Slaying Gentrification.

Eve Picker: [00:00:08] Hi there. Thanks for joining me on Rethink Real Estate. For Good. I’m Eve Picker and I’m on a mission to make real estate work for everyone. I love real estate. Real estate makes places good or bad, rich or poor, beautiful or not. In this show, I’m interviewing the disruptors, those creative thinkers and doers that are shrugging off the status quo, in order to build better for everyone. If you haven’t already, check out all of my podcasts at our website RethinkRealEstateForGood.co, or you can find them at your favorite podcast station. You’ll find lots worth listening to, I’m sure.

Eve: [00:01:00] David Kemper wanted to find a way to safeguard established renters against gentrification. His goal was to build a real estate investment model that both stabilized existing rents and gave a voice to that community. The model he landed on, MINT, or mixed income Neighborhood Trust, is a sophisticated and replicable ownership model. Each MINT develops, owns and operates a rental housing and retail portfolio. Trust Neighborhoods, David’s non-profit, works with neighborhood focused organizations to facilitate the formation of each MINT, with the goal of creating a self-sustaining organization run by the neighborhoods themselves. Trust Neighborhoods is still new, but David has said that they hope to expand their reach and work with neighborhoods around the country. Listen in to learn more.

Eve: [00:02:01] If you’d like to join me in my quest to rethink real estate, there are two simple things you can do, share this podcast and go torethinkrealestateforgood.co, where you can subscribe to be the first to hear about my podcasts, blog posts and other goodies.

Eve: [00:02:30] Hello, David. Thanks very much for joining me today.

David Kemper: [00:02:33] Thanks very much for having me on.

Eve: [00:02:35] You launched something called Trust Neighborhoods in 2019. And I wanted to ask you first, what problem are you trying to solve?

David: [00:02:45] Yeah. I’m one part of the three of us who are leadership at Trust Neighborhoods is Kavya Shankar and Jason Dehaemers, and the problem we’re trying to solve is that you have neighborhoods which have experienced disinvestment over decades, often from racist reasons, that now are finally having investment come into them and becoming a higher opportunity, both by public efforts, by private efforts and a lot of efforts on the part of current residents. But just as those neighborhoods are becoming higher opportunity, the very residents which are most deserving of participating in that and have often contributed so much to creating that experience a second injustice of being displaced from that neighborhood, not only denying them that experience of living in a higher opportunity neighborhood, but often even creating harm beyond that prevention of opportunity and around that problem is why we started working with neighborhoods through our nonprofit Trust Neighborhoods to help set up these mixed income neighborhood trusts.

Eve: [00:03:41] When did this need become clear to you? What’s the journey you took?

David: [00:03:46] We followed different paths in the leadership team. My particular path was through working at New York City government in affordable housing, and that was first in a department there called Housing Preservation Development, where I got to do a lot of refinancing of LI-tech which low-income housing tax credit deals and HUD multifamily deals, which is really the current meat and potatoes of American affordable housing finance. And you both saw how those worked at volume and the non-profits and neighborhood-based organizations that use them and also where it wasn’t working, which is especially around what real pinpoint anti-displacement looked like.

David: [00:04:22] The city of New York at the time was then interested with the arrival of de Blasio and really pinpointing neighborhoods where likely gentrification would create displacement. And a lot of the effort was around creating inclusionary zoning to prevent that displacement. And I had the good fortune to be part of the team who was working on that, and then a new team that was set up in capital planning in the city planning department and trying to work with neighborhoods facing that pressure to proactively prevent displacement. But there’s kind of this rhetoric in New York, which is wonderful, but, you know, New York is everywhere. And there’s this idea that they would build a model and it would work for the whole country. And I grew up in Kansas City and have stayed deeply appreciative and tuned into a lot of cities like it. And you see this phenomenon playing out across the country, including Pittsburgh, certainly very familiar with it.

Eve: [00:05:12] Oh, yeah.

