting to see intense demand.

Eve: [00:36:03] Well wow! I’m really impressed. You guys clearly have thought about absolutely everything. I hope I get to see the community when it’s finished. Is there anything else you want to tell me? I feel like we’ve jumped around everywhere. I’m sure I’ve missed a lot.

Scott: [00:36:18] No, I mean, I think the encouragement I would give to other people working in the space, and you’ve had so many great guests on your podcast. I was actually just listening to my my good friend Jonathan Dodson, to his version, I think, take hope in the fact that there are a lot of people working in this direction right now, and it feels like the tide is shifting a little bit. And thanks in part to people like you, Eve, doing these great communications and, like, sharing this because otherwise, how would we know about all these other people working in these other cities in the same area that we are? And so, I think it’s really, really valuable. And people who are feeling alone in this work out there, reach out to the people on those, like, we’ve had great success connecting with other developers. And, I mean, we flew to Oklahoma City to meet Jonathan, you know, kind of on a whim and then have become really good friends. And so, I encourage people, even if you’re working in this area and you have questions to reach out to us. You know, find us on LinkedIn and reach out and we’ll be happy to chat.

Eve: [00:37:20] Well, this has been delightful. Thank you so much for joining me and spending time. And, um, I do want to know how it ends up.

Speaker3: [00:37:27] We hope to have you down to Houston.

Eve: [00:37:28] I’m a little bit jealous.

Scott: [00:37:31] Well, we’ll look forward to that.

Eve: [00:37:40] I hope you enjoyed today’s guest and our deep dive. You can find out more about this episode or others you might have missed on the show notes page at RethinkRealEstateforGood.co. There’s lots to listen to there. Please support this podcast and all the great work my guests do by sharing it with others, posting about it on social media, or leaving a rating and a review. To catch all the latest from me, you can follow me on LinkedIn. Even better, if you’re ready to dabble in some impact investing, head on over to smallchange.co where I spend most of my time. A special thanks to David Allardice for his excellent editing of this podcast and original music. And a big thanks to you for spending your time with me today. We’ll talk again soon. But for now, this is Eve Picker signing off to go make some change.

Image courtesy of Scott Snodgrass

Pajama Factory

March 25, 2024

✅ $1,000 + Pajama Factory merch + an Invitation to a private rooftop party

✅ $2,500 + stay a night in one of our AirBNB lofts + all the perks above

✅ $5,000 + a free workshop in the woodshop, clay studio, darkroom, or Bicycle recycle shop + all the perks above

✅ $10,000 + stay two nights in one of our AirBNB lofts + take a 10% discount on the purchase price of a condominium unit + all the perks above

✅ $25,000 + take an additional 5% discount on the purchase price of a condominium unit + all the perks above!

Mark and Suzanne Winkelman are building a creative community in an historical and once defunct warehouse in Williamsburg, Pennsylvania.  They are shaping the lofty 300,000 square feet of space into artist studios, residential lofts and artist resources with the goal of a creating thriving creative community. With 60% occupied, they have their sights set on the next phase, this one to include condominium lofts for sale.

They’re looking for investors, small and big alike, just like you, on Small Change.co. And they’re offering some perks as well!


This is not a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities. All investing is risky and involves the risk of total loss as well as liquidity risk. Past returns do not guarantee future returns. If you are interested in investing, please visit Small Change to obtain the relevant offering documents.


Image courtesy of Pajama Factory

Crowdfunding tax credits.

March 13, 2024

Rich Rogers is an urban planner and attorney in Buffalo, New York. As a principal at Urban Vantage, he focuses on creative problem-solving to help public and private sector projects work from concept into financing and implementation. He frequently interfaces with clients, related professionals, and the public to work collaboratively on public and private sector projects. His work at the firm generally includes preparing financial projections and evaluating the applicability and utility of certain incentive programs for specific projects.

In addition to his role as a principal at Urban Vantage, Rich is a Shareholder at Yots Law Firm P.C., where he concentrates his practice on real estate financing closings, particularly in structuring and preparing documents for projects utilizing Historic and New Market Tax Credit Investments and Qualified Opportunity Zone incentives.

Rich also co-founded Common Owner, a web-based platform designed to attract capital to community and economic development projects while democratizing investment opportunities.  And now he has joined Small Change as a shareholder and member of the team.

Richard decided to pursue Urban Planning while hiking on the Appalachian Trail prior to entering his first year of law school. His motivation to become a planner is largely to protect and provide increased access to natural and scenic resources, which frequently includes researching methods and advocating for suburban sprawl prevention. Richard’s academic work focuses on how to use land use and economic laws and policies to conserve land and promote smart growth-oriented (re)development.

Read the podcast transcript here

Eve Picker: [00:00:05] Hi there. Thanks for joining me on Rethink Real Estate. For Good. I’m Eve Picker and I’m on a mission to make real estate work for everyone. I love real estate. Real estate makes places good or bad, rich, or poor, beautiful, or not. In this show, I’m interviewing the disruptors, those creative thinkers and doers that are shrugging off the status quo in order to build better for everyone.

Eve: [00:00:45] Rich Rogers is an urban planner and attorney in Buffalo, New York. In his practice, he focuses on tax credit financing and on creative problem solving to help public and private sector projects work from concept into financing and implementation. Rich is also a real estate developer with a project in lease up on Buffalo’s Main Street. There he’s put his knowledge to good use, converting a 30,000 square foot historic building into modern retail and affordable housing units, and employing every trick in his book to build his super complicated capital stack, which of course includes tax credits. If that’s not enough, Rich has a crowdfunding platform called Common Owner, focused on real estate and you guessed it, crowdfunding tax credits as well. There’s a lot to learn here. You’ll enjoy listening in.

Eve: [00:01:51] Hi, Rich. I’ve been looking forward to this conversation.

Rich Rogers: [00:01:54] Likewise.

Eve: [00:01:55] So what led you to study both law and urban planning?

Rich: [00:02:00] I think there were a couple things that influenced that decision. When I was an undergrad, I was, in the SUNY Model European Union program, traveled to Exeter and Limerick in Ireland and just kind of saw some really great urbanism right up against some really beautiful countryside and, you know, wanted to learn about that and ways to replicate that, you know, here in the States, hopefully. And then also when I was out hiking the Appalachian Trail, I got really into conservation easements and, you know, similar kind of legal concepts where I really wanted to study both things.

Eve: [00:02:50] Interesting. So, what is your specialty in law today?

Rich: [00:02:55] In real estate development and commercial finance, typically representing developers. But, you know, largely focused on tax credit syndication and the monetization of tax credits. So, that includes historic tax credits, new markets tax credits, Low-Income Housing Tax credits, and kind of other subsidies to help close construction financing.

Eve: [00:03:19] So that kind of really puts you in the, I don’t want to say distressed, but I suppose distressed neighborhood realm, doesn’t it? More often than not, with those types of credits.

Rich: [00:03:30] In many cases, I think, particularly in upstate New York there’s a lot of communities that have, you know, eligible buildings, to undertake historic rehabilitation projects. So, we see, we kind of see it all over the map. And in particularly more recently with higher interest rates and high construction costs probably folks looking at using those types of credits who wouldn’t do so maybe a few years ago, you know, as capital kind of gets tighter.

Eve: [00:04:09] Interesting. Okay. So, I know you have a lot of other things cooking. You’re a very busy person. Tell us about your real estate development projects. I think you have done a few of your own, including renovating your own house. Right?

Rich: [00:04:25] Yeah, that’s right. Right now, so we’re undertaking the rehabilitation of the Monroe Building, we’ve called it. It’s the former Record Theater in Buffalo, New York. Roughly $7 million project, roughly 30,000ft². We have 17 apartments that will be affordable to folks making 80% of area median income. And we have, six commercial spaces that kind of range from 750ft² to 5500ft². We have kind of an exciting mix of tenants in there, including a coffee shop. We have a hair salon, some restaurants, some other stuff. So, it’s been a very exciting process, albeit a bit scary closing on the building just before Covid hit.

Eve: [00:05:21] Oh, yeah, that’s really bad timing. So, and how far along are you with the project now?

Rich: [00:05:28] So we are currently pre-leasing apartments for occupancy March 1st. The first ten apartments should go online next month with the other seven to follow, you know, likely in by April. Mid-April. Some of the commercial spaces are just starting construction. We do have several signed leases. We have a couple more commercial spaces to to lease and finish designing. But that lease up should occur over the next couple months with full occupancy by June, I would say.

Eve: [00:06:05] Oh, that’s really exciting. So aside from Covid, what’s been the most challenging thing about this project for you?

Rich: [00:06:12] Yeah. It has certainly been a challenge. I think, you know, Covid, kind of, the outcomes there, right? Certainly, a spike in, in construction costs have been very, very challenging to deal with. We’ve really great general contractor on the job BRD and they kind of worked with us through various value engineering and different kind of iterations of the project, which is unfortunate. On one hand, you hate to value engineer out some really cool amenities and things like that. But at the same time, you know, you need to get the job done, right? So, construction costs were definitely a challenge. I would also say holding costs. I think folks don’t think about that all of the time. You know, the building had a sprinkler system that had, you know, stay heated so the the pipes don’t burst in the winter. And, you know, so we had the gas on for a time. And we have recently, but also had to do propane the one year which got very expensive. Yeah. So, holding costs are tough. And then, you know, obviously interest rates were a big one. Ultimately, we were able to rate lock with our permanent lender. And that’s what kind of finally got us over the hump into the construction loan closing. So, there were a lot of challenges and factors to kind of tackle.

Eve: [00:07:48] So I gotta ask, how are you financing it? Are there any tax credits in there?

Rich: [00:07:54] There are. So, we have both state and federal historic tax credits which are 40% of the qualified rehabilitation expenditures, which includes, you know, most of your construction costs, certain design costs, architecture, etc. We’re working with Chase Bank to monetize credits, Chase Community Equity. They’ve made an investment in the project. They’ll make additional investments once construction is complete, you know, based on the number of credits that we deliver to them. So, we have a master lease structure, it’s called, with Chase Bank, not to get too technical. But so, you know, that ends up being, you know, roughly 20 to 30% of the capital stack at the end of the day.

Eve: [00:08:50] Significant. Yeah.

Rich: [00:08:51] It really is. But it’s, you know, really a necessary gap filler in places like Buffalo, you know, where the rents perhaps aren’t as strong as some other areas. We also are using what’s called the Small Building Participation Loan program through New York State Homes and Community Renewal. That’s a per unit subsidy for us to keep our rents at 80% of AMI on average. So, I believe we got $50,000 per unit, very low interest subordinate loan that closed simultaneous with the construction financing. I guess what’s nice about that program is when you’re doing one of these rehab projects, you’re kind of stuck with the building envelope you have. Right? And so we have some units that are nicer than others, some that, for example, we have two units that don’t have windows. Um, so the fact.

Eve: [00:09:48] I’ve got a building like that.

Rich: [00:09:51] They’ve actually come out great. I really actually prefer some of those units to some of the other ones.

Eve: [00:09:58] Yeah. We have, we have spectacularly big skylights in our windowless units that are just amazing, yeah.

Rich: [00:10:04] Same thing. And so, you know that worked out well. But I guess my point is that the flexibility with this program, where it’s not that every unit has to be below a certain AMI, some can be up to 120% of AMI, So, a couple thousand dollars per month. And then you can have some others that are far below.

Eve: [00:10:25] AMI, for our listeners, stands for?

Rich: [00:10:27] Area Median Income. So, essentially, yeah, there’s a rental rate based on, you know, how much money you take home per household, right?

Eve: [00:10:42] How much you can afford to pay. Yeah, yeah, yeah. So, this is brain damage, this capital stack.

Rich: [00:10:48] It’s a lot. We have another program that’s a permanent loan program through Empire State Development in New York. And that’s a transit-oriented development loan program called the Better Buffalo Fund. It’s funded from Buffalo Billion. And, you know, that provides low interest financing coterminous with the permanent loan. So, it’s a 30-year term. But where our project is on Main Street in Buffalo it’s directly across from a college and it’s very close, maybe a five-minute walk to two, light rail rapid transit stations, which, we only really have the one line that goes under Main Street in Buffalo. But I think this project really helps support that light rail system and, you know, kind of both ways. I think that’s a huge amenity for our project. And then it’s also on several bus lines. So, it’s definitely very transit-oriented.

Eve: [00:11:47] Fabulous. Okay. If that wasn’t enough, you decided to co-found ma real estate crowdfunding platform called Common Owner. What led you to do that? And that was also during Covid, right?

Rich: [00:12:03] Yeah. I would say just before Covid. You know, it’s a bit of a process to start a funding portal. If you’re not familiar, obviously you are, but for listeners who aren’t, it takes quite a long time. So, we started that process before Covid and were able to launch, kind of, during Covid, but, you know, essentially with our legal work and also consulting work and my partners’ consulting work, we found a lot of folks struggling to access capital, right? Under kind of traditional means, you know. Perhaps not having the network to raise the capital or, you know, kind of other challenges around that. So, you know, I think just the complexity around some of the rules raising capital or folks not knowing those rules or realizing them. And so, you know, by creating a crowdfunding platform those folks would then be able to access a broader pool of potential investors to help get their projects done, because in many cases, those projects were quite good. You know, they have grant funding, they had tax credits. They looked a lot better on paper than many projects that we did see getting financed all of the time. They just, you know, didn’t have the access to raise the developer equity. And so that’s something that we wanted to address in addition to, in some cases, monetizing tax credits can be very difficult if the project is smaller in nature. And so, using crowdfunding and bringing in additional partners and investors, you know, allows for some structures to spread out those tax credits a bit and, I think, many people would argue kind of the way that Congress intended with some of these programs. So those were the private and primary motivations behind starting Common Owner.

Eve: [00:14:11] So I’m sort of fascinated by the historic tax credit equity twist on your platform. How does it work? Like, what are the types of offerings that are listed and how does this, how do tax credits weave into crowdfunding?

Rich: [00:14:26] Yeah. Yeah, sure. So, typically in a real estate financing that includes tax credits, you have a tax credit investor that will come in and take 99% of the credits. And there’s very specific IRS rules around the way to structure these types of financings. But typically, a bank, an insurance company, a similar entity will come in and they’ll take 99% of the credits and they’ll put in capital during construction.

Eve: [00:15:02] And they’ll be a limited partner, right? They’re not taking control. They’re just a partner for the purpose of those credits. And then they give you a certain number of pennies on the dollar, right? For the credits, and they turn around and get value for that immediately as a credit against their own taxes, right? That’s why they’re interested. Yeah.

Rich: [00:15:30] Yeah. And so. Right. They have the type of income that these credits work really well to offset and, you know, they know, right, how much income they’re going to have. There’s a lot of things that work well for a bank or an insurance company to invest in these types of projects. Banks also get CRA Community Reinvestment Act credits for doing so. But the issue here is that, in many cases, these tax credit investors want to do the, you know, the smallest number of largest projects possible to reduce their due diligence overhead, asset management overhead, and the types of projects that a lot of cities and villages and urban areas really need are not necessarily these massive, you know, redevelopments of old factories or train stations. Right? They’re these kind of mixed use Main Street buildings and that that creates a challenge. Right? Because these more traditional tax credit investors may not want to be bothered with those smaller deals. So

Eve: [00:16:43] It follows the same pattern that all real estate investors follow. They don’t want to be bothered with smaller deals which are…

Rich: [00:16:51] Absolutely.

Eve: [00:16:52] …so important for our cities. Right?

Rich: [00:16:55] Yeah, absolutely. And I think, crowdfunding, I think, broadens the pool of potential investors, right? In general, but also if you have these tax credits, maybe you don’t need to undertake this highly structured, very complicated, you know, kind of financing where an investor comes in for 99%, especially in many states that have state historic tax credit programs like New York. You know, those credits in New York are refundable meaning that if you don’t have tax liability, the state will write you a check for the overpayment of tax. So

Eve: [00:17:36] Oh, wow.