David: [00:05:13] And the mechanism is not going to be that you’re going to prevent displacement by incentivizing what’s going to happen when a five-story building is torn down for a ten-story building. A lot of the displacement and change in ownership and lack of control is happening long before that. So, the same principles are playing out, but you really need to focus on building a different kind of set of tools. And fortunately, both found others who cared about, and we had the time to work on this, but most of all spent time with a lot of neighborhood based organizations in neighborhoods that had either undergone gentrification or facing it. And really sat down with them and said, what are your pain points? How are you spending your days? What are you looking at for tools? And almost consistently you had this need identified of saying, if we could just have our own ownership group, that could really do cross-subsidy in our neighborhood in a way that we could raise outside capital akin to the developers we’re competing against that can move at the speed of the market. It’s not applying for a grant for a house that gets receipt that that grant was received months after the house was sold and really do it at the scale at which we were experiencing displacement. And bit by bit, we worked with some neighborhood partners on honing that model, launching pilots, and now we’re working to get out across the country.

Eve: [00:06:31] And that model, you call it MINT, right?

David: [00:06:35] We call it MINT, a mixed income neighborhood trust.

Eve: [00:06:38] So tell me precisely how it works.

David: [00:06:40] In some ways, it’s very simple. Some ways a little more complex. We help the neighborhood set up this mixed income neighborhood trust. It is an LLC which has all of its voting shares controlled by something called a perpetual purpose trust that is somewhat distinctive from some uses of trust models where there’s not national trust, there’s a legal trust which is assigned to a purpose agreement which controls all the votes of this new entity. That trust then has a trustee group which has the existing neighbor based organization on there and resident representation and adheres to a purpose agreement which we work with residents, the neighborhood based organization, on writing when we’re setting this up, which really identifies what anti displacement means, what protect me belonging means what long term financial sustainability for this new institution looks like and then really build in also details and nuances, that are particular for each neighborhood. That serves as a long term constitution that then this operating company of the Mixed Income Neighborhood Trust has to adhere to as it buys, develops, and then long term owns a mixed income portfolio, which today we’re entirely focused on housing in a way that prevents the displacement of residents in that neighborhood.

Eve: [00:07:57] So the trust is actually a developer.

David: [00:08:00] In some ways. It’s a vehicle to allow a neighborhood to serve in a developer function for its neighborhood. And the way we’ve set up is that each mixed income neighborhood trust will have a general management function, which is essentially a budget line that goes back to the neighborhood-based organization. So you aren’t building duplicative new institutions. You’re really building the capacity of groups that have been on the ground, have legitimacy, have been doing the hard work, and too often are then excluded from actually having that level of control and autonomy within their neighborhood as it experiences this kind of pressure. So really important for us is not just hitting numbers on preservation of affordable units, but really also changing power structures in these neighborhoods where especially women and people of color have been precluded for so long.

Eve: [00:08:50] I’m trying to wrap my head around this. It sounds pretty powerful. So if a new developer comes to the neighborhood and purchases a property outright, what control does this Trust or MINT have?

David: [00:09:04] It is just in parallel with that. There’s no outright authority it has. It’s more putting the neighborhood on more equal footing with a lot of more conventional developers that may be participating in a neighborhood that is facing gentrification.

Eve: [00:09:17] I see, okay. And so, how is a MINT portfolio designed?

David: [00:09:23] So one of the one of the key things we begin with is really doing an analysis with the neighborhood-based organization of what does protecting displacement need, what is the real need in the neighborhood. An example of this is one of the first neighborhoods we worked with was in Kansas City, Missouri, in the northeast section of neighborhoods there, and the neighborhoods called Lykins. And from a parcel view of housing in that neighborhood, they have 1700 units of housing and 900 of those are rental housing with basically zero regulated within that. They are next to a neighborhood that has had some of the fastest rising rents in the city. They’re beginning to experience that same pressure coming on the side of them. So, the beginning was talking with residents saying, look, you have 900 households that are renting in this neighborhood at this average rate. What does it look like to make sure that those households, some of those will move into homeownership? Some of those will not be necessarily having their income rise as fast as the market is rising. What does it mean to protect them from displacement and then working with them to identify how can we maximize the preservation of those units? What does cross-subsidy look like from likely rising rents and unrestricted units we put under that same ownership group? So it self-finances affordability, which works for a subset of neighborhoods and then saying also what is feasible?