Rich: [00:17:37] Yeah. So, it makes it a lot more user friendly for regular people to then benefit from some of these credits. But your typical, you know, real estate developer, sponsor, managing member kind of person is going to have a lot of losses, right? From depreciation. And won’t necessarily be able to use these credits. So, by bringing in a lot of different investors you can slice the credits more thinly where they can, you know, hopefully more effectively be used. And I think, you know, one thing with crowdfunding is, folks think about it as a, you know, kind of individual non-accredited investors. That’s kind of who it’s for. And I think that that’s a challenge in the industry right now because I think if you look at SEC data, you know, that’s in many cases you still have mostly accredited investors investing in many of these offerings. And I think really when you’re talking about these tax credits, you know, ideally you have a mix of maybe real estate professionals, some individuals, but then also, you know, starting to have, you know, corporations, maybe banks, you know, some other types of investors investing alongside these other folks to kind of, you know, raise more capital for some of these projects.

Eve: [00:19:04] So instead of a 99% like financial institution, tax credit investor, you could replace that with a crowd of people who own, or get their little pro rata share of however much they invest towards a tax credit which they may be able to use. Yeah.

Rich: [00:19:23] Right. Yeah. So right, you could, I mean there’s all sorts of ways to structure it, right? You could follow that more traditional model of the 99%. And then typically what happens in that type of a structure is after the five-year recapture period for the tax credits, the interest flip, right? So, the investor will take all of, or 99% of the credits for the first five years. And then the investor flips down to some lower amount, maybe 5 or 10% of the interest and in some cases will exit the transaction, right? So, here you might think of, if you’re raising equity anyway, perhaps you’re going to, you know, syndicate 30% of the interest in the deal to investors. You know, maybe instead you sell, you know, 50 or 60%. Those folks, along with the cash flow they would get, you know, may also get some tax credits. And that that can sometimes be a better, you know, or a way…

Eve: [00:20:27] You could also say that you, the developer, keep some of the credits for yourself. So maybe, you know, you keep 40% flow to you and the other 60%. So, there’s lots of ways to skin the cat, basically.

Rich: [00:20:40] Absolutely, absolutely. But it can be a bit more straightforward, I think, than some of these really complicated structures, you know, with hundreds of documents and hundreds of pages of projections and, you know, everything like that, you know, looking more like a more traditional partnership.

Eve: [00:21:03] Interesting. Okay. So, have how many historic tax credit deals have you had on your site and have they been successful?

Rich: [00:21:11] We only have a handful that I would say are really, you know, raising equity for the tax credits. And there’s a couple ongoing right now that you could check out if you go to the site. We haven’t had one fully closed that’s that type of offering, in terms of a regulation crowdfunding offering. We have had several deals closed that, you know…

Eve: [00:21:43] Just plain old crowdfunding.

Rich: [00:21:46] Yeah. Which might have a, right, plain old crowdfunding, but also, some Reg D deals on the platform that have closed that have a tax credit investor, right. A separate tax credit investor, this more traditional method, where the capital that’s being raised is more for that developer equity piece.

Eve: [00:22:10] Interesting. Okay. So, what do you think are the most challenging, the most significant challenges facing less experienced real estate developers?

Rich: [00:22:23] Yeah, I think there’s a lot. I think you know, in my mind maybe several years ago, it was mostly this, this equity piece. And obviously that’s a really significant challenge and problem. But I actually think a really big challenge is guarantees, right? And liquidity and net worth and balance sheet, you know, for folks especially who are starting out, who might, you know, not have a really strong balance sheet, maybe they have a lot of student loan debt or mortgage debt or, you know, something else. Right? Being able to close one of these loans is challenging, right? You’re going to need a partner not only to invest capital, but to also, you know, sign a guarantee and, you know, kind of be recourse on some of the financing. And that can be very, very challenging, especially, you know, for someone starting out to, you know, not only identify that type of partner, but negotiate a deal that still makes it worthwhile to do all of this work and be the general partner in the deal, right? You know, especially with some of these deals and, you know, some of these, I guess tertiary markets, you could say, you know, they’re already very thin from a cash flow perspective. And so, by the time you bring in a partner and dice it up, you know, for the guarantee, and then you also raise your equity, you need you need to really make sure there’s something left for you at the end of the day. And I think that can be a very significant challenge, especially once you get into these deals and perhaps you own the building, and now you’re committed. And, you know, it can be enormously stressful. But yeah, I think that…

Eve: [00:24:19] Also in sort of distressed markets where or softer markets where the returns aren’t as high, but construction costs are probably the same or close to the same. You know, this is why all those little bits of funky funding that you talked about become so important. Because there’s got to be something left for investors, right?

Rich: [00:24:44] Exactly, right. You know I think these subsidies are very important to essentially create a market where one doesn’t necessarily exist, right? In a lot of these geographies. So, but, you know, it doesn’t always quite get there, right? Especially in the, you know, this type of interest rate environment that we’ve seen. So, it’s challenging.

Eve: [00:25:12] So how do you think increasing interest rates are affecting developers in Rust Belt cities like Buffalo and Pittsburgh and…

Rich: [00:25:21] Yeah. I mean, I think it’s been a tough situation, right? Because I think a lot of people didn’t see it coming, obviously. And, you know, it’s made it harder to get deals done. You know, I think I mentioned we were fortunate enough to rate lock on our deal at a good time with our permanent lender, and that ultimately allowed us to get it closed. But, you know, I’ve seen folks who didn’t rate lock who, you know, never ended up closing their deal, right? As rates really climbed up. So that’s a challenge on the front end. But then also, you know, if you did a deal five years ago or ten years ago and that interest rate, resets right at the end of of that loan term, you can get in a, you know, a really bad situation, right?

Eve: [00:26:11] That’s one that I’m actually in. Yeah. I’m smiling because I really want to cry. We have a building which actually reset in mid-January. And fortunately, the upper interest rate was capped, or we would have been paying an additional 1%. So, and fortunately also at this point there are no prepayment penalties. So, if the rates go down we can we can go shopping. But still it’s another $2,000 a month that we have to pay on a building that’s limped its way through Covid, and we’ve had to discount rents and I. That part has brought us to our knees, you know, it’s been, it’s really tough. Yeah.

Rich: [00:26:59] Yeah. It’s really a bad situation, I think, for a lot of folks, especially in some of these deals where they don’t necessarily cash flow well. And, you know, at least in New York State, typically we’ll see these tax abatement programs for real property taxes that burn off in many cases simultaneous with these rate resets, right? So, you know.

Eve: [00:27:24] It’s really hard, it’s really hard. Yeah.

Rich: [00:27:28] So it’s yeah, it’s challenging, but I think that the interest rates have really brought many deals to a halt. I guess the as I mentioned earlier, the interesting counterpoint is, you know, projects that might not have, you know, been looking for tax credits or other subsidies, historically, you know, now might need them to make the numbers work. And some of these, you know, other markets that, you know, perhaps a bit more, stronger rents and things like that as rates go up, you know, those folks start to, to kind of seek these types of subsidies and alternative financing methods.

Eve: [00:28:09] So tell me then, how tax credits, not just historic tax credits, but maybe New Market and I don’t know what else is out there, how tax credits can move the needle for closing construction financing.

Rich: [00:28:23] Yeah. So, in many cases, you can, you know, reduce debt. So here in New York State, we have a brownfield tax credit program which is, again, a refundable tax credit. It’s based on, you know, cleaning up a historically, you know, contaminated site and essentially get a percentage of the overall construction cost that’s capped at either 3 or 6 times the site clean-up costs. Right? So, and there’s all sorts of adjustments. But at the end of the day, you know, that refund can sometimes be a source for the construction lender to pay down their construction loan. Right? So, when that refund comes in on the brownfield tax credit, you could make pay down to convert your financing or, you know, there’s some bridge loan products that folks are able to tap into. Some of the other subsidy programs, you know, New Markets Tax Credits is a very complicated program, but it does generate a nice subsidy if you can kind of get through the brain damage. You know, again, essentially, you’re reducing, you’re really reducing debt, right? And reducing leverage on the product, on the project, bringing in equity that doesn’t necessarily expect a traditional return, let’s say, on capital, which, you know, allows you to fill these gaps in your capital stack and get through construction financing, right? Because you need less debt on the project if you’re able to kind of raise capital by using these tax credits.

Eve: [00:30:09] And then there’s also opportunity zones, which are also another incentive for some investors. Yeah, so tax credits can be really huge, I think. But perhaps not, as you said, for small or non-accredited investors. So, it’s a slightly different market, right?

Rich: [00:30:28] Yeah. It depends, I think to really use the federal tax credits in particular, you have to have the right, you know, tax profile. You know, anyone who’s thinking about planning and trying to use tax credits should really have a long chat with their tax professionals just to make sure that they can use the credits. There’s all sorts of rules around that. And, which again, is creating this more limited market for tax credit, you know, monetization, right? So, but, you know, it varies, right? There’s things like, you know, the real estate professional election, if you’re a real estate professional to, you know, you may be able to use credits in a way that other folks can’t. So, it largely just depends on your tax profile. But that varies so dramatically from person to person, right? So definitely talk to your accountant.

Eve: [00:31:28] Yes. So, back to crowdfunding. What do you think are the biggest challenges for developers who try to crowdfund capital?

Rich: [00:31:37] Yeah, I think there’s a few, right. I think, you know, especially for folks who haven’t raised capital before, I think it’s just a lot harder than people think, right? At the end of the day, it’s really kind of sales, right? You’re selling your project in terms of pitching it to investors and, you know, that’s challenging, especially if you don’t really have the personality where you love sales. That that can be really hard. I think understanding the rules and complexities around crowdfunding and kind of the advertising regulations and prohibitions and stuff, it can be a challenge, right? I think especially for folks who, you know, the rest of the capital stack in many ways is more straightforward, right? Even if you’re going out and getting grant funding, right? And, you know, certainly applying for a construction loan, you know, none of that is all that complicated. Tax credits may be more complicated, but then you get into this capital raising piece that is really very hard work.

Eve: [00:32:57] It’s very hard work. I agree with you.

Rich: [00:32:59] Yeah. And so I think a lot of folks underestimate it.

Eve: [00:33:03] Yeah. Whether you crowdfund it or not, it’s hard work. It’s just different work. Right?

Rich: [00:33:08] Right. And so, kind of understanding those nuances and challenges. And then I think again, you know, being realistic in your anticipations of how much an investor is going to invest. Right? I think what I’ve seen a lot of is folks, you know, kind of have their list and they think that’s going to be sufficient. And then investors will come in and maybe they’re investing half or a third of what they anticipated. And that can leave you in a really tough spot, right? I think there’s definitely this, you know, build it and they will come kind of mentality for some folks. And that’s just not the case. Right? There’s not just people out there waiting to invest in your project in general. Right? You need to really build and cultivate those relationships. So, it’s hard. And especially in this environment.

Eve: [00:34:09] I think it works best when you have developers who understand that it’s just not a one-off thing, that crowdfunding offers them an opportunity to gradually build a group of investors who will follow them from project to project. And that is not just one project. It’s a series of projects. And I think those developers who get that really do best, and they sort of come up with a marketing strategy first with the first project, and they figure out what works for them and what doesn’t. And it can be wildly different for different people depending on where your network lives. Does it live on social media or the local coffee shop? You know, very, very different. So, I don’t know, I think, I wish people understood that instead of sort of believing, it’s just as you said, you just build it and they will come because it really doesn’t work that way. It’s really…

Rich: [00:35:10] Yeah, I agree. I also think that, you know, in some cases, I think folks who are, you know, really new or inexperienced or, you know, developing real estate, don’t realize that they’re selling securities and that they’re even, you know…

Eve: [00:35:30] And that was the other question I had for you.

Rich: [00:35:30] These rules, yeah.

Eve: [00:35:33] And then they have to follow the rules when they have these investors and they, you know, they need to do what they offered to do. You know, they need to follow through, you know. So

Rich: [00:35:45] Yeah, exactly. And so I think that’s a big challenge, telling people that they have to follow all these rules. And, you know, folks can sometimes get pretty defensive about that if they’re really confident that they’re right. And so, I think for that reason and, you know, it’s still fairly new, right? And I think, you know, I certainly thought that the crowdfunding, the equity crowdfunding space would take off faster than it has. But I think, you know, when you combine the fact that some people in real estate don’t realize that they’re selling securities when they’re raising capital and, that, you know, this is, you had this really long period with no changes to the securities laws, right? I think there’s still a lot of absorption that’s still kind of starting to happen. I do think, you know, over the last five years, there has been, you know, a broader swath of the population that’s hearing about crowdfunding and excited about it but I think there’s still, you know, we’re kind of scraping the tip of the iceberg, so to speak.

Eve: [00:36:53] Yeah, I agree. Are there any warts to the regulation crowdfunding rule that really irritate you? I have some!

Rich: [00:37:03] Yeah. I mean. I think, you know, the audited financial requirements. And I think they have made some good changes over time in terms of a lot of the rules that have bothered me. But, you know, just the cost of the financial statement audits.

Eve: [00:37:26] The financial statements. Yeah. So, I think what’s most upsetting about those, for, again for our listeners, is that there’s a financial review or an audit required if you want to raise more than $125,000. And that was, you know, I suppose that this rule was really intended for small businesses that were already operational. So, sharing financials makes sense. But in real estate, you typically have a brand-new inception entity that has done nothing. And often it’s formed right before the property is purchased. So now you’re spending money on a financial review or an audit of a whole bunch of zeros, and you can’t get out of it. It’s a regulation, right? It’s just, it’s very silly. And even for a small business, that’s a pretty high bar. You know, that’s a very high bar and I’m not sure that anyone looks at them.

Rich: [00:38:24] Yeah, except for us. Right. I think most investors. Well, it’s a bit hard to say, but, you know, also there’s a lot of rules and regulations around forward-looking statements and not being able to have these types of projections essentially, which is ironic because, as an attorney, you know, closing these tax credit deals, the projections really drive the deal, right? You have this set of 70-page projections and everyone spends hours and hours and hours poring over them, from the investor to the lender to the developer and all of their counsel, right?

Eve: [00:39:08] But it doesn’t mean that you can’t present a cash flow picture and an operational budget. You just can’t project an internal rate of return. You could, you can show investors how much free cash there is. You can show people exactly what the project is going to do, but you can’t, and an experienced investor is looking for internal rate of return, they’ll have to figure it out themselves. Right? That’s…

Rich: [00:39:36] Right. And I guess my point being is that, you know, on some of these other deals with these, granted, more institutional types of investors, that’s a specific, that rate of return is a really material thing that everyone is commenting on and adjusting the deal terms to accommodate, right? So, you definitely have a different kind of framework there. So that’s a challenge. I think the advertising, you know, rules and, you know, the way that these offerings can be marketed, I think could just maybe be a bit more clear for some of the issuers and the folks trying to raise capital, I think they’re a little confusing as well. And so then, folks, you know, don’t want to do something wrong. So they’re very scared about it. So, yeah.

Eve: [00:40:34] But Rich, we still love this rule, right?

Rich: [00:40:37] Yeah. No, I mean, I think the way it opens up, you know, access to investors is absolutely transformative and really important. Right?

Eve: [00:40:48] It is, it is.

Rich: [00:40:48] Even, you know, in spite of all the challenges that we’ve been discussing for much of the call, I think it’s really important. And I do think, you know, the thing that maybe gives me the most hope is that many of the changes that were subsequently made to the rule, I do think were really helpful in terms of, you know, the accredited investors and the special purpose entities and, and all sorts of changes. So, I think that there is, I’m cautiously optimistic about the future of the rule.

Eve: [00:41:25] We hope it will go mainstream, right? Okay. So, uh, just to finish up, what’s next for you?

Rich: [00:41:35] So, I have one more real estate development.

Eve: [00:41:40] This is a loaded question, too, right?

Rich: [00:41:45] Yeah, I have one more real estate development project, and then I am done developing real estate. I will be retiring from that aspect of my life. But, I’m actually looking forward to joining the Small Change team with some of my colleagues and really excited about working with you, Eve and your team, moving forward.

Eve: [00:42:10] And we’re very excited too. We think together we’ll be stronger, bigger, more mainstream, maybe.

Rich: [00:42:18] Hopefully.

Eve: [00:42:19] Well, thank you very much, Rich. And I actually can’t wait to see your project in Buffalo. I’ve got to go up and take a look.

Rich: [00:42:28] Yeah, it’s really exciting.

Eve: [00:42:29] It sounds fabulous.

Rich: [00:42:30] Yeah, it’s a beautiful building.

Eve: [00:42:35] Thank you very much for joining us.

Rich: [00:42:38] Thanks Eve.