David: [00:10:40] In terms of what are rehab partners or construction partners you can work with and what kind of volume can they work with? What is the churn happening in a market? Is this a neighborhood where you’re seeing hundreds of units bought and sold every month or is this something where you’re seeing a dozen bought and sold every month and then putting together a capital stack that makes that feasible. We really do that whole hands-on diligence process with them and service a lot of the short term capacity which a lot of neighborhood based organizations just don’t have to set up that kind of vehicle. But then once it’s set up with that governance, with those partnerships in place for renovation, for property management, and that scope of of what they want to be building in as their own ownership, as much as possible we then build their own autonomy to be running that and attuned at the neighborhood level as they build that ownership and manage it in an accountable way long term.

Eve: [00:11:27] So tell me, how long does it take to go through this process, from thinking about it to actually forming a group that’s governing itself?

David: [00:11:36] Yeah, I mean, we’re kind of figuring it out. We did the two pilots. We are in the midst of a third one right now. We’re in the midst of a fourth one right now. So, we’re learning exactly what the long term process looks like. It’s probably about nine months to a year in terms of our experience, but it may be that right now, I think one of the bigger bottlenecks has been capital appetite, especially for more philanthropic sources. And we’re building it so that long term can take in non-philanthropic sources that are okay with low returns, which certainly can move faster. We don’t know what looks like if that bottleneck is not there for how fast it happens.

Eve: [00:12:12] Interesting. So, the pilots, where are your pilots and where’s the third one? Kansas City and.

David: [00:12:17] Our pilots are in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Certainly, a really meaningful place to get to work, especially in 2021 with the memorial of the race massacre there. And then in Kansas City, which is also where we’re based and very meaningful to work with a neighborhood in our own home in a way that is disciplining and really holds us to doing quality work. The third, which is currently in formation, is in Fresno, in central Fresno with some really great neighborhoods there as the downtown is experiencing growth and preserving a lot of housing stock as well as hopefully providing alternative to owners that have been in the neighborhood they would like to have purchased out.

Eve: [00:12:58] So how far are these experiments in? Like the the MINTs are formed? Have they purchased properties? What are they doing?

David: [00:13:08] Yeah. As noted, Trust Neighborhoods came together in 2019. We really worked with the neighborhoods and the pilots and on the whole scoping and 2020 and both those pilots launched in early 2021. So, they’re just over a year old right now. But both have really seen promising signs so far. They both control well over a dozen units of housing. I think the one can see is almost up to two dozen now.

Eve: [00:13:30] Wow.

David: [00:13:30] And out of that is some real glimmers of hope, both in terms of just operational efficacy, seeing the governance really have resonance in that governance. But most importantly, some of those of early glimmers of impact, like the Mixed Income Neighborhood Trust in Tulsa, which was set up with Growing Together, which is focused in the Kendall-Whittier neighborhood, is the Kendall-Whittier Neighborhood Trust and I was actually just out there last week as they did a celebratory open house for another one of the renovated units that’s open, and had both residents and contractors and funders and everyone all together having paletas really feeling the promise of the work. But alongside things like that were it’s a deep renovation project, they’ve had ones where they’ve just bought housing that was for sale in the neighborhood and been an alternative to a lot of what are kind of unsavory buyers and sellers in that neighborhood, and there was one that was selling and a they bought it and the seller told them, you know, every other buyer told us they were going to clear out the residents in these units in order to renovate them and re rent them at a higher rate.

David: [00:14:37] And instead the Kendall-Whittier Neighborhood Trust was able to own them and have all the residents stay in place along with the budget, to actually improve the quality of those units of housing discovered families that are in the school, which is a place based school that would have told you’re not able to come back to your school with your kids on a couple of months’ notice of a new school year. So, it was a real change to instead get a knock on the door from the Kendall-Whittier Neighborhood Trust saying, hey, look, you’re not only in a safe place versus this threat which is facing you, but we’re also here to make sure that you’re not displaced as this neighborhood continues to become a better place.

Eve: [00:15:17] That’s very powerful. So how do you plan to scale? I mean, how many neighborhoods will be successful?