Eve: [00:42:47] I hope you enjoyed today’s guest and our deep dive. You can find out more about this episode or others you might have missed on the show notes page at RethinkRealEstateforGood.co. There’s lots to listen to there. Please support this podcast and all the great work my guests do by sharing it with others, posting about it on social media, or leaving a rating and a review. To catch all the latest from me, you can follow me on LinkedIn. Even better, if you’re ready to dabble in some impact investing, head on over to smallchange.co where I spend most of my time. A special thanks to David Allardice for his excellent editing of this podcast and original music. And a big thanks to you for spending your time with me today. We’ll talk again soon. But for now, this is Eve Picker signing off to go make some change.

Image courtesy of Richard Rogers

Big change for Small Change.

March 6, 2024

SmallChange.co Expands, Welcomes Five Partners With Expertise in Regulation Crowdfunding


PITTSBURGH – March 6, 2024 – SmallChange.co, an investment crowdfunding platform focused on real estate development with social impact, has expanded significantly with the addition of five partners. All have extensive experience in regulation crowdfunding: Their track record includes the establishment of Common Owner, a Buffalo-based crowdfunding platform with a specialization in real estate.

The five include Julian Anjorin, a serial entrepreneur with a strong background in cybersecurity; Derek King, who specializes in historic preservation; Richard Rogers, an urban planner and attorney; Mitchell Skomra, a software engineer; and Jacob Walsh, who has substantial experience in operations management. All are based in Buffalo except for Anjorin, who lives in North Carolina.

Anjorin will oversee web development and support for the Small Change platform and business applications used for operations. King will focus on early-stage business development, with a primary emphasis on real estate developers and pipeline partners.  Rogers will assist issuers with structuring their offerings, review and negotiate contracts, and handle a variety of compliance functions. Skomra will work with Anjorin on web development, and Walsh will guide issuers through the onboarding process and manage the company’s books.

“Reg CF platforms for real estate are thin on the ground, but Small Change has been growing rapidly,” says Eve Picker, founder and CEO. “Julian, Derek, Richard, Mitchell, and Jacob are joining us at a pivotal time. They are bringing additional resources, deal flow, and a lot more brain power, all of which will help us to accelerate speed to launch and greatly expand our offerings and support for developers and investors alike.”

She adds: “They are committed – as I am – to bringing equity to the world of equity. And they have the skills and experience to turn this commitment into serious progress in the real estate industry.”

“We love the potential of crowdfunding as much as Eve does,” says Anjorin. “It provides opportunity for those who may not have access to traditional banking channels for finance and allows developers to access capital through Reg CF. The world is not fair, and it probably won’t ever be, but we’ll be damned if we don’t try to balance the financial scales a bit. We’re going to make sure that Small Change evens them out.”


About Small Change

SmallChange.co has helped 47 developers raise more than $13 million for projects in 26 cities, big and small, across the United States. SmallChange.co uses its proprietary Small Change Index™ to  measure a broad array of factors to determine the project’s social impact with the goal of creating more affordable, more equitable and more innovative communities. To date, 62% of the deals funded via the Small Change platform have either a minority and/or female sponsor, and all of them score above 60% on the Small Change Index.  Additionally, 68% of the mixed-use or residential projects listed on the platform have included affordable housing, and almost 90% have been located in underserved communities.

For more information on SmallChange.co, please visit www.smallchange.co or email [email protected].

Media Contact:
Rachel Antman, Saygency
[email protected] or (212) 362-5837


NSSC Funding Portal, a SEC registered Funding Portal and member of FINRA, offers investments under Regulation Crowdfunding or Title III, per Section 4(a)(6) of the Securities Act. These investments are offered to everyone 18 or over.

This is not a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities. The projects illustrated above may not be indicative of all projects on the platform. All investing is risky and includes the risk of loss. Securities are subject to liquidity risk and cannot be easily converted to cash. *Past returns do not guarantee future returns. If you are interested in learning more, please visit Small Change for educational material and detailed offering information. You can always say [email protected].


Image by Ivanka Nikitovic via Vecteezy.com (modified)

Reclaiming Control.

February 28, 2024

Adriana Abizadeh is the executive director of the Kensington Corridor Trust (KCT) in Philadelphia. The mission, duty and purpose of the KCT is to help the Kensington community reclaim control over a once thriving commercial corridor by reactivating real estate, fostering local entrepreneurship and reinvesting capital in the neighborhood.

With deep interests in public policy Adriana has taken every opportunity to utilize her privileged position as a nonprofit leader in order to speak out for what she believes in and to lift the voices of impacted community members. Immersed in policy initiatives, she has facilitated community collaboration to address the intersectionality between immigration status, housing, poverty, and race.

All of Adriana’s professional working experience has been in the nonprofit sector and she is passionate about serving others. Adriana has a BA from Rutgers University in Political Science with a minor in Security Intelligence and Counter Terrorism. She also has an MS in Public Policy from Drexel University. She has committed herself to serving on several boards that reflect some of her deepest passions: immigration, racial and health equity, and youth development. When Adriana isn’t serving her community, she is at home with her two children and two dogs.

Read the podcast transcript here

Eve Picker: [00:00:06] Hi there. Thanks for joining me on Rethink Real Estate. For Good. I’m Eve Picker and I’m on a mission to make real estate work for everyone. I love real estate. Real estate makes places good or bad, rich, or poor, beautiful, or not. In this show, I’m interviewing the disruptors, those creative thinkers and doers that are shrugging off the status quo in order to build better for everyone.

Eve: [00:00:39] Adriana Abizadeh is the executive director of the Kensington Corridor Trust in Philadelphia. You might wonder what that is and why it exists. Kensington was once known as the workshop of the world, with booming manufacturing and a well employed neighborhood. Then Kensington Avenue was a bustling local business corridor. Now there is a lack of economic investment and everything that comes with it. 58% of Kensington residents live below the federal poverty line, and the average household annual income is just over $20,000. Formed in 2020, the trust is tasked with reclaiming control of the corridor. They do this through the purchase of property, which is placed in trust and governed by the neighborhood. Neighborhood trusts are fairly new, but if Adriana has her way, they will become mainstream. Listen in to learn more.

Eve: [00:01:51] Hi, Adrianna. Thanks for joining me today.

Adriana Abizadeh: [00:01:55] Good morning. Thanks for having me.

Eve: [00:01:57] So, unwavering commitment to reclaiming control of the business corridor. That’s the bold statement on your website. What corridor are we talking about? And? And how do you reclaim or regain control?

Adriana: [00:02:13] Absolutely. Yeah. So, we are talking about the Kensington Avenue corridor in the Kensington neighborhood of Philadelphia. And for us, reclaiming control is really a couple of different elements, but all focused on community control. So, reducing vacancy, bringing new businesses into the space with an emphasis on a focus on businesses that are coming from within the neighborhood and then providing affordable residential spaces also on that very same corridor.

Eve: [00:02:40] So when did the need for control become clear and why?

Adriana: [00:02:47] Yeah. So, KCT was formed in 2019. The Kensington Corridor Trust, we were formed in 2019. I would say the need probably became clearer probably sometime in the five years before that and maybe even longer before that. But it was watching, kind of, the wave of gentrification in some of the neighboring neighborhoods following the elevated train, which we call the L, and acknowledging that at some point Kensington would be next. We’d already begun to see at that time some active redevelopment from private developers. Still not a ton of city investment, some nonprofit investment but even with all of that there was still very large vacancy rates, a lot of properties with absentee landlords or not in active use at all. And so it was this mixed space where there was deep investment alongside disinvestment. And so, in 2019 we were formed.

Eve: [00:03:42] So was the next space, right? The next edge. But what did the Kensington corridor, what was it like previously? How did it shift over the last several decades?

Adriana: [00:03:42] Like decades ago?

Eve: [00:03:53] Yeah.

Adriana: [00:03:54] Yes. So, like many neighborhoods, we were one of the workshops of the world. So, it was a manufacturing and factory space, textiles, among other things. And, you know, as we saw that boom kind of shudder and leave spaces like Philadelphia and other major urban centers, we saw increased vacancy. We also saw white flight, and then we saw affordability emerge. And so, the neighborhood is now and has been for several decades, predominantly black and brown, fairly low average household median income around 25,000 a year, which is half of the city of Philadelphia’s AMI, which is at around $54, $55,000 a year. You know, just alongside the disinvestment in the work and the employees leaving, there was also then disinvestment in the neighborhood in itself. And so that’s where we began to see a rise in the vacancy, which then led to an increase in crime, you know, and it kind of trickled from there.

Eve: [00:04:46] All the things that follow. So, what is the Kensington corridor? Is it primarily retail? Is there housing, office, like, what sort of uses are along there?

Adriana: [00:04:55] Absolutely. So, it’s predominantly commercial mixed use. So, most of the buildings are commercial on the first floor with residential on the second and third story. Some of the blocks are two stories. Some of the blocks are three story. But it’s predominantly commercial mixed use.

Eve: [00:05:07] How long is the area that you’re working on?

Adriana: [00:05:11] So we are a 1.4-mile-long corridor, but we’re actively acquiring on three blocks. So, we are using a strategy of density for acquisition.

Eve: [00:05:20] So you launched actually something called the Kensington Corridor Trust and when did it launch?

Adriana: [00:05:27] It was formed in 2019, and then I was hired as inaugural ED in 2020.

Eve: [00:05:32] Okay, so it’s pretty young?

Adriana: [00:05:34] It is. Yes. Still infants.

Eve: [00:05:36] The primary goal you’re trying to accomplish and the target market…

Adriana: [00:05:41] Is community wealth building. Yeah. So, we are trying to have localized ownership and control of the real estate to preserve affordability and localized control. So, making sure that the folks who have lived there historically have access and control over those spaces.

Eve: [00:05:52] So the target market is the people in the neighborhood, like, how do you stop other people from buying in, like…

Adriana: [00:05:58] You can’t.

Eve: [00:05:59] You can’t, right? So let me step back a bit. What is a neighborhood trust? What is the Kensington Corridor Trust and exactly how does it work legally and financially?

Adriana: [00:06:10] Absolutely. So, a neighborhood trust legally is the combination of a 501(c)(3) and a Perpetual Purpose Trust. So, it’s that hybrid construct between those two entities that creates the neighborhood trust model. And then in terms of the way that we operate, we have two governing bodies, both of which are fully comprised of residents and small business owners in the neighborhood. So, of the 19134-zip code, specifically. We touch six census tracts along that 1.4-mile-long corridor. So, in those there’s about 32,000 residents. Again, average household median income about 25,000 a year. On the 1.4-mile-long corridor there are over 600 assets. In our current target acquisition space, which are those three blocks, there’s a little over 100 assets. KCT is in the process of closing on its 20th property now. So, we hold about one fifth of what’s in that three target blocks. When we get to about 40 to 60% of ownership on those blocks, we’ll then begin to move outward one block at a time in each direction towards the outer boundaries of the 1.4 miles. Again, density strategy.

Eve: [00:07:12] So it’s a neighborhood trust. The neighborhood trust owns the property. The governing organizations are also people from the neighborhood in perpetuity. So it can be no one else who controls the property. That’s essentially…

Adriana: [00:07:25] Correct.

Eve: [00:07:25] Do I have that right?

Adriana: [00:07:26] Yes. Yeah. So, a perpetual purpose trust, which is the part that most folks are not as familiar with. Most folks understand the 501(c)(3) non-profit model. In a perpetual purpose trust, you can protect assets perpetually for a purpose. And so, the assets that we are protecting are real estate for collective ownership and localized control and affordability. And then for that purpose that I just mentioned. And so, once the assets go in, they cannot come out.

Eve: [00:07:50] And how do you decide who is on the governing board?

Adriana: [00:07:54] We hold open democratic elections annually. So actually, we’re in open cycle right now. So, anyone from the neighborhood is eligible to apply or be nominated, either, again, as a resident or the owner of a small business. And then the existing governing body selects the folks that applied, bring them in, and then we do rotating cycles so that we’re not losing institutional knowledge as terms are ending.

Eve: [00:08:15] Wow, okay! You said the trust owns about 20 properties now. Total square feet?

Adriana: [00:08:22] Each property is about 2200ft² on average. Typically, 16 foot frontages and 65 foot runs back, in terms of depth. Most of our properties are three-story. We hold a couple of two-story properties, and then we also hold some vacant land which we steward in a community garden. So, we have an 11 lot pollinator garden that we steward directly on the corridor.

Eve: [00:08:42] So these are all pretty tiny properties actually. They remind me of what’s called sliver buildings in Pittsburgh, which are slightly larger.

Adriana: [00:08:50] That’s exactly right. Yes.

Eve: [00:08:50] 20 by 100. Yeah.

Adriana: [00:08:53] Yeah, that’s actually larger. These are small. These are typically 16 by 65.

[00:08:57] Slightly. And what condition are most of these properties when you buy them. And do you renovate them yourselves? I mean, do you have your own development arm. How does that work?

Adriana: [00:09:10] Yes. So, most of the properties are requiring gut rehab. Some of the properties we’re acquiring are coming from private developers, so we’re exiting them so that they can move on and be extractive somewhere else. And so…

Eve: [00:09:23] Not all developers are extractive. Come on.

Adriana: [00:09:26] Not all of them. Just the ones that we’re dealing with, just the ones we’re dealing with. But when we do exit something from a private developer, typically it doesn’t require rehab, and we’re able to pull it back into affordability, right? So, for example, we just acquired a property where the commercial tenant was paying $1300 a month, and we’re going to be able to bring their rent down to $950. So, it is a significant difference in terms of the relationship that I think they’re having with a neighborhood stewarded trust. And then the other assets that we’re acquiring that require a gut rehab, we have a construction project manager that oversees the subcontractors, and we directly sub out the different aspects of the work and get the project back online and activate it as quickly as possible. And then the commercial tenants that are coming into those spaces are approved by the neighborhood. So, we do a ton of community engagement to ensure that the neighborhood wants that business on their corridor before moving someone in and signing a lease.

Eve: [00:10:16] Are the people who come in as commercial tenants sometimes from the neighborhood?

Adriana: [00:10:21] Yes.

Eve: [00:10:21] Like, do you help them with their businesses and growing sufficiently to be able to manage a space like that?

Adriana: [00:10:27] Yes. So, a couple of things. Most of the folks that have come to us so far are from the neighborhood. Most of those folks are folks of color and more than half of them identify as immigrant as well and we have several women owned businesses. And so, those folks, most of them, as I said, have come from the neighborhood. Most of it has been fairly organic. So, folks are referring them to us, we’re having a conversation. The other thing to keep in mind, as we talked about the square footage of the space, these are on average very small spaces. So about 850 square foot frontages on the commercial space. So, they’re small operators.

Eve: [00:11:00] That would be really big in Paris.

Adriana: [00:11:03] Ah, okay. See, all relative.

Eve: [00:11:04] It’s all relative.

Adriana: [00:11:06] For Philly it’s a small footprint.

Eve: [00:11:07] Yeah it is small. That can be good for someone who’s starting out. That’s just way less to take on.

Adriana: [00:11:13] That’s exactly right. So, a lot of the operators that we’ve brought in thus far are single owner, you know, member LLCs. They are figuring out something. Maybe they’ve tried it in a different space. Maybe they’ve been a maker inside their home, and they’re now at the space in the capacity where they’re ready to transition into a bricks and mortar. So, it’s been really exciting for our organization and our partner organizations to support them in, you know, gaining access to physical space, but also ensuring that their business is ready and that they, as entrepreneurs, have the wraparound services that they need to be successful and thrive in that space.

Eve: [00:11:46] And so the properties that you’re purchasing, do you hope to eventually have control of most of the properties in those three blocks?

Adriana: [00:11:54] Yeah. So ideally, we want to hold between 40 and 60%. So KCT, right, when we talked about earlier about like how do you stop other people from coming in. We can’t. That’s not what KCT is doing. I think at the Kensington Corridor Trust, our focus has been on protecting as much as we can by preserving the affordability and the local control, acknowledging that there’s always going to be outside development, there’s going to be city development, and also there’s going to be individual owners, which we want to continue to own and steward their spaces on the corridor, right? We are not trying to exit individual owners who are, you know, operating their business out of their space or, you know, making their own individual generational wealth out of the space. We’re interested in taking on the spaces that no one is activating, or that are highly extractive.

Eve: [00:12:35] Okay. So, then on to financing. How do you finance these projects?