David: [00:15:24] Yeah, that’s a lot of a lot of our focus is yeah. From the beginning which which may be distinctive in some ways is that we really have had an eye toward saying we are not content if this happens for a dozen units in one neighborhood, the scale of the need in just one neighbor is larger, that the scale of need across the country is hundreds of neighborhoods which are very rapidly changing. And we at this point get a lot of cold outreach from neighborhoods across the country that say, we’re interested using this model, we’ve heard about you, can we work together? Our biggest limit on that side is our own capacity of a team as we grow that team and grow our own operational ability.

David: [00:15:59] But we’re really focused on building our own team to be this short-term service, which is a big piece, is really being able to step in and work with neighborhoods across the country on setting it up. A big part is building long term capital supplies. We’ve had a generous supporter who has come in for funding the design of a fund that will be the national with ready capital, which we hope will solve that bottleneck issue and help build that overall market, which can bring in a lot of capital which is not usually participated in both community governance models and models focused on anti-displacement and changing power structures in this way. And then a big piece is just learning from each neighborhood trust and really powerfully having them start to build their own peer group in a way that is self-reinforcing, builds us as a better support partner, but also can build on their own experiences, lessons learned interpretations from those governance bodies of what anti displacement really looks like and very hard decision making moments. And then also step in as they discover things which are even more valuable to each neighborhood trust. And already the two pilots have met and compared notes. And we think it will only get stronger as you have more and more mixed income neighborhood trusts in the country working these neighborhoods for the residents.

Eve: [00:17:14] So that was one of the questions I have. Like, community engagement is really hard. Do you experience friction when you set up one of these? Like what does it take to get everyone on board?

David: [00:17:29] Community engagement is hard, but what we’ve been doing with the Mixed Income Neighborhood Trust is so different from a lot of what more conventional community engagement is. I think the place to pinpoint there is, we are helping the neighborhood-based organization set up these entities that have residents in long term governance. And that is very different from a typical project where there is a community engagement period, which then ends and residents never have another maybe not even another voice, much less any actual real power in that institution or project. And residents are smart, and they get it. And if they think they have a six-month engagement process to try to convey all the complexity of experience in a neighborhood and any possible thing in this, that will be a very hard process. And instead, with this both, I think we’ve worked with really great partners on designing community engagement, which both make for very productive sessions, where people come into it already with a sense of having had time to do one on ones with everyone and talk through their experience and have that as a, as a jumping off point. But then the most important thing is they then step into the actual governance long term. So, there’s a real ability to keep on iterating and having a voice in the model and in this new institution in their neighborhood. That’s actually something I think we thought was going to be a lot harder and has been really energizing to spend time with residents who just get this and are excited to have this kind of institution as a vehicle for creating this kind of change in their neighborhood.

Eve: [00:18:56] So how big is your team and what sort of skills are represented at the moment?

David: [00:19:01] Not very big. Five of us full time right now. We’re doing some hires right now.

Eve: [00:19:05] Small but mighty, right?

David: [00:19:07] Yeah. Part of the building up the capacity to actually take on the scale of problem and our skill set is mixed. Kavya had been out in the White House and had done organizing work as well as some amount of investment side work. And then Jason is utterly brilliant all things finance, governance and had really worked more in the investment banking, private equity world and then some corporate governance and just delights in building out an actual new financial structure which is solving for things that are more complex than just making money. And then my background was more in the affordable housing finance community development side. We’ve got two wonderful more junior members of the team, Natalie and Ben, who have both actually come through Venture for America, which has been a great source of team members and a delight to work with.

Eve: [00:19:55] So you’ve been working on this a little while. I’m sure you’re thinking about improvements. How could it be improved and why? It can’t be perfect, right?

David: [00:20:04] A big thing is the pilots in place as they grow. And I think then building out their own governance and being improved in that way.

Eve: [00:20:13] This is a pretty entrepreneurial idea. So, entrepreneurs never sit still for very long.

David: [00:20:18] Yeah, I think a big part of the improvement also is building that peer group in terms of having the neighborhood trusts speak to each other more. Building out just a lot of the capital familiarity. Right. There’s a risky moment at the beginning of saying, can you put money into a new vehicle that is creating this kind of impact, and will that really work? And as we start to see them work, that makes it so it’s a lot easier for the next one to say, yes, I want to see that happen too. I think as each neighborhood-based organization kind of learns what what means to be taking this on and building into their existing institution. And as you varied organizations right now, they’re, one is a neighbor association, one is one of the purpose-built communities, one is a CDC. So, as you start to have a peer group of different kinds of neighborhood focused organizations that are using this, that will make it even better.

Eve: [00:21:06] And do you think this is really unique? Is there anyone else doing similar work?

David: [00:21:11] There are aspects that are unique in their aspects that are very familiar. A lot of the land trust community and world, I think, is using community land trust towards similar spirit and functions. But I think unique here is the ability to use the outside capital, the outright control of the land versus separation, the focus on, there’s a lot of renters being displaced, There’s a big focus of this, versus a lot of CLTs tend to have more home ownership focus. We early on have met with a lot of peers across the country that we sort of think are doing relevant, familiar work. And a big part of ours is not having too much pride of authorship of really learning for others. A part of that early on is we were calling this a mixed income land trust and we spent time with the Kensington Corridor Trusts out in Philadelphia. And they said, hey, look, you know, we’re really trying to establish more the terminology of a neighborhood trust here. And we said, sure, great, we don’t we don’t have any pride of term here.

David: [00:22:04] We have a really great to actually be part of helping build on what you’re doing. So, we decided to call it a mixed income neighborhood trust. And so a noted MINT kind of sounded nice too. So, that was part of it. We’ve also liked a lot of the shared equity worlds and built out. The Kresge Foundation include us in the community of practice of several groups working on shared equity models, which certainly plays into a lot of what you in Small Change have also been building into and that’s been really great to be part of. And Elwood Hopkins, who’s led that has just been a great champion and convener. And then I think also on, if you see models and neighborhoods facing gentrification that have relatively succeeded in doing cross-subsidy to the benefit of their neighborhoods. Some of those have come out of almost less conventional models than necessarily a community developing corporation. Where if you look at what the Hasadim community has done in South Williamsburg, in New York, it’s experienced massive gentrification pressure, which, because of ownership and cross-subsidy, has in many ways actually made it more affordable for that community through their cross-subsidy and ownership of land. Likewise, you see some of that with some of the Chinatown family societies in New York, and you see a couple of clusters of that in different places in the world. And there are some community development corporations, I think, use their assets. We right now are working with the East Boston Development Corporation in Boston, which has been both an amazing partner to work with and also the way in which they’ve built out the organization ownership and building their own self-financing mechanisms is really in line with what we’d like to see this model enable for more neighborhoods. So, it’s been amazing to get to work with them as a partner in that.

Eve: [00:23:39] So, how many more neighborhoods do you think will have mint in one year or three years from now?

David: [00:23:46] One year. A few, but three years. We’d like to see actually getting up to really doing this at scale.

Eve: [00:23:55] And what does success look like to you?

David: [00:23:57] Success looks like living in a country where we have cities that have mixed income neighborhoods led by especially residents that had been excluded and discriminated against, especially black and brown leadership of institutions that are creating high opportunity neighborhoods that work for everyone. And not only does it hopefully make it so that those neighborhoods become very high opportunity neighborhoods in a way that works for a mix of incomes and identities there, particularly each neighborhood, but also it stops this phenomenon in America where we’ll see investment go into one geography. And there’s almost this assumption that you’ll end up not serving a large chunk of residents who will get displaced somewhere else. And then almost, then you’ll continue to see a cycle where you’re chasing poverty to different geographies, just as all these efforts to try to improve a place come to fruition. Instead, we stop that. I think with half a dozen MINTs in each American city, you could actually create a thing where at the core of each American city are these mixed income neighborhoods which are robust, wonderful, I think could be some of the best neighborhoods in the country. And you also have this window of opportunity, the United States, where we buy deep tragedy of racism and suburban investment. We’ve ended up with the cores of our cities being massively underinvested and undervalued. But, we in many ways are the anomaly in the world on that. And we’re seeing our appetite shift where the cores of our cities are becoming the most valuable places, which is much more akin to everywhere else in the world. It would be a tragedy, I think, to then see us also just have it where if you don’t have the money, you can’t afford to live anywhere near the middle of the city.