Adriana: [00:12:40] Yes. So, we look at it from kind of like two worlds, if you would. We do have a 501(c)(3). So, we are able to take in subsidy in grants. At this time, we’re not using government funding, so it is all private foundation dollars. And then on the debt side, we’re using program-related investments or PRIs, also known as mission, aligned investments from foundations, from their endowment. And that allows us the space to be able to do the rehab on the, you know, do the acquisition, do the rehab on the properties, reactivate them before we’re moving into repayment. So, we have longer runways on the front end of those debt terms that do either interest only or interest only deferred followed by the P&I. And then there’s a balloon. Most of our terms are between 10 and 15 years. All of our debt is at 2% or below. So, we’re between 0 and 2% interest on all of our debt.

Eve: [00:13:31] Pretty good.

Adriana: [00:13:31] It’s been really, really great. Challenging to scale, but very, very good in terms of the projects and making sure that we can sustain affordability.

Eve: [00:13:39] Okay. So, tell us about a successful project that you’re particularly proud of.

Adriana: [00:13:46] Hmm. Well, one that we have in the pipeline that we’re particularly proud of is not at full fruition yet. We are bringing a small grocery store to the corridor. So, when I first started working at the Kensington Corridor Trust in 2020, you know, I was trying to learn about the neighborhood, meet with residents, meet with small business owners, and the single thing that I kept hearing over and over in every room, different rooms, you know, different people, was, we need a grocery store, we need a grocery store, we need a grocery store. And the second thing that folks were saying is we need more spaces for our youth to engage in positive and healthy spaces after school and on weekends. And so, for the last few years, we’ve been working at trying to figure both of those out. The youth element was a little bit of a lower hanging fruit because there are already partners in the space who, you know, in the neighborhood, rather, who are already doing youth programming. And so, it was a matter of partnering with them, making that activation at our garden, which we now do successfully and have for two seasons, two garden seasons. The grocery store was a harder lift. One, because of the square footage of the buildings, right? We just talked about the average square footage of a building at 2200ft² across, three stories.

Eve: [00:14:49] Right?

Adriana: [00:14:50] Two, parking. Right? So, it’s a very busy and bustling corridor in terms of commuters and for the businesses that are operating. And so, parking is very challenging. And then a loading dock, there really aren’t any buildings that have loading docks on the corridor to bring the grocery pallets in and out. So, last year we stumbled on a gem that came up for sale on the market. There was an artist who had been using it as his studio, his artist design studio, for the last 20 years, and he was moving towards retirement and put his property up for sale. That property is about 3400ft² across two stories. So, it’s a much larger run.

Eve: [00:15:24] Huge!

Adriana: [00:15:24] Yeah, it’s a much larger run than the average building on the corridor for us. And so, we were very excited to bring that in. Just right after we brought it in and we found a local operator. So, this gentleman grew up in the neighborhood, has been operating his business in the neighborhood, doing food imports and exports and is going to move into the grocery space and then is also going to operate a commercial kitchen on the second story, a shared commercial kitchen. And so, we’re really, really excited for that project.

Eve: [00:15:54] That’s a great project!

Adriana: [00:15:55] Yes, it’s going to be super great. The neighborhood is excited. It’s accessible by transit, so it’s literally right outside of the train station. So, for folks who are riding the El it’s been very well accepted and regarded and welcomed by the residents. And we’re really, really excited to bring it online, hopefully by winter of this year.

Eve: [00:16:14] Sounds terrific. So how do you engage community members and stakeholders, so they know what you’re doing and become part of this trust?

Adriana: [00:16:23] There’s a couple of ways. Traditional organizing and engagement, right? Going out, canvassing, being present at events, making sure that we’re visible. All of our staff at this point, right when we’re out on the corridor with our swag, with our KCT-shirts, everyone’s like, oh, hi! Like, you know, we’re very known just from walking so much up and down the corridor. That’s one way. The other way is through our partners. So, engaging in partnership and collaboration as much as we can, right? We’re a very small entity in comparison to some of the larger nonprofits that exist in the space and so really leveraging and pulling shared resources together for events and for activities and programming has been really, really helpful. And then the last way I’ll say, has really been around policy advocacy. Right? So, in addition to thinking about perpetual ownership, we’re also thinking about public policy and systems change. And what does it mean? Or what does it look like to have residents engaged and small business owners engaged in that work? And so, we do have a full-time organizer on staff who’s leading our engagement work, but also doing our policy advocacy. And so, we’ve engaged with a lot of folks in that way, because people want to see change in the neighborhood. And they, you know, we all have a vision for what we want. And so, bringing those folks at City Hall to do testimony and meeting with legislators and council, and having them hear directly from the folks on the ground. So, I think through those kinds of three different avenues, we’ve been pretty successful in engaging with folks.

Eve: [00:17:39] So that was going to be my next question. Is the city of Philadelphia supportive of the trust and its goals and how?

Adriana: [00:17:45] Yeah, I think the city has been supportive. I was invited to be on the Mayor’s Transition Committee for Economic Development this past winter. I think we have a strong presence in the city of Philadelphia as a new and innovative model. What I think we haven’t quite cracked the code on is determining funding and land, so.

Eve: [00:18:03] I was going to ask about that.

Adriana: [00:18:04] City of Philadelphia has a land bank and so we are working with our local councilwoman who was recently elected. So, a new rep to determine how we can move forward with doing that, with unlocking some of these properties that sit within the target boundaries of where we’re currently doing acquisition, and then trying to learn more and be in the right spaces and places with the right people at the right time to determine how we can unlock some funding from the city of Philadelphia. And I think we’re getting closer every day but, you know, when we look at other cities across the country, you know, some cities are making multi-million-dollar investments into innovative trust structures. That has not yet been the case in Philadelphia. But I am very, very hopeful that we can unlock some land and some dollars to make this work possible.

Eve: [00:18:46] So is the Kensington Corridor Trust unique in Philly or anywhere?

Adriana: [00:18:53] It is, yeah. So, it’s the only one in Philly and then the other folks who are using the same legal infrastructure and also building a neighborhood trust structure are based in Kansas City, Missouri. And we both formed around the same time. They’re very focused on the residential aspect, we’re more focused on the commercial aspect but we use the same legal infrastructure and back end and we’re both neighborhood trust models. But, outside of us, to our knowledge, there are no others.

Eve: [00:19:16] Should there be more of you?

Adriana: [00:19:18] I think so. We at KCT have been very cautious. Just to say, let us make sure that this is sustainable first, before we begin to replicate. We don’t think that neighborhoods are stomping grounds for experiments. So, we want to make sure that this is viable and sustainable and that it has impact, and that it can be governed locally and that you can, you know, secure sufficient funding and land to make it work long term. I think we’re still maybe another year or 2 or 3 out from that determination. But we have conversations with communities across the United States and some international conversations as well, regularly. Just like, what would it look like to replicate this? What does it look like to scale it in Philadelphia? I think folks are very interested in the model and particularly in the governance and the financing of the work. And so, we, on our website, we have a document center where we share all of our learnings, and we’re dropping reports on a fairly regular basis. We define common terms, because it’s not just there for folks who are looking at our model externally, it’s also there for residents who want to understand and learn more about the work as well. And so we try to make sure that it’s very transparent and that it’s easy to access and to grasp.

Eve: [00:20:23] Do you think, is there another neighborhood in Philly that you think is ripe for a trust like this? I’m sure you’ve thought about it.

Adriana: [00:20:32] Yeah. And there’s several that have approached us. I think there are some that could be ready. I think one of the things, I think there are two things. One is, it should come from the residents. Right? So, it should really come from the folks who are there who have lived there historically, those legacy residents and those legacy business owners wanting to preserve and protect for themselves. So that’s part one. So, you have to have like a ready neighborhood. Those folks are ready to go. The second part is the financing of the model. Right? Like going out to national foundations and securing these program-related investments is not light work. And it’s not for the light-hearted. And so, you know, having folks who are ready and prepared to do that work and to make those pitches and to have those very financial conversations alongside, you know, the societal impact conversations. So, yeah, there’s a couple that come to mind, but I wouldn’t name one specifically now. I would say that there are some who are already exploring and thinking about it. And, you know, we want to be of support wherever we can. To all of those folks.

Eve: [00:21:30] You mentioned that you have a small team. How big is your team?

Adriana: [00:21:34] There are four of us as of January 2nd.

Eve: [00:21:37] Small but mighty, right?

Adriana: [00:21:39] Small but mighty. So, it’s myself, the construction project manager, the lead community organizer, and then we just brought on a part-time operations assistant in January, just to give us a little bit of extra capacity boost for everybody to get their projects across the line.

Eve: [00:21:52] And how big were you when you started? Just you?

Adriana: [00:21:57] One. Just me. For the first two years, it was just me.

Eve: [00:22:00] That’s pretty decent growth, right?

Adriana: [00:22:02] Yes, I think so. Slowly but surely.

Eve: [00:22:06] So what excites you most about the work you are doing?

Adriana: [00:22:11] Mhm. Really the community-led aspect, right. So, I’m an organizer by background. I have a public policy background, which is what attracted me to this work and to exploring the development of the neighborhood trust model. But to me, there’s nothing more exciting than folks leading the way forward, the folks who are most closely impacted, the folks who know the best solutions to the work, and to the issues and the challenges. That’s the best part. Like, our governance is amazing and bar none. I love working with the residents and small business owners to design and to determine what it is that they want done, and for our team to just go and implement it and serve as the stewards.

Eve: [00:22:44] I hope people are listening to this because a lot of people are very scared of that.

Adriana: [00:22:48] Oh no, I mean, it’s my favorite part. It really is.

Eve: [00:22:52] But I mean, working with people who don’t necessarily have the skills or understanding around real estate development, that can be really tough.

Adriana: [00:23:01] Yeah, it can be, 100%. And we’re so grateful to have funders that have supported us in doing governance education. So, we’ve brought in outside facilitators to have discussions with our boards around the different issues where they felt they could have some skill strengthening. Right.? So, thinking about how to make a real estate deal, right? When do you know something is the right acquisition? How do you, you know, put together your portfolio. But even other things like marketing and communications and thinking about social media and press hits, you know. Development and fundraising, making a pitch, right, like all of those things, if you haven’t served on a board before or if this isn’t an area where you’ve had space.

Eve: [00:23:36] It’s all new. It’s all new.

Adriana: [00:23:38] All new, right? And so, making sure that folks feel like they are equipped to support our staff team, but also each other and the broader neighborhood in executing the work. But, yeah, I think so, oftentimes, particularly in the nonprofit sector, we feel like, you know, you’ve got to have the attorney, the HR consultant, you’ve got to have a finance expert to be your treasurer. Right? Like all of these things are necessary. And it’s just so untrue. You can bring in those external supports to make sure that the folks who are closest to the works are the decision makers, but that they have expertise at their side when they’re making those decisions.

Eve: [00:24:10] So you don’t have any requirements for skills for the governance board?

Adriana: [00:24:14] We do not. Open applications every year. The only requirement is that you live in or have a small business in the neighborhood. Outside of that, there are no formal requirements for skill sets or education or anything else.

Eve: [00:24:28] So looking ahead ten years, what potential do you think trusts like this hold?

Adriana: [00:24:33] Yeah. One, I think preserving pockets of affordability. Right? The private development is coming, city development is coming. Individualized donor development is coming. And so, I think, you know, making sure that the folks who have lived in a certain space in place historically can afford to continue doing so. And so, reducing some displacement is my hope. I think scaling is definitely viable in ten years. Right? So, thinking not just only in Philly, but also in other places and spaces, and acknowledging too that the model is not a one size fits all, right? You can use this legal infrastructure in back end, and you can think about neighborhood-led governance and work on residential. Right? Strictly residential, as they’re doing, you know, trust neighborhoods out in Kansas City, Missouri. Or, you know, potentially other uses. Maybe you use it just for green spaces, right? Like we’ve been able to integrate. Right? So, we’re working on residential and commercial and green space. But you know, you could have focuses based on the needs of any specific neighborhood or place at any given time. And then my hope is that ten years from now, this really won’t be seen as innovative or othered, right? It’ll be very, this is normal, right? Just when you think about community land trust.

Eve: [00:25:36] Mainstream.

Adriana: [00:25:38] Mainstream, right? When community land trusts first emerged, everyone was like, what is this? This is not a thing. This won’t be viable. And look now, right, there are hundreds of commercial land trusts, but maybe thousands. I don’t know the statistics, but there are many across the United States, several of which are in Philadelphia and have been very successful at preserving green space and doing affordable housing construction. And so, you know, I think getting it less from like this shiny new thing into like a this is a place where we can invest, and we know it’s a sure investment and there’s space to have real impact in neighborhoods through this work.

Eve: [00:26:08] And it will unlock financing, because financing is definitely mainstream, right?

Adriana: [00:26:14] 100%. The way that we define risk is very mainstream.

Eve: [00:26:17] Very mainstream. So one final question for you. What keeps you up at night?

Adriana: [00:26:22] Oh! Moving too slow.

Eve: [00:26:24] Interesting.

Adriana: [00:26:25] Like are we moving too slow? That question of just like, what is the right pace and scale in order to make sure that there is sufficient impact, and you are preserving enough affordability, meanwhile, making sure that there is sufficient external investment to take, you know, care of some of these larger things that folks want to have taken care of, like crime and education and public transportation. Right? Like all of these societal benefits that we have at large, it’s like a little bit of a coin toss, almost, right? Like if you have too much investment in one place, you have really active displacement of low-income folks. And if you have so much preservation of affordability, it makes it difficult to have investment, perhaps, in some of these other areas. So, yeah, sometimes I’m just like worried about the pace and the scale at which we’re doing the work. We’re acquiring about five properties a year right now, which when I say that to some folks, they’re like, that’s amazing. I’m like, yeah, but remember, they’re like 2200ft² apiece. There’s over 600 of them on this 1.4-mile-long corridor. So if I buy five a year, we’re like, really, the impact, you know, this feels fairly small. It’s very impactful for the folks who take on those spaces as commercial tenants or as residential tenants. But in the larger scheme of things, like I’d love to see us acquiring more each year, bringing more properties online each year, attracting more businesses each year, and making sure that there’s more residential affordability annually as well. So yeah, just like pace and time, I always feel like I’m fighting some clock, some like non-affordable clock.

Eve: [00:27:50] Well, it sounds to me like you’re going gangbusters and I expect in a year or two you’re going to be buying 20 properties a year. I don’t expect less from you okay.

Adriana: [00:28:01] OK then, the pressure is on!

Eve: [00:28:03] So thank you very much for joining me. And I can’t wait to see what else you do.

Adriana: [00:28:08] Thank you. Thanks for having me.

Eve: [00:28:28] I hope you enjoyed today’s guest and our deep dive. You can find out more about this episode or others you might have missed on the show notes page at RethinkRealEstateforGood.co. There’s lots to listen to there. Please support this podcast and all the great work my guests do by sharing it with others, posting about it on social media, or leaving a rating and a review. To catch all the latest from me, you can follow me on LinkedIn. Even better, if you’re ready to dabble in some impact investing, head on over to smallchange.co where I spend most of my time. A special thanks to David Allardice for his excellent editing of this podcast and original music. And a big thanks to you for spending your time with me today. We’ll talk again soon. But for now, this is Eve Picker signing off to go make some change.

Image courtesy Adriana Abizadeh

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

sign up here

APPLY TO BE A PODCAST GUEST

More to See

Passive House Duplex.

November 20, 2024

The case for social housing.

September 18, 2024

Pittsburgh champion.

September 3, 2024

FOLLOW

  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Tag Cloud

Affordable housing Climate Community Creative economy Crowdfunding Design Development Environment Equity Finance FinTech Gentrification Impact Investing Mobility Offering Opportunity zones PropTech Technology Visionary Zoning

Footer

©rethinkrealestateforgood.co. The information contained on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this website is intended as investment, legal, tax or accounting strategy or advice, or constitutes an offer to sell, solicit or buy securities.
 
Any projections discussed or made may not be accurate and do not guarantee a specific outcome. All projections or investments are subject to risk due to uncertainty and change, including the risk of loss, and past performance is not indicative of future results. You should make independent decisions and seek independent advice regarding investments or strategies mentioned on this website.

Recent

  • Real estate and women.
  • Oculis Domes.
  • Bellevue Montgomery
  • West Lombard
  • Swank Atlanta.

Search

Categories

Climate Community Crowdfunding Development Equity Fintech Investing Mobility Proptech Visionary

 

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in