Eve: [00:25:39] I think that shift is already happening.

David: [00:25:40] Yeah, we have we have a window of opportunity, I think, for a crucial subset of neighborhoods to at least secure some place near the center of the city that especially carries such deep meaning and current social capital institutions in a way that could create a very different kind of city.

Eve: [00:25:58] I’ve been living in a downtown myself for quite a few years now and have gone from being one of the first residents to one of many who look very affluent to me now. And it’s disturbing. I really feel like the vitality of mixed people using a place is really being wiped out. So, I agree with your argument here. So, I have one more question for you, and that is what keeps you up at night?

David: [00:26:29] Oh, lots of things. At the very beginning, I really did not sleep that well. There’s a lot more stress and things, I think. As we built out a really quality team that’s helped with the sleep. Journaling helps the sleep. You know, you write down your worries.

Eve: [00:26:46] I’m so glad it’s not me alone.

David: [00:26:48] Then you don’t have them bouncing around your head in the middle of the night. I mean, you always you always kind of swing back and forth too, you have this thing where you go, there are moments where you go, oh yeah, this is doing great and we’re going to run with it. There are moments that you go, oh, is something going to hit us that we aren’t expecting and everything’s going to fall apart? And I feel fortunate that more and more of the days are the former.

Eve: [00:27:09] Yes, yeah. Or there are moments where it’s like, why am I doing this? It’s a very hard road.

David: [00:27:16] We’re up against a daunting scale of historical injustice, of momentums, of other forces in the world. So it’s understandable. It’s hard, but there’s also hope.

Eve: [00:27:27] I think you’re also up against greed, unfortunately. So, the gentrification of neighborhoods is going to continue. The question is, is how many can you catch and save? Right.

David: [00:27:39] Yeah. I think the hardest thing for us right now has been when we have neighborhoods that say we really want to work with you, now is the moment. And we’ve just had to say we just don’t have the capacity to work with you right now. And that’s been really hard.

Eve: [00:27:54] That’s heartbreaking.

David: [00:27:55] I remember one very early on going, well, you know, whether or not you work with us, we’re going to be here fighting displacement, our neighborhood. So, it’s not so much are we going to work together and find displacement more? They’re going to be there doing it regardless. It’s just really hard to not have the ability at this point to say yes to everyone and get these in place with the speed which with these words are changing.

Eve: [00:28:20] Is there any like white label option that you can create for do-it-yourselfers?

David: [00:28:26] We’ve occasionally sent along pieces. Unfortunately, it’s just, I think a big reason why we built the team is that a lot of people know all the principles, it’s just, don’t have the capacity in a team that actually will step in and run with it. So, that was, we have no pride of that. We’re happy if someone else wants to do it. Just a big part is building the team to be able to actually say yes to more places and run with it.

Eve: [00:28:52] Well, you’ve chewed off a huge problem, and I really hope you’re super successful and I can’t wait to see where you are in three years. Maybe we’ll have one in Pittsburgh or 2 MINTs.

David: [00:29:05] Yeah, we’d love that.

Eve: [00:29:07] That would be fantastic. Yes. Let me know if you need any introductions.

David: [00:29:12] Yeah, well, if they’re are neighborhood based organizations, this resonates with their priorities and what the neighborhoods are, then. .

Eve: [00:29:18] There’s tons. I feel like someone once told me that community development work started in Pittsburgh. It’s got an enormous number of neighborhood-based organizations. I helped found one myself, a CDC. So, every neighborhood has one. It’s a pretty active place that way.

David: [00:29:37] Well, we’ll follow up. Definitely.

Eve: [00:29:38] Yes, definitely. But thank you very much and congratulations and good luck.

David: [00:29:44] Eve thank you.

Eve: [00:30:01] You can find out more about this episode or others you might have missed on the show notes page at our website RethinkRealEstateForGood.co. There’s lots to listen to there. A special thanks to David Allardice for his excellent editing of this podcast and original music, and thanks to you for spending your time with me today. We’ll talk again soon, but for now, this is Eve Picker signing off to go make some change.